Royal Dutch Shell plc .com Rotating Header Image

Posts from ‘May, 2011’

Death threat from Shell supplier on Brazilian tribe’s land

Energy giant Shell’s joint venture partner, Cosan, is buying sugarcane grown on Guarani land. © João Ripper/Survival

A Brazilian rancher supplying sugarcane to a joint venture partner of energy giant Shell has reportedly issued a death threat against a political opponent.

 José Teixeira, who is also a state deputy, is said to have recently warned a political rival that, ‘If it were up to me, you’d be under the ground.’

Teixeira is renting out part of his ranch for sugarcane production, even though the Government has confirmed that the land belongs to Guarani Indians.

Shell and Brazilian ethanol company Cosan are now united in a $12 billion joint venture company called Raizen, to produce ethanol to sell as a biofuel. Cosan is buying sugarcane grown on Guarani land that Teixeira continues to occupy. Survival has urged Shell and Cosan to stop using sugarcane grown on the Guarani’s land, but the companies continue to use it.

The Guarani of Guyraroká community were evicted from their land decades ago by ranchers. For years they lived destitute on the roadside. Despite now occupying a fraction of their land their lives and livelihoods are at risk as they have very little space to plant crops or hunt game.

The current boom in sugarcane production is taking over the Guarani’s ancestral land © Sarah Shenker/ Survival

They warn that the chemicals used on the sugarcane plantations are polluting the rivers they use for drinking, bathing and fishing, and provoking acute diarrhoea. They report that the vinhoto – the by-product of ethanol production – is causing intense headaches amongst adults and children.

Guarani health agent Senilda Esnade told Survival, ‘In the past, the children were happy. They had clean water, they ate traditional, healthier food. It’s different now; often, the children grow up eating food that is contaminated. If we had our own land, we’d be able to revive what we’re losing’.

Survival’s Director, Stephen Corry, said today, ‘The deputy’s death threat is yet more evidence of the brutality linked to the land struggle in the Guarani’s area. Shell and its partners cannot continue to profit from their use of Guarani territory while the Guarani themselves are squeezed on to smaller and smaller patches of land. The company must abide by the international norms requiring respect for indigenous rights, which its own policy statements claim to support’.

Download Survival’s report about the Guarani’s land situation, sent to the United Nations last year in English or Portuguese” (pdf, 2.5 MB).

SOURCE ARTICLE

Shell accused of supporting Syrian regime

Daily Mail

31 May 2011, 10:05am

Royal Dutch Shell has been accused of working ‘hand in glove’ with the government in Syria where hundreds of unarmed demonstrators have been killed during protests against the regime.

The firm chartered a tanker to export almost 600,000 barrels of the country’s oil worth $55m, according to campaign group Platform. Shell declined to comment.

Platform researcher Lorenzo Paluello said: ‘While the British and Syrian public believe that suppressing a mass democratic uprising with tanks is problematic, Shell continues to work hand in glove with the regime.

He added: ‘The people of Syria rising up for freedom, but this company has placed itself firmly on the side of corrupt dictators.’

SOURCE ARTICLE

Shell must suspend operations in Syria

IKV Pax Christi believes that all cooperation with the regime in Syria is illegitimate and that Shell must suspend its operations immediately. In Syria it is impossible for Shell to ensure that it is not involved in human rights violations. Shell has no other option than to suspend all operations until violence against demonstrators has completely ended, says a statement issued by IKV Pax Christi.

Shell is a major player in the Syrian oil industry. Shell owns 20% of Syria’s largest oil producer Furat Petroleum Company, that sells all its oil to state-owned General Petroleum Company, that exports 39% of Syrian production and that largely supplies to the domestic market. The Syrian tanks shelling civilians are likely to run partly on fuel provided by Shell. The same goes for police cars and the vans of the security police that strike terror in the streets of Homs and Tall Kalakh. Shell has a license to operate from government and no more from Syrian society.

IKV Pax Christi asked Profundo to document Shell’s involvement in Syria. You can read the report here.

Shell accused over Syrian oil exports

FT.Com

By David Blair, Energy Correspondent

Published: May 29 2011 20:02

Royal Dutch Shell has been accused of working “hand in glove” with Syria’s regime after the energy company chartered a tanker to export almost 600,000 barrels of the country’s oil.
A spokesperson for Shell declined to confirm or deny the vessel’s arrival in Syria, saying only that the company does not comment on “commercial information”.

Hundreds of people have been killed since popular protests against the regime began in March. The army has responded to the unrest by opening fire on unarmed demonstrators in the country’s largest cities.

By continuing its commercial relationship with Syria despite the bloodshed, critics say that Shell is complicit in Mr Assad’s repression. “Shell continues to work hand in glove with the regime. The people of Syria rise up for freedom, but this company has placed itself firmly on the side of corrupt dictators,” said Lorenzo Paluello, a researcher for Platform.

The dependants of Shell’s expatriate staff have been evacuated from Syria in line with embassy advice, the company added. A spokeswoman declined to respond to criticism about the company’s alleged complicity with Mr Assad’s regime.

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2011

FULL ARTICLE

ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC: OFFSPRING OF AN OFF-THE-SHELF COMPANY OF DUBIOUS ANTECEDENCE

By Alfred Donovan

As a result of proceedings Shell International brought against me in May 2005 via The World Intellectual Property Organization, we carried out a financial investigation of the setting up of Royal Dutch Shell Plc.

We discovered from Companies House documents that the company is the offspring of an off-the-shelf company – FORTHDEAL LIMITED – a company of dubious antecedence.

In 2005, Shell management was so grossly incompetent that it forgot to obtain registration of the royaldutchshellplc top level domain name as part of the process of setting up the unified company: Royal Dutch Shell plc.

Trading under a new name was meant to distance the new company from the stigma of the reserves scandal.

What an unpleasant surprise for Shell when it found out that not only had someone beaten them to the dotcom domain name registration for its new company, but that the person who had done so was its oldest adversary, in age and years of hostility.

Richard Wiseman (now retired) must have felt some discomfort if, as he later boasted, he was the “conductor of the legal orchestra”, which set up the new company, apparently in too much of a rush to avoid humiliating blunders.

The initial directors of the company under the new name – Royal Dutch Shell Plc, were ALL Dutch Nationals. No Brits. The accounts were shown as being “Overdue”. In the “Last Accounts made Up To” section it stated (NONE AVAILABLE). The Annual Return and Current Appointments Report amounted to 11 pages. Under “Nature of Business it was stated “Non-trading company.”

From an image standpoint, this was surely an unedifying corporate platform for the new grandiose unified company: Royal Dutch Shell plc – a global business worth $200 billion plus.

The domain name blunder and dubious history of the original company made it all seem more reminiscent of a “Trotters Independent Traders” venture organized by Del boy and Rodney, the incompetent cockney con-artists whose hilarious antics featured in the classic BBC TV comedy series, “Only Fools & Horses”.

Shell also blundered in wasting time and money in trying to seize the domain name, as it lost the case.

DOMAIN NAME PROCEEDINGS BY SHELL INTERNATIONAL

(Some of the docs are almost 50 pages so take some time to load)

WIPO Notification to Alfred Donovan of Shell proceedings: 25 May 2005

Shell Complaint Document: 18 May 2005 (46 Pages)

Wall Street Journal Article: 2 June 2005

Donovan Response Document: 14 June 2005 (Includes Shell financial docs and postings from “Tell Shell”

Transition of FORTHDEAL LIMITED to Royal Dutch Shell Plc: Shell financial transition docs obtained from Companies House 31 May 2005

WIPO Notification of Decision: 11 August 2005

PARTY AGAINST THE PIPE

http://partyagainstthepipe.wordpress.com

By: Keith Bourke – Extract from Western People article

SCORES of musical acts and performers are heading to the shores of Broadhaven Bay in north Mayo this June Bank Holiday weekend for an extraordinary three-day festival.

The ‘Party Against The Pipe’ will feature an eclectic mix of music, circus performance, art, children’s activities and free camping, celebrating a decade of resistance to the Corrib gas project.

FULL ARTICLE

Shell turns up heat in race to woo Russia

29 May 2011, 3:32pm

Shell has moved ahead of its rivals in a multi-billion pound race to partner Russia as it starts to exploit its vast oil riches in the Arctic.

Following BP’s failure to conclude a partnership deal with Rosneft, Shell has organised a series of further talks with the Kremlin-controlled company.

A meeting on Wednesday between Shell chief executive Peter Voser and deputy prime minister Igor Sechin has fuelled speculation that an alternative deal may be on the cards.

While Sechin, the former Rosneft chairman and the broker of the BP deal, has listed an impressive set of potential partners, according to energy sources, only Shell had been invited for further talks.

Oil giants such as Chevron, Petrobras and Exxon are not scheduled to go to Moscow.

Talks with Rosneft and Shell last week went so well that prime minister Vladimir Putin suggested that Rosneft could swap shares with Royal Dutch Shell in an Arctic offshore deal similar to one that fell through earlier this month.

The two companies signed an agreement on strategic co-operation in 2007.

BP will be pinning its hopes on Putin, who said last week that it could still be involved in Arctic exploration in some way.

SOURCE ARTICLE

Shell’s battle for the heart of Ireland

Shell’s Karoo-born man steers clear of shale gas rumpus

Sunday Times

May 29, 2011 3:08 AM | By ANTON FERREIRA

One of Colesberg’s most successful sons, who went from a sheep farm childhood to becoming vice president of a leading multinational, is trying to keep a low profile in the controversy over plans to look for shale gas in the Karoo.

That’s because the company De la Rey Venter works for in the Netherlands is Royal Dutch Shell, one of the companies that want to “frack” his former backyard.

Venter, a former head boy at Colesberg High School, has had a meteoric career since obtaining a BCom at the University of Johannesburg in 1997. He worked for Samancor, then BHP Billiton. In 2002 he joined Shell.

On a website advertising the school at which he obtained his MBA, Venter said he had chosen his career at Shell because he was “fascinated by the intrigues of geo-politics and by the global energy and environmental debates”.

Now he is the company’s global head of liquefied natural gas with responsibilities that include negotiating supply contracts around the world.

He is putting deals together to ship liquefied natural gas to Japan, which has increased its gas consumption after the earthquake disaster at Fukushima nuclear power station.

But Venter’s involvement with gas appears to have confused some residents of Colesberg, who thought he might be the man to speak to about Shell’s unpopular plan to explore for shale gas.

Clem Olivier, head of the local farmers’ union, said members held a meeting earlier this year where the proposal was made that Venter, whose family have farmed in the area for several generations, should be asked to address a meeting of the union about the fracking plans which many farmers fear will destroy their groundwater supply.

“The thought we had was that De la Rey Venter Jnr would come to give us feedback at a meeting,” Olivier said this week.

“But later it became apparent that this guy is in Holland, so we didn’t take the decision. It would be stupid to get someone from Holland to come out to tell us what Shell’s thoughts are.”

A local newspaper carried a misleading report about the farmers’ union meeting which, a Shell source said, caused unjustified hostility towards the Venter family.

Venter himself declined to answer e-mailed questions about fracking.

A Shell spokesman in Johannesburg said: “He does not want to talk on behalf of Shell, or as a Karoo-born stakeholder on the gas exploration project.”

Venter’s father, De la Rey Venter Snr, said from his retirement home in Jeffreys Bay that the fracking controversy had nothing to do with the family.

“It’s not part of (my son’s) responsibilities. He’s head of Shell’s gas marketing all over the globe, and it’s got nothing to do with fracking. So it can’t affect my family, or him.”

SOURCE ARTICLE

Shell tried to lean on Time Magazine

By John Donovan

Our applications compelling Shell to supply us with Shell internal documents in which we are mentioned, has generated some very revealing information, especially in regards to Shell bullying and manipulating the news media.

We have previously published articles revealing Shell’s intent to “kill” a half-page story about this website that The Sunday Times was on the brink of publishing.

The story was killed.

In 2007 Shell lawyers and media specialists in the USA and Europe were frantic about thwarting our contact with Fox News. As is evident from repetitive fragmented Shell internal correspondence, Shell was panicked about the prospect of Bill O’Reilly taking up our suggestion of Americans boycotting Shell, because of its continued links with the fanatical Iranian regime.

Last summer Shell decided to remonstrate with the Financial Times just because FT.com published a link to our site.

We have now stumbled across a letter from Chris Redman, the Editor of Time Magazine, to Richard Wiseman, the then Legal Director of Shell UK Limited.

Mr Redman was seeking an apology.

Here is the content of the letter…

R.M. Wiseman
Legal Director
Shell U.K. Ltd
Shell Mex House
Strand
London WC2R ODX

Dear Mr Wiseman,

I was puzzled by your recent letter complaining about a letter to TIME from a certain Mr John Donovan.

We have done an extensive search of all our letters columns in all our editions for the last few years and can find no trace of such a letter. I can only conclude that your attention was drawn to this alleged letter by someone who had not done their homework and that you yourself had not checked the facts before writing to me. If I’m wrong please let me know. If I’m right then I think you owe me an apology.

There is no evidence that Mr Redman received an apology, though he deserved one.

Time Magazine had not published any letter from me (I am sure I would recall if it had).

What Time Magazine did do is publish my advertising/announcements of the High Court Writs I issued against Shell.

Shell was stealing so many of our ideas, that my lawyers could hardly keep up the flow of issuing Writs. Shell settled them all, but on the basis, as per normal, of hiding news of the settlements from the media and Shell stakeholders.