Royal Dutch Shell plc .com Rotating Header Image

Posts from ‘November, 2009’

SHELL SPIN ON PEARL GTL BUDGET

In the light of the information printed below, how can anyone be expected to believe anything Shell says…

ARTICLE PUBLISHED TODAY BY THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

NOVEMBER 23, 2009, 10:22 A.M. ET

THE BS:

Shell Pearl GTL Project To Cost $18B-$19B, In Line With Budget

LONDON (Dow Jones)–Royal Dutch Shell PLC’s (RDSB.LN) Pearl GTL in Qatar is expected to cost $18 billion to $19 billion, in line with its planned budget, a spokeswoman said Monday, underscoring progress made by the company in controlling its costs.

The news contrasts with the disclosure four years ago by the Anglo-Dutch oil company that costs at a giant Russian liquefied natural gas plant had doubled to $20 billion.

-By Benoit Faucon, Dow Jones Newswires; +44-20-7842-9266; benoit.faucon@dowjones.com

WSJ ARTICLE

THE TRUTH

COMMENT POSTED ON SHELL BLOG BY AN EAGLE EYED SHELL INSIDER

guest1
on Nov 23rd, 2009 at 4:56 pm

I just saw that Shell stated the costs for Pearl are estimated to fall between 18-19 billion dollar. And now it comes: this is in line with the planned budget! I do not have the stamina nor inclination to look back in the files or on the Donovan site, but I remember that the plan was around 4 billion. Exxon was bigger for a similar project, but they withdrew in time. Nice spin: 4 fold increase of project cost and then with a straight face say this is in line with the planned budget. Must be invented by the Brinded the Beard.

COMMENT BY JOHN DONOVAN

I do have the stamina and the inclination to expose Shell BS.

This is an extract from an article published by Energy Compass/Energy Intelligence on 22 July 2005.

“…it has broader implications for Shell, which despite its global leadership in LNG is developing an accident-prone reputation when it comes to project execution. Sakhalin is the latest in a series of flagship projects where it has failed to stay within budget. Costs have spiraled on the Athabasca oil sands project in Canada, on Bonga in Nigeria, and most recently on the Pearl GTL project in Qatar — priced at $5 billion at its launch last year, but now already creeping up to around $6 billion. “This type of high-profile project disappointment can do little to help Shell’s case when competing for new opportunities with host governments,” investment bank Citigroup says. “Following 30% cost overruns on Bonga and a 20% increase in cost estimates for Pearl GTL, resource holding governments must be paying attention.”

SOURCE ARTICLE

And from a Wikipedia article

In 2003 the project cost was estimated to be US$5 billion. However after facing huge cost escalation it was reported to be $18 billion in 2007,[1] and according to Qatar Petroleum sources final project cost is expected to reach as high as $24 billion.[7]

Shell was found guilty by the financial regulators of fooling the markets in respect of its claimed proven oil and gas reserves. The fines, class action settlements and associated legal costs of the scandal, amounted to almost $1bn. Now the shysters in the company are apparently at it again, making claims directly at odds with the truth, in blatant breach of Shell’s business principles. Can we expect Shell’s Chief Ethics & Compliance Officer to intervene? Don’t hold your breath.

Royal Dutch Shell PLC agrees to train former gun-toting militants in oil-rich Niger Delta

Royal Dutch Shell PLC has even agreed to offer business training to former gun-toting militants in the volatile, oil-rich Niger Delta, following a government-sponsored amnesty here.

Click to continue reading “Royal Dutch Shell PLC agrees to train former gun-toting militants in oil-rich Niger Delta”

Essar May Rise After Report That Shell May Acquire 10% Stake

By Fred Pals

Nov. 23 (Bloomberg) — Essar Oil Ltd. may rise in Mumbai after a report that Royal Dutch Shell Plc is acquiring a 10 percent stake in the company as part of a deal to sell three refineries to the Indian company.

The stake is valued at about 17 billion rupees ($360 million) and will account for less than half the $800 million value of the three plants, the Economic Times reported Nov. 21, citing unidentified people. Essar and The Hague-based Shell have been in exclusive talks since Oct. 30 on the sale of the Stanlow refinery in the U.K. and the Hamburg and Heide refineries in Germany.

Shell is reviewing the future of its refineries worldwide as it seeks to reduce costs after the global recession curbed demand for fuel and dragged down prices. Shrinking profit margins have prompted refiners to idle and sell plants and slow operating rates.

Essar Oil, India’s second-largest non-state refiner advanced 1.95 rupees, or 1.5 percent, to 136.85 rupees on Nov. 20. The stock has added 57 percent this year.

An Essar Oil spokesman declined to comment when contacted by phone. Wim van de Wiel, a spokesman in The Hague for Shell, declined to comment when contacted by phone.

The Hamburg refinery can process 110,000 barrels of oil a day while Heide has a capacity of 91,000 barrels a day, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Stanlow, Britain’s second-largest refinery, can process 233,000 barrels a day.

To contact the reporter on this story: Fred Pals in Amsterdam at fpals@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: November 22, 2009 13:30 EST

Shell and Essar talk

THE SUNDAY TIMES

Shell and Essar talk

Royal Dutch Shell is considering buying a 10% stake in Essar Oil. The Indian group is in talks to buy three of the oil giant’s refineries, including at Stanlow near Ellesmere Port, Cheshire. The potential $365m (£221m) investment is being discussed as part of that transaction and would give Shell a stake in a group in one of the world’s fastest-growing markets.

TIMES ARTICLE

Shell seeks more time to settle back excise taxes

MANILA, Philippines – Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corp. wants more time to settle more than P7 billion in back excise taxes
, saying it might be forced to stop its local operations if compelled to pay tomorrow, Bureau of Customs Commissioner Napoleon Morales said.

Click to continue reading “Shell seeks more time to settle back excise taxes”

The SEC Surrenders to the Oil Industry

By Felix Salmon (Left)

November 20, 2009

What are the consequences of allowing multi-billion-dollar systemically important multinational corporations to report their assets using proprietary mark-to-model tools involving discredited Monte Carlo simulations? I think we all know the answer to that one. But unbelievably, after such shenanigans contributed enormously to the greatest financial meltdown in living memory, the SEC is now set to allow more or less exactly the same thing in the oil industry.

Otto points to a stunning report by oil consultant Alan von Altendorf which spells it all out. Up until now, oil companies needed to actually prove they had reserves before they reported proven oil reserves. Now, however, the SEC is allowing them to use internal, proprietary computer models to essentially pull their “proven reserve” numbers out of thin air (or the nearest friendly Monte Carlo simulation).

Von Altendorf goes into great detail about how such numbers are useless and meaningless, and how the “proven reserve” rules should probably be tightened, rather than loosened, given the number of enormous write-downs in proven reserves which have taken place across the oil industry in recent years.

So what’s the SEC thinking here? Frankly, it’s not thinking at all: This is just another case of regulatory capture. And a sign that, so far at least, nothing has changed at the unsalvageable and dysfunctional institution.

Related Articles

Stanlow Refinery Sale: Union warns Essar Oil of dispute with Shell

By John Donovan

Talks with Shell regarding expansion of union recognition for workers at the Stanlow Refinery have broken down. Unite the Union intends to pursue the issue through “legal channels”.

The union sent a related letter today (printed below) to Essar Oil Limited, the company named by Shell as the preferred bidder for the refinery. A deadline for the completion of negotiations between Shell and Essar for the sale of the refinery is only days away.

Part of the deal with Essar reportedly involves Shell taking a stake in the Indian company.

UNITE LETTER TO ESSAR OIL

143 Sefton Street

Liverpool

L8 5SN

Tel:                  0151 728 2200

Fax:                  0151 728 2201

Our ref: gd/sw        EMAILED & POSTED 20th November 2009

Essar Oil Limited

Essar House

11 Keshavrao Khadye Marg

Mahalaxmi

Mumbai    400 034

India

Essar Oil (UK) Limited

3rd Floor Landsdown House

57 Berkeley Square

London

For the attention of:  Mr Naresh Nayyar – Chief Executive Officer Energy Business Group

Dear Mr Naresh Nayyar

I am the Regional Officer of Unite responsible for our members employed at Shell Stanlow Refinery. Unite is the largest union in the UK and we have sole recognition at the Stanlow site.

I understand that your company has been awarded preferred bidder status by Shell. Therefore, Unite is anxious to meet with you prior to the completion of any sale agreement. I have been involved in transfers between European business and Indian business in the past, and great difficulties could have been avoided if we had met before the sale had been completed.

In one particular instance the purchasers of the business were unaware of the costs of providing occupational pension schemes, and of complying with our stringent health and safety standards. Had they known they would have negotiated a lower price for the business.

Unite wishes to work with you in continuing the success of Stanlow site, and it is important that you are advised of the current dispute with Shell on Trade Union recognition. This is likely to result in an application to the CAC that will be inherited under the TUPE arrangements.

I have received an assurance from someone I respect greatly that you wish to do business with Unite, and I ask that you contact my secretary as soon as possible to arrange a meeting.

I look forward to meeting you soon.

With best wishes

Graham Daley

Regional Officer

cc:  Mr Adil Malia – Group President HR

Mr Ron Wood

Shell seeks to reassure analysts on major projects

Shell posted a 62 percent decline in net income to $3.25 billion and Voser said the outlook “remains very uncertain” given forecasts that demand for crude will fall the most this year since 1980. Shell is cutting 5,000 jobs, equivalent to about 5 percent of its workforce, and has reduced operating costs by about $1 billion.

Click to continue reading “Shell seeks to reassure analysts on major projects”

Ethnic Chinese nabbed for stealing secrets, espionage

Reuters India
Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:44pm IST
EXTRACTS

BEIJING (Reuters) – The United States is seeking the release of Chinese-born, American geologist Xue Feng, who was detained two years ago on state secrets charges after negotiating the purchase of an oil industry database.

March 1996 – An official of the state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp was detained for leaking state secrets to a Chinese employee of Royal Dutch Shell who was released after spending a year largely incommunicado. Shell was in talks with CNOOC then to build an oil refinery.

FULL REUTERS ARTICLE

Shell jobs restructuring mess

This information is based on multiple  insider sources as conveyed to John Donovan

There will be more than 1/3 reduction of staff in jg A and B. In the level below that the reduction is of a similar magnitude.

The aim is to announce by 1st December who can continue and who has to go.

The mess is so great that many retired old codgers are being offered contract extensions to keep the machine running.

We hear that dato Chadwick has got it in the neck too. So young, so talented and no job for him…. He probably befriended the wrong gods in Shell.

The Brinded gestapo is very tightly controlling who stays and who goes. TFA also applies to the resourcing process: do not touch anyone not on the list of friends of Malcolm. Cronyism and nepotism are flourishing as never before.

The chaos and mass distraction brought about by the jobs reapplication process has turned out to be rather more than the mere “interesting exercise” that Peter Voser had in mind.

In terms of unfortunate events in Shell’s history, some might put it on a par with a previous boss of Royal Dutch Shell spending four days as a guest of Adolf Hitler at Berchtesgaden, discussing Nazi terms for granting a monopoly to the Royal Dutch and Shell Companies for petrol distribution in Germany. Ruthless then and ruthless now.

COMMENT RECEIVED FROM A SHELL INSIDER…

SeeMeNo
Nov 20th, 2009 at 3:04 pm

John

As a MOR applicant, I can confirm the number of lobbying and cronyism. Its so time consuming and wasteful. The telephone bills in the office would surely increase these few months. I hope there is no fatality or major safety incidents as almost all staff lost focus.

At the end of the day, it is the incumbent or those who has higher up “Friends” who get the job. Its who you know and not what you know! I am applying outside at the same time. If I get both, rest assured, I shall go. If I do not get a job outside, I stay till I get a job, how about that! In worst case, I get a Christmas bonus.

Comment received from “shellwaarbenjijnu”
on Nov 20th, 2009 at 5:33 pm

Regarding the discussion on Open (i.e. behind closed doors) Resourcing, the cat was out of the bag already in July when Voser said “an interesting exercise because we could really select those we are keen on”. If ever there was an indication of selection based on “who you know rather than what you know” – this was it. In Voser’s e-mail to staff sent whilst Jeroen was actually still in charge he referred to a number of Shell “firsts”. In his next letter in similar vein, he may wish to consider including another first “the devaluation of the notion of open, fair internal resourcing based on skill, competence, capability, and track record of delivery”.

MUSAINT
on Nov 20th, 2009 at 7:52 pm

Mr.D, your article “Shell jobs restructuring mess” based on an “insider” is all fine and dandy, HOWEVER, why add the irrelevant (to THIS article) the bit about Adolf Hitler. I feel you should stick to the headline of the article as some who visit this site and are 50:50 Shell might think what has A.H. got to do with JGA/B job losses. Anyway, cronyism has been widespread in Shell (and other large businesses) for eons unfortunately. A clear example is Bichsel who loves nodding donkeys all around him.

Attention Royal Dutch Shell Plc: If you confirm by email that any information printed under this headline is categorically untrue, it will be removed immediately.