MEERA SELVA ASSOCIATED PRESS August 16, 2011
LONDON — Royal Dutch Shell struggled to contain the worst North Sea oil spill in a decade as well as damage to its credibility Tuesday as a second leak was found in an oil line the company had said was “under control.”
Although the amount of oil involved in the Shell spill off the coast of Scotland is an order of magnitude smaller than BP’s 2010 Gulf of Mexico disaster — around 1,300 barrels so far compared to an estimated 4.9 million in the Gulf — the spill undercuts Shell’s earlier suggestions that it was a safer company than BP.
The Gannet Alpha oil rig, 112 miles (180 kilometers) east of the Scottish city of Aberdeen, is operated by Shell and co-owned by Shell and Esso, a subsidiary of the U.S. oil firm Exxon Mobil.
Shell shut down the main leak in a flow line at the rig by closing the well and isolating the reservoir, said Glen Cayley, technical director of Shell’s European exploration and production activities. However, he acknowledged a second, smaller leak has proved more elusive to control.
“The residual small leak is in an awkward position to get to,” he said. “This is complex sub-sea infrastructure, and really getting into it amongst quite dense marine growth is proving a challenge.”
“It’s taken our diving crews some time to establish exactly and precisely where that leak is coming from,”
The secondary spill is pumping about two barrels — or 84 gallons — into the cold water each day.
Saket Vemprala, an oil and gas analyst for Business Monitor International, said while any spill is problematic, the North Sea spill is much smaller than the Deepwater Horizon spill.
“The numbers are simply not comparable,” he said.
While the BP leak was from the well’s head, the Shell leak is from a flow line, so the company knows what to expect, he said. “There is a finite amount of oil in the flow,” Vemprala said.
Still, the shallow-water disaster is an embarrassment for Shell as the company seeks its first license for exploratory drilling off the coast of Alaska. Shell CEO Peter Voser has previously said the BP blowout could never have happened to Shell, due to Shell’s different well design.
“The risk management practices of some companies in the Gulf of Mexico do lag behind the standards set by other companies,” Voser told analysts on a conference call in February. “We at Shell have been applying the best of the North Sea standards to our worldwide operations for many years.”
Kenneth E. Arnold, a member of the U.S. National Academy of Engineering who served as an adviser to the U.S. Department of Interior during its probes into the Deepwater Horizon explosion, said the suggestion that any company is not vulnerable to a catastrophe is dubious.
“What we can measure are things that happen frequently enough that there is a trendline,” he said, citing injuries, time lost to accidents, minor spills and incidents where a company failed to comply with government rules. “Predicting major disasters — that’s something we struggle with.”
On the eve of the Gulf disaster, BP had been tipped by some industry insiders as a potential winner of a safety award for its Gulf operations.
Arnold said he would classify a 1,300-barrel spill as “significant” but not catastrophic.
At its largest, the North Sea oil spill sheen covered an area 19 miles wide by 2.7 miles long (31 kilometers by 4.3 kilometers). Both Shell and the British government predict the oil will disperse naturally and not reach shore.
Cayley, in a statement, said the company “deeply regrets” the spill. He said the first leak was stopped Thursday but now “the oil found a second pathway to the sea.”
Shell said it believes the oil is now leaking from a relief valve close to the original leak, and once it is certain of the source, it will stop the spill.
The British government agrees that the leak is small compared with the BP disaster but says it is still substantial for the U.K.’s continental shelf. It has promised to investigate the spill, which is four times the amount leaked by all British rigs into the North Sea in 2009.
Vicky Wyatt of Greenpeace criticized Shell for not releasing information about the spill as quickly as it should have.
“The news that there’s now a second leak from the Shell platform will only heighten concerns over how this episode is being handled,” she said. “While oil has been flowing, timely information has not.”
Shell informed U.K. government agencies of the spill on Wednesday, but did not make the news public until Friday. On Saturday it declared that the leak had been contained.
Britain has already beefed up its inspections of the 24 drilling rigs and 280 oil and gas installations in its part of the North Sea in the wake of the 2010 Gulf spill.
The last major spill in the North Sea was in 1993, when oil tanker MV Braer ran aground in the Shetland Islands, spilling around 620,000 barrels of crude into the sea.
____
Sterling reported from Amsterdam. Danica Kirka also contributed to this story from London.
SOURCE ARTICLE
Shell Blog RSS Feed
