Royal Dutch Shell plc .com Rotating Header Image

Posts from ‘March, 2010’

ConocoPhillips, Shell to expand Alaska drilling

REUTERS

* Exploration can proceed after U.S. drilling expansion

* Shell’s Odum says company can begin exploring in 2010

* Shell spent $2.1 billion for Chukchi Sea leases in 2008

* ConocoPhillips spent $506 million on leases

By Kristen Hays

HOUSTON, March 31 (Reuters) – Oil companies with their sights on drilling for oil off Alaska on Wednesday said President Barack Obama’s offshore oil announcement allows them to press ahead with big projects there.

Two companies — Royal Dutch Shell (RDSa.L) and ConocoPhillips (COP.N) — have spent large sums to secure drilling rights in the remote Chukchi Sea, only to see their plans put on hold by court challenges.

Marvin Odum, president of Shell Oil Co, Shell’s U.S. arm, said Obama’s plan clears the way for the company to begin exploration drilling this year off Alaska’s northwestern coast.

“This is actually good news for us in Alaska. It’s certainly something we’ve been looking forward to,” Odum said at a news conference on Wednesday announcing the startup of the company’s Perdido oil and gas platform in the Gulf of Mexico.

Shell is the largest leaseholder in the Chukchi and Beaufort seas off the north shore of Alaska, which could be home to some of the most prolific, undiscovered U.S. hydrocarbon basins.

Shell spent $2.1 billion for Chukchi Sea leases in 2008, and ConocoPhillips, the third-largest U.S. oil company, spent $506 million for its Chukchi leases the same year.

ConocoPhillips spokesman John Roper said Obama’s plan allows the company to proceed after a U.S. appeals court ruling last year ordered an environmental review of Chukchi and neighboring Beaufort areas.

“Our understanding is that today’s announcement means exploration and development of existing Chukchi and Beaufort leases can proceed,” Roper said.

The company’s initial exploration of Chukchi leases is slated for the summer of 2012, Roper said. ConocoPhillips has spent tens of millions of dollars on environmental studies.

In January Statoil, (STL.OL) Norway’s government-owned oil and gas company, bought a 25 percent interest in ConocoPhillips’ Chukchi leases. Statoil also has 16 leases there.

The Obama administration’s plan said exploration drilling in leased areas could begin as early as this summer. However, the plan nixed four future lease sales in the current 2007-2012 plan.

Odum was nonchalant about the removal of those lease sales.

“That’s acceptable because there are quite a few leases already,” he said. “We have plenty of work to do for a couple of years to execute that program.”

The Chukchi, between northwest Alaska and northeastern Siberia, is believed to hold 15 billion barrels of recoverable oil and 76 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, according to U.S. government estimates.

(Editing by Lisa Shumaker)

REUTERS ARTICLE

Shell employees on go-slow over market exit report

Motorists queue at Shell station to get petrol. Photo/CHRIS OJOW

By ZEDDY SAMBU
Posted Thursday, April 1 2010 at 00:00

Kenya Shell employees on Thursday started a two-day go slow, protesting against lack of formal communication on reports that the firm was leaving the Kenyan market.

The employees, who donned black and red outfits, prompted the firm’s executives to hold an emergency meeting to try and calm the nerves of the restless staff.

Players in the oil market reckon that OiLibya is the front runner to snap up the assets at an estimated price of $2 billion (about Sh152 billion) for Shell’s African operations.

Sources at the firm said the executives promised that a formal communication over the fate of Shell’s interests would be made today at 1 pm through a video conference addressed by regional Vice-President for North and East Africa George Brunton from Johannesburg.

The employees were concerned over their fate and compensation benefits in the event the firm bolts out.

“There has been a lot of anxiety surrounding reports about the planned sale. Today, employees wanted to know their future stay and there was a meeting to address them,” said a senior executive at the firm who requested not to be named.

Questions over whether Kenya Shell will continue to operate in the country deepened on March 16 after its parent company, Royal Dutch Shell, announced it would exit more than a third of its current fuel distribution and marketing operations.

Royal Dutch Shell, in its annual brief to investors, stated that it planed to exit from 35 per cent of its current downstream businesses, with 20 of 24 Africa retail outlets targeted.

However, the firm added that it would boost its presence in South Africa and Egypt, further putting doubts over its stay in Kenyan — which has in recent years witnessed the exit of multinationals Chevron, BP, Mobil, Esso and Agip because of low profit margins.

“Downstream continues to focus on profitability, with plans to exit 15 per cent of refining capacity and 35 per cent of retail markets, and growth investment to enhance the quality of manufacturing and marketing portfolios,” said chief executive Peter Voser in the report, adding that 5,000 employees would be leaving the company as part of restructuring.

In 2008, Shell left 15 African countries saying that it wished to concentrate on its remaining operations.

The firm sold its downstream business in Ethiopia, Sudan and Djibouti to OiLibya.

Officials at OiLibya Kenya declined to comment on the issue as managing director Kamel Jarnaz, who is authorised to speak for the firm, is currently out of the country.

SOURCE ARTICLE

$3.3 million penalty imposed on Shell for Clean Air Act violations

Los Angeles Times: Shell refineries reach Clean Air Act settlements

By Associated Press

March 31, 2010 | 12:02 p.m

ST. ROSE, La. (AP) — Two Shell chemical companies have agreed to install $6 million in pollution reduction equipment at two petroleum refineries in Louisiana and Alabama and upgrade a terminal in Puerto Rico as part of a Clean Air Act settlement with the federal government.

Shell Chemical LP and Shell Chemical Yabucoa, units of Royal Dutch Shell PLC, also will pay a combined $3.3 million civil penalty to the federal government, Alabama and Louisiana.

About $193,000 will go to Louisiana organizations for environmental education, teacher workshops and emergency operations.

The new pollution control equipment will be installed at Shell Chemical refineries in St. Rose, La., and Saraland, Ala.

The settlement was announced Wednesday by the Justice Department and the Environmental Protection Agency.

SOURCE ARTICLE

Shell starts up its new Perdido Gulf of Mexico oil and gas platform

REUTERS

HOUSTON, March 31 (Reuters) – Royal Dutch Shell (RDSa.L) on Wednesday started up its new Perdido oil and gas platform in the Gulf of Mexico, the world’s deepest offshore drilling and production facility.

Royal Dutch Shell (RDSa.L) Perdido, 100,000 barrels of oil per day, 200 million cubic feet per day of gas, the first producing platform in the Lower Tertiary, a frontier area in the deepest waters of the Gulf and furthest from shore; Mars, 160,000 barrels of oil per day, 121 million cubic feet of gas.

SOURCE REUTERS ARTICLE

Shell still hopes to drill this year

AlaskaDispatch

Rena Delbridge

Mar 31, 2010

Royal Dutch Shell, which has spent several billion dollars trying to advance its offshore oil program off Alaska’s northern coast, heralded a decision by President Obama to allow exploration and drilling to continue.

The decision takes Bristol Bay leases off the table and may not lead to additional Arctic leases. But the decision does allow development of existing leases, including Shell’s in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas.

Federal waters off Alaska’s northern shores hold an estimated 25 billion barrels of oil and 120 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. Offshore oil development in federal waters is important to Alaska and generally seen as a solution to declining oil production from aging North Slope fields, like Prudhoe Bay. Without new oil production, the 800-mile trans-Alaska pipeline could reach a point in the next decade where flow is too low to continue operations, cutting off North Slope development and, in turn, the source of some 90 percent of state revenue.

Shell Alaska has spent several billion dollars on leases, icebreakers and more, all aimed toward firming up oil and gas estimates and leading to production. Vice president Pete Slaiby has said the company has spent $40 million alone to keep a 2010 exploration season in play, pending permitting and resolution of several legal challenges.

A statement issued Wednesday by Shell Alaska spokesman Curtis Smith indicates the company still plans to drill in 2010, pending air-quality permits from the Environmental Protection Agency. Here’s Smith’s full statement:

As many of you recall, in April of 2009, the D.C. Court of Appeals found a single specific analytical defect in the 2007-2012 OCS Leasing Program under which Shell purchased 275 lease blocks in the Chukchi Sea. As a result of the ruling, the Court required the Department of Interior (DOI) to conduct a more complete environmental sensitivity analysis to determine whether certain areas should be excluded from the 5-Year OCS Leasing Plan.

On March 31, 2010, Department of Interior Secretary Ken Salazar completed the work required by the D.C. Court of Appeals and published a revised Proposed 2007-2012 OCS Leasing Program that continues to include the Chukchi Sea leases Shell purchased in 2008 for over $2.1 Billion. The revised Proposed Program will now be published for a 30-day public comment period after which the Secretary will take public comments into consideration and then publish the revised Final Program.

Shell appreciates the work by Secretary Salazar and the MMS to complete this process, which combined with the conditional approval of our Chukchi Plan of Exploration, means we can continue to plan for success in the Alaska offshore and eventually bring much-needed U.S. production on-line. That timeline starts after we drill our first well.

Today’s announcement by President Obama and Secretary Salazar acknowledges that responsible oil and gas exploration can take place in the Arctic. It also highlights the need for Shell to secure final air discharge permits from EPA Region 10. The issuance of draft Chukchi and Beaufort air permits earlier this year started a timeline of events that will ultimately dictate Shell’s drilling plans for 2010. As of today, we are still planning to drill in 2010 and remain optimistic that our final Chukchi and Beaufort Sea air permits will be issued soon.

For our part, we have been shovel-ready since 2007. Shell has already completed three years of successful seismic acquisition in the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas – areas that could be home to some of the most prolific, undiscovered hydrocarbon basins in the US. We believe the oil and gas reserves in the Alaska offshore could play a major role in reducing our dependence on foreign oil, increase the tax base, provide thousands of jobs for Alaskans and help extend the life of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline.

Finally, while we respect the Secretary’s decision to remove the North Aleutian Basin from future lease sales, we remain confident that we have the experience and technology needed to operate safely and responsibly in sensitive offshore theaters throughout the world – including the North Aleutian Basin. We are disappointed for Alaskans closest to the region who have worked tirelessly over the last several years to make OCS exploration a reality in southwest Alaska.

SOURCE ARTICLE

Shell To Pay $9.5 Million In Settling Clean Air Act Allegations

DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

Royal Dutch Shell PLC (RDSA, RDSA.LN) has agreed to pay $3.5 million in penalties and spend an estimated $6 million to install pollution-reduction equipments at three U.S. refineries to reduce harmful air emissions.

The equipment is intended to cut output of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides by more than 1,450 tons a year at the facilities in Louisiana, Alabama and Puerto Rico.

Assistant Attorney General Ignacia Moreno said the settlement is an example of businesses’ effort to comply with government environmental regulations. “We will continue to work with industry to achieve compliance under the Clean Air Act to remove harmful pollution from the air we breathe,” she added.

-By Jodi Xu, Dow Jones Newswires; 212-416-3037; jodi.xu@dowjones.com

(END) Dow Jones Newswires
03-31-101334ET
Copyright (c) 2010 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Shell, Total Chase ‘Impossible’ Sales in Race to Curb Refining

BusinessWeek Logo

By Brian Swint and Brett Foley

March 31 (Bloomberg) — Oil companies may struggle to unload their excess refining capacity in Europe this year as profits from turning crude into fuel stay depressed.

Total SA, Royal Dutch Shell Plc and Chevron Corp. are seeking to sell refineries in Europe after the recession reduced demand. Eni SpA Chief Executive Officer Paolo Scaroni said this month it’s “impossible” to find buyers after refining profit margins slumped to a 15-year low in December.

The desire to cut capacity highlights oil companies’ shift toward China and India for growth as demand for fuel slips in Europe and North America. BP Plc Chief Executive Officer Tony Hayward, whose company sold at least 10 refineries in the past decade, has said that mature markets will never again consume as much gasoline as they did in 2007.

“It will be very difficult to get a decent price, there are just too many sellers,” said Gudmund Halle Isfeldt, an Oslo-based analyst at DnB NOR ASA, Norway’s largest bank. “Both the U.S. and Europe are in structural decline when it comes to these products. The refining market will be difficult for the next three years.”

The International Energy Agency on March 12 raised its forecast for fuel demand growth in developing countries, led by China and India, to 41.2 million barrels a day and cut its prediction for Europe and the U.S. That’s why Shell and BP have considered joining China Petroleum & Chemical Corp., known as Sinopec, in investing in new refineries in the world’s fastest- growing major economy.

Dismantle Dunkirk

Total SA said March 11 it intends sell a European refinery outside of France with a capacity of about 200,000 barrels a day. The company will shut and dismantle a 137,000 barrel-a-day refinery near Dunkirk, France in its effort to trim confining capacity by about 20 percent.

OAO Gazprom Neft, the oil unit of Russia’s natural-gas exporter, said March 28 that it doesn’t plan to buy Total’s U.K. Lindsey refinery after the Sunday Times of London reported that it was up for sale.

If buyers can’t be found, companies can close them, use them for storage or wait to sell until refining becomes more profitable. Shell, which has been negotiating with India’s Essar Oil Ltd. since August to sell three refineries in Europe, said this month it may convert others into terminals. Eni said last month that its Livorno refinery is no longer for sale after it had been on the market for more than a year.

‘Lowball Bid’

“Sellers, especially the majors, aren’t going to panic and hit a lowball bid,” said Ryan Kauppila, a refining analyst at Nomura International Plc. “But there is an opportunity for willing buyers to acquire assets at very attractive prices. We’ll see some transactions by year-end.”

PetroChina Co., the world’s biggest company by market value, may acquire Ineos Group Holdings Plc’s Grangemouth facility in Scotland, Chairman Jang Jiemin said on March 5. The company will spend at least $60 million in the next decade on overseas acquisitions, he said this week.

“The ones that people will want to buy tend to be coastal refineries with lots of storage capacity,” said Lydia Rainforth, an analyst at Barclays Capital in London. “The smaller, less efficient capacity will have to shut and will get moved over toward the Middle East and Asia.”

Valero Energy Corp., the largest U.S. independent refiner, said March 9 it will consider buying the Pembroke refinery in Wales that Chevron Corp. said it plans to sell. At the same time, Valero is selling assets in the U.S.

Delaware City

The company is in “advanced” negotiations to sell its closed refinery in Delaware City, Delaware, to PBF Investments LLC, the investment arm of Petroplus Holdings AG, Valero said Jan. 22. PBF is a partnership with private equity firms Blackstone Group and First Reserve Corp.

“Refinery valuations in the U.S. have fallen further than they have here in Europe, so we may have further to drop here before people start buying,” said David Waring, head of oil and gas banking at Lexicon Partners in London. “Sellers are still not being realistic about expectations on price.”

Sellers may improve their bargaining position if profitability continues to pick up. Margins for turning crude into fuels rose 98 percent to $2.95 per barrel in the quarter to March 25, according to BP’s Global Indicator Margin. That compares with the 15-year low of $1.49 in the fourth quarter and $6.20 in the first quarter of last year.

“Margins can be strong for a period of time, but it’s a very seasonal and very cyclical industry,” said Barclays’s Rainforth. “Companies are taking this decision because they think we’re not going back to the golden age of refining.”

–Editor: Will Kennedy, Stephen Cunningham.

To contact the reporter on this story: Brian Swint in London at bswint@bloomberg.net; Brett Foley in London at bfoley8@bloomberg.net.

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Will Kennedy at wkennedy3@bloomberg.net

SOURCE ARTICLE

Royal Dutch Shell head spinning mismanagement

Peoples heads have been spinning so much from changes in the past 15 years they don’t even know what their job scope is anymore!

Series of Shell Blog postings by “Uncle Tom” on Mar 30th, 2010

Shell Management . . . . . .

In years past Shell looked at the long “cycles” in the business. Staying diversified meant when one part of the business wasn’t doing well, the other side of the business was. Being diversified kept the Company afloat.

Today’s Management Philosophy is a short term 1 to 2 year focus period, if results are not achieved in that short span of time, make changes quickly and expect better results. Change, change, change, change.

Peoples heads have been spinning so much from changes in the past 15 years they don’t even know what their job scope is anymore!

No Company will ever be successful with this type of Management Philosophy. But seems people running this Company for the last several years can’t see that?

Shell Management . . . . .

How about this statement from a few years ago. We’ll pay average salary for our people, but expect top results.

Hmmm, I’ve seen the people we hired in the last decade, not quite the Top Talent out there, the Top Talent has been hired by the Companies paying the Top Salaries!

So we’ve hired average talent in the last decade, and we’re finishing up the process by laying off experienced (aged) talent. Now where will that leave us?

But we can expect better results . . . right?

Expect and Attain don’t mean the same thing in my book!

Shell Management . . . . . .

Reducing Costs . . . . (at least where they say to!)
What a Joke ! Wish I Could Laugh About It ! But Its Not Funny.

Lets start with these “Preferred Vendors”.

Companies that “partner” with Shell to sell us their products and services at a “preferred” price (Shell thought that meant lower?) so that we don’t have to go to other Companies (usually called COMPETITION) to buy these items.

How many items are we overpaying for? ALL of them!
We create books of documents for some of the simplest purchased items and wonder why we pay 2X, 3X, 4X, or more for that product. Its this way from office supplies to production equipment to contract labor and services.

The only “preferred” part of these deals are the Companies collecting these premium prices for all these items.

Now when someone at a location tries to buy the same item for an advertised cheaper price, what do you think happens? The Purchasing Nazi come out and fight diligently to prevent that from happening, because somewhere up the ladder someone else made that sweet deal and might be benefitting from that agreement.

How about a game of Golf? Dinner? Oops

I have personally seen 25 cent items purchased for $1.25, other items for $2.25 purchased for $6.00 and was frowned upon and fought against to stick up for what I knew was right (and wrong).

Now can you imagine in the entire Shell Company how much that would add up to at that magnified expense!

That my friend, is just the tip of the iceberg of things like that. Waste and Greed

And my last comment for Today . . . . .

Shell is/was a good Company with a lot of good hard working people.

Unfortunately in today’s world, there are also a lot of useless unworthy people in the organization too, and with today’s short term focus (I want results now!), things won’t change for the better anytime soon.

A strong house is built upon a strong foundation and plans, and ours have been crumbling for some time now.

Hope it gets better . . . . . eventually!

ENDS

Headline by John Donovan

Essar to Decide on Shell Assets by June

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

MARCH 30, 2010

By AMOL SHARMA

MUMBAI—Indian conglomerate Essar Group will decide by June whether to move forward with the purchase of three European oil refineries from Royal Dutch Shell PLC as part of its global expansion plans, the company’s chief executive said.

The companies extended their exclusive talks in November without specifying a time frame. Essar Group CEO Prashant Ruia said the company is studying whether the deal makes sense now, given the low refining margins globally in the oil business.

The company decided “that we would like to wait a while and study it,” Mr. Ruia said in an interview. “It’s something we want to be 100% sure about when we do it. We’ve already done a lot of homework on the transaction.”

Acquiring the Shell refineries, which are in the U.K. and Germany and can process 500,000 barrels of crude oil per day, would move Essar closer to its target of handling one million barrels per day in coming years. Essar currently operates a 280,000-barrel-per-day refinery in Western India. Larger rival Reliance Industries Ltd. already handles 1.24 million barrels per day at its Indian refineries.

Oil companies world-wide are struggling with low profit margins due to depressed demand for fuel. That is why majors like Shell and Chevron Corp. have put some refinery assets on the block. Indian companies such as Essar and Reliance are using the opportunity to scout for assets overseas and build a global footprint that will help them sell into markets in Europe and Africa when prices rebound.

“We are totally convinced that the margins that are so low right now won’t stay there. We do believe they’ll rise,” Mr. Ruia said.

Mumbai-based Essar, which started out as a small Ruia family construction company in the late 1960s, has transformed itself into a conglomerate with interests in oil, power, steel, shipping and telecommunications and $15 billion in annual revenue. It has been one of India’s most active acquirers of overseas companies in recent years, with purchases of steel, outsourcing and coal-mining companies in North America.

Essar is also considering listing an entity including its oil and power businesses on the London Stock Exchange to raise $2 billion to $3 billion in what would be the largest overseas listing by an Indian company, people familiar with the situation said. The company intends to complete the listing this year, if possible, but some potential investors think Essar’s roughly $10 billion valuation for the assets is high, the people said.

Mr. Ruia said the company hasn’t completely made up its mind on whether to follow through with the listing, but said raising equity isn’t necessary to complete the Shell deal. A deal for Shell’s refineries could be valued as high as $1.5 billion, but Essar may contribute some equity from its domestic oil business to lower the price tag, according to a person familiar with the situation.

“We have the ability to go out and do that transaction without waiting for capital to be raised,” Mr. Ruia said. He said Essar is looking to raise new capital, however, for its roughly $8 billion expansion plans in India.

The company intends to boost its domestic refinery operations to 360,000 barrels per day by March 2011, and 720,000 barrels in a later phase. It is also rapidly expanding its power business, with plans to increase its generation capacity from 1,200 megawatts to 6,000 megawatts by 2012. Mr. Ruia said the company could also opt to raise equity in India if family members choose to dilute their large shareholdings in various Essar businesses.

The Ruias own more than 84% of shares in all group companies.

Write to Amol Sharma at amol.sharma@wsj.com

SOURCE ARTICLE

A case of good oil, but bad blood

Shell’s reputation was besmirched by the conduct of its New Zealand executives, whose court testimony Justice Wild rejected as unreliable.

Last updated 09:32 26/03/2010
By NICK SMITH

OPINION: Shell’s standing as a good New Zealand corporate citizen is on the line.

It will be at least  three weeks before Todd Energy’s fascinating $274 million lawsuit against oil multinational Shell finishes at the High Court in Wellington.

Justice Robert Dobson, assisted by economist lay member Professor Martin Richardson, is then likely to reserve his decision on the exemplary damages claim, relating to efforts by Shell and Austrian partner OMV to limit production at the Pohokura gasfield.

Todd alleges this was to increase prices and lessen competition. Reduced production also harmed Todd’s interests.

The Kiwi company’s claims are the culmination of more than a decade of bad blood between Todd and Shell, who have gone at each other  in at least five court battles since 2002.

Todd chief executive Richard Tweedie describes the latest legal challenge as akin to David battling Goliath, just as he did earlier last decade when his legal team bloodied the nose of the oil giant over a separate but related battle to oust the local energy company from its Taranaki gas interests.

It is an apt description given the relative resources of the two combatants. Even so, Goliath must be mightily sick of the pounding it is receiving from its lightweight competitor.

“We’ve gone through five courts, 10 judges and on every occasion Shell lost,” Tweedie told me after the Court of Appeal rejected Shell’s protestations about the earlier dispute.

That battle was about the Dutch oil giant’s attempt to again amplify its return, but in this instance, remove a large obstacle should it choose to sell its New Zealand assets.

Its agreements with Todd represented a $100 million hurdle to a clean sale so it sought to load costs on to its smaller New Zealand partner to compel it to withdraw from  contracts.

In the end, Shell decided to retain its gas interests but sell its chain of service stations, no doubt partly because of Todd’s court success.

Shell’s reputation was besmirched by the conduct of its New Zealand executives, whose court testimony Justice Wild rejected as unreliable.

Success for Todd in the latest fracas would  be a crippling blow to Shell’s standing as a good New Zealand corporate citizen, already in doubt after its earlier court exposure.

Todd’s lawyer, Jim Farmer, QC, told Justice Dobson last month that Shell and OMV have since 2006 sought to manipulate production of the Pohokura field, north of New Plymouth, to artificially reduce its capacity from 85 petajoules to 70 petajoules, a constraint that continues today.

The reduction represents not only a breach of the joint venture operating agreement but deprivation of Todd’s property right, Farmer argues.

“Each party has the right and obligation to take and sell its share of the total production capable of delivery at any given time.”

At the same time, Shell has denied Todd, until forced by court injunction, to connect its export pipes to the production system, a breach of contract and “a further attempt by the defendants to limit Todd’s offtake from the field”, says Farmer.

Those accusations are grave enough but more serious is the charge that limiting production was in intent and effect an attempt to control prices and lessen competition.

“The inevitable effect of that constraint is to deprive the market of a volume of gas that would otherwise be available,” Farmer says.

“That in turn, has an inevitable effect on the price of gas, it being a fundamental tenet of anti-trust economics that output and price are inversely related.”

Farmer provided the court with internal Shell emails that set out its strategy: Pohokura sales would take sales off Maui so that it was desirable, in Shell’s interest, to limit production.

Shell owns 83.75 per cent of Maui but only 48 per cent of the Pohokura field, of which both OMV and Todd hold a 26 per cent share.

“Shell and OMV between them have also been able to control the amount of Maui gas available to the market, with Todd being unable to take and sell its [6 per cent] share of Maui gas separately,” says Farmer.

It is not the first time Shell documents have become court property. In the earlier case, a paper titled “Project Zinfandel” was tabled, revealing the plan to replace Shell Todd Oil Services, the operator of the Maui and Pohokura fields exploration ventures and Omata tank farm, with Shell Petroleum Minings.

The $274m Todd claim in exemplary damages is a huge amount, one the respondents describe as “totally unrealistic”.

Given Shell’s court track record, which Justice Dobson will bear in mind if he finds in Todd’s favour, even such an eye-watering sum cannot be ruled out.

It would certainly pay for a very expensive bottle of zinfandel, to be uncorked on the judge’s ruling.

SOURCE ARTICLE