Royal Dutch Shell Plc  .com Rotating Header Image

Search Results for 'shell reserves fraud' ↓

Shell reserves fraud document published on 6 Dec 2007: deposition of John Malcolm, Managing Director Petroleum Development Oman

Videotaped Deposition of JOHN MALCOLM taken in Washington, D.C. on Friday, October 20th, 2006: John Malcolm, Managing Director of Petroleum Development Oman (owned partly by Royal Dutch Shell Plc)

http://www.shellnews.net/classactiondocs/357_3_Malcolm_dep.pdf

Settlement of Shell reserves fraud litigation to cost over $600 million

By John Donovan

In April 2007, Shell offered to settle for $352.6 million plus $47 million in legal fees, non-U.S. shareholder claims relating to the 2004 oil reserves scandal. Shell pledged that it would make a request to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to contribute towards the settlement the $120 million fine imposed on Shell by the SEC in 2004.

Relevant Dutch Court Documents

Petition to Amsterdam Court of Appeal April 2007

http://www.shellnews.net/classactiondocs/dutch_petition.pdf

Proposed European Settlement April 2007 read more

Videotaped Deposition of Tim Warren, retired Country Chairman, Shell Australia – in relation to Shell reserves fraud

Shell discovery documents published by royaldutchshellplc.com on Sunday 18 November 2007

Videotaped Deposition of Tim Warren, retired Country Chairman, Shell Australia, deposed in Washington, D.C. Tuesday, January 30, 2007: 10:25 a.m. Formally Shell EP Technology director, Shell International Exploration & Production B.V.

ENTIRE SEARCHABLE DEPOSITION: 16.62mb pdf file containing 518 pages, so will take some time to load, particularly if you don’t have broadband…

http://www.shellnews.net/classactiondocs/depo_tim_warren_ocr.pdf read more

First 390 pages of Walter van de Vijver deposition on Shell reserves fraud

By John Donovan

Friday 16 November2007

Below is a link to a transcript of the Videotaped Deposition of former Royal Dutch Shell Group MD and Chief Executive of Shell Exploration & Production – Mr Walter van de Vijver, in Washington, D.C. 16 Wednesday, January 31st, 2007:

(first 390 pages)

http://www.shellnews.net/classactiondocs/365_2.pdf

Further parts of Van de Vijver deposition will be published here later, on Friday 16 November 2007

For the first time you can read his own account of events including the infamous email correspondence with Philip Watts eg. “I am sick and tired of lying…” read more

ROYAL DUTCH SHELL RESERVES FRAUD/SCANDAL

ROYAL DUTCH SHELL RESERVES FRAUD/SCANDAL

THOUSANDS OF PAGES FROM ROYAL DUTCH SHELL RESERVES COURT CASE DOCUMENTS, INCLUDING WITNESS STATEMENTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

ROYAL DUTCH/SHELL TRANSPORT SECURITIES LITIGATION

Civ.No. 04-374 (JAP)

PACER CODE: 3:2004-cv-00374

3:04-cv-00374-JAP-JJH BROCKAMP v. N.V. KONINKLIJKE NEDERLANDSCHE PETROLEUM MAATSCHAPPIJ et al Judge Joel A. Pisano, now presiding

Most if not all files are pdf and Adobe Reader is needed to access them. Please be patient when multiple pages are involved. To download a FREE Adobe Reader click on the adobe link: http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html read more

ShellNews.net: Global Floodgates Open on Shell Reserves Fraud Class Action

By Alfred Donovan

On Friday 20 January, we exclusively broke the news that the global floodgates are now open for qualifying non-US Shell shareholders to join a US class action lawsuit which has already been given permission to go ahead by a US District Chief Judge.

The Judge has ruled that Shell has a case to answer for alleged securities fraud and has decided that for the first time in US legal history, non-US shareholders can join a US class action. The lead plaintiffs are the Pennsylvania State Employee Retirement System and the Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System. The class action seeks to recover damages on behalf of all investors worldwide, no matter where they bought shares. read more

Shell Lent Former Directors $12M For Reserves Fraud Legal Costs In 2004

By John Donovan: As can be verified from page 81 of the Shell Form 20F 2004 filing with the US Securities & Exchange Commission and a related Wall Street Journal article, Shell lent the fraudsters responsible for the reserves scandal $12 million to cover litigation costs. Almost a decade later, I have not seen any evidence that any of the money was ever repaid? Perhaps the Rev. Sir Philip Watts, or Simon Henry, the current Royal Dutch Shell CFO, who played a starring role in the scandal, can enlighten us?

Screen Shot 2013-04-02 at 15.26.56

Extract from Page 81

Over the year 2004, the Group advanced a total of $12,048,441 (certain amounts have been converted at the average £/$ exchange rate for 2004) for litigation costs for former Board members under these provisions.

Screen Shot 2013-01-09 at 08.46.10

Shell Lent Former Directors $12M For Legal Costs In 04

DOW JONES NEWSWIRES March 31, 2005

LONDON — Royal Dutch/Shell (RD,SC) said in a filing released Thursday it was in settlement talks on some of the class action litigation unleashed after it was forced to reclassify its oil reserves.

In a 20-F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the oil giant said it was in talks with holders of various Shell Oil Company pension plans which had been launched in the U.S. under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. read more

Shell chairman deeply ashamed about reserves fraud

From our October 2004 Shell News Archive

London Evening Standard: Market Report: SPEAKING OUT

“All of us are deeply ashamed about what happened about the reserves, but we are determined to regain our position. — Shell chairman Jeroen van der Veer on the oil giant’s attempts to put its misdemeanours behind it”

Market Report

By Mickey Clark

27 Oct 2004

“I’m convinced we have a lot of strengths. All of us are deeply ashamed about what happened about the reserves, but we are determined to regain our position.”

— Shell chairman Jeroen van der Veer on the oil giant’s attempts to put its misdemeanours behind it.

RELATED ARTICLE

Financial Times: Not clammed shut

“Jeroen van der Veer remains refreshingly candid even after all Royal Dutch/Shell has been through this year.”: “We are like the schoolboy standing in the corridor outside the classroom.

By Clay Harris

Published: October 27 2004

Jeroen van der Veer remains refreshingly candid even after all Royal Dutch/Shell has been through this year.

Asked at a conference about the International Energy Agency’s call for governments, regulators and corporations to unify energy reserves accounting, he said: “We are like the schoolboy standing in the corridor outside the classroom. I don’t think it is for us to lead the charge of new rules on reserve accounting, we shall leave that to others. But whatever the rules are, we will comply with them.” read more

Is it right or fair the describe the Shell reserves scandal as a “Fraud”

Christopher Cox, the Chairman of the SEC is on record as describing the scandal as a “fraud” when he listed European frauds.

ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC: Amsterdam Court of Appeals sets date for Shell reserves securities fraud hearing

Google image Shell logo 

Amsterdam Court of Appeals sets date for hearing with respect to Shell securities class settlement of reserve-related claims with European and other non US investors

11/04/2008
 
Shell *, Stichting Shell Reserves Compensation Foundation (the Foundation), VEB (the Dutch Shareholders Association), APG, All Pensions Group (on behalf of pension fund ABP) and PGGM (on behalf of Stichting Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn) have announced that the Amsterdam Court of Appeals (the Court) has scheduled a hearing on 20 November 2008 with respect to their request for a binding declaration of their settlement agreement concerning reserve-related claims. This settlement agreement provides relief in the amount of US$352.6 million to qualifying non-U.S.-shareholders who bought Shell shares on any stock exchange outside the United States between April 8, 1999 and March 18, 2004 (the European settlement). 
 
The European settlement was originally reached and announced in April 2007. The parties opted to wait to file an amended petition until a U.S. court ruled on Shell’s position that the Court did not have jurisdiction to consider the claims of non-U.S. shareholders in the pending U.S. class action based upon the same reserves issues.
read more

Shell confidential reserves fraud documents published on 14 December 2007: includes PERSON OVERVIEW assessment of Shell executives

Shell confidential reserves fraud documents published on 14 December 2007

Declaration of Sarah Bell, Sakhalin Energy Investment Company Limited, formally Reservoir Engineer at Shell Development Australia (Five pages)

http://www.shellnews.net/classactiondocs/344.pdf

Transcript of Videotaped Deposition of MATTHIAS BICHSEL, Executive Vice President Technical, Shell Exploration and Production B.V.: taken in New York, New York October 31, 2006

Exhibit 49 (200 pages) Bichsel Deposition

http://www.shellnews.net/classactiondocs/ex49_344_2.pdf read more

Shell confidential reserves fraud discovery documents published on 5 December 2007

Shell confidential reserves fraud discovery documents published on 5 December 2007

Exhibit 167: CONFIDENTIAL: NOTE – 31 May 2002: From Anton Barendregt to Lorin Brass and Chris Finlayson (Managing Director, BSP) copied to Brian Straub, Rosmawatty Abd-Mumin, Salieh-Bostaman Zainal-Abidin, Martin Graham, Thomas Prudence, Peter Worby, Ben van den Bergh, Chris Kennett, Dominique Gardy, Rahim Khan, Malcolm Harper, Jaap Nauts, John Pay, Paul Tauecchio, Han van Delden (KPMG Accountants NV) and Stephen Johnson (PriceWaterhouseCoopers): Subject: SEC PROVED RESERVES AUDIT – BRUNEI SHELL PETROLEUM SDN BHD, 29 April – 3 May 2002 (17 pages) read more

Shell confidential reserves fraud discovery document published on 29 November 2007

Shell confidential reserves fraud discovery document published on 29 November 2007

Exhibit 64: January 2002 Royal Dutch Shell Committee of Managing Directors Confidential Investor Relations Plan signed by Philip Watts (15 pages)

http://www.shellnews.net/classactiondocs/ex64_420.pdf

Shell confidential reserves fraud discovery documents published on 28 November 2007

Shell confidential reserves fraud discovery documents published on 28 November 2007 

Exhibit 132: SPDC Restatement 1998-2002: Confidential (9 pages)

http://www.shellnews.net/classactiondocs/ex132_419_7.pdf

Exhibit 133: Note for Discussion: Group Investor Relations: Strategy and Plan to 2004: Every page marked “Confidential” (20 pages)

http://www.shellnews.net/classactiondocs/ex133_419_8.pdf

Exhibit 134: 2002 Executive Summary: Most Confidential: Signed by Walter van de Vivjer (12 pages) read more

Internal recriminations at Shell 6 days before the reserves fraud was revealed to a stunned world: between a rock and a hard place

Shell reserves fraud discovery documents published on Sunday 25 November 2007

The first item, Exhibit 186, is email correspondence on 3 January 2004 from Frank Coopman, Chief Financial Officer, Shell Exploration and Production B.V. to Curtis Frasier of Shell International, which was copied to John Darley, SIEP-EPT. This was sent just 6 days before the Shell reserves fraud was announced to a stunned world. Frank Coopman made it plain that the “independent” Group reserves auditor, Anton Barendregt (*a retired former Shell employee who acted as the Group reserves Auditor on a part-time basis) was in fact “not completely independent”. read more

U.S. Court Decision by U.S. District Judge Joel A. Pisano to allow Royal Dutch Shell European reserves fraud settlement to proceed: 13 November 2007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY: 

RE ROYAL DUTCH/SHELL : Civ. No. 04-374 (JAP) TRANSPORT SECURITIES : (Consolidated Cases) LITIGATION :

OPINION/ORDER: Joel A. Pisano: United States District Judge: Dated: November 13, 2007: 20 Pages

http://www.shellnews.net/classactiondocs/453.pdf

Related article:

Dow Jones Newswires: US Court Ruling Paves For Shell Reserves Settlement To Proceed

Comment Rules

  • Please show respect to the opinions of others no matter how seemingly far-fetched.
  • Abusive, foul language, and/or divisive comments may be deleted without notice.
  • Each blog member is allowed limited comments, as displayed above the comment box.
  • Comments must be limited to the number of words displayed above the comment box.
  • Please limit one comment after any comment posted per post.