Royal Dutch Shell plc .com Rotating Header Image

Posts under ‘Alaska’

AP Interview: Shell hopeful for Arctic drilling

By DAN JOLING
Associated Press

Published: February 5th, 2012 08:59 AM
Last Modified: February 5th, 2012 09:04 AM

ANCHORAGE, Alaska – It’s the billion-dollar question in Alaska for 2012: Will this be the year Shell Oil begins large-scale offshore exploratory drilling in Arctic waters?

Two months into 2012, the oil giant is beyond the lead time it said it needed to assemble the flotilla of support vessels that must accompany drill ships to leases in the to the remote Chukchi and Beaufort seas. But Shell Alaska Vice President Pete Slaiby remains hopeful drilling can begin when Arctic Ocean ice melts this summer, even as he awaits a green light from regulators.

“There is clearly more certainty with the regulatory process than we’ve had in previous years,” Slaiby said in an interview.

President Obama in July created an interagency working group to coordinate energy development in Alaska. Discussions with Shell have been fruitful, Slaiby said.

“There’s a lot of questions coming back from the regulators: How does this work, when will you have this in place? What are your competencies? How do you ensure it will work? This is stuff we had all thought out,” Slaiby said. “It was not like it is new stuff, or somebody was coming back with something we hadn’t thought about. But they are clearly now front and center in asking questions and in really doing the things that the public demands.”

Alaska’s elected officials are banking on offshore development to maintain Alaska’s petroleum-based economy. Environmentalists fighting to protect marine mammals have contested every permit application, claiming oil companies can’t clean up spills in ice-choked oceans. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, in the wake of the BP oil disaster, pledged “utmost caution” in Arctic offshore drilling, to the frustration of Shell, which has spent upward of $4 billion on Arctic offshore development.

The federal government estimates Arctic Ocean outer continental shelf reserves at 26.6 billion barrels of recoverable oil and 130 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. Diminished production on Alaska’s North Slope has lowered flow in the trans-Alaska pipeline to less than a third of its capacity.

Shell hopes to provide a source to fill it, and has made progress.

The company cleared a hurdle last month when the Appeals Board of the Environmental Protection Agency confirmed an air permit for one of Shell’s drill ship, the Noble Discoverer, which had blocked 2011 drilling. Shell hopes to use the drill ship in the Chukchi Sea.

The federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management in December approved Shell’s exploration plan for the Chukchi – with a major caveat. Shell must stop drilling into hydrocarbon zones 38 days before ice is likely to move in, roughly Sept. 24, to have time to fix a wellhead blowout.

Shell contends the chance of a blowout is minimal and that its cleanup preparations can address any spill. It is trying to reverse the 38-day restriction but will move ahead with drilling if it can’t.

“Look, you have 105 days,” Slaiby said. “Thirty-eight days is a large factor in 105 days. But it looks like we’ll have to take a bit of measure of inefficiency unless we’re successful in challenging it,”

Shell has other hurdles to clear. The company could hear this month whether the Bureau of Safety and Environment Enforcement will sign off on its spill response plan, the focus of environmental groups that contend oil companies have not demonstrated they can clean up a spill 1,000 miles from the nearest Coast Guard base and from infrastructure – ports, major runways, even warehouses and hotels – that is available elsewhere.

Shell continues to make its case that it has an effective cleanup plan in place with response vessels standing by and additional support from resources staged at Prudhoe Bay and elsewhere.

“It’s been a process where we’ve not had to significantly change what we’ve done, but we’ve had to put in a lot more explanation of how it’s doing,” Slaiby said.

Well control will include a “capping stack” that can be lowered onto a well as BP did to stem the Macondo blowout. It’s being fabricated in Louisiana and will be tested in Washington or Alaska waters before drilling begins, Slaiby said.

“We’re going to have that ready to go,” Slaiby said. “It will be tested. It will meet with all of the BOEM, BSEE, requirements. We’re going to have it offshore with us. It will actually be resident on one of our anchor handlers, with a lifting frame and ready to be deployed.”

Shell is awaiting a decision on an appeal of the EPA’s air permits for its other drill ship, the Kulluk, which it hopes to use for exploratory wells in the Beaufort Sea.

Environmental and Alaska Native groups have challenged Shell’s exploration plan in the Beaufort. Arguments in the case are scheduled for March.

Shell is constructing an ice-hardy spill containment barge in Seattle. The Kulluk has been undergoing upgrades in dry dock since last summer, including replacement of engines to make them compliant with air standards. The Noble Discover is finishing up a well in New Zealand before it will make the trip to the West Coast for modifications.

Environmental groups have challenged the lease sale that allowed the 2008 sale of leases in the Chukchi. A federal judge in Anchorage ruled that the former Minerals Management Service had not followed environmental requirements before the sale. He’s now considering corrections made by the Interior Department. A negative outcome, Slaiby conceded, could block Chukchi drilling.

Slaiby remains optimistic about progress in the regulatory process. Interior Department Deputy Secretary David Hayes, the chairman of the interagency group on Alaska energy, has done a good job assembling various agencies to “kick the tires” on the project to make sure it was put together properly.

“I think the end result is pretty good,” Slaiby said.

SOURCE ARTICLE

Shell Seen Raising Dividend for First Time Since 2009: Energy

Shell may even go as far as paying a special dividend or buying back shares to maximize shareholder value, according to analysts at Citigroup Inc.

Click to continue reading “Shell Seen Raising Dividend for First Time Since 2009: Energy”

Shell to shut its main UK research base and transfer its work overseas

Hundreds of scientists to be relocated as oil multinational aims to shift most research and development work to Germany by 2014…

Shell staff told the Guardian privately that they were “seething”…

Terry Macalister: guardian.co.uk, Sunday 15 January 2012 15.12 GMT

Shell, led by Peter Voser, is to close its technology centre in Thornton, Cheshire. Photograph: Guido Benschop/AFP/Getty Images

Shell is to shut its main UK research and development base and transfer the work overseas in a bitter blow to Britain’s knowledge economy.

Hundreds of senior scientists working at the centre at Thornton in Cheshire will be scattered to other offices in a move that follows the sale of the nearby Stanlow refinery and is seen by some as a more general retreat by Shell from the UK.

Shell Technology Centre Thornton has been the base for developing biofuels and more traditional fuels for customers that include the Ferrari Formula One racing team.

Only 18 months ago the R&D base launched two new FuelSave products using the former England cricketer Andrew Flintoff to lead the marketing effort.

But the facility, where almost 300 scientists work, is to shut completely in 2014 with Shell concentrating its R&D efforts in Germany and other overseas centres.

A spokesman for Shell, which made £11.4bn in its last full financial year, said some of the positions would “migrate” to Shell’s UK headquarters in London. Other staff could work in Manchester, he added.

“This relocation of employees within the UK follows the decision … to move the site’s laboratory activities, largely to Hamburg but also to other sites globally, as part of a global review of our technology footprint,” he said.

Shell staff told the Guardian privately that they were “seething” that the oil firm had been gradually cutting staffing at Thornton after closing R&D bases at Sittingbourne in Kent and Egham in Surrey. They said it reflected a general reduction in the importance of UK operations at the Anglo-Dutch group since the last British chief executive, Phil Watts, left in 2004 after a row with the US securities and exchange commission over the way the company had been booking its oil reserves in its accounts.

Shell, now led by a Swiss man, Peter Voser, announced the sale of Stanlow – its last UK refinery and the country’s second largest – to Essar Energy of India in 2010.

And last week Shell, which is looking at ways to reduce its costs, said it planned to close its pension scheme to new entrants next year in order to “reflect market trends in the UK”. Existing members of the fund will be unaffected.

After last spring’s budget, Shell said it might sell some of its North Sea oilfields because of tax changes but its nearest rival, BP, has also faced accusations it is investing less and less in its home market. Shell, which is expected to unveil fourth-quarter profits of about $5bn (£3.25bn) on 2 February, said it hoped the Thornton site could still continue to pioneer R&D.

A spokesman said: “We will work with interested parties to explore options for re-use of the site and facilities and we hope that science, technology and research can continue to be part of its future.”

Meanwhile, Shell’s hopes of drilling exploratory wells in Arctic waters received a boost last week with the affirmation that its federal air permits for the Chukchi Sea were properly granted. The US environmental protection agency’s appeals board rejected Alaska native and conservation groups’ challenges to the granting of air permits.

Shell Alaska’s spokesman Curtis Smith announced that the decision meant Shell, for the first time, had usable air permits that would allow its drill ship, the Noble Discoverer, to work in the outer continental shelf off Alaska’s north-west coast this year.

SOURCE ARTICLE

Shell’s Arctic Drilling Plan Clears Hurdle

By CLIFFORD KRAUSS: January 13, 2012

A Royal Dutch Shell vessel surveying for oil reserves in the Arctic in preparation for drilling. Photo: Shell Oil

Royal Dutch Shell has been on a six-year crusade to drill in Arctic waters off Alaska’s coast, and has spent about $4 billion on the effort so far without drilling a single well.

But the company took one more bureaucratic baby step forward this week toward drilling in the Chukchi Sea later this year. An appeals board of the Environmental Protection Agency on Thursday rejected four challenges brought by Alaska Native entities and environmental groups like Earthjustice to block Clean Air Act permits covering airborne emissions from industrial operations.

Opponents argued that nitrogen dioxide emissions from drilling would pollute the air of Native communities, but the appeals board concluded that the evidence presented was not robust enough to support the claim.

Nonetheless, Shell faces more hurdles, including a possible appeal of the decision to the federal courts.

But since delays in the air-permitting process was a principal reason Shell did not drill last year, Shell executives have expressed cautious satisfaction with the new ruling..

Four weeks ago the company received conditional federal approval to drill six exploratory wells in Arctic waters, but environmentalists say they will press on with their appeals. They argue a spill in freezing waters would be a disaster for endangered wildlife and challenging to clean up because of the region’s harsh climate, ice cover on the water, strong winds and long seasonal darkness.

“We look forward to continued progress on the permitting front and remain committed to working with regulators and stakeholders to achieve all of the permits necessary to drill in 2012,” Shell said in an optimistic statement late Thursday.

Eric Jorgensen, an Earthjustice lawyer, said: “We’re disappointed. The E.P.A. cut corners in issuing the permit and we don’t believe it complies with the Clean Air Act.”

As for an appeal, he said, “We’re looking at all options.”

SOURCE ARTICLE

Shell leader expects Arctic offshore drilling this year

By Emily Pickrell, HOUSTON CHRONICLE

Published Thursday, January 12, 2012

Shell Oil Co. expects to clear remaining regulatory hurdles and begin drilling later this year in the Chukchi Sea near Alaska, company President Marvin Odum said at a scientific conference on Thursday.

Shell received conditional federal approval last month to drill six exploratory wells in the Arctic offshore region but still must secure permits for individual wells.

Among the requirements for Shell to obtain those permits will be selling regulators on its plan for responding to spills or other accidents at the sites.

Odum said Shell is mindful of the 2010 Deepwater Horizon disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, and the wide criticism BP and others involved received for the conditions leading to the accident and their response.

“We will have every piece of response in Alaska available on a one-hour notice,” Odum said in a keynote address at the ninth conference of the Academy of Medicine, Engineering and Science of Texas.

“The access to the equipment will provide for a much different response than what the world watched in the Gulf of Mexico.”

Environmentalists who oppose the drilling contend that no proven technology exists for cleaning up a spill in the slushy Arctic environment.

The area about 70 miles off the Alaska coast is more remote than the Gulf, and winter ice causes additional challenges.

Odum noted, however, that the drilling will be in about 150 feet of water – far shallower than the well under a mile of water that blew out in the Deepwater Horizon disaster.

He said that Shell is also working with Norwegian experts on how best to clean up any potential spills in colder climates.

On another subject, Odum predicted that Shell will soon get into the gas-to-liquids business in the U.S., with plants similar to its $20 billion Pearl plant in Qatar, which converts natural gas to liquid transportation fuel.

“With very low natural gas prices, we have a market that still has to import much of its liquid fuels,” Odum said. “It is high time to do something like that in the U.S.”

A view of the wind

In another panel Thursday, Shell Wind Energy President Richard Williams presented an optimistic view of the opportunities in wind.

“Everyone asks us if a wind farm makes money,” Williams said. “The answer is yes.”

The cost of turbine construction has decreased about 30 percent, and installation costs have gone down about 10 percent, Williams said, while improvements in safety and additional technical education programs have made it easier to find and train employees to run wind farms.

Odum emphasized, however, that while Shell is continuing to explore opportunities in renewable energy, growing demand will mean continued reliance on oil and natural gas.

“Thirty percent of global energy could come from alternatives to oil and gas, but at the same time, the world will need twice as much energy as today,” Odum said.

emily.pickrell@chron.com

SOURCE ARTICLE

EPA board rejects appeal of Shell Arctic permit

By DAN JOLING, Associated Press 13 January 2012

ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) — Royal Dutch Shell’s quest to drill exploratory wells in Arctic waters has received a boost with the affirmation that its federal air permits for the Chukchi Sea were properly granted.

The EPA Appeals Board on Thursday rejected challenges to the air permits brought by Alaska Native and conservation groups.

Shell Alaska spokesman Curtis Smith said in a formal announcement that the decision means Shell, for the first time, has usable air permits that will allow its drill ship, the Noble Discoverer, to work in the outer continental shelf off Alaska’s northwest coast in 2012.

“Achieving usable permits from the EPA is a very important step for Shell and one of the strongest indicators to date that we will be exploring our Beaufort and Chukchi leases in July,” Smith said.

Drilling is strongly opposed by conservation groups that contend oil companies cannot clean up a spill in ice-choked waters, and that the remote Chukchi and Beaufort seas are too far from ports, major airports and other infrastructure for an effective cleanup if there’s a blowout.

Earthjustice attorney Colin O’Brien, who represented groups that filed one of four air permit appeals, said it an email response to questions that the decision could be appealed in federal court, but that it was too early to speculate about potential next steps.

He said EPA took shortcuts when it issued the permits and failed to fully protect Arctic air quality as required by the Clean Air Act.

“These permits pave the way for Shell to emit thousands of tons of harmful air pollution into the pristine Arctic environment, at levels that may be harmful to nearby communities and the environment for years to come,” he said. “We are disappointed that the Environmental Appeals Board decided against us and allowed EPA’s permit decisions to stand.

A Shell subsidiary has applied to drill up to three exploratory wells in the Chukchi during the open water season this year and additional exploratory wells in 2013. The company hopes to use a second drill for exploratory wells in the Beaufort Sea off Alaska’s north coast, and awaits a decision on the appeal of its air permit.

The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management in December approved Shell’s Chukchi drilling plan with one important stipulation. The agency said Shell must still drilling into hydrocarbon zones 38 days before sea ice is projected to engulf the drill site to make sure it has time cope with a spill or a wellhead blowout. That would cut the drilling window by about one-third.

A successful appeal of previous air permits played a part of Shell’s decision to cancel drilling for 2011. In that case, the appeals board concluded that analysis of the impact of nitrogen dioxide emissions on Alaska Native communities was too limited. The board remanded the permits to allow the agency to fix permit problems.

The appeal filed by Earthjustice contended that Shell’s new permit was based on pollution estimates that were inherently unreliable because they are based on equipment that Shell did not identify and that the EPA never intends to test.

Shell faces other hurdles before it can send its drill ships and support vessels north. The Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement must approve Shell’s oil spill response plan for the Chukchi.

SOURCE ARTICLE

Shell Executive: Expects To Drill In Alaskan Arctic This Summer

JANUARY 12, 2012

HOUSTON (Dow Jones)–Royal Dutch Shell (RDSA, RDSA.LN) is confident it will be able to drill for oil and natural gas in Alaska’s arctic region this summer as it hopes to overcome its remaining legal challenges.

“We still have a few not insignificant hurdles to get past, but it looks that we will be drilling,” Marvin Odum, president of Shell Oil Co., the U.S. unit of the Anglo-Dutch giant, said in prepared remarks delivered at a conference in Houston.

Shell recently received various federal environmental permits to drill in Alaska’s Chukchi and Beaufort Seas, but environmental groups have filed lawsuits challenging those approvals.

-By Isabel Ordonez, Dow Jones Newswires; 713-547-9207; isabel.ordonez@dowjones.com

SOURCE ARTICLE

Shell CEO Says the Potential for Shale Gas in Europe Is Limited

By John Buckley

Jan. 11 (Bloomberg) — Royal Dutch Shell Plc chief Peter Voser said the potential for shale gas development in Europe is limited by the region’s regulations and its dense population.

Shell expects expansion in shale and tight gas — which is locked in rock that’s difficult and expensive to break — in North America, China and Australia, and has signed a deal in Ukraine, the chief executive officer said in an interview in Shell Venster, the company’s Dutch-language personnel magazine.

“We are looking further at possibilities in Europe, but the development of shale gas there will be limited as a result of regulation, legislation, high population density and the challenge of obtaining permits,” he said in the interview.

Shell, based in The Hague, applied for permits to drill for oil in Arctic regions this year and next, he said. “We have all the permits we need but we have a long way to go before we start drilling. The emphasis is on Alaska and to a certain extent Greenland, and in Russia some possibilities may arise.”

The company said in September it agreed to invest as much as $800 million to explore for oil, natural gas and shale gas in Ukraine. Shell will cooperate with Ukraine’s Ukrgasvydobuvannia to explore six license areas covering about 1,300 square kilometers (500 square miles) in the Kharkiv region. Drilling of the first deep exploration well would begin this year, it said.

–With assistance from Eduard Gismatullin in London. Editors: Tony Barrett, Randall Hackley

To contact the reporter on this story: John Buckley in Amsterdam at johnbuckley@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Stephen Voss at sev@bloomberg.net

SOURCE ARTICLE

Feds say timely answer ahead on Alaska drilling

January 10, 2012 at 11:30 am by Puneet Kollipara

A top federal official said today the Interior Department is committed to giving Shell Oil Co. a firm, timely answer on its applications to drill off the Alaska coast starting next summer.

Deputy Interior Secretary David Hayes said his department is well along in its consideration of several components of Shell’s applications for drilling exploratory wells in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas starting next summer.

“We are committed to giving them a timely up or down,” Hayes told reporters at an event hosted by Platts Energy Podium. Although he didn’t specify an exact date to expect a final decision, he said the department has a general sense that Shell needs input early this year.

Shell has spent $4 billion in securing leases from the Interior Department in those two seas since 2005. But the company has yet to drill a single well thanks to a variety of events, ranging from litigation to the successful appeal of air permits.

The company has already received approval from the department on a broad plan for exploratory drilling in the Beaufort Sea. The company also has gotten Interior Department approval for its Chukchi exploration plan, albeit with some strings attached aimed at ensuring any spills could be stopped and cleaned before the water ices up.

Although environmental groups have mounted a legal challenge to the Beaufort plan, Hayes said the department is processing the applications under the assumption that the litigation doesn’t pose a barrier.

Shell must get permits for each of the individual wells before it can start drilling them, and the Interior Department must sign off on the company’s oil-spill response plans. Hayes said Interior doesn’t yet have Shell’s applications for individual well permits.

Hayes also defended the Interior Department’s decision to make approval of the Chukchi exploration plan contingent on restricting the time when Shell could drill.

The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management has said Shell would have to stop any drilling 38 days before the first day when ice starts encroaching over the drilling site, typically Nov. 1 or later, under the condition. Shell has criticized the restriction, saying it “could severely impact our ability to deliver a complete Chukchi program.”

“We believe that was the right decision to make a conservative decision, and we intend to stand by it,” Hayes said.

SOURCE ARTICLE

CORRIB GAS PROJECT WARNING TO SHELL FROM IRISH GOVERNMENT

Irish President Michael D Higgins and author Lorna Siggins at the launch of “Once Upon A Time in the West: The Corrib Gas Controversy.” Photograph: Cyril Byrne

By John Donovan

Michael Crothers, a Shell veteran, has recently taken over as the new managing director of the Corrib Gas Project in Ireland, a project mired in controversy.

The welcome he has received from the Petroleum Affairs Division of the Irish environmental agency responsible for Energy and Natural Resources, cannot be described as warm. A written warning issued to Shell on 22 December, threatened a “cessation of works” following breaches of conditions attached to pipeline construction, granted on 25 February 2010.

In a letter dated 22 December 2011 addressed to Mr Crothers, the department notified Shell E & P Ireland (SEPIL) of a breach of the conditions governing the construction of the Corrib Gas Pipeline. The breach of Condition 2 resulted in untreated water being discharged from the Aghoose site via the natural drainage channel, contrary to the requirements of the Environmental Management Plan. Continual assessment of the works at the Aghoose compound by independent consultants also identified an ongoing breach of Condition 20 of the consent to construct.

The letter also complained about the “considerable delay” in bringing the matter to the attention of the Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources (DCENR), leading to a delay in the government consultants Environcorp, and its independent advisers, being able to consider the implications.

Detailed information was supplied with the warning letter, which also said that the incident had highlighted procedural concerns. The letter demanded that “any environmental incident, whether identified by SEPIL, or during inspections by third parties, must be reported immediately to DCENR.”

An attached ENVIRON report recommended: “In addition to the corrective actions being implemented by SEPIL, we further recommend that SEPIL reviews their management control and training procedures to ensure that similar failures of procedure do not re-occur.

The cover letter went on to warn:

Should there be future incidents of continuing non-compliance, or material incidents resulting in significant environmental impact in breach of the conditions of consent and EMP commitments, the Department will consider measures up to and including requiring the cessation of works until such time as compliance with the statutory permissions can be demonstrated.”

Probably because of the reported death threats against Shell Corrib Project whistleblowers, who have previously supplied information to us, including Shell documents, our source for this story does not want to be identified.

American government officials hoping that Shell lives up to its pledges in respect of drilling in the Arctic Ocean are unlikely to be impressed with the latest developments on the environmentally sensitive Corrib Gas Project.

Although not major incidents, compared for example with the BP Gulf of Mexico disaster, the environmental impact was significant.

Under the circumstances, the non compliance, incompetence, and delay in notifying the environmental authority (which some might perceive as an attempted cover-up), do not exactly inspire confidence in pledges given by Royal Dutch Shell.

Letter to Shell dated 22 December 2011 and attached ENVIRON report (10 pages in all)