BBC News: US court allows apartheid claims |
|
The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for a lawsuit against major international companies accused of aiding South Africa’s apartheid system. The court said it could not intervene over the case because of a potential conflict of interests. Four of the nine justices had ties to the firms involved and could not rule on the case, it said. By law, at least six justices must sit in order for the Supreme Court to hear a case. As a result, the court could only uphold a lower court ruling allowing a lawsuit to go ahead against firms accused of aiding South Africa’s apartheid system. Apartheid was a policy which enforced a separation of the nation’s races from the 1940s until the early 1990s. The victims are seeking damages reported to be worth more than $400bn (£205bn). Financial interests Among the corporations accused in the lawsuit are oil firms BP and Exxon Mobil, banks including Citigroup and Deutsche Bank and multinationals like General Motors and Ford. The plaintiffs bringing the lawsuit argue that the corporations violated international law by assisting South Africa’s former apartheid government. An appeals court in New York ruled last year that the lawsuit, being brought under a US law which allows foreigners to sue in US courts over breaches of international law, could proceed. The Bush administration, the current South African government and business groups had sought the intervention of the Supreme Court. They argue that the legal action is damaging to international relations and may threaten South Africa’s economic development. However, the court’s hands were tied by federal laws requiring at least six of the nine justices to hear any case. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Stephen Breyer and Samuel Alito all had to sit out because they had financial interests in some of the companies concerned. According to the Associated Press news agency, Mr Roberts owns stock in Hewlett Packard, Mr Alito has shares in Exxon Mobil and Mr Breyer has stock in Colgate-Palmolive, Bank of America, IBM and Nestle. Justice Anthony Kennedy sat out the case because his son works for Credit Suisse, another company concerned. |
|
News and information on Shell Plc
John Donovan’s ebooks
EBOOK TITLE: “SIR HENRI DETERDING AND THE NAZI HISTORY OF ROYAL DUTCH SHELL” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON
EBOOK TITLE: “JOHN DONOVAN, SHELL’S NIGHTMARE: MY EPIC FEUD WITH THE UNSCRUPULOUS OIL GIANT ROYAL DUTCH SHELL” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON.
EBOOK TITLE: “TOXIC FACTS ABOUT SHELL REMOVED FROM WIKIPEDIA: HOW SHELL BECAME THE MOST HATED BRAND IN THE WORLD” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON.
SHELL OFFICIAL ENDORSEMENT OF THIS WEBSITE
Critic’s corner
30 November 2023: Posted by John Donovan
The content below is sourced from current verifiable customer reviews of Shell Energy published on Trustpilot.
Extremely slow broadband for 10 months, not fixed. I have had slow broadband well below the guaranteed speed for 10 months and Shell Energy have not been able to fix it. They have tried sending about 4 or 5 engineers but have not fixed the problem. Gurps, who I have been dealing with most recently, has been friendly and polite, alth… Read more
OVER 500 EXTERNAL PUBLICATIONS CITING OUR SHELL WEBSITES
See our link list of over 500 articles by the FT, Wall Street Journal, Reuters, Bloomberg, Forbes, Dow Jones Newswires, New York Times, CNBC etc, plus UK House of Commons Select Committee Hansard records, information on U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission website etc. all containing references to our Shell focussed websites, or our website founders Alfred and John Donovan. Includes TV documentary features in English and German, newspaper and magazine articles, radio interviews, newsletters etc. Plus academic papers, Stratfor intelligence reports and UK, U.S. and Australian state/parliamentary publications, also citing our Shell websites. Click on this link to see the entire list, all in date order with a link to an index of over 100 books also containing references to our non-profit websites and/or our activities.
John Donovan, the website owner
DISCLAIMER
This is not a Shell website. That fact should be abundantly plain from the overall content of this home page and our sister Shell focussed websites, including shellnazihistory.com. Click on the Disclaimer link at top of this page for more information. You Can Be Sure Shell does not endorse or approve of this website. There are no subscription charges nor do we solicit or accept donations. No advertising is accepted. It is an entirely free to use non-commercial website drawing attention to the negative side of Shell. The Shell logo image with the white text used on this website, as per the above example, is in the public domain because its copyright has expired and its author is anonymous. It can be found here on WIKIMEDIA COMMONS. Use this link for Shell’s own website.
SHELL PROPPED UP APARTHEID
ARTICLE: U.S. unions urge boycott of Shell to fight apartheid: 19 Jan 1986
ARTICLE: Shell, South Africa and Apartheid: 16 Oct 2012
ARTICLE: Shell propped up racist apartheid regime in South Africa: 24 Nov 2012
ARTICLE: The Neptune Strategy:Shell, propped up Apartheid in South Africa: 26 Nov 2012
ARTICLE: Shell accused of benefiting from South African apartheid-era land law: 21 March 2013
ARTICLE: THE CAMPAIGN TO END APARTHEID: 12 Dec 2013
RELEVANT PAGES FROM "A HISTORY OF ROYAL DUTCH SHELL, VOLUME 3, PUBLISHED IN 2007. PREPARED BY SHELL'S PAID HISTORIANS. DEALS WITH SHELL'S SUPPORT FOR APARTHEID
SHELL TOXIC BRANDS
Comment Rules
- Please show respect to the opinions of others no matter how seemingly far-fetched.
- Abusive, foul language, and/or divisive comments may be deleted without notice.
- Each blog member is allowed limited comments, as displayed above the comment box.
- Comments must be limited to the number of words displayed above the comment box.
- Please limit one comment after any comment posted per post.