Editorial: Big oil confronts climate change – not a minute too soon
News and information on Shell Plc
Editorial: Big oil confronts climate change – not a minute too soon
Posted in: Ben van Beurden, Big Oil, BP, Business ethics, Business Principles, Carbon Capture, Chevron, China, Climate Change, COVID-19, Environment, Exxon Mobil, Fossil Fuels, Gas, Houston Chronicle, Oil, Oil Company Profits, Oil Prices, Royal Dutch Shell, Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Shell, Solar Power, Total, Wind Power.
Tagged: Alternative Energy · BP · Chevron · ConocoPhillips · Environment · ExxonMobil · Oil Prices · Royal Dutch Shell Plc · Shell · Total
EBOOK TITLE: “SIR HENRI DETERDING AND THE NAZI HISTORY OF ROYAL DUTCH SHELL” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON
EBOOK TITLE: “JOHN DONOVAN, SHELL’S NIGHTMARE: MY EPIC FEUD WITH THE UNSCRUPULOUS OIL GIANT ROYAL DUTCH SHELL” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON.
EBOOK TITLE: “TOXIC FACTS ABOUT SHELL REMOVED FROM WIKIPEDIA: HOW SHELL BECAME THE MOST HATED BRAND IN THE WORLD” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON.
Broadband Service is Appalling
I ordered shell energy broadband on nov 2. I was promised connection the following week. They initiated the direct debit. I called the following week and was told router would arrive on 13 and service would go live on 17. No further email or communication until 20 when I was told service would start on 30th. Spent 10 minutes waiting on phone line and spoke to a polite assistant who was absolutely useless in solving my problem. Avoid this unprofessional and chaotic… Read more
30 November 2023: Posted by John Donovan
The content below is sourced from current verifiable customer reviews of Shell Energy published on Trustpilot.
Extremely slow broadband for 10 months, not fixed. I have had slow broadband well below the guaranteed speed for 10 months and Shell Energy have not been able to fix it. They have tried sending about 4 or 5 engineers but have not fixed the problem. Gurps, who I have been dealing with most recently, has been friendly and polite, alth… Read more
The worst ever
I used shell broadband. It was by far the worst broadband provider ever! The internet did not work most days. I had their super fast broadband and it dropped out constantly. Watching a movie was awful with the constant buffering. Customer support was super slow. Now their going to charge me for the useless router which I have sent back.
Date of experience: 21 November 2023
The worst ever
I used shell broadband. It was by far the worst broadband provider ever! The internet did not work most days. I had their super fast broadband and it dropped out constantly. Watching a movie was awful with the constant buffering. Customer support was super slow. Now their going to charge me for the useless router which I have sent back.
Date of experience: 21 November 2023
See our link list of over 500 articles by the FT, Wall Street Journal, Reuters, Bloomberg, Forbes, Dow Jones Newswires, New York Times, CNBC etc, plus UK House of Commons Select Committee Hansard records, information on U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission website etc. all containing references to our Shell focussed websites, or our website founders Alfred and John Donovan. Includes TV documentary features in English and German, newspaper and magazine articles, radio interviews, newsletters etc. Plus academic papers, Stratfor intelligence reports and UK, U.S. and Australian state/parliamentary publications, also citing our Shell websites. Click on this link to see the entire list, all in date order with a link to an index of over 100 books also containing references to our non-profit websites and/or our activities.
John Donovan, the website owner
This is not a Shell website. That fact should be abundantly plain from the overall content of this home page and our sister Shell focussed websites, including shellnazihistory.com. Click on the Disclaimer link at top of this page for more information. You Can Be Sure Shell does not endorse or approve of this website. There are no subscription charges nor do we solicit or accept donations. No advertising is accepted. It is an entirely free to use non-commercial website drawing attention to the negative side of Shell. The Shell logo image with the white text used on this website, as per the above example, is in the public domain because its copyright has expired and its author is anonymous. It can be found here on WIKIMEDIA COMMONS. Use this link for Shell’s own website.
© 2024 Royal Dutch Shell Plc .com | Powered by WordPress
A WordPress theme by Ravi Varma
On Thursday, one of the world’s largest oil companies — Royal Dutch Shell — confirmed it will never again produce as much oil as it did in 2019. Peak oil production at Shell, said CEO Ben van Beurden, has come and gone.
The week before, ExxonMobil had made a similarly telling announcement: It is spending billions on a subsidiary formed to advance technologies to reduce the company’s carbon emissions and develop new products to help its customers do the same.
Last August, BP announced it would by 2030 reduce its oil and gas production by 40 percent, scale back its refinery capacity by more than 30 percent, and up its annual spending on renewable fuels and low-carbon technology tenfold, to $5 billion.
Pandemic or no, and no matter who is in the White House, the oil business is entering an exciting, scary new frontier — and there’s no turning back. The sooner Houston, the oil and gas capital of America, embraces that reality, the better its prospects, and those of its energy industry workforce, will be.
By now, the link between oil production and the increasingly deadly change in the planet’s climate is beyond any serious doubt, so we welcome the oil giants’ announcements. We also acknowledge they come as many in Houston were already on edge. Just last month, newly sworn-in President Joe Biden made clear he means to keep his campaign promises to accelerate America’s move away from fossil fuels and toward renewables.
Biden’s decisions — from a moratorium on new oil and gas leases on federal lands to rejoining the Paris accord to canceling the Keystone pipeline — triggered a backlash from Texas lawmakers in Austin and Washington worried that too sudden a shift could mean tens of thousands of jobs for Texas and Houston.
Those concerns are valid, as we wrote two weeks ago in response to Biden’s steps. But the Shell and Exxon announcements underscore that changes away from oil have been underway for years — especially in Europe and, of late, even in the United States. These efforts are gathering steam now only in small part because of voters’ rejection of President Donald Trump in November.
More powerful currents — propelled by the companies’ own understanding of both the climate emergency, their customers’ preferences, and by investors demanding change — are leading a global reevaluation of the role oil and gas will play between now and 2050. That’s the year the United States and many of the world’s largest businesses — from BP and Shell to General Motors and a host of leading tech companies — have pledged to have net-zero carbon emissions. Even China has pledged to be carbon neutral by 2060.
Van Beurden’s statement on Thursday explicitly referenced those dynamics. “We must give our customers the products and services they want and need — products that have the lowest environmental impact,” the Shell CEO said. BP sent a further signal last week, when it announced a massive investment in the UK to boost offshore wind farms.
Those big companies are reacting to the same kind of customer demands that smaller firms tell U.S. Rep. Lizzie Fletcher they are hearing. “They want the green energy plans and plans powered by renewable fuel,” said Fletcher, a Houston Democrat. “These companies are hearing the push (toward greener options) from multiple sources, including their customers.”
All of the above
Fletcher praised Biden’s decision to return America to the Paris Climate Agreement, but she also joined many Republicans in criticizing his temporary ban on new oil and gas leases on federal lands. She was thinking about jobs. The oil and gas business makes up roughly 10 percent of the Houston GDP, Houston-based economist Jesse Thompson of the Dallas branch of the Federal Reserve told the editorial board. If indirect spending is included, that share jumps to roughly 30 percent, he said.
That’s a lot of workers. Fletcher told this editorial board her message to her colleagues in Washington, and to the White House, is that Texas supports an all-of-the-above strategy when it comes to America’s mix of fossil fuels and renewables such as wind and solar.
“We believe in science and believe in climate change,” Fletcher said, adding that she supports federal incentives for low-carbon technologies and sensible regulation that rewards best practices. “But oil and gas are going to be part of the mix for a long time to come.”
True, oil and gas aren’t going away overnight. But here’s what Fletcher and other oil industry boosters leave out: The industry is going to shrink. The growing energy demand from developing nations won’t be enough to fully counteract a global shift away from fossil fuels and toward renewables.
Last year, Shell produced a series of three scenarios for the future use of oil and other sources of energy. In all of them — including what it called the business-as-usual case — the amount of oil consumed worldwide in both absolute terms and as a share of all energy use falls in coming years.
That’ll mean fewer jobs as we know them in oil and gas, no matter how weak or aggressive the U.S. climate policy is. In that light, it might sound like good sense for supporters of the industry to cling to every last oil and gas job. But that short-term approach will tie their hands in the long run.
‘More stable wages’
For years, the Obama administration kept saying the green economy will spin off hundreds of thousands of new jobs to replace those lost as the world consumes less oil. The problem with that scenario, for Houston anyway, is that if those new jobs are located elsewhere, they won’t do much to stave off a mighty economic reckoning here.
We believe, however, that the same companies that call Houston home, the ones with famous names and tens of thousands of highly skilled energy workers — from scientists to materials engineers to oil patch roughnecks — could help lead the push into new products, new technology and ultimately new energy sources. When Exxon announced it was creating its low carbon subsidiary, it amounted to a recognition that as the world changed, so too was Exxon’s willingness to slide more of its chips over to the green economy. Shell, which has 8,000 workers in the Houston area, is moving more aggressively still: the Chronicle’s Paul Takahashi reported Friday it will divest itself of oil and gas assets to the tune of $4 billion a year over 10 years.
Thompson, the Federal Reserve economist, said that’s likely to continue. There are thousands of workers in Texas who could easily transfer their skills to a greener economy. “The same people who are drilling for oil could be building off-shore wind farms,” he said. “Will it be a one-to-one transfer? Probably not,” he said. “But there is still really good reason to believe the industry will be able to innovate its way through this transition.”
A lot depends on what forms the new energy investments take. If Big Oil leads the way in developing hydrogen fuel sources, for instance, then the highly skilled scientists already working in the area will be very welcome, he said.
Even lower wages in other areas could have a positive trade-off: “They might have to accept somewhat lower wages,” Thompson said, “but they will be more stable wages.”
Confronting the crisis
The real excitement behind Exxon’s announcement is that it signals American oil giants are moving to confront the climate crisis. Quickly enough? Not nearly. But it marks a fundamental shift in mindset.
John Hofmeister, the former president of Shell Oil, Royal Dutch Shell’s U.S. subsidiary headquartered in Houston, told us the industry’s embrace of greener fuels is accelerating: “The European majors are well ahead of their American counterparts on energy transition, but there is a desire on the part of the American companies to catch-up.”
That’s great news, and not just for the planet. The very companies that anchor the Houston economy now are the ones that have the deep pockets, highly skilled workers and increasingly, the customer-driven incentives to reinvent the way the world uses energy. It’s in everyone’s interest — including their own — to fully embrace that future.
Written By