Royal Dutch Shell Plc  .com Rotating Header Image

Kommersant: Gazprom Puts a Cork in Sakhalin-1: The government doesn’t want to export its gas

June 20, 2007

Having concluded the deal for Sakhalin-2, Gazprom has turned its steely attention to another major project in the region, Sakhalin-1.

Deputy chairman of the Gazprom supervisory board Alexander Ananenkov announced yesterday that all the natural gas from Sakhalin-1 must be rerouted from China, as the projects shareholder planned, to the domestic market. The Ministry of Industry and Energy supports the idea. Industry analysts say, however, that export attracts Rosneft more than Sakahlin-1 shareholders.

Ananenkov, speaking yesterday at a session of the presidium of the commission on the economic development of the Russian Far East and Transbaikal, stated that “Consumption of gas in just the four Far Eastern regions of the country exceeded 15 billion cu. m. per year. We consider it necessary for the gas from Sakahlin-1 to be sold by Gazprom so we can gasify those regions, and the gas not go for export.” Ananenkov noted that production will begin at Sakhalin-3 no earlier than 2014, and there will be no other raw material to guarantee the regions’ supply until then. The Industry and Energy Ministry support’s Gazprom’s initiative. “Without that gas, the region’s [energy] balance will not work out,” Deputy Minister Andrey Dementyev claimed. He emphasized that the gas could be delivered “wherever” on the domestic market, while “there exists a single window for export.” He was referring to Gazprom’s monopoly right to export natural gas.

The Sakhalin-1 project is being implemented on a product-sharing basis. Its shareholders are the U.S. ExxonMobil (30%), Japanese SODECO (30%), Indian ONGC (20%) and Rosneft (20%). According to Industry and Energy Ministry data, total category C reserves at Sakahlin-1 amount to 329 billion cu. m. The project is to produce 11.4 billion cu. m. per year.

ExxonMobil began providing gas on the domestic market for Khabarovskenergo and Khabarovskkraigaz at the end of 2005. They are to receive 3 billion cu. m. of gas in 2009. The remainder, more than 8 billion cu. m., the operator planned to sell to China. At the end of last year, ExxonMobil concluded a preliminary agreement on gas supplies with China and the deal was to be finalized by the end of this year.

Gazprom objected to the distribution of the gas in that manner more than once and expressed the intention of buying all of the gas at the well. The possibility of liquefying the gas from Sakhalin-2 has also been considered. “But gas can be sold to the plant and be sent for processing,” a source connected with Sakhalin-1 noted.

Analysts doubt that the gasification of the Far East is the real reason for Gazprom’s resistance to the export of Sakhalin-1 gas. Under the gasification program for the region approved by the government on June 15 (with final approval expected in autumn), 9-12 billion cu. m. of gas will be consumed there. The possibility of China’s buying Sakhalin-1 gas interferes with Gazprom negotiations over gas supplies to that country. At the 11th Economic Forum in St. Petersburg, Gazprom department head Stanislav Tsygankov stated that the Chinese CNPC was trying to negotiate a purchase price based on the price for Sakhalin-1 gas. “in this case, it’s not just a matter of the gasification of the region,” Troika Dialog analyst Valery Nesterov said. “The shareholders in the project are being pressured. But there are not just foreigners among them, as it was in Sakahlin-2. There is also Rosneft, for which export deliveries are preferable.”

Rosneft spokesmen declined to discuss the Gazprom announcement. At ExxonMobil, they stated that negotiations are continuing with the Chinese and a discussion is underway with Gazprom “on the possibility of cooperating on deliveries to China.” They stated at ExxonMobil that all options for the sale of gas are being considered with the goal of maintaining the profitability of the project. Long-term plans for Sakahlin-1 will be subject to negotiation, experts suggest. “The energy balance is not a law,” said Nesterov. “It cannot be implemented by force.” He added that product sharing projects are not subject to the law on a single export channel. BrokerCreditService analyst Maxim Shein suggested that conditions for liquefying Sakhalin-2 gas would be the topic of negotiations in the end.

Denis Rebrov

http://www.kommersant.com/p775927/r_529/product_sharing_gas_exports/

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, and shellnews.net, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Comment Rules

  • Please show respect to the opinions of others no matter how seemingly far-fetched.
  • Abusive, foul language, and/or divisive comments may be deleted without notice.
  • Each blog member is allowed limited comments, as displayed above the comment box.
  • Comments must be limited to the number of words displayed above the comment box.
  • Please limit one comment after any comment posted per post.