Royal Dutch Shell Plc  .com Rotating Header Image

Bloomberg: Sarkozy, U.S. Lawyers Shift Class-Actions to Europe (Update1)

EXTRACT: Shell’s $353 million settlement with non-U.S. shareholders was good for both the company and investors, Hess and lawyers for the plaintiffs say. If the Hague-based Shell can settle with European shareholders, the oil company may avoid the risk of a worldwide action brought before a U.S. jury with the power to award even more money, Hess said.

By Caroline Byrne and Cary O’Reilly
 
July 24 (Bloomberg) — French President Nicolas Sarkozy, Deutsche Telekom AG shareholders and American lawyers are laying the groundwork to make Europe the next battleground for U.S-style class-action lawsuits.

The unlikely allies are pushing for changes that encourage group litigation and send a chill through corporate Europe. Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP and Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll PLLC set up London class-action practices this year as European regulators plan to make it easier for consumers to sue cartels and monopolies.

There have been steps in that direction as Sarkozy called for the introduction of “class action a la Francaise.” In the Netherlands, while investors can’t sue as a group, they can settle like one under a 2005 law that allowed Royal Dutch Shell Plc to reach a $353 million resolution of non-U.S. securities claims in a case over misstated oil reserves.

“If you are confronted with litigation, be it in the U.S. or Europe, you are often immediately talking about millions of pounds or dollars,” said Beat Hess, the 58-year-old legal director of Shell. “You can say that is part of doing business, it doesn’t matter to a company like Shell. Well it does matter.”

Still, plaintiffs may have a long wait if they expect U.S.- style payouts, such as the $7.2 billion set to go to Enron Corp. investors, the largest class-action settlement ever according to Stanford Law School. Most European Union countries operate on a loser-pay principle, weeding out frivolous complaints. Only Spain has contingency fees that award lawyers a percentage of damages, said Matthew Newick, a lawyer at Clifford Chance LLP.

Spreading to Europe

Companies are concerned that once a few countries adopt new laws that allow class-action lawsuits, it will be hard to stop them from spreading across the continent.

“I think one is more concerned about it in the U.S., but what is in the U.S. generally comes here a few years later,” Helen Mahy, London-based lawyer for National Grid Plc, owner of the U.K.’s natural-gas and electricity transmission networks, said in a telephone interview.

U.S. lawyers who represent shareholders and consumers in securities fraud and antitrust lawsuits are looking to Europe amid a decline in class-action suits at home. Just 59 securities-fraud lawsuits were filed in the U.S. in the first six months of 2007, almost half the semi-annual average over the previous decade, according to a July 10 study by Stanford Law School.

The numbers still sound better than in Europe. In the U.K. there have only been 58 so-called “Group Litigation Orders” since 2000 and only one so far this year.

`Shop Window Effort’

“It’s a shop window effort to find a new feeding ground for the U.S. class action lawsuits, primarily the institutional investors in Europe,” said Andrew Clark, a partner specializing in international commercial litigation at London-based Allen & Overy LLP.

The U.S. lawyers have found support from European politicians, including Sarkozy. French officials and European Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes have separately pushed for plans to promote private enforcement of national antitrust and price-fixing laws.

“It’s necessary for consumers to become players” in promoting competition, Bruno Lasserre, France’s chief antitrust regulator, said in an interview.

Something Realistic

Shell’s $353 million settlement with non-U.S. shareholders was good for both the company and investors, Hess and lawyers for the plaintiffs say. If the Hague-based Shell can settle with European shareholders, the oil company may avoid the risk of a worldwide action brought before a U.S. jury with the power to award even more money, Hess said.

“For plaintiff lawyers from the traditional European firms it is good news because they have something to offer that is realistic and will get a settlement on the table,” said Daan Lunsingh Scheurleer, a partner at Amsterdam’s Nauta Dutilh who represented two Dutch pension funds in the Shell settlement.

The landscape is changing Germany as well. When 16,000 shareholders of Bonn-based Deutsche Telekom swamped a Frankfurt court with 2,500 suits in 2003, alleging the company made false statements when issuing shares, the German government responded by passing a 2005 law that introduced a special procedure for shareholder suits.

`New Emphasis’

“There is a new emphasis on the rights of shareholders, and it’s being driven by shareholder activists and legislators,” said Ralph Stone, a lawyer at Shalov Stone & Bonner in New York, who worked on U.S. aspects of the case with a German law firm representing Deutsche Telekom shareholders.

A Frankfurt court is currently deciding on two Deutsche Telekom test cases before lower courts decide individual claims. Andreas Leigers, a spokesman for Deutsche Telekom, called the suits “unfounded” in an interview.

Michael Hausfeld, a partner at Cohen Milstein, sees a future focused on European competition and securities law. The firm has hired three London partners and an associate, Hausfeld said.

“Legal systems and societies are recognizing the need to provide access to justice to victims of mass wrongs,” Hausfeld said. “Simultaneously, these victims in Europe are recognizing their right to such access.”

To contact the reporters on this story: Caroline Byrne in London at [email protected] ; Cary O’Reilly at [email protected]

Last Updated: July 24, 2007 01:42 EDT

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, and shellnews.net, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Comment Rules

  • Please show respect to the opinions of others no matter how seemingly far-fetched.
  • Abusive, foul language, and/or divisive comments may be deleted without notice.
  • Each blog member is allowed limited comments, as displayed above the comment box.
  • Comments must be limited to the number of words displayed above the comment box.
  • Please limit one comment after any comment posted per post.