Royal Dutch Shell plc .com Rotating Header Image

Posts from ‘July, 2011’

Workers exposed to potentially lethal Shell gas leak

Jul 22nd, 2011
by John Donovan.
No comments yet

Victoria MacDonald   |  July 22nd, 2011

WORKSAFE Victoria will visit Shell on Monday to probe how two contractors were exposed to potentially lethal gas in a leak at the Corio oil refinery yesterday.

Eight CFA crews from across Geelong were called to the Shell plant after the company sounded a major alert about 8.35am after hydrogen sulfide, a flammable and poisonous gas, was found to have leaked from one of the refinery pumps.

Yesterday’s alert was deemed to be of the highest level of three available to Shell, according to CFA sources.

The gas is found in crude oil and is removed during the refining process.

WorkSafe Victoria spokesman Michael Birt said the leak had come as fitters worked on a line in the plant, preparing it for a future shutdown.

“They opened an area on to a live system; there was a mix of gasoline and hydrogen sulfide gas,” Mr Birt said.

“It leaked out and they were exposed.

“The hydrogen sulfide detector alarm went off, which initiated the emergency measures.”

The exposed contractors attended the plant’s health centre for assessment by Shell medical staff and Ambulance Victoria paramedics, but did not require hospital treatment.

Mr Birt said the flow to that line had been stopped within minutes and the leak was isolated before the CFA arrived.

Shell spokesman Paul Zenarro said the company was still investigating the cause of the leak.

“Although the leak was minor, the refinery’s major siren was sounded as a precautionary measure to evacuate employees out of the immediate area,” he said.

Shell notified the Environment Protection Authority of the leak, but the pollution watchdog is leaving Shell to investigate the incident itself, a spokeswoman said.

The National Pollutions Index advises exposure to high levels of hydrogen sulfide can lead to collapse, coma and death from respiratory failure, while prolonged exposure to lower concentrations may cause sleeplessness, blurred vision, haemorrhage and death.

SOURCE ARTICLE

Discovery underway in age discrimination suit against Motiva

Jul 22nd, 2011
by John Donovan.
No comments yet

SOURCE

7/20/2011 3:16 PM By David Yates

A certificate of written discovery was recently filed in an age discrimination suit against Motiva Enterprises.

Tyler resident Kurt Floersheim filed suit against his former employer, Motiva, on April 15 in Jefferson County District Court, alleging he was laid off so that two younger men could replace him.

Court records show that on July 11 Motiva filed a response to Floersheim’s request for disclosure.

The incident began on June 15, 2009, when Motiva informed Floersheim that he was being included in a reduction in force. He alleges that the day after he was laid off, Motiva hired two younger specialists to replace him.

“Defendant’s selection process for its reduction in force resulted in the three oldest engineers being laid off (ages 50-65),” the suit states. “No process engineers under 40 were laid off.”

Floersheim says Motiva’s age discrimination became apparent when they replaced him with younger men.

He is suing for his emotional pain and lost wages.

Houston attorney Gregg Rosenberg represents him.

Motiva is represented by attorney Robert Hambright of the Orgain, Bell & Tucker law firm in Beaumon.

Judge Bob Wortham, 58th District Court, is assigned to the case.

Case No. A189-793

SOURCE ARTICLE

Shell CEO: China Shale Gas a Big Opportunity

Jul 22nd, 2011
by John Donovan.
No comments yet

Anglo-Dutch energy giant, Royal Dutch Shell has been pushing into China’s energy market. The company has been deepening ties with state-owned China National Petroleum Corp. (CNPC) and subsidiary PetroChina to explore and develop natural gas in the nation. In an exclusive broadcast interview with CNBC’s Christine Tan on Managing Asia, CEO Peter Voser says China looks set to surpass the U.S. and Canada in the supply of shale gas.

Q. How useful have your partnerships been with leading energy companies like Petrochina in giving you access into China, one of the world’s biggest energy markets?

I think it has developed extremely well. We are working with CNPC and PetroChina within China, but also globally. I think the success here is based on a win-win partnership, inside and outside China. If you only focus on what you can do inside China, and not let these companies participate on the global stage, I think this will not be successful. So we are combining with CNPC’s technologies to (extend) the global range. We are in Australia, Syria and Qatar. We have shale gas acre-age in China, and we do R&D together. We have similar partnership with Qatar Petroleum.

We have a good partnership with Petronas here in Malaysia and in one or two places abroad. It’s another partnership where we can clearly see that developing things together will (lead) to success in the future.

Q. China is estimated to have one of the largest reserves of shale gas more than the U.S. What role does Shell want to play here? How involved do you want to be in shale gas in China?

I think it’s the key strategy to go for Shell. We are operating with PetroChina in the Changbei field, which is already in production. We are drilling in the Sichuan and Ordos basins already.

So we are well placed to help China develop their gas resources that it’ll need for the future, because it is the lowest kind of CO2 fossil fuel. I think that’s where we can bring technology and people, and PetroChina can give us access to develop these things together. We’re in the middle of it, and this will develop into something big over the next few years.

Q. How big?

It’s too early to say because we are doing exploration at the same time, so to say how much is difficult at this stage. But if you look at external estimates, China is mostly going to be bigger than what we have seen in U.S. and Canada. Therefore this is a great prospect for us in the future.

Q. You say Shell will produce more gas than oil next year. Where do you see demand and gas prices going from here?

This is correct. In 2012, there will be more gas than oil.

We clearly see that volumes and growth in the Middle East and Asia Pacific will be substantial, as the gas percentage in the energy mix goes up. Also, Europe is shifting into gas which will see growth as well, including the U.S. (The) U.S. is a bespoke market and therefore reflecting the shale gas costs.

I think Europe and Asia Pacific will be more oil price-linked, therefore they will follow the volatility of the oil price. We are satisfied with the margins that we have at the moment, and we see them in a similar way long term.

Q. How fast do you see gas prices going up from here?

When we look at the supply-demand balance, a year ago we thought that up to 2014 and 2015, we’ll be long in the market, so more supply and some pressure on the pricing side.

With what has happened in Japan, that window is actually coming together in probably 12 months or a year to go. It will probably shift around and demand will outpace supply. Therefore, we don’t see pressure on the pricing side like 12 months ago so we are actually quite optimistic on the pricing side.

This interview is an excerpt from CNBC’s longest-running feature program Managing Asia. Catch the full interview with Christine Tan over the weekend at these times:  July 22nd at 1730 (SIN/HK).

© 2011 CNBC.com Published: Thursday, 21 Jul 2011 | 7:40 PM ET

SOURCE ARTICLE

Shell looks to avoid paying for low-value drilling

Jul 21st, 2011
by John Donovan.
No comments yet

Thu Jul 21, 2011 9:06pm GMT

* Push against paying service firms for low-margin work

* Oil service profit margins rising again with oil prices

HOUSTON, July 21 (Reuters) – An executive at Royal Dutch Shell Plc sees a new Chinese partnership as an opportunity to avoid paying oilfield service companies for drilling they could do just as effectively themselves.

The venture with state-owned China National Petroleum Corp will build systems to automate repetitive drilling, with a goal of having them in the field by 2013, said Peter Sharpe, executive vice president, wells, at Shell Global Solutions International BV.

While Shell expects it will need traditional services in most instances, drilling in coalbed methane and heavy oil fields is relatively simple and can often be automated, he said.

“There are parts of our business where we think we can do better without them (service companies), and we intend to prove that,” Sharpe told a media luncheon in Houston outlining the plan, which was first unveiled last month.

The partners are putting together a Singapore-based entity to run the project, but the software-managed drilling piece is already in use in the Netherlands and North America, he said.

Scale and longevity would determine whether the approach would work on a project, which would need at least hundreds of similar wells. Apart from coal-bed methane, he also mentioned the Carbon Creek heavy oil project in Canada as a good fit.

Sharpe said the goal was to convert more of the service function from a low-volume, high-margin business to one that is high volume with low profit margins.

His speech happened to come a day before oilfield services industry leader Schlumberger Ltd reports second-quarter results, and just days after rival Halliburton Co posted a sharp increase in profits.

The push to cut service costs is reminiscent of colorful verbal sparring a few years ago between the former Shell CEO, who called service companies “plumbers,” and Andrew Gould, the Schlumberger CEO who steps down this month.

Speaking at the CERAweek conference in Houston in 2009, Gould’s response to calls for oilfield service companies to cut rates in response to a dramatic drop in the price of oil was: “When did the bill from your plumber last go down?”

© Thomson Reuters 2011 All rights reserved

SOURCE ARTICLE

Ogoni pollution: Delayed release of UNEP report is suspicious?

Jul 21st, 2011
by John Donovan.
No comments yet

Press Release

July 21, 2011

Ogoni pollution: Delayed release of UNEP report is suspicious, says ERA

The Environmental Rights Action/Friends of the Earth Nigeria (ERA/FoEN) and other civil society groups have cautioned the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) from further prevarication on the planned release of its two-year assessment of the environmental and public health impacts of oil spills in Ogoniland.

In a statement issued in Lagos, ERA/FoEN said the people of Ogoniland and the entire Niger Delta are becoming worried over UNEP’s continued delay in releasing the report after failing to honour a pledge to do same earlier in the year.

Other groups that have joined in the call include the Ogoni Solidarity Forum (OSF), Social Action and Dutch environmental group, Milieudefensie

In early July 2011, UNEP had again informed the Federal Government that the report will be ready for publication by last week of July, and proposed that the launch take place in Abuja. However, there are speculations there may be another shift in its release.

Following the uproar over a statement ascribed to one of its staff which blamed most of the incidence of oil spills on locals and a negligible fraction on negligence on the part of Shell, the UN agency had said no report had been made public and that its findings will be out early 2011.

“What we hear now is that UNEP will not apportion blame over who caused the spills. We believe that everyone knows who is responsible for the spills. It is hoped that the report will clearly set out the enormity of the environmental pollution in Ogoni and ginger government to hold polluters accountable and enforce actions to clean up Ogoni and the entire Niger Delta. Any further delay in the release of the report might raise avoidable apprehension among the Ogoni people who have borne and continue to bear the brunt of the reckless pollution visited on their environment,” said ERA/FoEN Executive Director, Nnimmo Bassey.

In the disowned but infamous statement by the UNEP official, Mike Cowing August last year, it was claimed that 90 per cent of the spills in Ogoniland were acts of sabotage by locals and only a fraction could thus be linked to equipment failure or Shell’s poorly managed facilities.

The global outrage and condemnation that trailed the leaked document compelled the UN agency to reveal that the report in question took data from the Nigerian government and the oil industry, thus seeking to distance itself from the alleged exoneration of Shell.

Evert Hassink from the Dutch environmental group, Milieudefensie, says all this messing about has been bad for the region.

“No one likes the idea of the UN exonerating Shell and this has damaged UNEP’s reputation of independence and led to the report not being taken seriously. But it’s really difficult to get all the Niger Delta’s ethnic groups and local and provincial administrations to sing from the same song sheet. This report should have played an important part in establishing a basis for cleaning up the delta. There shouldn’t be all sorts of rows and squabbling over things that aren’t even in the report.”

Previous reports suggested the UN would hold local Ogoni people and not Shell responsible for the large-scale oil leaks. It is believed that this controversial conclusion had resulted in more than a year’s delay in publishing the report.

The Ogoni Solidarity Forum (OSF) and Social Action have said they will resist any report that twists the facts and put the blame on the Ogoni people.

“We have always said that in carrying out the so-called environmental audit, UNEP excluded community people who have painfully lived with the polluted environment. UNEP only relied on information supplied by Shell and weak regulatory agencies of government. We will reject any attempt to exonerate the polluter,” said Celestine Akpobari, spokesperson of OSF.

Isaac Asume of the Social Action insists: “Our position remains unchanged. UNEP definitely consulted Shell and other weak agencies of government in coming up with that report but it did not consult with the real people that have been assaulted. We will not accept any report that did not take our views into account.”

Philip Jakpor
Head of Media
ERA/FoEN
08037256939

Irish resistance against Shell Corrib project continues

Jul 20th, 2011
by John Donovan.
No comments yet


Issued by Shell to Sea
Wednesday 20 th July 2011 – 11am

Shell to Sea protest halts Shell’s peat works for second day

At 10.30 am this morning Shell to Sea campaigners stopped work for the second day in a row at the Bord na Móna site at Shramore, near Bangor, Co. Mayo. They are currently on the site and occupying machinery.

The site is currently preparing to store the 125,000 tonnes of peat that Shell will attempt to remove in the coming weeks. While rural communities are faced with a turf cutting ban, Shell is allowed to remove 125,000 tonnes from an area surrounded by EU Special Areas of Conservation, this on top of the 600,000 tonnes of peat that was removed during the creation of Shell’s refinery in Ballinaboy. A banner saying “Turf Cutting – One law for people, One law for Shell” was hung on the gates of the Bord na Móna site.

‘It’s shocking to see Bord na Móna – a state owned company – facilitating Shell, despite the fact that Ireland does not own any of Corrib gas and so cannot benefit. Indeed a recent report by the Commission for Energy Regulation stated that Corrib Gas coming on-stream would actually raise gas prices for the Irish public’ said Shell to Sea spokesperson Maura Harrington.

‘Shell’s so called environmental management plan was released to the public yesterday but completely fails to address the serious breaches of EU law. Shell also continues to ignore the community’s concerns about the health and safety of the high pressure raw gas pipeline.’

Shell has announced its intention to begin peat removal shortly despite the An Taisce legal challenge.

Shell to Sea has stated that it will continue to resist Shell’s Corrib project on the grounds of health & safety of the local community, protection of the environment and economic interest of the nation.

ENDS

Links

Shell to Sea campaign website: http://www.shelltosea.com

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maura Harrington            087 9591474
Terence Conway             086 0866264

The Shell to Sea Campaign has three main aims:

1) That any exploitation of the Corrib gas field be done in a safe way that will not expose the local community in Erris to unnecessary health, safety and environmental risks.

2) To renegotiate the terms of the Great Oil and Gas Giveaway, which sees Ireland’s 10 billion barrels of oil equivalent* off the West Coast go directly to the oil companies, with the Irish State retaining a 0% share, no energy security of supply and only 25% tax on profits against which all costs can be deducted.

3) To seek justice for the human rights abuses suffered by Shell to Sea campaigners due to their opposition to Shell’s proposed inland refinery.

*This figure is based on the estimate, issued by the Department of Communications, Energy & Natural Resources (DCENR) in 2006, that the amount of recoverable oil and gas in the Rockall and Porcupine basins, off Ireland’s west coast, is 10 BBOE (billion barrels of oil equivalent). Based on the average price of a barrel of oil for 2010 of $79, this works out at $790 billion, or €580 billion. This does not take account of further oil and gas reserves off Ireland’s south & east coasts or inland. The total volume of oil and gas which rightfully belongs to Ireland could be significantly higher. Also, as the global price of oil rises in the coming years, the value of these Irish natural resources will rise further.

Irish resistance against Shell Corrib project continues

Shell will disclose chemicals used to extract shale gas

Jul 20th, 2011
by John Donovan.
No comments yet

OIL company Shell will publicly disclose the names of chemicals to be used in the planned shale gas hydraulic fracturing in the Karoo

BY SISEKO NJOBENI
Published: 2011/07/20 07:44:11 AM

OIL company Shell will publicly disclose the names of chemicals to be used in the planned shale gas hydraulic fracturing in the Karoo, Shell SA Upstream GM Jan-Willem Eggink said yesterday.

The move by the company is meant to allay fears that hydraulic fracturing or fracking would lead to groundwater contamination in the water-scarce area.

Farmers, landowners and residents of the Karoo have come out against Shell and other companies’ plans to extract shale gas in the area, citing the negative environmental effects of fracking .

Fracking is a method of exploiting shale gas by pumping a mixture of water, sand and chemicals into the rock formations at high pressure.

Speaking at a conference on shale gas in Johannesburg, Mr Eggink said Shell would not compete with the people of the Karoo “for their water needs”. “Nobody will go short of fresh water because of our operations,” he said.

Mr Eggink said that at each drilling location Shell would disclose the fracturing fluids used . “The key challenge in the Karoo is access to water, not hydraulic fracturing or possible spills,” he said.

Shell’s possible water sources were deep-level saline water, surface water, municipal waste water and sea water, Mr Eggink said.

According to an environmental management plan submitted by Shell Exploration Company, a Shell subsidiary, to the Petroleum Agency of SA (Pasa) as part of its application for exploration rights, Shell intends to explore for shale gas in an area of about 30000km2 .

In terms of the plan, Shell said the exploration activities would include drilling up to eight exploration wells and engaging in hydraulic fracturing. “Fracturing would only be performed if hydrocarbons are found following the drilling of an exploration well,” the company said.

The conference has further exposed contrasting opinions on shale gas. Karoo communities remain steadfast in their opposition to plans to extract it in the area.

Karoo resident and lawyer Derek Light yesterday accused Shell of failing to consult with Karoo residents on its plans. “We have appealed to industry and government to allow for proper engagement,” he said.

Other companies with plans to extract gas from the Karoo include Sasol , which is in a joint venture with Norway’s Statoil and the US’s Chesapeake Energy Corporation. Pasa granted the joint venture a permit to prospect for shale gas last year.

Mr Light accused companies that intend to extract shale gas from the Karoo of rushing the application process “with indecent haste”.

“We have been saying do not rush this process,” he said.

But NT Energy Africa MD Chris Mumby said: “We need to debate all variables (but) what is happening is that industry is shut down even before it has opened its mouth.” He said engineers should play a prominent role in the fracking debate.

Earlier this year, the Department of Mineral Resources declared a moratorium on oil and gas exploration licences in the Karoo while a task team investigates the implications of fracking.

Spokesman Bheki Khumalo said on Monday that the task team would report to Mineral Resources Minister Susan Shabangu soon.

njobenis@bdfm.co.za

SOURCE ARTICLE

Shell Alaska oil drilling rig heads south

Jul 19th, 2011
by John Donovan.
No comments yet

Shell is moving its Arctic drill rig, the Kulluk, to Seattle for maintenance and technical upgrades.

This according to the West Seattle Blog, which keeps a close eye on the industrial marine facilities there and saw the notice in a marine industry advisory. Actually, the popular hyperlocal online site is more interested in the fact that another floating industrial machine that looks like a giant golf ball and has dominated the skyline for two months needs to be moved to make way for the Kulluk. The golf-ball thing is actually the SBX, for military Sea-Based X-Band missile detecting radar system.

The blog quotes Shell as saying the Kulluk headed south on July 1 for its time in the shipyard. Shell hopes to have the Kulluk and its other Arctic rig, the Discoverer, on the job in the Chukchi and Beaufort seas in summer 2012 for exploratory drilling. The company is still waiting on regulatory approval for those exploration activities.

Cool pictures and the West Seattle Blog story here.

Contact Patti Epler at patti(at)alaskadispatch.com.

Note: This article was corrected to reflect that the Kulluk is a drilling rig, not to be confused with the Nanuq, an ice-strenghened drilling ship that Shell also plans to use in the Arctic next summer.

SOURCE ARTICLE

Threat to endangered tribes in Peru from oil and gas exploitation

Jul 18th, 2011
by John Donovan.
No comments yet

Raya, a Nahua elder. More than half his people were wiped out after their land was opened up for oil exploration.

Peru’s ‘final attempt’ to stamp out uncontacted tribes: 18 July 2011

Peru’s Indian Affairs Department has revealed plans to open up uncontacted tribes’ reserves to oil companies – just days before the country’s new government takes office.

New laws would allow the state to grant oil and gas companies open access to the reserves, despite the extreme risk this would pose to the Indians’ lives.

The proposal has generated a wave of criticism from indigenous organizations.

Around 15 tribes have chosen to resist contact in the Peruvian Amazon; all face extinction if their lands are opened up.

Critics have highlighted the timely coincidence of the proposal with plans to expand the massive Camisea gas fields in south-east Peru.

The controversial gas project covers a significant part of the Kugapakori-Nahua-Nanti reserve, where several uncontacted tribes are known to live.

According to Peru’s leading Amazon Indian organization, AIDESEP, any new exploration in the reserve would breach conditions set by the Inter-American Development Bank, which funded the development of Camisea.

Both Peruvian and international laws state that indigenous people should be consulted about projects affecting their lands. In the case of uncontacted tribes, this consultation is impossible.

Survival is calling for all oil and gas exploration on uncontacted tribes’ land to cease immediately.

Survival’s Director, Stephen Corry, said today, ‘This is an unbelievably cynical move by the outgoing government. If it keeps up this kind of work, the Indian Affairs Department will have no Indians to look after. Opening up uncontacted tribes’ reserves will almost certainly lead to their extinction and if the new administration has any commitment to protecting tribal peoples, it will abandon the plan.’

SOURCE ARTICLE

Warning about working for Shell in Malaysia

Jul 17th, 2011
by John Donovan.
No comments yet

Above are screenshots from Shell Malaysia website taken 17 June 2011

Introduction by John Donovan

Many visitors to royaldutchshellplc.com are aware of past litigation involving several hundred thoroughly disgruntled employees of Shell in Malaysia who sued Shell on various grounds, including wrongful dismissal and allegations that Shell management made unlawful deductions from the employee retirement fund.

That was not the only recent litigation.

Eight Royal Dutch Shell Companies joined together to sue a former Shell Malaysia Production Geologist, Dr John Huong (right), to stop him blowing the whistle on management misdeeds, including fraudulently inflating claimed hydrocarbon reserves and putting employee lives at risk due to lax safety procedures. Shell buried Dr Huong in multiple injunctions and made repeated attempts to have him imprisoned before settling the entire litigation out of court.

A former  Shell Malaysia executive, Mr John Johns has also made very serious allegations against his former management colleagues and says he has the evidence to prove that was he alleges is true.

Unfortunately, obtaining justice in Malaysia is an uphill struggle because the judiciary is endemically corrupt and Shell has friends and infuence in very high places.

We now have alarming news from another Shell Malaysia source.

WARNING FROM OUR LATEST SHELL MALAYSIA SOURCE (WHO WISHES TO REMAIN ANONYMOUS)

Despite being the world’s number one Fortune 500 company, Shell has a long way to go to comply with its own Ethical Guidelines.

The previously well respected company has taken the stand that if there are no local labour laws to protect its employees, then, ‘anything goes’. Unfairly dismissing employees is a rampant practice in Malaysia. It is so common, that Shell Malaysia has appointed multiple legal firms to defend itself. In the capital of Kuala Lumpur alone, it has appointed at least three separate legal firms to deal with the piling cases.

Unfortunately, these are only cases that went to courts. For every such case, there were many more that never reached the courts. The losers are not Shell…it is the victimised employees. Unlike Western countries, the only legal remedy Malaysians have is to go through the legal process, which sometimes take more than 10 years. Many victims don’t bother with this and just accept their fate and try to move on.

Employees are often bullied into resigning or given poor performance evaluations by their incompetent supervisors. Usually, the management needs a scapegoat to put the blame on. The lax employment laws in Malaysia makes it an ideal place for Shell to literally do as it likes.

The following are just some of the cases that are pending in the Malaysian Labour courts. (Claimants names removed to protect privacy). For full details of each case and findings, please go to the court website http://www.mp.gov.my/ and type ‘Shell’ in respondent. This is publicly available.

I would strongly recommend potential Shell employees to consider carefully before signing the dotted line.

Case No. 8/4-234/97
50 employees vs Sarawak Shell Bhd

2 8/4-406/97
4 employees vs Sarawak Shell Bhd

3 8/4-653/97
5 employees vs Sarawak Shell Bhd

4 8/4-8/98 Miss G vs Sarawak Shell Bhd.

5 8/4-166/98
5 employees vs Sarawak Shell Berhad

6 8/4-334/98
2 employees vs Sarawak Shell Bhd.

7 7/4-732/11 Mr K vs Shell Malaysia Trading Sdn. Bhd.

8 14/4-1996/07 Mr M vs Shell Malaysia Trading Sdn. Bhd

9 3(15)(3)/4-1461/04 Mr J vs Shell Malaysia Trading Sdn. Bhd./Shell Malaysia Limited

10 22(19)/4-2884/04 Mr N Shell Malaysia Trading Sdn. Bhd.

11 8/4-653/98 C & 5 others vs Sarawak Shell Sdn. Bhd

12 8(17)/4-770/00 Mr R vs Sabah Shell Petroleum Company Limited

13 1(15)/2-155/02 Workers Union vs SHELL Malaysia Trading Sendirian Bhd., SHELL Refining Company Bhd., SHELL Malaysia Limited dan Tiram Kimia Sendirian Bhd.

14 27(12)/4-851/02 Ms R vs Stesyen Minyak Shell Jana

15 12/1-357/04 Workers Union vs Shell Malaysia Trading Sdn. Bhd, Shell Refining Company Bhd, Shell Malaysia Limited & Tiram Kimia Sdn. Bhd

16 20(28)(12)/4-733/04 Mr A vs Shell Refining Company (FOM) Bhd.

17 8/4-1377/04 Mr H Sarawak Shell Berhad

18 17/4-2322/04 Mr A vs Sabah Shell Petroleum Company Limited

19 22(6)/4-2455/04 Mr J vs Shell Malaysia Trading Sdn. Bhd.

20 8/4-2607/04 Mr J vs Sarawak Shell Berhad

21 17(8)/4-2622/04 Mr Y vs Sarawak Shell Berhad

22 10/4-3272/04 Mr P vs Shell Malaysia Trading Sdn. Bhd.

23 20(13)/4-618/06 Mr M vs Shell Malaysia Trading Sdn. Bhd.

24 26/4-1017/06 Mr A vs Shell Malaysia Trading Sdn.Bhd

25 1/1-1329/06 Ms R vs Stesyen Minyak Shell Jana

26 11/4-1879/06 Mr M vs  Shell Refining Company (Federation Of Malaya) Berhad

27 10/4-2258/06 Ms L vs Clamshell Dredging Sdn. Bhd

28 2/4-201/07 Mr V vs SHELL AUTOSERV MALAYSIA, A DIVISION OF CHAMP DISTRIBUTORS SENDIRIAN BERHAD

29 1/1-912/07 Shell Employees Union vs Shell Malaysia Trading Sdn. Bhd. Shell Malaysia Limited & Shell Refining Company (F.O.M) Bhd

30 20/4-307/08 Mr M vs Shell Malaysia Trading Sdn. Bhd

PHOTO OF SOME OF THE PAST EMPLOYEES OF SHELL MALAYSIA WHO HAVE SUED THE COMPANY (TEAM A)

MORE INFORMATION ABOUT DR HUONG.

Shell has spent shareholder funds on draconian defamation legal proceedings with related injunctions and demands for the imprisonment of Dr. Huong by lawyers acting for EIGHT DIFFERENT ROYAL DUTCH SHELL companies. Ironically, despite a settlement between the parties, including a case for wrongful dismissal, the same information is still being published on the same website (THIS ONE).

Click to continue reading “Dr John Huong Index”

← Earlier Posts
Newer Posts →