Royal Dutch Shell Plc  .com Rotating Header Image

The Wall Street Journal: Exxon’s $1 Trillion Hurdle

Wall Street Journal photograph of Rex Tillerson, ExxonMobil

COMMENT FROM BREAKING VIEWS

As Oil Reserves Dwindle,
Giants Find That Size
Can Often Be a Liability
July 14, 2007; Page B14

Exxon Mobil this week became the first company worth more than $500 billion since the millennial stock boom burst. The Texas oil producer is now nearly twice as valuable as its nearest rival, Royal Dutch Shell. But the supermajor faces supersized obstacles if it ever hopes to become the world’s first $1 trillion company.
 
Size has traditionally been an advantage for Big Oil. As the world shrinks, the number of choice oil fields has diminished and new finds have become more expensive and complicated to tap. The trouble for Exxon chief Rex Tillerson is that to move the needle on a company bigger than most governments, he needs to broker ever larger deals.

Yet last year Exxon didn’t replace its reserves through the drill-bit for the first time, according to Oppenheimer research. That’s because more of the world’s oil reserves have become off limits to Exxon and other private drillers. Many are controlled by national oil companies, such as Saudi Arabia’s Aramco or Mexico’s Pemex. Expropriation by governments like Russia and Venezuela took other reserves off the market.

In the past, Exxon’s size gave it sufficient political sway to overcome such hurdles. Today, size may be a liability. It makes Exxon a continuing target for the environmental movement. And every time gas closes in on $3 a gallon, legislators talk of imposing windfall taxes. That’s not happened. But equally, Exxon has failed to persuade Congress to allow it to drill in Alaska and other environmentally sensitive places.

And where once Washington might have sent the Marines into a country that failed to honor its commercial agreements, all it could do when Hugo Chávez tore up Venezuela’s pact with Exxon and others was express disapproval. Mind you, that’s probably for the best. But Exxon rivals like Gazprom and PetroChina have effectively used their ambassadors to sign deals with foreign governments.

Moreover, as money has flowed to Russia and China, their domestic exploration companies increasingly have the resources to drill complicated wells in far off places, reducing Exxon’s competitive advantage. This may put Exxon in the position of having to spend more, and receive less, from its future projects. This would reduce its industry-leading returns on capital and impede its march to the head of the $1 trillion club.

–Cyrus Sanati, Rob Cox and Lauren Silva

• This column is written by breakingviews.com, an online financial commentary site.

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, and shellnews.net, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Comment Rules

  • Please show respect to the opinions of others no matter how seemingly far-fetched.
  • Abusive, foul language, and/or divisive comments may be deleted without notice.
  • Each blog member is allowed limited comments, as displayed above the comment box.
  • Comments must be limited to the number of words displayed above the comment box.
  • Please limit one comment after any comment posted per post.