Royal Dutch Shell plc .com Rotating Header Image

Posts Tagged ‘Linda Cook’

LINDA’S LOLLY: $30 MILLION PLUS PAYOFF FROM SHELL

She was universally hated and in the end Shell thankfully ducked appointing her as CEO and she cleared off in a hissy fit! Laughing all the way to the bank no doubt.


Graphic From Daily Mail Article: Shell braced for yet another revolt over directors’ pay

Wilt Staph Posting on Apr 15th, 2010 at 10:16 am

Shell insiders will be shocked but not surprised by the revelations about Linda cook’s departure. There are two main factors at play in this sorry saga – Americanisation and diversity. Senior American executives in Shell have historically had bonus and pay structures which far exceed those of their mainly European colleagues. The uneasy relationship between Shell’s US subsidiary, Shell Oil, and the rest of RDS over the years led to a number of high-flying Americans moving into the Shell international arena to try and address this problem. In virtually every instance these moves have been unmitigated disasters.

Steve Miller was on the CMD in the 1990s and was an expensive failure. He had little or no feel for the complexity and diversity of Shell’s business outside of the US and he was eventually sent home with his tail between his legs – the only CMD member effectively to be sacked. John Hofmeister became the head honcho of Shell’s HR function and managed to unravel decades of a more paternalistic (but successful) approach to employee relations and by his own efforts reduce morale to new lows. Like Miller before him he was repatriated in the end to Houston – unliked and unmissed in Shell Centre and The Hague. Finally Linda Cook was not only supposed to smooth relations between the Dutch/British management mafia and their American cousins but also add to Shell’s diversity status by being a very senior woman on the Board. The carrot of perhaps succeeding to the top job when van der Veer retired was undoubtedly dangled in front of her – as well as a mind-blowing remuneration and pension package. Cook was by all accounts utterly unsuited to a top international job (all of her prior Shell experience had been in the US) and her ambition was such that she tried to trample on any in her way. She was universally hated and in the end Shell thankfully ducked appointing her as CEO and she cleared off in a hissy fit! Laughing all the way to the bank no doubt.

Posting by “insider” on Shell Blog Apr 15th, 2010 at 5:00 pm

Wilt Staph, good story, I could not have worded it better. But you were incomplete, the story is worse. What of Boynton who was sacked albeit with a large severance payment. Was she an incompetent and token woman like Cook, or an incompetent american or both or simply corrupt? We will never know. And what of our friend Botts, the cowboy from Wyoming? He ruined EP Europe with his silly ideas and was not sacked but kicked to do something managerial in downstream. All the while raking in humongous american pay. He has gone quiet and this is worth a lot of money! One midlevel engineer american expatriate (say graduate with 10 yrs experience) in the Netherlands costs as much as 4-5 dutch PhDs. The latter ones may not be so flamboyant and gung-ho nor always in agreement with the boss, but they certainly could provide value for money.

The days when Shell Oil would provide good old technical competence are long gone by. But occasionally there is a good one in the senior ranks, I think I know both of them. One retired, one resigned from Shell as he could not take the crap anymore.

So Wilt, thanks for your heads up, perhaps others can complete this staffwork on crooked and overpaid americans? Personally I think you were far too kind on that idiot Hofmeister. He ruined Shell for good and spent enormous amounts traipsing around with the HR community and on himself. All the while pretending to be a sober living Amish. Pretending is an understatement…

$7.6m golden goodbye for Shell Exec Linda Cook: No wonder she is smiling

Linda Cook: 29 years’ service with Shell. Photograph: Adrian Dennis/Rex Features

FINANCIAL NEWS

17 March 2010
Mark Cobley

Yesterday the Dutch shareholders’ group VEB, which represents small investors, blasted Royal Dutch Shell for paying out $13m to boost a departing director’s pension pot, coupled with a $7.6m “golden goodbye”.

Errol Keyner from VEB told the Guardian newspaper: “The people who came up with this must have been smoking something which is not allowed in law. It’s beyond belief.”

–write to mcobley@efinancialnews.com

SOURCE ARTICLE

RELATED ARTICLE

Shell to sell refineries to boost output

Daily Telegraph: Royal Dutch Shell has unveiled the most dramatic overhaul of its business in recent memory, outlining plans to exit more than a third of its 90 retail markets, slash refining capacity and return to growth after seven years of falling output.

By Garry White
Published: 10:10PM GMT 16 Mar 2010

Peter Voser, chief executive, unveiled a further 1,000 jobs cuts in addition to the 6,000 already announced as he vowed to “sharpen up” Shell in the next three years by boosting output by 11pc.

“Shell has been disadvantaged recently, due to our higher exposure to refining and natural gas, where margins are hard-wired to the economy,” Mr Voser said.

“The priorities are for a more competitive performance, for growth, and for sharper delivery of strategy. We have more to do to drive out cost and improve the operating performance in the company.”

Shell plans to exit 35pc of its petrol station markets and reduce refining capacity by 15pc to help it make cost saving of $1bn (£658m) this year. It also said it would sell non-core assets worth $1bn-$3bn a year, including its refineries in Gothenburg, Los Angeles and New Zealand.

Monday is the deadline for bids for the company’s liquified petroleum gas distribution arm, which could raise £1.1bn. Those understood to be tabling offers include Brazilian chemicals group Ultrapar, Centrica spin-off DCC and French listed Rubis, as well as a number of private equity groups.

“Upstream, we have built up strong foundations in activities like gas-to-liquids, oil sands and liquefied natural gas,” Mr Voser said. “Looking out to 2020, I expect Shell’s exploration to underpin new upstream growth, especially in North America and Australia, with additional barrels from development-led projects.”

The news came on the day that Shell released its annual report, which showed that Mr Voser earned less than Tony Hayward, chief executive of rival BP, in 2009. Mr Voser earned a total salary and bonus of £2.8m compared with Mr Hayward’s £4m.

Shell has said it would freeze management salaries until 2011 after shareholders objected last year when executives were awarded bonuses even after performance targets were missed.

Linda Cook, who resigned as head of Shell’s gas and power business in May last year, was paid a salary and bonus of £2.1m as well as a severance payment of almost €5.5m (£5m). She leaves with a total pension pot of just under $25m. Mr Voser’s predecessor, Jeroen van der Veer, left with a pension pot worth $34.2m.

Shell predicts oil will trade between $50 and $90 a barrel over the next few years and is targeting output of 3.5m barrels of oil equivalent per day in 2012. This compares to 3.15m in 2009, the equivalent to an annual growth rate of 3.5pc, or 11pc in total over three years

Mr Voser said the company should be in a surplus cash flow position in 2012, after capital investment and dividend payments – assuming $60 oil prices and a more normal environment for natural gas prices and downstream. In order to achieve this it will have to invest between $25bn and $27 a year in its operations.

The Anglo Dutch group also said that it replaced 288pc of its oil and gas output with new discoveries in 2009, or 3.42bn barrels of oil equivalent.

SOURCE ARTICLE

RELATED TELEGRAPH ARTICLES

Shell’s female head of gas and power earned £3.9m in 2008 – by resigning

Oil company’s ‘golden goodbye’ made Linda Cook the second highest-paid businesswoman in Britain

Terry Macalister, Monday 14 September 2009 18.39 BST: guardian.co.uk

Linda Cook earned £3.9m last year, making her the second best-paid businesswoman in Britain. But the former head of gas and power at Shell only achieved the top remuneration spot after a “golden goodbye” when she left the company after 29 years’ service.

American-born Cook abruptly resigned after losing out to rival Peter Voser in the race for the chief executive role following the retirement of long-standing boss, Jeroen van der Veer.

There was speculation that the 50-year-old was pushed and the company was unable to say what job she was moving on to. She is understood to have built up a pension pot worth more than £7m by the end of last year.

Her departure coincided with the exit of BP‘s top woman, Vivienne Cox. Both had responsibility for developing a green power agenda that was being given a dwindling profile at both groups.

Cook’s departure on June 1 meant she missed out on a further £800,000 loyalty bonus, one of a number of wider pay issues at Shell that caused a rumpus at the company’s annual general meeting this year.

Franklin Mutual, part of the Templeton group of funds in the US, described as “pathetic” the defence offered by Sir Peter Job, chairman of Shell’s remuneration committee, over last year’s top pay awards, in a revolt that led to his resignation at the weekend.

Cook, who has been named as one of the world’s most powerful businesswomen, headed the growing gas and power division for the last five years.

She had overseen the company’s largest single project –the Pearl gas-to-liquids plant in Qatar –and its investments in liquefied natural gas (LNG). Shell’s gas and power division, which includes one of the biggest LNG portfolios in the world, produced earnings for 2008 of $5.3bn (£3.2bn), up over 90% from 12 months earlier.

Shell, whose gas operations accounted for nearly 45% of upstream production last year, has said it expected gas to eventually overtake traditional oil production.

But the company is not planning any big investments in Cook’s other area of responsibility, solar and wind energy, with the focus shifting onto biofuels, led by Shell’s oil products and refining division.

SOURCE ARTICLE

BP shuts alternative energy HQ

• ‘Beyond Petroleum’ boast in doubt as clean energy boss quits
• Renewables budget will be reduced by up to £550m this year

Click to continue reading “BP shuts alternative energy HQ”

UPDATE: Leaked Shell E-mail Shows 62 Senior Executive Appointments

Retour à l'accueil

Monday June 22nd, 2009 / 17h48 

(Adds detail, background.) LONDON -(Dow Jones)- An internal e-mail from Royal Dutch Shell PLC (RDSB.LN) leaked to a blog critical of the company has revealed the appointments of 62 senior executives to new roles within the restructured company.   

The e-mail dated June 16, sent by incoming Chief Executive Peter Voser, was published Saturday on the blog royaldutchshellplc.com. A Shell spokesman said the company does not comment on purported leaks. 

Effective July 1, Ceri Powell, former Executive Vice President, or EVP, for Strategy becomes EVP for Exploration for the company’s international operations, the e-mail said. Dave Lawrence, former EVP for global exploration moves to head up exploration in the new Shell Americas division. 

Ian Craig, the former head of the Sakhalin-2 liquefied natural gas project in Russia becomes EVP for Sub-Saharan Africa and will oversee the company’s troubled Nigerian operations, the e-mail said. Former Africa chief, Ann Pickard, becomes EVP Australia. 

Charles Watson, former EVP of Shell Energy Europe, will head the company’s Russian and Caspian upstream operations. 

All the above executives will report to the global head of Exploration and Production, Malcolm Brinded. 

Shell’s downsized Alternative Energy division, which will eschew new investments in wind and solar in favor of second generation biofuels, falls under the remit of EVP for Strategy and Portfolio Mark Gainsborough, the e-mail said. 

Voser, who will take up the position of chief executive on July 1, is implementing a major restructuring to make the company faster moving and more efficient. The biggest change in the shakeup was the elimination of the Gas and Power division – operations were split between the new upstream and downstream divisions. 

The former head of Gas and Power, Linda Cook, resigned from Shell shortly before the restructuring announcement. 

Blog Web site: http://tinyurl.com/lsjxwm 

-By James Herron, Dow Jones Newswires; +44 (0)20 7842 9317; james.herron@dowjones.com 

 

Surprise departure as Shell set for revamp

Royaldutchshellplc.com, an independent website used by Shell staff, said yesterday that more than 30 per cent of senior managers were expected to go.

Click to continue reading “Surprise departure as Shell set for revamp”

Massive shake-up at Shell puts 24,000 jobs at risk

The Independent

Up to a third of senior management under threat

By Sarah Arnott

Thursday, 28 May 2009

Hot on the heels of the surprise resignation of top executive Linda Cook, Shell’s in-coming chief executive Peter Voser announced major restructuring plans yesterday that could cut thousands of rank-and-file jobs.

Some 24,000 staff at the Anglo-Dutch oil giant will be affected by the changes, with job losses expected to be in the thousands. Up to a third of senior management are believed to be under threat.

There are three major structural changes. The company’s three upstream businesses – exploration and production (EP), gas and power (GP) and oil sands – will be combined into two, new regional units: Upstream Americas and Upstream International. Mr Voser is also creating an entirely new “Projects & Technology” division which will manage everything from R&D to project delivery to contracting and procurement. Finally, some parts of Shell corporate are to be absorbed into specific business units, while the rest is streamlined under a single combined human resources (HR) corporate director role.

The measures are intended to simplify the structure of the company, speed up implementation and cut costs. Mr Voser – who takes over from out-going chief executive Jeroen van der Veer at the start of July – said: “This new structure will increase accountability in the company, and improve Shell’s performance on delivering new projects and developing new technologies. These changes will increase our focus, accelerate our plans to reduce complexity, corporate overheads and costs, and result in faster decision-making and delivery.”

At the top level, the changes mean a significant re-balancing of Shell’s eight-strong executive committee. The company says the new structure allows greater representation from business units and less for internal functions.

The new regime appears to confirm rumours that the resignation of Ms Cook, who was head of the gas and power group, stemmed from differences with Mr Voser. With Ms Cook gone, there is space for the head of the new Projects & Technology unit, Matthias Bichsel, currently at Shell’s EP technology division. He will be joined by Marvin Odum – now executive vice-president of Americas EP business – as the new director of the Upstream Americas business. Malcolm Brinded, the executive director of EP, will take on the Upstream International job.

The changes at Shell HQ will claim the scalp of Ms Cook’s only other female colleague on the executive committee. Under the new structure, the committee will have only three members from Shell headquarters – from finance, legal, and the newly combined human resources and corporate director – as opposed to four. The HR and corporate role will go to the current HR director Hugh Mitchell, while Roxanne Decyk, current head of corporate affairs, will stand down from the committee to take a role leading a new government relations department in Washington, DC.

SOURCE ARTICLE

Shell spokesman says assertions of royaldutchshellplc.com “pure speculation”

Tuesday, royaldutchshellplc.com site, hosted by former employees against the direction of the oil company, had argued on the basis of internal sources as the new boss of Shell would cut a third of senior management positions. “Inevitably, there will be fewer jobs, but Shell did not set a goal in the subject, provided his side a spokesman for the group to AFP, calling the assertions of royaldutchshellplc.com of “pure speculation”.

Click to continue reading “Shell spokesman says assertions of royaldutchshellplc.com “pure speculation””

Shell showing three into two will go

It is expected that exploration and production and gas and power will be combined into a single division. The merged business is then expected to be split in two, with an American division run by Marvin Odum, now head of Shell Oil, the US subsidiary, and the rest of the world run by Malcolm Brinded, now head of exploration and production.

Click to continue reading “Shell showing three into two will go”