Royal Dutch Shell Plc  .com Rotating Header Image

Shell faces activist outcry over planned seismic survey of South African coast

Shell faces activist outcry over planned seismic survey of South African coast

By PAUL BURKHARDT and Laura Hurst: Bloomberg

Nov. 29, 2021 at 10:24 am Updated Nov. 29, 2021 at 7:10 pm

Royal Dutch Shell faces a growing campaign against its plans to conduct a seismic survey of potential oil and gas reservoirs off South Africa’s rugged coastline.

The standoff is the latest example of environmental groups’ push to halt oil and gas developments before they even get going – an effort that has been buoyed by an International Energy Agency report saying no new fields can be tapped if the world wants to prevent damaging climate change.

In the U.K. North Sea, Shell’s Jackdaw project last month failed to get environmental approval from the regulator. Another, the Cambo oil development operated by Siccar Point Energy and co-owned by Shell, had to delay work earlier this year while waiting for regulatory consent following pressure from Greenpeace on the government to block the field.

In South Africa, activists including Cape Town-based Just Share are arguing that Shell seismic surveys planned over the next two months – off what’s known as the country’s “Wild Coast” where whales are frequently spotted – could be detrimental to the environment. They also say the activity was granted through a process that’s not in line with evolving policy to mitigate climate change.

“Shell has long experience in collecting offshore seismic data and the welfare of wildlife is a major factor in the stringent controls we use,” a company spokesperson said in response to questions from Bloomberg. Sounds used in the survey process are increased slowly to allow any animals to move away from the source, according to the company.

After protests in Cape Town anticipating the arrival of the vessel that will conduct the survey, South Africa’s environment department noted the activists’ concerns, but said that it was not mandated to make a decision on the matter and that a 2014 process around survey applications remained valid.

“The survey’s severe impacts – on our ecologically diverse and sensitive environment, and on affected communities – cannot be sufficiently mitigated,” said Robyn Hugo, director for climate change engagement at shareholder-activism group Just Share. New fossil fuel projects shouldn’t go ahead and risk becoming stranded assets, she said.

Shell acquired a 50% working interest and operatorship of the Transkei & Algoa exploration area off South Africa last year from Impact Oil and Gas, which holds the other half.

SOURCE

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, and shellnews.net, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Comments are closed.

Comment Rules

  • Please show respect to the opinions of others no matter how seemingly far-fetched.
  • Abusive, foul language, and/or divisive comments may be deleted without notice.
  • Each blog member is allowed limited comments, as displayed above the comment box.
  • Comments must be limited to the number of words displayed above the comment box.
  • Please limit one comment after any comment posted per post.