Royal Dutch Shell Plc  .com Rotating Header Image

Financial Times: EBRD set to reject $300m loan for Sakhalin

By Arkady Ostrovsky in Moscow
Published: January 1 2007 18:13 | Last updated: January 1 2007 18:13

The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development is unlikely to approve a loan for the giant Sakhalin 2 oil and gas project in Russia’s Far East, following its effective re-nationalisation by the Kremlin, according to officials.

The recent emergence of Gazprom, the Russian state-controlled gas company, as the majority owner of the project “made it more difficult” for the EBRD to approve a $300m loan to the $20bn project, the London-based multi-lateral bank said on Monday.

No formal decision on whether to proceed with a loan has been made yet. With almost 80 per cent of the project completed the EBRD loan would anyway mainly have been of symbolic value.

But formally walking away from the largest energy project in Russia, would be considered a snub to the Kremlin and it’s policy of taking control over private sector assets.

Anthony Williams, an EBRD spokesman, said Gazprom’s entry into the project in December made the bank’s participation harder and “may make it less needed”.

The EBRD’s brief is to back projects which contribute to the transition towards a free market.

The bank also aims to provide financing where no other commercial source is immediately available. Recent developments in Sakhalin 2 appear to contradict both these rules. Gazprom secured control of the project after months of pressure from the Kremlin on the foreign shareholders who finally agreed to halve their stakes in return for $7.45bn.

Gazprom said that since the EBRD had never lent money to the project, the bank’s decision would have little material impact.

The EBRD had been considering a syndicated loan for the Sakhalin 2 project for several years, using it as leverage over shareholders, including Royal Dutch Shell, Mitsui and Mitsubishi of Japan to make them comply with environmental rules.

Non-involvement by the EBRD would be a blow to environmentalists in Russia who relied on the bank to apply pressure to limit damage to the surrounding environment.

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2007

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, and shellnews.net, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Comment Rules

  • Please show respect to the opinions of others no matter how seemingly far-fetched.
  • Abusive, foul language, and/or divisive comments may be deleted without notice.
  • Each blog member is allowed limited comments, as displayed above the comment box.
  • Comments must be limited to the number of words displayed above the comment box.
  • Please limit one comment after any comment posted per post.