Royal Dutch Shell plc .com Rotating Header Image

Posts Tagged ‘Toxic Waste’

OGONI ACTIVISTS ACCUSE SHELL OF ‘ENVIRONMENTAL RACISM’

Extracts from a Press Statement issued by the National Union of Ogoni Students, USA.

On August 04, 2011 the world had a preview of the report of the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP) sent to the Nigerian government after 14 months of studying the impact of Shell Oil Company’s operations in Ogoni.

The report was astonishing and confirmed the toxicology of the Ogoni environment as a result of oil exploration, pollution, spillages and negligence. The report also collaborated on genocidal claim by Ogoni people as they experience slow death resulting from oil agents like benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylene (BTEX), mercury, PAHs, VOC, polluted reactive gases, and metals.

Shell Oil Company has knowingly degraded the Ogoni environment and made Ogoni people live and die slowly  from pollutants, a man made poison for 55 years, while applying different operating standards in the west. This is the height of injustice and tantamount to environmental racism.

Since it is the desire of the United Nations that Ogoni and other indigenous communities should survive, we urge the UN and other western nations to come to the aid of Ogoni by compelling Nigeria to adhere to the terms of the Ogoni Bill of Rights (1990), Resolution of the Rivers State House of Assembly (1993), and the UN Report on Ogoni (1996).  We also recommend that the international community should compel Shell Oil Company to follow universal operation standards, be accountable, and accept responsibilities for 55 years of environmental devastation and degradation in Ogoniland.

BP accepted liability in the United States’ Gulf Oil Spillage in 2010 by adequate clean-up and setting-up compensation funds.

We want Shell Oil to do the same in Ogoni.

Port Arthur activist wins $150,000 environmental prize

POSTING BY GOLDEN TRIANGLE WATCHMAN

John D, you want to engage with a true activist that has been a pain in the rear for Motiva, read this article. Motiva and the Purves gang are busy building the project. They had to buy this guy off to get the permit…. Might be worth connecting with him and seeing if he truly understands Shell’s equity position on crude when the project completes. They won’t be running the Saudi crude as much since it is going to China… where do you think they are going to get the crude…. Answer another question… Where is Shell’s investment of late north of the border in Canada…. oil sands…. on it’s way to PAR…

By Matthew Tresaugue, Houston Chronicle
Published 07:45 a.m., Monday, April 11, 2011

Port Arthur activist Hilton Kelley speaks out in 2008 about Veolia Environmental Services, which is asking permission from the EPA to reverse a longtime ban on importing PCBs. James Nielsen/Houston Chronicle / Houston Chronicle

The public housing project where Hilton Kelley was born and raised sits in the shadows of two refineries that belch toxic chemicals into the air.

His mother moved him away from Carver Terrace long ago, but he is still here, waging what seems to be a one-man crusade in one of America’s most polluted places. With many of this Gulf Coast town’s poorest residents suffering from asthma, skin irritations and cancer, he has neither forgotten nor forgiven.

So for the past decade he has pushed and prodded, with a bit of shouting, mostly by him, for more restrictions on industrial construction and stricter monitoring of plant emissions.

And now, what once seemed like a quixotic pursuit – greater environmental and public health protections in a refinery town – no longer seems so quixotic.

“Port Arthur has been a dumping ground for years because this was the area of least resistance,” Kelley says. “But this is a new day.”

For his work, Kelley is one of the 2011 winners of the Goldman Environmental Prize, sometimes called the Green Nobel as the highest honor of its kind for grass-roots environmentalists.

He will be in San Francisco today to receive the award, given annually to an environmentalist from each continent, and the $150,000 check that goes with it. Past winners have sought justice for victims of environmental disasters at Love Canal and Bhopal, India, resisted oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and tried to prevent the U.S. military from incinerating chemical weapons.

Film, TV in California

The 50-year-old Kelley came to environmentalism late and without any training in community organizing. He left Port Arthur for the U.S. Navy in 1979 and later settled in Oakland, Calif., where he worked as a stuntman and extra on movies and television shows filmed in the San Francisco Bay area, including CBS’ Nash Bridges

During a visit for Mardi Gras in 2000, Kelley saw his once-vibrant hometown in a relentless decline – its storefronts shuttered, its fields filled with rusty debris, its residents sick and its children with nothing to do. He returned to life in California, but not for long.

“I didn’t see anyone doing anything about it,” he said. “And then one day I looked in the mirror and said, ‘I’m from Port Arthur. What am I doing about it?’”

Kelley recognized that the town could not pull itself back up without addressing the environmental problems first, but he knew change would not come easily in a community dependent on refineries and chemical plants for jobs. One of his early protests outside City Hall attracted only two people, and one was his brother.

Paid for air samples

Port Arthur, near the Louisiana border, was built on oil wealth. The city’s west side, which is largely African-American, is home to eight major industrial plants, including the Motiva and Valero oil refineries.

Without the support of many, including the mayor at the time, Kelley took a different tack, collecting air samples during “upset events,” unpermitted releases caused by lightning strikes, human error, startups and shutdowns. He used the results, at a cost of $500 per sample, to prod regulators and the plants to take action.

Among his victories was a deal with an expanding refinery that included new pollution controls and a $3.5 million fund to support small businesses and provide health coverage for residents of Port Arthur’s west side. He also managed to stop the shipment of highly toxic PCBs from Mexico for disposal at a nearby incinerator.

And his efforts have made Port Arthur visible again. Last year, the Environmental Protection Agency put it on a list of 10 cities nationwide that would receive attention and funding over two years to address disproportionate environmental burdens.

“I have a lot of respect for Hilton,” said Al Armendariz, the EPA’s chief for Texas and four adjacent states. “I really admire his work. He cares a lot about his community and he pushes our agency to do all we can to serve them. He is successful because he doesn’t give up and because his goals are to help others.”

Jobs come first

So far, the discussions, which involve Kelley and representatives from the city, EPA and industry, have touched on the relocation of Carver Terrace, additional emissions reductions and an improved alarm network for upset events.

Kelley said his goal is not to close the refineries and chemical plants but to make them cleaner, so that Port Arthur may be able to regain a bit of its past self.

“We understand that Port Arthur may never be what it was, but it can be better than it is,” he said recently while standing among a row of abandoned storefronts on Procter Street, once a main commercial strip in the city’s downtown.

At the same time, his focus on rebuilding the city has put him at odds with other environmentalists. Kelley, for example, does not oppose the proposed Keystone XL pipeline, which would bring heavy crude from Canada’s oil sands to the Port Arthur area for refining, because the city has 17 percent unemployment.

“That pipeline will bring thousands of jobs,” he said. “Our fight starts when we smell the sulfur. I’m hopeful that by the time the pipeline is done, the proper emissions controls will be in place.”

Matthew Tejada, director of the environmental group Air Alliance Houston, said Kelley’s position made him rethink how he does his job. It’s easy for activists “in the treetops,” like himself, to lose sight of the nuances at the grass-roots level, Tejada said.

“He is one of the best environmental activists in the country because he takes his marching orders from the community,” Tejada said. “It’s not born out of idealism. It’s about seeing the state of a community he loves and grew up in and doing something about it.”

SOURCE ARTICLE

RELATED ARTICLE:

THE WASHINGTON POST: Goldman Environmental Prize goes to Texas man who took on refineries over pollution

Carson residents frustrated at Shell Oil over toxic soil

6:48 a.m. | Molly Peterson | KPCC MP3 Download

Carson’s Carousel residents frustrated at Regional Water Board, Shell Oil over toxic soil

Molly Peterson/KPCC: Residents of Carson’s Carousel neighborhood voiced anger and frustration at a public meeting Thursday, where water regulators said they’re readying a cleanup order for soil contamination under their houses.

Officials at the regional water quality control board say they’re almost ready with a cleanup order for the Carousel neighborhood of Carson. Some residents of the Carousel neighborhood are greeting those plans with anger and criticism.

Environmental testing has revealed toxic soil contamination under hundreds of homes on land where Shell Oil once ran a tank farm.

Soil tests for hydrocarbon show elevated cancer risk for hundreds of homes. Scientific sampling found benzene above levels the state deems safe in about 15 percent of homes tested.

The regional water quality control board’s executive officer, Sam Unger, says that’s why his agency will order Shell Oil to clean up property the company operated in the 1920s, ’30s and ’40s. Unger says the regional board is opening up more public comment on cleanup plans because nearly 300 homes sit on the site of a former crude oil reservoir. “The public will see the plans at the same time that we see them. We will wait for their comments and consider their comments before we finalize approval of those plans.”

Shell is helping test and investigate the site, but regional regulators will set goals for cleaning up property to levels safe for residences. Shell has not yet said whether it will cooperate in cleanup.

Some homeowners waved signs and shouted at Unger and other water regulators at Thursday’s public meeting. Businessman and former mayor of Carson Mike Mitoma says delays in cleaning up soil contamination are driving property values down – trapping residents in their properties. “A lot of the people are retired. They’re in their golden years, their twilight years, and the thought of waiting 10 years to move – they’re not going to be able to do that. And even after they clean it up, my fear is that the values will not be there.”

Mitoma is among hundreds of Carson residents suing Shell Oil over the contamination. Unger told Thursday’s crowd that once state officials set cleanup goals, removing cancer-causing chemicals could take between two and 10 years.

SOURCE ARTICLE

Rocky Mountain Arsenal ready for its post-Superfund life

Shell… arrived in 1952 and for three decades produced chemical pesticides, such as dieldrin, that Shell sold worldwide for agriculture.


After 23 years and $2.1 billion, the Rocky Mountain Arsenal is ready to be removed from the nation’s Superfund list of environmental disasters.

Environmental Protection Agency officials are transferring a final 2,500 acres at the 27-square-mile site to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. This clears the way for the arsenal’s new incarnation as a national wildlife refuge.

U.S. taxpayers paid for the bulk of the cleanup — done by the Army and Shell Oil under a legal settlement.

For half a century, the arsenal at Denver’s northeast edge loomed as a secretive complex of more than 250 buildings with signs around it warning “Use of Deadly Force Authorized.” There, the Army made chemical weapons and later, Shell made pesticides.

Residential and commercial development gradually encroached on the site. Today, 47 bison roam, raptors circle and badgers burrow on recovering short-grass prairie 10 miles from downtown Denver.”We’ve transformed a very highly contaminated site into a beautiful prairie landscape,” said Carol Campbell, the EPA’s assistant regional administrator handling Superfund cleanups and other officials. “Because it is something that people now can go to and enjoy, it is different from other Superfund cleanup sites.”

The Army still will be responsible for 725 acres of fenced-off land where toxic materials were consolidated and buried. Devices called lysimeters, about 6 feet beneath the clay and dirt, are supposed to verify that surface water isn’t reaching the waste.

In addition, monitoring of the already-contaminated groundwater at the arsenal must continue to ensure that lethal chemicals don’t spread farther toward the South Platte River.

“We feel that those remedies are protective of human health and the environment,” EPA project spokeswoman Jennifer Chergo said.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is charged with running the wildlife refuge, with a $7.4 million visitor center under construction.

Nearly 25,000 people a year visit the site. With marketing and eventually a new entrance north of Interstate 70, off Quebec Street, federal officials say they expect visitation to at least quadruple.

Plans call for carrying visitors around the refuge’s lakes and ponds in open-air buses. About 8 miles of walking trails have been cut.

Wildlife already is thriving, including dozens of coyotes, about 30 bald eagles, hundreds of deer, hefty large-mouth bass and waterfowl such as egrets and herons.

Much of the refuge eventually will be devoted to bison with a herd of up to 250, fenced off from people, refuge manager Steve Berendzen said.

Friday, Army and Shell officials inspected the cleanup and met with Xcel officials about burying power lines.

“Shell is real proud of the end result,” Shell’s site manager, Roger Shakely, said. “We’ve met the budget, and we are one year ahead of schedule.”

Army leaders see this as a model for cleanups, the Army’s arsenal program manager, Charlie Scharmann, said. “So many good things came out of this project.”

Once, homesteading farmers and ranchers lived here. In 1942, the Army established the arsenal to make mustard gas and blister agent to deter Japan and Germany. Then, during the Cold War, factory workers in body suits and gas masks produced thousands of tons of napalm and sarin nerve gas, which was stuffed into bomblets that were placed in Honest John rocket warheads.

Army leaders later leased the site to private companies, including Shell, which arrived in 1952 and for three decades produced chemical pesticides, such as dieldrin, that Shell sold worldwide for agriculture.The liquid waste was dumped in evaporation ponds. Solid waste was dumped into trenches. More than 600 lethal chemicals spread through the soil into groundwater.

Ernie Maurer, 88, whose Swiss immigrant family lived on a farm here, recalled how Army officials “gave us 30 days notice” to leave. The Army told them that “because Germany was making that mustard gas, we needed to do it here,” he said.

“We were disappointed. The thing we didn’t like about it was that they treated us like foreigners, you know?”

Now Maurer works as a volunteer tour guide at the refuge, delighted that the cleanup finally appears to be done.

“I like it to be the way it was,” he said. “Denver’s growing too big for me. I like the prairie out here.”

Bruce Finley: 303-954-1700 or bfinley@denverpost.com

DENVER POST ARTICLE

RELATED ARTICLES:

Brazil Court Fines Shell, Basf for Making Workers Sick

The plant was built in 1977 by Shell… Dozens of former employees of the plant have been diagnosed with prostate, thyroid and other types of cancer, circulatory, liver and intestinal illnesses, as well as infertility and sexual impotence, the statement added.

Shell Pesticide Revelations:

Shell knew early on what a potential long term and persistent environmental and health menace these pesticides were. Yet they kept producing them and moving production to new locations even as one country after another banned their use. This is a very ugly story of corporate greed and utter contempt for the welfare of their employees and the consuming public in general.


Alleged buried Shell nuclear reactor at Earley, Reading

EMAIL TO MR RAY FOX FROM JOHN DONOVAN

Re: RAY FOX NUCLEAR NIGHTMARE

Hello Ray

Thank you for your email.

I note with interest your news about the imminent return of Professor Dr Chris Busby to the land adjoining the former Shell Terminal at Earley, Reading, to carry out tests using new equipment. Please be advised that I received last night, a confidential Shell internal document dated 21 January 2010 containing the clearest denial yet by Shell on “the alleged nuclear reactor at Earley“.

It says…

“We have given a categorical written assurance that Shell has never been involved in “atomic” or “nuclear” research at Earley or elsewhere in the UK, and that no nuclear bunker is buried under the former Shell terminal. According to the European Commission, the data show radioactivity levels substantially below those considered harmful to human health. Any radioactivity found on the site has nothing to do with Shell’s activities.”

Please feel free to pass this information to Professor Dr Busby as it is at variance with the report he prepared in July 2009.

So who should the residents of the housing estate built on the former Shell terminal believe? Shell, which has an international track record of deadly pollution, or Professor Busby BSc, PhD, C.Chem, MRSC, the renowned scientist, who is one of the worlds leading experts on radioactive contamination?

We have to bear in mind the evidence that Shell was unsuccessful in at least the initial and second attempts at decontamination of toxic chemicals at the site, otherwise there would not have been a third attempt.

Buenos Aires Citizens Seek Cleanup of Shell Refinery

The complaint calls for immediate action by the company to redress the social and environmental harms caused to the community and to the local environment by the refinery at the Polo Petroquímico Dock Sud during decades of abuse and irresponsible corporate behavior.

Click to continue reading “Buenos Aires Citizens Seek Cleanup of Shell Refinery”