Royal Dutch Shell plc .com Rotating Header Image

Posts from ‘September, 2011’

MOSOP to explore whether Dutch law can provide justice for the Ogoni people

MOSOP WANTS THE TRUTH IN A DUTCH-NIGERIAN ACTIVIST TERRORIST CHARGE

The Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni People, MOSOP says it is treating the case of Mr. Sunny Ofehe in The Netherlands with the basic principle of law that an accused remains innocent, until proven guilty.

In an online statement, MOSOP President /Spokesman, Dr. Goodluck Diigbo said the responsibility in the dispensation of justice does not end with the accused, but that the prosecutor has obligation to discharge its duty in a transparent manner that will protect the sanctity of the Dutch Law and the diplomatic respect that The Netherlands enjoys as an openly democratic society and the host of several important international institutions, including the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court.

Dr. Diigbo said although he had not met Mr. Ofehe in person, he has read about him online, but that MOSOP as a responsible organization withholds any judgment on the matter and will keep track of the proceedings to the end.

The other side of this case is that MOSOP will in the future explore how the Dutch Law can provide justice for the Ogoni people.

In reaction to inquiries as to whether Shell was behind the case, Dr. Diigbo said that MOSOP has not established any direct link, but that the charges clearly link it with oil pipelines in Nigeria, where Shell has operated for decades. It is not known to MOSOP at the moment whether or not the charges have any direct connection with the pressure being put on Shell by the recent United Nations Environmental Programme, UNEP- Ogoniland Assessment Report, 2011.

Instead to jump to all kinds of conclusion, individuals and groups interested in the Ofehe case should not only show serious concern by issuing statements, but to demonstrate support and active diligence in the pursuit of the truth and to ensure that justice prevails at the end, Diigbo remarked.

Tambari Deekor
Assist Editor
MOSOP Media

Protecting Irelands oil and gas reserves

Monday, September 5, 2011

Sir, – As a former ambassador to Denmark and Norway (1998-2001) I would like to endorse your call for judicious and far-sighted harvesting of this country’s oil and gas reserves (Editorial, August 29th).

Oil wealth can often prove to be a curse, but the Nordic countries are examples of the positive impact that natural resources can have on small, well-managed, open societies. Both Norway and Denmark benefit from strong parliaments which carefully monitor the actions of government and civil service in dividing up a resource which is the property of the people. Their allocation of exploration and extraction licences is accordingly transparent, well-informed and clearly subordinate to the public good.

I was also ambassador to Indonesia under Suharto (1987-1989) where massive natural resources provided little benefit to ordinary citizens.

If we cannot now replicate the factors that have helped the Nordic countries maximise the social benefit of oil and gas extraction, perhaps we should leave the resources in the ground as a form of national savings-which can only increase in value and strengthen our negotiating hand – to offset the massive borrowings that we are imposing on future generations. – Yours, etc,

JIM SHARKEY,

Clonmany, Co Donegal.

SOURCE

A shocking documentary about shale gas fracking

Dear John,

Today a shocking documentary about the truth on negative impact on human health and environment was broadcasted in Holland.

The first few minutes are in Dutch, but the rest is English spoken:

http://beta.uitzendinggemist.nl/afleveringen/1110325

September 14 a public hearing will take place in Dutch Parliament about the risks of Shale Gas Fracking. One permit has already been given for drilling a Shale Gas well in the province of Noord-Brabant (in the South of Holland).

I thought you might be interested to watch the documentary and the information within.

Kind regards,

Evidence that Royal Dutch Shell financed fascist death squads

Royal Dutch Shell de facto CEO J.E.F. de Kok in the centre of this 1938 photograph

By John Donovan

The article below was published by an American newspaper a year after the death of Royal Dutch Shell founder Sir Henri Deterding and weeks after the sudden death of his immediate successor as de facto CEO, Johan Egbert Frederik (Frits) de Kok, known as J.E.F. de Kok.

It confirms that Royal Dutch Shell financed fascist death squads collectively known as the Romanian Iron Guard “and helped to link it with Nazi interests in Berlin.” The Iron Guard carried out high-level political assassinations.

The Evening Independent: THE SUNSHINE NEWSPAPER: Clearwater Florida: 11 December 1940

Article on page 18  – top far right column (very appropriate)

GAMBLERS– The conflict between two vast oil empires–Standard and Dutch Shell–lies behind the internal turmoil that recently culminated in Rumanian riots, shootings and jailings–and an infiltration of Nazis into the harassed country in the Balkans. Oleaginous history simply repeated itself.

The Royal Dutch Shell Oil company long headed by Henry Deterding and owned 50-50 by Dutch and British capital, is taking heavy punishment. Losses of extremely valuable oil properties in Russia transformed Deterding into a bitter anti-Bolshevik, and he labored for years to make Rumania a Fascist stronghold.

His successor J. E. F. de Kok–who in turn passed on last month–financed the Rumanian “Iron Guard,” and helped to link it with Nazi interests in Berlin. Both groups played with Rumanian politicos and intriguers who looked after Shell’s health. They opposed King Carol, who had lined up with the French. Standard Oil likewise cast its lot with Paris, and stands to suffer unless it falls in with the Dutch Shell party line.

It is probable that neither Deterding nor De Kok contemplated or desired the political and international mess that the long-range scheming precipitated.

Both Shell and Standard will undoubtedly lose out in the end–as did the German and Italian industrials barons who financed and fostered their totalitarian masters, Hitler and ll duce.

SOURCE

Sir Henri Deterding of Shell donated millions of dollars in food to Nazi Germany


Photograph shows Swastika flag flying at the head office of Royal Dutch Petroleum, 30 Carel van Bylandtlaan , The Hague, (From Image Database Hague Municipal)

By John Donovan

Printed below is a rough translation of an article in a Dutch newspaper published on 28 December 1936 reporting a donation to Germany by Sir Henri Deterding (founder of the Royal Dutch Shell Group). The donation was in the form of Dutch food products worth millions of dollars. This was in a period when the Nazis were building up their military might.

Sir Henri (right) was by this time an ardent Nazi and admirer and friend of Adolf Hitler. The first of many brutal dictators supported by Shell over the decades.

We would be grateful if any of our Dutch visitors could kindly improve the translation. The original article is also displayed.

The Nation: State and literary newspaper: 12-28-1936

Sir Henri Deterding and the Dutch agriculture

Purchase for Germany

Following reports in the press, be informed that Sir Henri Deterding, concerned with the difficulties, which finds the Dutch agriculture and impressed by the objections that the food in Germany reveals has decided outside the Netherlands German-clearing to, funds amounting to some millions of dollars available for the purchase of Dutch agricultural products which will go to Germany you will be expo-respected.

The Netherlands regeerlng has cooperated in so far granted that the necessary vergunnlngen for uitvoerlng of these operations an additional output to Germany signifies will be provided.

Obviously, the size of the amount to be reported nothing positive.

1936 photo of Shell House in Berlin

RELATED ARTICLES

The Scotsman: £1,100,000 Gift to Germany FOR FOOD PURCHASE: 28 December 1936 (Contains confirmation of the report of the gift)

The Manchester Guardian: £1,000,000 TO BUT FOOD: Helping Germany: SIR H. DETERDING PROVIDES MONEY: Tuesday 29 December 1936

Extract

£1,000.000 TO BUY FOOD

Helping Germany

SIR H. DETERDING PROVIDES MONEY

The report is published in the official Nazi newspaper “Angriff,” under the headline “Deterding Plans Gigantic Gift of Foodstuff for the “Winter Help.”

The Times: Dutch Shell for Germany: Surplus Farm Produce: Sir Henri Deterding’s Scheme: 30 December 1936

SAN ANTONIO EXPRESS: DUTCH SHELL HEAD TO BUY DUTCH FARM PRODUCTS FOR GERMANY: Wednesday 30 December 1936

DUTCH SHELL HEAD TO BUY DUTCH FARM PRODUCTS FOR GERMANY

The rise of a new agrarian party in the Netherlands, dominated by Sir Henri Deterding, may result from the oil magnate’s large-scale purchases of Dutch farm products for Germany, officials here said today.

Another result may be preferential treatment for Sir Henri’s oil interests in a grateful Germany, these authorities indicated.

Sir Henri, chairman of the Royal Dutch Petroleum Company, a Hollander recently married to a German woman, yesterday announced he was making available 10,000,000 guilders (about $5,400,000) to buy products of Dutch farms – which have had a hard time finding markets- for shipment to Germany, where shortage of foodstuffs is a serious problem.

The Argus (Melbourne) Wednesday 30 December 1936 Page 1

With the object of assisting Dutch farmers, Sir Henri Deterding has given £1,000,000 for the purchase of farm products for export to Germany.

EU Bans Syria Oil As Marchers Shot

Royal Dutch Shell: 32% stake in Al-Furat Petroleum.

SEPTEMBER 3, 2011

By FARNAZ FASSIHI

BEIRUT—The European Union banned all import of Syrian crude oil on Friday to protest Damascus’s violent suppression of demonstrators, but the standoff between protesters and President Bashar al-Assad’s government showed no signs of subsiding.

Security forces shot at least 14 marchers dead Friday as Syrians took to the streets following noon prayers. The largest protest appeared to take place in the city of Homs, where tens of thousands of people turned out against the Assad regime to support a day activists had labeled “death before humiliation.”

The EU’s ban on purchases of Syrian oil, which will go into effect Saturday, marks the most serious measure so far taken by the international community against the Syrian leader. The EU is Syria’s largest single trading partner, with €7.2 billion ($10.4 billion) in business last year.

Syria pumps about 370,000 barrels of oil a day, about 150,000 of it exported, according to the International Energy Agency. Those oil exports make up about one-third of Syria’s export income—and nearly all of it is sold to Europe.

The EU oil embargo follows several rounds of EU and U.S. sanctions against Mr. Assad and members of his inner circle, and follows a U.S. decision last month to block purchases of Syrian energy products. The U.S. move, however, was more symbolic: U.S. officials estimated such imports were the equivalent of 6,000 barrels per day.

Among those that human rights activists said were killed by security forces in Syria on Friday, at least eight were killed in the suburbs of Damascus, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.

In Erbeen near Damascus, security forces raided the Raja Takhsees hospital and arrested wounded protestors, according to activists from the Local Coordination Committee, whose members have organized and documented the uprising in cities across Syria.

“The EU has made clear that we will increase the pressure on President Assad until he steps aside…Throughout Ramadan we have witnessed horrific scenes of continued brutality,” U.K. Foreign Secretary William Hague said from a meeting of EU foreign ministers’ in Sopot, Poland.

The EU sanctions prohibit European customers from buying Syrian oil but don’t prohibit European companies with operations inside Syria from continuing their ventures there. Firms with existing contracts to buy Syrian oil have until Nov. 15 to do so.

The top European oil companies with significant business with Syria include Anglo-Dutch Royal Dutch Shell PLC, France’s Total SA and Hungarian MOL Nyrt.

Analysts say that while Europe is a huge market for Syria, it isn’t clear that the oil ban will deliver a blow to the regime. Syria’s government, though likely squeezed in the short term, could replace European markets with those in Asia, as Iran has done in recent years to lessen the sting of Western sanctions.

“It’s an important step and an indication that the EU and U.S. might consider other measures to isolate Assad. But sanctions have a limited effect on what could happen in Syria,” said Ayham Kamel, a Washington D.C.-based analyst at Eurasia Group.

Some Syrian activists welcomed the news of the EU embargo and hoped it would make it harder for Mr. Assad to fund the crackdowns against protestors. Other activists, however, voiced concern that the sanctions would hurt ordinary people, not the regime, drawing parallels to present-day North Korea and Iraq under the rule of Saddam Hussein.

“This will 100 percent hurt Syrian people. The international community should stop their diplomatic relations and close the embassies to send a strong message,” said Rami Abdel Rahman of the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.

U.K. Foreign Secretary Hague said Thursday sanctions have been targeted to minimize their impact on ordinary Syrians. “President Assad and those around him are to blame for this. No one else,” he said. “Any attempt to pass on further hardship to the Syrian people would show his utter disregard for their well being.”

A spokesman for Royal Dutch Shell said the company was “taking a very close look” at the EU announcement and trying to work out what it means for Shell. He said the company “always complies with international sanctions.”

Shell exports some Syrian crude but doesn’t have any loading schedule in the coming days. Industry observers say the company is now likely to stop exporting Syrian oil once it has worked through the legal issues of exiting its trading contracts.

A Total spokeswoman said the French oil giant would comply with all sanctions. Chief executive Christophe de Margerie told a conference this week that Total had decided to stop shipping any oil or refined products from Syria even before the sanctions were imposed. But the company so far has no intention of exiting its oil production venture in Syria, since the EU sanctions don’t oblige it to pull out.

Swiss oil trader Vitol had been shipping gasoline and diesel into Syria, but will be reviewing its position once details of the sanctions legislation are clear, a person familiar with the company said. Imports aren’t prohibited under the sanctions, but some of the importing entities are, making it difficult for trading companies to do legitimate business with the Syrian regime.

—Guy Chazan in London contributed to this article.

Write to Farnaz Fassihi at farnaz.fassihi@wsj.com

SOURCE ARTICLE

Twitter storm pounds Shell’s Syria operations

Twitter users have joined forces to protest against Dutch oil giant Shell’s business operations in Syria. Friday saw the announcement of an EU-wide-ban on Syrian oil imports. Activists used the hash tag #shellfuelsmurder to stop all of the company’s operations in the country. Shell is the second-biggest foreign oil firm in Syria after French Total SA, which claims to have stopped all exports prior to the official sanctions. Shell has said it will comply with the EU embargo but will not unilaterally stop its activities in the country. The campaign comes on another Friday of widespread Syrian protests. Thousands of protesters have been killed by security forces since the start of the demonstrations in March.

MORE HERE

‘Shell fuels murder’ campaign by Syrian activists moves ahead despite EU sanctions

A Google Doc shared Friday by the campaign accused Shell’s oil sales of “financing the military operations against civilians throughout Syria” by President Bashar al-Assad’s government.

Posted at 10:57 AM ET, 09/02/2011

By

The European Union on Friday imposed an embargo on oil exports from Syria as the country’s security forces surrounded mosques to prevent anti-government protesters from demonstrating after prayers.

Despite the ban, a campaign started by Syrian activists to halt Shell’s operations in Syria showed no signs of stopping, as many pointed out that the company could still export outside the EU.

The EU ban covers purchase, import, and transport of oil and other petroleum products from Syria, and would affect major oil corporations like Shell, which released a statement Friday that read: “Shell complies with all applicable laws, including international sanctions.”

A Google Doc shared Friday by the campaign accused Shell’s oil sales of “financing the military operations against civilians throughout Syria” by President Bashar al-Assad’s government.

“Bullets that pierce through the bodies of young children and babies in their mothers’ arms are financed by payments made by Shell and other oil companies to the Assad regime,” the dramatic document read.

The document also refers to a meeting that was likely the impetus for the campaign. Earlier this week, Shell’s Netherlands country head Dick Benschop said in a meeting with the Dutch Parliament that halting its operations would hurt the Syrian people more than its government, and that the company would not stop producing oil in Syria unless it was directed to do so by the EU.

The document called Shell’s attitude “despicable and greedy attitude,” and said it showed Shell “does not care” about human rights abuses in Syria.

When asked for comment, a Shell spokesperson pointed to the company’s statement about complying with EU sanctions.

Shell is the second-largest foreign oil producer in Syria after French company Total SA, producing 7.3 million barrels of oil in 2010. It works in the country through a joint venture under which it has a minority share.

On Twitter, Syrians rallied around the hashtag #ShellFuelsMurder, asking followers to boycott Shell until they stopped operations in the country. Some implored Shell to “stand on the right side of history,” while others asked the company to “do your homework,” or went so far as to say that Shell gas now smelled like blood.

Shell’s Twitter feed was silent Friday.

A blogger at OpenOil.net, a consultant for “socially progressive outcomes” to the global oil industry, explained that while Syria is not a major exporter to international markets, oil is an essential part of its economy.

“As far as the Assads go, [oil revenues are] a magical slush fund, unrestricted income compared to other revenue streams filtered and strained through more regular workings of government,” Open Oil wrote.

Since the uprising began in Syria five months ago, a brutal government crackdown has killed 2,200, anti-government activists say.

On Friday, protesters rallied around the banner “death rather than humiliation” as they continued to call for Assad’s resignation.

By |  10:57 AM ET, 09/02/2011

SOURCE ARTICLE

RELATED

Royal Dutch Shell to continue operation in Syria: xinhuanet.com

Shell won’t stop oil production in Syria unless EU mandates a boycott: Washington Post/Bloomberg

Shell fuels Syrian Tanks?: RoyalDutchShellPlc.com

Why is Shell still present and operating in Syria?: RoyalDutchShellPlc.com

UN to investigate ‘crimes against humanity’ in Syria: Telegraph 23 August 2011

EU prepares to embargo Syrian oil in line with US: The Scotsman 25 August 2011

EU Embargo on Syrian Crude Likely to Hurt Italy Most: Wall Street Journal 26 August 2011

MEP lodges complaint over Corrib protest with Garda ombudsman

As well as an investigation of his complaint, Mr Murphy said a public inquiry should be held into the entire policing operation around the Shell project and the working relationship between Shell’s private security contractors and the Garda.

CONOR LALLY, Crime Correspondent

DUBLIN SOCIALIST Party MEP Paul Murphy has lodged a formal complaint with the Garda Síochána Ombudsman Commission over alleged mistreatment by gardaí policing a protest in Co Mayo.

Mr Murphy claims he was subjected to excessive force by gardaí during the protest over Shell’s Corrib gas project last Thursday.

He said he was left with bruising and was unable to chew properly for a number of days after gardaí used “pressure point” techniques on him when removing him and other protesters.

He has submitted photographs of himself, taken by others, while being removed from a sit-down protest on a roadway. Some of the photos show small bruises, which Mr Murphy said he sustained when being subjected to the techniques.

These tactics are used by the Garda and prison officers to subdue prisoners or people who pose a public order risk. They involve using fingers to apply pressure to certain areas of the body, including behind the ear, aimed at physically subduing a person for a short period to allow their arrest or removal from a public order incident.

Mr Murphy’s complaint is that the force used against him and others was excessive and disproportionate to any risk posed by the protest on the day. He described the actions of some gardaí as “outrageous”.

“Garda brutality has been a persistent feature of the situation in Rossport since the end of 2006, when the area was effectively militarised with hundreds of gardaí coming into the area,” he said.

“At that time, protesters including myself were subjected to serious assaults by the gardaí, including being thrown into ditches, beaten with batons and deliberately punched.”

He said that during the incident last Thursday he was one of a group that sat on a roadway to block gardaí from driving a cherrypicker into a location at Erris near Aughoose. Gardaí were trying to remove a protester who had climbed onto the roof of a Shell lorry at one of the company’s sites.

The works were part of a construction project to lay a pipeline that will carry sludge with gas from the seashore to Shell’s onshore plant for refining into gas.

Mr Murphy, who travelled to Mayo as part of a Socialist Party delegation, claims gardaí were aggressive when they moved in, and made no attempt to use any approach apart from an extreme one.

He says he was picked up by four or five gardaí, had the area behind his ear and his left jaw pressed hard and also suffered blows to his ribs and head, while having his ears twisted with some force.

He was among a group of between 15 and 20 protesters removed from the road by gardaí and put behind Garda lines, though they were not arrested.

Mr Murphy lodged his complaint yesterday afternoon at the offices in Dublin of the Garda ombudsman. He said he had no confidence his complaint would progress in any meaningful fashion, pointing out that of the 111 complaints lodged in relation to the policing of the Shell to Sea protests, 78 were deemed inadmissible by the ombudsman and seven were sent to the DPP.

“Most strikingly, only one file was sent to the Garda Commissioner’s office calling for disciplinary procedures. To date, no disciplinary action has been taken.”

A spokesman for the ombudsman said it did not comment on individual cases.

As well as an investigation of his complaint, Mr Murphy said a public inquiry should be held into the entire policing operation around the Shell project and the working relationship between Shell’s private security contractors and the Garda.

He said the working relationship between the Garda and Shell security guards was too close and went “well beyond” the co-operation between the Garda and private security firms at events such as concerts and sporting fixtures.

SOURCE ARTICLE

Karoo gas could fuel SA for decades — Shell

Shell says it would invest billions of dollars in the development of a Karoo gas field in the event that it got the go- ahead to drill and if its exploration of the area proved fruitful

LINDA ENSOR
Published: 2011/09/02 06:49:50 AM

CAPE TOWN — Shell would invest billions of dollars in the development of a Karoo gas field in the event that it got the go- ahead to drill and if its exploration of the area proved fruitful, Shell’s upstream manager for SA, Jan Eggink, said yesterday.

The US Energy Information Administration has estimated that there are 485-trillion cubic feet of shale gas in the Karoo, enough to make SA self-sufficient in energy for decades to come.

Exploration alone would cost Shell $200m even if it was found that the reserves were not exploitable, Mr Eggink told the Cape Town Press Club.

Shell, along with a number of other companies, has applied to the government to explore for gas in the Karoo — a proposal that has generated fierce opposition from environmental lobby groups and some Karoo landowners. The debate rages on, with opponents saying gas mining in the Karoo would desecrate an ecologically sensitive area of pristine beauty. Mineral Resources Minister Susan Shabangu has established a task team to investigate the pros and cons of “fracking” for gas, and is expected to receive this report in the next few months.

Mr Eggink stressed that Shell was committed to paying fair compensation to landowners in the Karoo to gain access to their land and also made the commitment that it would not compete with residents for water. This is one of the major concerns of landowners. Access to sufficient quantities of water will be a critical factor in the decision to develop the gas.

Mr Eggink said about 1-million litres would be required in the exploration phase and a further 5- million to 10-million litres in the development phase. If there was not enough water underground, it would have to be brought in by truck or by pipeline.

Contamination of underground water supplies is another of the key concerns of landowners, as chemicals would be used in the process of hydraulic fracturing.

But Mr Eggink said Shell knew from experience elsewhere “that if a well is properly constructed it will not leak any fluid into groundwater supplies.”

He believed SA would gain enormously from producing its own gas, which was a much cleaner form of fuel than the coal that was currently used to generate about 90% of the country’s electricity. Gas was a cleaner source of energy, which would enable SA to reduce its carbon footprint.

Developing renewable sources of energy, such as solar and wind, in sufficient quantities to make an impact would take decades.

Mr Eggink noted that a modern gas power plant generated up to 70% less CO² than the old-styled coal-fired plant and was cheaper to build.

He also stressed that the surface footprint of a shale gas development would be very small (1%) compared to the overall acreage that Shell had applied to explore in, and would create thousands of jobs.

“Rapid economic growth means electricity demand is rising. By drawing on potential abundant gas supplies you can meet rising energy demand while maintaining energy security,” Mr Eggink said.

In the exploration phase, Shell would drill at least six wells, which would reveal whether gas could be extracted in sufficient quantities to be commercially viable. But even before this phase started, an environmental impact assessment would have to be made — a process that could take between 18 months and two years.

ensorl@bdfm.co.za

SOURCE ARTICLE