Royal Dutch Shell Plc  .com Rotating Header Image

Shell disagrees with Amnesty International on Bodo oil spill

Shell disagrees with Amnesty International on Bodo oil spill

By Emeka Ugwuanyi

1 May 2012

Shell Petroleum Development Company Limited (SPDC) has condemned the report by Amnesty International on discrepancy in figures on oil spills in Bodo community of the Niger Delta region by Shell.

The Director of Global Issues at Amnesty International, Audrey Gaughran and the Co-ordinator, Centre for Environment, Human Rights and Development (CEHRD), Patrick Naagbanton, in the report, said new evidence obtained by Amnesty International and CEHRD about the 2008 Bodo oil spill, showed that more than half of the oil spilt in the Niger Delta in 2008, was due to operational failures – and possibly as much as 80 per cent, and not as a result of sabotage.

The report entitled: ‘Shell’s wildly inaccurate reporting of Niger Delta oil spill exposed,’ noted that the spill in 2008 was caused by a fault in a Shell pipeline, which resulted in tens of thousands of barrels of oil polluting the land and creek surrounding Bodo.

Shell in a statement issued by the Corporate Media Relations Manager, Tony Okonedo, said: “We do not agree with Amnesty International’s assessment of the spill investigation process. We have recently had the investigation process, which is common to all operators in the Niger Delta, independently verified by Bureau Veritas – a global leader in conformity assessment and certification services. All oil spill incidents are investigated jointly by communities, regulators, operators and security agencies.

“The team visits the site of the incident, determines the cause, and volume of spilled oil and impact on the environment, and signs off the findings in a report. This is an independent process – communities and regulators are all involved.”

Shell said under Nigerian regulations, oil spill incidents are investigated by a joint team of operators, communities, security agencies and regulators. A similar team investigated the spills in Bodo, and we stand by their findings. The spill volume was ascertained on the ground by experts at the time and agreed by all parties, who signed-off on the joint investigation report. As has been stated previously, SPDC admitted liability for two spills of about 4,000 barrels in Bodo caused by operational failures, as soon as their cause had been verified in late 2008 and early 2009.

Shell noted that it is deeply regrettable, that both before, and since those two operational spills occurred, much more oil has been spilt as a result of illegal activity – sabotage, illegal refining and theft, which blights the delta generally.

“Our clean-up teams were able to deal with the initial operational spills, but subsequently they have been prevented by local communities from reaching sites that were re-impacted by this illegal activity to begin clean-up and remediation work. This could be because those communities hold a misguided belief that more spilt oil, irrespective of the cause, equals more compensation,” the statement added.

Okonedo said SPDC provided relief materials to the Bodo community, as promised, adding that while still discussing issues around the spills, including the amount of compensation, with representatives of the Bodo community, SPDC received several letters of claim from different lawyers, each claiming to be acting for the Bodo community. The challenge for SPDC was to try to identify which of these lawyers to deal with. This severely slowed the process and was further worsened with the introduction into the matter of a longstanding dispute between Bodo Council of Traditional Rulers and the paramount ruler and his faction of the Council of Chiefs. There was and still is pending litigation between these two groups. It was while discussions were still on-going to resolve these challenges so that negotiation of compensation could proceed that the letter of claim written by Leigh Day on behalf of the Bodo community was served on Royal Dutch Shell in April 2011. The matter remains unresolved therefore.

“SPDC is committed to cleaning up all oil spilt from our facilities, no matter what the cause, where we have access and staff and contractors can work safely in a secure environment. In Bodo, we were unable to proceed with clean-up as quickly as planned because of lack of access. Amnesty International knows that we were denied access – indeed one contractor was kidnapped during the process.”

 SOURCE and its sister websites,,,,, and are all owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia article.

0 Comments on “Shell disagrees with Amnesty International on Bodo oil spill”

Leave a Comment

%d bloggers like this: