Royal Dutch Shell Plc  .com Rotating Header Image

Shell Canada: Carmon Creek oilsands project faces two-year delay

Screen Shot 2015-05-09 at 08.42.49

Screen Shot 2015-05-09 at 08.41.41

Screen Shot 2015-01-06 at 21.26.38DAN HEALING, CALGARY HERALDPublished on: May 8, 2015

Screen Shot 2015-05-09 at 08.48.02
Royal Dutch Shell says first oil production from its 80,000-barrel-per-day Carmon Creek thermal oilsands project northeast of Peace River in northern Alberta will be delayed for two years until 2019.

The project was sanctioned by the company in October 2013 and estimated by analysts at the time to cost about $3 billion to build. Its delay was confirmed in a first-quarter update by chief financial officer Simon Henry on April 30, as he described how Shell would reduce capital spending by $2 billion in 2015 to $33 billion US or less.

“This is a dynamic picture, and has included a series of pragmatic decisions on new opportunities,” he said in a transcript posted on Shell’s website.

“For example … we have continued to reduce spending in resource plays — by around 20 per cent this year — and we have re-phased the development pace at Carmon Creek Phases 1 and 2, to optimize design and re-tender some parts of the project,” he said.

The project is to use steam injected through vertical wells to heat the formation and drive the heated oil toward the surrounding producer wells.

“Carmon Creek remains a priority for Shell and we’re continuing to advance the project,” Shell Canada spokesman Cameron Yost said in an e-mail Friday.

“We are still early enough in the schedule to make adjustments to ensure the long-term competitiveness of a project that will ultimately have a lifespan of more than 30 years.”

He said the delay is not driven by current low oil prices.

“We know prices will fluctuate during that time. The current market downturn does however, create an opportunity to find some cost reductions on the Carmon Creek project,” said Yost.

Shell has operated in the Peace River area since the 1950s.

It submitted its regulatory application for Carmon Creek in 2010 and received approval in April 2013.

The project was to include a 630-megawatt cogeneration power plant which would sell about 500 MW into the provincial power grid.

In February, Shell withdrew its application for approval of its Pierre River oilsands mine proposed in 2007.

“The Pierre River mine remains a very long-term opportunity for us but it’s not currently a priority,” said Lorraine Mitchelmore, president of Calgary-based Shell Canada, at the time.

[email protected]

Twitter.com/HealingSlowly

SOURCE

RELATED

JEFF LEWIS: CALGARY — The Globe and Mail: Published Friday, May. 08 2015

Shell pushes back Carmon Creek oil sands project to 2019

Royal Dutch Shell PLC has postponed the startup of a major oil sands project while it works to wring cost savings from suppliers, amplifying pressures faced by the sector after crude prices sank to multiyear lows.

Shell is tweaking the design of its steam-driven Carmon Creek project near Peace River, Alta., and has re-tendered some contracts as it seeks to lower the price tag for the development’s initial two phases.

The work means oil won’t start flowing until 2019, about two years later than initially planned, company officials say. The delay comes after Shell deferred investment in future phases of the development as part of a company-wide effort to chop $15-billion (U.S.) from its budget over three years.

A spokesman said the project remains a priority for Shell. “We are still early enough in the schedule to make adjustments to ensure the long-term competitiveness of a project that will ultimately have a lifespan of more than 30 years,” Cameron Yost said in an email.

“This revision should result in an improved cost structure and will likely push the full rampup of the project out by a couple of years.”

The move reflects a cost purge under way in northern Alberta, as major energy companies scramble to claw back expenses to cope with oil prices that remain subdued at around $60 a barrel.

Some of the sector’s largest companies have pointed to a cooling regional market for construction and labour as a big upside of the sharp drop in energy prices, which has hobbled industry growth plans and led to major budget revisions and layoffs that number in the thousands.

Imperial Oil Ltd., Suncor Energy Inc. and Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. are among those pressing suppliers for price breaks – in some cases targeting hundreds of millions of dollars in savings – on equipment and other inputs to offset sharply lower profits as a result of skidding oil prices.

Those efforts have enabled larger and more well-financed companies to press ahead with major expansions in hopes they will pay off over time, even as smaller players dial back spending or cancel projects outright.

However, analysts have said newer oil sands projects are especially vulnerable to deferral and cancellation because of high upfront costs and long payback periods.

Shell announced plans to move forward with Carmon Creek in October, 2013. It has not disclosed a capital cost, but similar developments have clocked up billions’ worth of expenditures in recent years. The project’s first two phases are designed to pump 80,000 barrels a day.

The decision to push back initial production marks another pause for Shell in northern Alberta as it focuses on improving performance at its existing assets.

In February, the global oil giant scrapped plans for its Pierre River oil sands mine, effectively killing a 200,000-barrel-a-day project that had been dormant for years.

“Our current focus is on making our heavy-oil business as economically and environmentally competitive as possible,” Lorraine Mitchelmore, president of Shell’s Canadian unit, said at the time.

The company in January also cut some 200 jobs from its Albian Sands bitumen project, a joint venture with Chevron Corp. and Marathon Oil Corp.

West Texas intermediate oil edged up 0.8 per cent on Friday to $59.39 a barrel, up from as low as $43 in March, but well under levels that fuelled massive industry growth plans of recent years.

SOURCE

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, and shellnews.net, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Comment Rules

  • Please show respect to the opinions of others no matter how seemingly far-fetched.
  • Abusive, foul language, and/or divisive comments may be deleted without notice.
  • Each blog member is allowed limited comments, as displayed above the comment box.
  • Comments must be limited to the number of words displayed above the comment box.
  • Please limit one comment after any comment posted per post.