Royal Dutch Shell plc .com Rotating Header Image

Posts under ‘Daily Telegraph’

Oil price could fall to $70 in 2012 amid volatility, Shell warns

Oil prices could fall to $70 a barrel during 2012, from current levels above $110, as high volatility in the economy and energy markets becomes “a fact of life”, Royal Dutch Shell executives said.

By Emily Gosden: 3 February 2012

The oil giant unveiled its 2011 results on Thursday, with a 54pc jump in full-year profits to $28.6bn (£18.1bn).

High oil prices helped to compensate for a tough fourth quarter in which Shell reported a loss in its ‘downstream’ refining and marketing division.

Shell’s chief executive, Peter Voser, outlined an aggressive long-term growth strategy, focused on ‘upstream’ exploration and production. He said the strategy would help Shell ride out volatility and increase cash flow by up to 50pc over the next four years. It would spend $30bn in 2012, with more than 60 projects under construction and in design.

“The global economy and energy markets are likely to see continued high volatility,” he said, due to a combination of robust structural growth and “unprecedented geopolitical events” such as the Japanese earthquake, eurozone crisis and the Arab spring.

“Both volatile macro and volatile earnings are now a fact of life for our industry,” he said. “We deal with this by staying focused on longer-term trends.”

Mr Voser said Shell used “conservative ranges” in its assumptions about oil prices to assess risk when planning projects, to ensure they break even – even if prices fall. “We plan inside a $50-$90 range for oil,” he said.

Discussing the $50-$90 planning range, Simon Henry, Shell’s chief financial officer, told analysts: “I’m not sure we see it right at the bottom of that one over the next 12 months, but we could certainly see it in the middle of that range,” he said.

However, Mr Henry said that the company’s target of up to 50pc cashflow growth in the next four years was based on oil remaining above $80.

“Our cash flow from operations was $136bn for 2008-2011, over the four year period during which the average oil price was $87,” he said. “In the next four years we are expecting cash flow from operations to be 30pc to 50pc higher than that, around $175-$200bn in four years, assuming $80-$100 Brent oil prices.”

Shell’s results were slightly below expectations, which had already been lowered recently as the extent of the downturn in the refining industry became apparent.

Fourth quarter earnings for 2011 on a current cost of supply (CCS) basis – the oil industry’s preferred measure that strips out inventory value changes – were $6.46bn, down 11pc on the previous quarter, but up 13pc on the same quarter in 2010. It saw a $278m loss in downstream in the quarter, compared with a $482m profit in the same period of 2010.

Mr Voser said: “Our fourth quarter results were impacted by a sharp downturn in industry refining margins and North American natural gas prices.”

Shell said it planned a dividend for the first quarter of 2012 of $0.43 a share, up 2pc on the first quarter of 2011 but below some expectations.

It also said it had sold a 20pc stake in a Canadian shale gas project to PetroChina, in a deal estimated to be worth $1bn. Shares closed down 28.5p at £22.97.

SOURCE ARTICLE (WITH COMMENTS)

RELATED ARTICLES

BP should take a close look at Shell

There are two main differences between Royal Dutch Shell and BP.

By , Head of Business 11:17PM GMT 02 Feb 2012

Shell’s results on Thursday showed it was capable of mistakes, like any company. Hiccups in its production business and continued over capacity in refining meant it undershot market expectations and the share price ended 1.2pc down.

But the company’s dividend remains strong (in 2011 it was Europe’s biggest dividend payer, before special distributions, and probably the world’s biggest as a result) and it plans to start raising the payout on the back of continued investment.

However, it’s not infallible, as we know is the case with BP. But two things separate the companies. One is £56bn, which is the gap between their market values. The other is management credibility.

Carl-Henric Svanberg and Bob Dudley, BP’s chairman and chief executive, don’t have the track record of Jorma Ollila and Peter Voser. Neither do they have the same level of trust and credibility with shareholders.

A credibility discount may not account for the entire £56bn, but it’s certainly contributing a fair chunk.

BP has results next week and the company, after another mistake-riddled year in 2011, needs a new story to tell – a clear and precise strategy for growth and investment based on a clear and precise corporate structure that’s communicated on Tuesday and delivered over the next 12 months.

SOURCE ARTICLE

Cuadrilla admits drilling caused Blackpool earthquakes

Private company Cuadrilla Resources has admitted that its activities probably caused two “seismic events” that occured in Blackpool earlier this year.

By 12:36PM GMT 02 Nov 2011

In April, a tremor measuring 2.3 on the Richter scale was felt in the Lancashire seaside resort, followed by an event in May that measured 1.5 on the scale.

“It is highly probable that the hydraulic fracturing of Cuadrilla’s Preese Hall-1 well did trigger a number of minor seismic events,” Cuadrilla admitted. The report also said there was no threat to people and property in the local area caused by the drilling.

Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, involved pumping a solution at high pressure through shale to crack the rock formation. This allows trapped gas to be released and collected.

The process is widespread in the US, but it has prompted concerns about the chemicals used in the process and the effect on the water table. However, “unconventional” gas has caused gas prices in the US to stay extremely low, even as the oil price soared.

“The seismic events were due to an unusual combination of geology at the well site coupled with the pressure exerted by water injection as part of operations,” Cuadrilla added, saying that this combination of geological factors was extremely rare and would be unlikely to occur together again at future well sites.

In response, the company will modify the amount of fluid it use and have installed a seismic early warning system.

The news came as protestors from anti-fracking group Frack Off stormed one of Cuadrilla’s rigs at a drilling site in Hesketh Bank, Lancashire this morning.

“The action is aimed at highlighting the hypocrisy behind the ‘Shale Gas Environmental Summit’ starting today in London: a conference sponsored by a host of companies involved in the oil and gas industry who are trying to spin the rapid expansion into the untapped fossil fuel as ‘green’,” the protest group said in a statement.

Mark Miller, chief executive of Cuadrilla, told The Daily Telegraph: “It’s a shame that this has got to the stage where people are putting themselves in danger.”

He said it would be better for people who object to tthe operation to sit down with the company experts and ask them their “toughest questions”

Mr Miller said that drilling would not restart until the regulators had examined their findings. This is expected to take “some time”. He said that “a lot of economic benefits would come from the find both locally and nationally, as Cuadrilla had shown there was “enormous amounts of gas in place”.

Martin Stewart-Smith a partner in international law firm Morgan Lewis’s Energy Transactions Practice said that although they are drilling deep wells the benefits in terms of energy security for the UK made the operation attractive.

“My personal view is that they should be permitted to proceed,” Mr Stewart-Smith said.

SOURCE ARTICLE

HSBC fined £10.5m for ripping off OAPs

Mon, 05 Dec 2011

By STEVE HAWKES, Business Editor

BANKING giant HSBC faces a nearly £40million bill after being found guilty of ripping off almost 2,500 pensioners.

The City regulator today said elderly customers who were mis-sold products were more likely to DIE than benefit from their investment bonds.

The Financial Services Authority fined HSBC £10.5million — its biggest ever retail fine.

It also said the bank was set to pay £29.3million in compensation.

FULL ARTICLE

RELATED

The 10 biggest Financial Services Authority fines

HSBC has been handed a £10,5m fine, but it is not the biggest financial slap on the wrist handed down by the FSA.

£33,320,000 JPMorgan Securities Ltd
Failing to protect client money by segregating it appropriately.

£17,500,000 Goldman Sachs International
For weaknesses in controls resulting in failure to provide FSA with appropriate information

£17,000,000 Shell Transport and Trading Company, Royal Dutch Petroleum Company and the Royal Dutch/Shell Group of Companies
Market abuse

£13,960,860 Citigroup Global Markets Limited
Breaching FSA Principles 2 and 3 by failing to conduct its business with due skill, care and dilligance

£10,500,000 HSBC
For inappropriate investment advice provided by one of its subsidiaries, NHFA Limited (NHFA) to elderly customers.

£8,000,000 UBS AG
For systems and controls failures that enabled employees to carry out unauthorised transactions involving customer money on 39 accounts

£7,700,000 Barclays Bank plc
For failures in relation to the sale of two funds

£7,000,000 Toronto Dominion Bank
For repeated systems and controls failings around the pricing of sophisticated financial products

£7,000,000 Alliance & Leicester Plc
For serious failings in its telephone sales of payment protection insurance

£6,895,000 Willis Limited
For failings in its anti-bribery and corruption systems and controls.

FULL ARTICLE

Shell to invest $1.6bn in Brazilian oil block

Royal Dutch Shell will invest more than $1.6bn in the second phase exploration of a key Brazilian oil block and also plans to compete in the country’s next auction of oil and gas concessions, senior company figures have disclosed.

An oil rig in Guanabara bay, Rio de Janeiro Photo: Alamy

Robin Yapp

By , in Sao Paulo 7:07PM BST 21 Sep 2011

Already Brazil’s second biggest oil producer after the state-run energy giant Petrobras, Shell has had impressive results in the Campos Basin, part of Brazil’s pre-salt oil fields that lie deep below the Atlantic ocean and a thick layer of salt.

Production in the area has been 30pc higher than anticipated, convincing Shell to make substantial further investment in the hope of seeing similarly impressive results.

Andre Araujo, president of Shell Brazil, said the second phase development of the BC-10 block in the Campos Basin – in which Shell has a 50pc share and is believed to hold 400m barrels of recoverable oil – will start next year.

“To give you an idea of the importance of exploratory activity in Brazil for Shell, we are going to invest, just in the second phase of BC-10, more than the $1.6bn that we spent to set up Raizen [its joint venture Brazilian ethanol plant],” he said.

Marvin Odum, Shell’s director of exploration and production for the Americas, said the company would look to further expand in Brazil because it now appears a more attractive investment prospect than many other oil-producing nations.

“The opportunities that we find here are of the highest quality in global terms, both from the regulatory point of view and geological,” Mr Odum told business newspaper Brasil Economico.

“Because of this, we don’t believe that a recovery of production in countries such as Iraq and Libya, in the future, will reduce Brazil’s attractiveness. The pre-salt has areas of the highest quality.”

Mr Odum indicated that Shell was likely to compete when Brazil’s National Petroleum Agency auctions new exploration blocks off the country’s north-east coast in 2012 but said a final decision would be taken after details of the auction are published.

SOURCE ARTICLE

Former Shell chairman James Smith to lead deregulation of UK oil and gas industry

WHAT WILL BILL CAMPBELL MAKE OF THIS? PUTTING A FOX IN CHARGE OF THE HEN HOUSE?

The Government has appointed James Smith, the former UK chairman of Royal Dutch Shell, to lead a radical deregulation of the oil and gas industry.

By 6:00AM BST 07 Sep 2011

Charles Hendry, the energy minister, promised oil executives at Aberdeen’s annual Offshore Europe conference that they would be facing less regulatory oversight in years to come.

Mr Smith, the longtime head of Shell UK, who retired this year, will start gathering opinions in November from companies on how to cut regulation.

“You are not going to see more regulation,” Mr Hendry told delegates. “What we badly need is input from industry on how to reduce the burden of regulation. The approach of ticking boxes you see in other countries, that’s not the UK’s way of doing things.”

He promised that a non-prescriptive, flexible approach to regulation would be the Government’s starting point, as it seeks to encourage more investment in the North Sea.

The minister has written to “stakeholders” in the oil industry urging them to contribute their thoughts, while promising that current standards would not be lost. However, his comments may cause alarm among those who have pressed for tighter regulation in the wake of recent North Sea problems such as Shell’s pipeline leak and concerns from the Health and Safety Executive about platform corrosion.

Mr Hendry said the UK’s safety regime was one of the world’s “most robust”, as he unveiled two oil spill caps designed to tackle future oil leaks.

SOURCE ARTICLE

RELATED ARTICLES

Investigation gets under way as Shell plugs North Sea oil leak

It also emerged over the weekend that there was an internal investigation into Shell’s Gannet plaforms in 2003 raising concerns about unapproved repairs and unreliable fire sensors. The claims are made within papers held by Bill Campbell, a former senior Shell employee, who has questioned the company’s environmental and safety record.

Government inspectors are preparing to interview a number of key players involved in Shell’s North Sea oil leak, including staff on the platform, officials at the company’s headquarters and the helicopter pilot who spotted the sheen.

Government investigators are preparing to take a close look at Shell’s physical assets, including the pipeline where the source of the leak was discovered. Photo: Alamy

By , Energy Correspondent 5:30AM BST 22 Aug 2011

The start of their investigation comes as an analysis of oil and chemical leaks from Shell’s Gannet platforms shows that there have been at least 34 spillages since 2002, ranging from one litre to 590 barrels.

Data from surveys conducted on behalf of the Maritime and Coastguard Agency show that most of these 34 came from Shell’s Gannet Alpha platform, whose pipeline suffered the 10-day leak that ended on Friday.

It also emerged over the weekend that there was an internal investigation into Shell’s Gannet plaforms in 2003 raising concerns about unapproved repairs and unreliable fire sensors. The claims are made within papers held by Bill Campbell, a former senior Shell employee, who has questioned the company’s environmental and safety record.

Government investigators are now preparing to take a close look at Shell’s physical assets, including the underwater pipeline where the source of the leak was discovered.

As they begin to work out what went wrong, officials will this week meet Scotland’s procurator fiscal, who will eventually decide whether to prosecute, to identify the initial scope of the inquiry.

Shell finally managed to seal its leaking pipeline on Friday after a week-long battle to stop the flow. It said yesterday that further monitoring of the well shows that no more oil is leaking into the ocean and the sheen on the surface has now naturally dispersed.

At 1,500 barrels, it is still a tiny fraction of BP’s 4m barrel Gulf of Mexico oil spill. However, it is still the worst environmental lapse in the North Sea for a decade and now that the flow has stopped, Shell will be facing tough questions from regulators.

The oil giant has suffered a series of problems on its North Sea installations this year, in particular on the Brent field.

Since January, the company has seen the death of a maintenance worker, a series of gas “kicks”, equipment collapsing off a platform into the sea and a 15,000-hour backlog of repairs.

All four of the Brent field’s platforms – Alpha, Bravo, Charlie and Delta – stopped producing oil and gas in January after a chunk of protective railing plunged into the ocean as a result of “metal fatigue”.

Production at Bravo and Alpha only restarted this month, with Delta shortly to follow. However, the Charlie platform remains closed after a rare “prohibition notice” following a series of gas leaks.

The Health and Safety Executive recently warned that only one in 20 of Britain’s North Sea oil platforms was in good condition and expressed concern that companies were neglecting workers’ safety.

More than 96pc of installations in the North Sea were found to require improvements during inspections over the past three years, with one in five showing “major failings”.

Shell has been under pressure to release pipeline inspection reports for the infrastructure where the leak was found.

However, it is understood that the company does not think it appropriate to make these documents public while official investigations are ongoing.

Glen Cayley, Shell’s technical director in Europe, said: “We care about the environment and we regret that the spill has happened. We have taken it very seriously and responded promptly to it.”

Shell has spent $1.2bn (£730m) on upgrading assets in the North Sea since 2004 and this year will pump a further $600m into the region.

SOURCE ARTICLE

Royal Dutch Shell closes oil valve after 12 day North Sea battle

Royal Dutch Shell has finally managed to stop oil from spilling into the North Sea after a 12-day battle with the Gannet field leak.

Shell’s work is not over as it will have to remove oil trapped in the pipeline between the sealed off well and the platform. The Marine Coastguard’s latest estimate is that the sheen currently covers an area of 6.7 square kms and 26 barrels by volume. Photo: REUTERS

By , Energy Correspondent 6:41PM BST 19 Aug 2011

Divers switched off a valve from which just one barrel per day was trickling over the last couple of days, but in total around 1,600 barrels has made its way into the ocean over the course of the spill.

Shell’s work is not over as it will have to remove oil trapped in the pipeline between the sealed off well and the platform. The Marine Coastguard’s latest estimate is that the sheen currently covers an area of 6.7 square kms and 26 barrels by volume.

“Closing the valve is a key step,” said Glen Cayley, technical director of Shell in Europe. “ It was a careful and complex operation conducted by skilled divers, with support from our technical teams onshore. But we will be watching the line closely over the next 24 hours and beyond.”

Hugh Shaw, the Government’s representative for maritime salvage and intervention, said he would closely monitor the progress of the operation.

“Shell informed me at 10.58 this morning that both valves have been closed by divers, though I must be clear that this is not the end of this particular phase of the operation as there will now be a period of extensive monitoring to determine whether the operation has been successful and whether the leak has been stemmed,” he said. “This will be done through subsea surveillance as well as by aerial surveillance by Government aircraft.”

Environmental campaigners have seized on the incident as a sign that oil companies should not be trusted to drill in even more difficult weather conditions like the Arctic.

Vicky Wyatt, of Greenpeace, said: “While we’ll be keeping a careful eye on whether the leak really is plugged as Shell claims, it’s obvious that the more we learn about what is supposed to be a gold standard operation, the more you worry whether Shell can be trusted to drill in the remote and fragile Arctic.”

SOURCE ARTICLE

Shell could face fines over Gannet oil spill

Royal Dutch Shell may face a criminal investigation and hefty fines in the Scottish courts for its oil leak, which is still trickling into the North Sea.


Shell is currently working to stop 4,500 barrels still in the pipeline from leaking into the sea. Photo: REUTERS

Rowena Mason

By 7:49PM BST 17 Aug 2011

The Government said last night it will make recommendations to the Scottish Procurator Fiscal about whether to prosecute Shell, as its inspectors began to investigate what went wrong on the Gannet Alpha platform’s pipeline.

Hugh Shaw, the Government’s representative for maritime salvage and intervention, said he believed the leak was now “under control”, though it is still leaking around one barrel per day into the sea.

He became involved in the operation on Friday night, three days after the leak started, when it became clear there was “potential for significant pollution”.

Officials have now set up an operations control unit in the North Sea with Government advisers and technical experts, as Shell battles to seal the off the leak once and for all.

Shell’s costs are continuing to mount as it is still working with underwater robots and surveillance flights to monitor the leak, which is thought to have spilt around 1,300 barrels into the sea.

The well was immediately shut in, after the spill was spotted by a helicopter on Wednesday morning. However, there is a hole in the pipeline itself, which contains around 4,500 barrels.

Shell is working to stop this amount from getting into the sea.

It is looking at sending divers down to fix the leak but weather conditions have not been good enough so far.

Mr Shaw said. “My role is to monitor and approve Shell’s response to the spill to ensure that it is dealt with as quickly and as safely as possible, and with minimum impact on the environment.

“Based on the latest intelligence that I have, my view is that the oil leak is under control and has now been greatly reduced as validated by remotely operated vehicle footage and Government aerial surveillance flights.

The priority now and over the coming days is to completely halt any further leakage in what is a complex environment.

“Although the spill was deemed as significant, our information is still that the oil is not expected to reach the shore, and that it will be dispersed naturally.

Inspectors from the Department for Energy and Climate Change and the Health Safety Executive are beginning to look into the causes of the accident. Their report will be submitted to the Scottish Procurator Fiscal who will make a final decision on whether to prosecute Shell.

Milford Haven Port Authority was given a £4m fine for the Sea Empress oil tanker spill, which polluted miles of beaches in west Wales in 1996.

SOURCE ARTICLE

Shell’s oil spill is bad news for all as energy prices rocket

The flow of oil into the North Sea may have been reduced to no more than a trickle, but the damage to Shell’s reputation has already been done.

The Royal Dutch Shell platform Gannett Alpha is seen in the North Sea in a 2009 file photograph Photo: REUTERS

Richard Fletcher

By 9:05PM BST 16 Aug 2011

Yes, it’s tiny when compared to Exxon Valdez or BP’s Gulf of Mexico disaster, but the Gannet oil field spill still ranks as Britain’s worst oil spill for over a decade.

More importantly, as my colleague Rowena Mason reports on B5, the spill has highlighted the increasing difficulties facing Shell (and other explorers) when trying to pump oil and gas out of the North Sea.

Even before the Gannet leak it had been a challenging a year in the North Sea for Shell. All four of its Brent platforms stopped producing for eight months, when part of one fell into the sea in January.

The problems didn’t stop there. Following a series of gas leaks the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) forced Shell to close one of its largest North Sea platforms. It is not expected to come back on stream until next year.

This year has also witnessed the first death on one of Shell’s North Sea installations for five years, when an abseiler plunged to his death.

The reality is that a number of North Sea oil platforms are now almost 50 years old and so are the pipelines. Corrosion, according to the HSE, is becoming an increasing problem.

With maintenance costs spiralling no wonder there appear to be so few buyers for the billions of pounds worth of North Sea assets dumped on the market by the oil majors in the past year.

This situation was only aggravated by the Government’s tax grab on North Sea oil in the last Budget.

North Sea exploration is going to get a more complicated and problematic in the coming decade. Expensive shutdowns and equipment problems are inevitable.

That’s bad news for all of us, not just Shell. With energy prices soaring we need every drop of oil and gas from our depleting fields we can get.

SOURCE ARTICLE