Royal Dutch Shell Plc  .com Rotating Header Image

SEC considers shake-up of reporting rules

FT Home

SEC considers shake-up of reporting rules

By Joanna Chung in New York and Ed Crooks in London

Published: June 13 2008 02:34 | Last updated: June 13 2008 02:34

Oil and natural gas companies may have to change the way they disclose their reserves for the first time in more than 25 years under proposals being considered by US regulators.

The Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday said its staff had drawn up recommendations for “updating and modernising” the financial reporting requirements for oil companies, reflecting the significant changes in the industry, including improved technology.

Reserves reporting, used as a key measure by investors for assessing a company’s long-term financial prospects, has been hugely sensitive in the past. The 2004 revelation of misreporting of reserves by the Royal Dutch Shell group triggered official investigations and lawsuits. It cost executives their jobs and prompted a shake-up of the company’s management structure.

Many industry executives and experts argue that the SEC rules have become increasingly outdated as technology has advanced and “unconventional” resources such as oil sands have become more important. Investors have been increasingly focusing on other measures of companies’ performance.

“In the decades since adoption of the current requirements, there have been tremendous changes in the way reserves are measured and oil and gas companies do business, which are not yet reflected in our rules,” said John White, director of the SEC’s corporation finance division.

The SEC’s recommended proposals would allow oil companies to provide investors with “additional information” about their reserves, though the agency declined to comment further on Thursday. It is expected to propose the rules this summer, opening up a period for further public comment.

But regulators have been examining the issue since last year and have received about 80 letters on whether the SEC should revise its definition of proved reserves – including the criteria used to assess and measure them – and whether it should require third-party verification of reserves estimates.

The rules are also likely to address whether other categories of resources should be disclosed.

Some oil and gas companies have been emphasising the much broader measure of resources to which they have access, rather than the SEC-definition proved reserves, in their communications with investors.

Additional reporting by Sheila McNulty in Houston

EDITOR’S CHOICE

Spotlight turns on US regulators – May-04 

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2008

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, and shellnews.net, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Comment Rules

  • Please show respect to the opinions of others no matter how seemingly far-fetched.
  • Abusive, foul language, and/or divisive comments may be deleted without notice.
  • Each blog member is allowed limited comments, as displayed above the comment box.
  • Comments must be limited to the number of words displayed above the comment box.
  • Please limit one comment after any comment posted per post.