Royal Dutch Shell Plc  .com Rotating Header Image

Closed-door Arctic deal denounced as ‘carve-up’

Closed-door Arctic deal denounced as ‘carve-up’

Wilkins ice shelf breaks apart in Antarctic

Environmentalists say the meeting paves the way for a land grab by countries. Photograph: Jim Elliott/British Antarctic Survey/AP

Environmentalists today denounced as a territorial “carve-up” a deal signed by five Arctic nations seeking to resolve competing claims for control of the polar region.

The agreement was signed in Greenland by ministers from Russia, the US, Norway, Denmark and Canada, and sought to cool down an increasingly heated scramble for the Arctic driven by the prospect of oil and gas reserves made newly accessible by the melting of the polar ice cap.

Last year, Russia sent a submarine under the icecap to plant a national flag on the seabed to underline its territorial claims. Denmark has planted a flag on Hans island, a territory which Canada also has claims on; it has announced plans to set up a military training base and a deep sea port in the disputed region.

Today’s declaration said that all five nations would abide by the 1982 Law of the Sea, which determines territorial claims according to coastlines and undersea continental shelves.

Thomas Winkler, head of the international law department in the Danish foreign ministry, told the Guardian: “The main point is that the five coastal states have sent a very clear political signal to everybody that we will manage the Arctic responsibly, that we have the international rules necessary and we will all abide by those rules.”

But environmentalists said the closed-door meeting paved the way for a land grab by countries who have claims to the continental shelf at the pole.

Iceland, Finland and Sweden, who are part of the Arctic Council group of nations, but who do not have similar territorial claims were excluded, as were environmental groups and the native Inuit.

“It’s clear what’s going on. They are going to use the law of the sea to carve up the raw materials, but they are ignoring the law of common sense. These are the same fossil fuels that are driving climate change in the first place,” Mike Townsley, a Greenpeace International spokesman said.

“The closed door nature of this is doubly troubling. It’s clear they know what they’re trying to do is unacceptable.”

Environmentalists would like to see the Arctic protected by the same sort of treaty that applies to the Antarctic, which prevents drilling or military activity.

However, the Norwegian foreign minister, Jonas Gahr Stoere, argued that further international regulatory agreements were unnecessary.

“Those that say there is a legal vacuum in the Arctic are wrong because the UN law of the sea convention prevails in the Arctic as it does in other oceans,” he said.

The law of the sea is unlikely to resolve all the territorial disputes in play as the Arctic melts. Both Denmark and Russia claim the Lomonsov ridge running under the North Pole is part of their territory. The Danes are seeking to prove it is a geological extension of Greenland, a self-governing Danish territory.

Critics of the meeting also questioned the inclusion of the US, which has not ratified the law of the sea.

Rob Huebert, the associate director of the Centre for Military and Strategic Studies in Calgary, argued: “The move by the Danes to invite the Americans to the meeting about the northern continental shelf raises the possibility that the Americans may gain the benefits of the convention without having to shoulder any of the responsibilities. Although this may not be the Danes’ intent, one needs to ask why they want to hold a meeting to discuss the Arctic continental shelf with a country that refuses to become a party to the treaty,” Huebert wrote.

Representing the US, the deputy secretary of state, John Negroponte, said he believed it was in his country’s interests for Congress to ratify the treaty, “not least because of the impact it would have on our Arctic policy, where it’s very important. I’m not certain we have enough time before the end of the year to get it ratified, but we will work as hard as we can.”

Today’s declaration also included an agreement to cooperate in the event of marine accidents, caused by an expected increase in shipping through the sealanes opened up by the melting icecap, and a rise in the number of icebergs breaking off from the Pole.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/may/28/fossilfuels.arctic

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, and shellnews.net, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Comment Rules

  • Please show respect to the opinions of others no matter how seemingly far-fetched.
  • Abusive, foul language, and/or divisive comments may be deleted without notice.
  • Each blog member is allowed limited comments, as displayed above the comment box.
  • Comments must be limited to the number of words displayed above the comment box.
  • Please limit one comment after any comment posted per post.