Royal Dutch Shell Plc  .com Rotating Header Image

SHELL INSIDER COMMENTS ON THE LEAKED EMAIL FROM JEROEN VAN DER VEER

(THIS SHELL INSIDER WAS NOT THE SOURCE OF THE LEAK)

John

Some of the more scrupulous people in Shell (who incidentally are also recipients of the largesse) are questioning why the rules made three years ago for a bonus relating to 2005 have been changed retroactively to turn a 0% bonus award for 2005 into a 65% award. According to all the internal criteria, 0% was the correct figure. Those behind the changes to the rules are also allegedly recipients of the award.

I don’t seem to remember any reserves related bonuses being repaid when the reserves were restated, so why are the rules for the 2005 bonus payments being rewritten now?

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, and shellnews.net, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Comment Rules

  • Please show respect to the opinions of others no matter how seemingly far-fetched.
  • Abusive, foul language, and/or divisive comments may be deleted without notice.
  • Each blog member is allowed limited comments, as displayed above the comment box.
  • Comments must be limited to the number of words displayed above the comment box.
  • Please limit one comment after any comment posted per post.