Royal Dutch Shell Plc  .com Rotating Header Image

The Observer: Storm brews over the content of ethical funds

There are plenty of climate change and eco options, but few are really green, writes Huma Qureshi

Sunday February 17 2008

Ethical and climate change funds that claim to be socially responsible are failing to invest in companies which support the environment, a new study claims.

The report by independent financial adviser Holden & Partners reveals most ethical funds are ‘surprisingly mainstream’ in their overall portfolios, with very little investment in committed environmental companies.

‘Some funds that are branded as ethical do not look any different to non-ethical funds when it comes to the companies they are investing in,’ says Mark Hoskin, partner at Holden & Partners, which specialises in offering ethical and environmental financial advice.

‘A socially responsible investor will choose a fund precisely because it is branded “ethical”. They won’t necessarily look at the underlying investments because they trust they will be ethical. But some investors would be surprised to see what their holdings really are.’

Socially responsible investment (SRI) funds use a form of ethical screening to select which stocks and sectors they will invest in, using a mixture of negative and positive criteria. Each fund has its own interpretation of these positive and negative factors- one may categorically choose not to invest in a company that has any involvement in animal testing, while another might invest in companies that carry out legally required animal testing only for the production of life-saving medicines rather than, say, cosmetics.

However, the study reveals that several ethically branded funds hold stocks in oil giants such as Premier Oil, Shell, Neste Oil and BP. ‘This throws up questions about the screening process used by some companies,’ says Hoskin. ‘Can it be an ethical fund if some of its biggest holdings are in oil?’

Credit Suisse Fellowship Fund’s top 10 holdings include HSBC, GlaxosmithKline, Vodafone, Schroders and Associated British Foods. It holds just 2.5 per cent of its money in environmental companies. Likewise, Legal & General’s £126.7m ethical fund has just 0.747 per cent of this invested in environmental stocks. Its top 10 holdings include Barclays, Tesco and Lloyds TSB.

‘None of these top 10 companies stands out as particularly ethical,’ says Hoskin. ‘An investor might expect a more ethical weighting.’

A spokesperson from Legal & General says: ‘Our ethical fund is an index- based fund based on the whole economy and isn’t pretending to only operate in a particular fashion and only choose to invest in, say, wind farms. We are not making any judgment on what is ethical and what isn’t – we filter companies based on what market research tells us consumers consider to be ethical.

‘On that basis, it is perfectly accurate to call it an “ethical” fund, because we invest in companies that contribute to the entire economy and operate under ethical practices based on what consumers tell us they believe to be ethical.’

Environmental approaches

Those that do have bigger environmental holdings include Henderson Industries of the Future fund, 51.1 per cent of which is invested in environmental solution providers such as solar power company Solarworld.

Jupiter’s £291.25m ecology fund invests 50 per cent of its holdings in companies such as Bioteq Environmental Technologies, which builds water treatment plants, and Augean, a specialist waste and resource management group.

Jupiter, F&C and Norwich Union all have dedicated ethical research teams which actively analyse and decide upon the companies in which they can and cannot invest. Standard Life regularly petitions its investors to find out which environmental issues they are most concerned about, adjusting the holdings in its ethical funds to reflect this. Last week, the company announced its SRI funds would no longer be investing in airlines, after a third of its investors called for the company to drop holdings in this sector. More than half of its investors said they saw climate change as one of their top three concerns.

Climate change

Climate change funds, which invest in environmental companies, are a big growth area according to many fund managers. James Vaccaro, investment director at Triodos Renewables, a purely environmental retail fund, says: ‘Companies are under pressure to develop alternative sustainable energy sources for the future, and investors should benefit from this demand.’

In the past three months, at least six climate change funds have been rolled out by investment companies, including Allianz, F&C, HSBC, Jupiter and Schroders. Strictly speaking, these funds do not necessarily fall into the same definition as an ‘ethical’ fund as they generally do not follow the same strict screening process. Instead, they will typically invest in any company working on climate-related projects or solutions.

‘We see climate change primarily as an area of importance as an investment theme rather than purely in ethical terms,’ says Farley Thomas, who runs HSBC’s climate change fund, which launched last November.

‘We have been very careful not to specifically brand our fund “ethical” – it’s just an amazing coincidence that something which is a great investment also happens to be ethical. We see it more as a mainstream global investment area.’

HSBC’s biggest holdings are in energy provider Eon, Vestas Wind Systems and international industrial services group Suez. The fund will only invest in companies that generate at least 10 per cent of their revenues from climate change activities, but Thomas says he would not exclude investment in sectors such as nuclear power within the climate change fund.

‘The reality is that the world needs alternative energy and the best way to support that is to invest in companies based on their overall sustainability and ethical behaviour, regardless of their sector,’ he adds. ‘Alternative energy, like windpower, is not yet mass-produced, but nuclear energy is a proven large-scale energy source. Ultimately, whether we invest in a nuclear power company or not depends on its performance.’

Virgin Money launched its climate change fund in January. It says it will ‘invest in all industry sectors, but only in companies with lighter-than-average environmental footprints for their sector.’ Ten per cent of the fund is instead in ‘solution providers specialising in offering solutions to environmental problems’, with the rest invested in the European market.

Holden & Partners, however, believes Virgin Money’s climate change fund does not display a big enough commitment to the sector to be given the name that it has. ‘It’s just a European equities fund with only 10 per cent invested in what it calls solution providers,’ says Hoskin. He says the name will attract ethical investors who may be disappointed when they find out where their money is ending up.

‘There are some genuinely focused climate change funds around, such as HSBC and the Impax environmental markets investment fund, which state that they will only invest in companies with revenue generated specifically from good environmental practices,’ says Hoskin. ‘But Virgin Money’s fund doesn’t have this sort of criteria. Climate change funds are new and there is a lot of interest in them, but a lot of companies are fudging things a bit. It’s a great marketing push to call something “climate change” at the moment, and we think Virgin Money has done this.’

Virgin Money says: ‘Our climate change fund invests in companies across all sectors, but only those that do a better job than their peer group in minimising their environmental footprint. The effect of this type of investing will be to see the stocks of lighter-footprint companies outperforming those of heavier-footprint companies.

‘In our view, nothing can bring greater pressure to bear on company management teams to lighten their footprints than seeing their competitors’ share prices outperform theirs. We think this benefits both investors and the environment in a more tangible way than the traditional approach, which in our view is just one small part of the answer.’

Choosing an ethical fund

Alex Davies, head of SRI at broker Hargreaves Lansdown, says he recommends three ethical funds to investors: the Aegon Ethical Equity fund (UK all companies), the ‘best UK ethical fund on the market’ at the moment; the F&C stewardship income fund; and the Jupiter global growth ecology fund. ‘These funds are all performing remarkably well – there’s a perception that you have to sacrifice performance when you choose an ethical investment, but you do not have to,’ he says. ‘Each of these funds scores very well against the wider sectors.’

Broker Hargreaves Lansdown has an online ethical investment fund comparison tool which includes a ‘filter’ to enable investors to choose the ethical criteria important to them. The comparison tool, along with a guide to SRI, is available at h-l.co.uk/ethical-investment.

This article appeared in the Observer on Sunday February 17 2008 on p17 of the Cash section.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2008/feb/17/ethicalmoney.investmentfunds

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, and shellnews.net, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Comment Rules

  • Please show respect to the opinions of others no matter how seemingly far-fetched.
  • Abusive, foul language, and/or divisive comments may be deleted without notice.
  • Each blog member is allowed limited comments, as displayed above the comment box.
  • Comments must be limited to the number of words displayed above the comment box.
  • Please limit one comment after any comment posted per post.