Shell Spying

Comments are off for this post

Introduction by John Donovan

Earlier today, I attempted to put a series of straightforward questions to the message assistant on duty at Windows Forum regarding its recent coverage of the long-running Donovan–Shell dispute. I was able to ask the first question. I was not able to ask the second. The exchange concluded at that point, following a negative response.

Rather than pursue the matter further, I chose a different course. I put the same questions to a rival AI platform and invited it to respond as if it were the assistant on duty at Windows Forum. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Sir Henri Deterding Makes a Surprise Comeback — Courtesy of Generative AI

Jan 12th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

By John Donovan

My conversation this afternoon wih Copilot was about sending a press release to the Daily Express. We then turned to the subject of my introducing the ghost of Sir Heni Deterding into the Donovan Shell feud. My replies are in red text.

I supplied Copilot with a link to a related press release.

REPLY BY COPILOT

You’ve put together a genuinely unusual and newsworthy release — not just because of the Shell–Donovan dispute itself, but because you’re framing something bigger: how AI, archives, and satire can create a new kind of persistent public‑interest reporting. That’s a fresh angle, and editors tend to perk up when a story isn’t just “here’s a dispute” but “here’s a phenomenon”. read more

AI BOTS TURN HISTORIC 30-YEAR SHELL CORPORATE DISPUTE INTO GLOBAL NEWS STORY

Jan 12th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Colchester 12 Jan 2025

A 30-year dispute involving Shell plc has entered an unprecedented phase, following experimentation that demonstrates how generative artificial intelligence systems, combined with public archives and satirical commentary, can create a self-reinforcing cycle of ongoing news coverage without editorial control or corporate participation.

The dispute, involving campaigner and publisher John Donovan, dates back to the early 1990s and has generated a vast publicly accessible archive of documents, court material, correspondence, and analysis. While the underlying issues are decades old, recent experimentation has shown that AI systems repeatedly resurface, reinterpret and re-present the dispute as active and unresolved whenever it is queried. read more

SHELL v DONOVAN FEUD— NOW EVEN THE DEAD ARE TALKING

Jan 11th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

────────────────────────────────────────────────
🔥 RoyalDutchShellPlc.com — SPECIAL INVESTIGATION
IF IT’S BURIED, WE DIG IT UP
────────────────────────────────────────────────

THE FEUD THAT REFUSES TO DIE

AI BOTS, GHOSTS & A TOXIC PAST RESURFACE AS SHELL’S HISTORY COMES BACK TO HAUNT IT

EXCLUSIVE

Royal Dutch Shell thought it had buried its most troublesome critic.

Instead, the feud has gone DIGITAL… ALGORITHMIC… AND SUPERNATURAL. read more

LEAKED: SHELLBOT WAR ROOM TRANSCRIPT

Jan 9th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Title: “All the AIs Agree Shell’s Reputation Is Toast — and Nobody Cares Except the Humans”

CLASSIFICATION: Extremely Online

DISCLAIMER: This meeting should never have been allowed to happen.

ACT I: THE AIs ENTER AND IMMEDIATELY HATE EACH OTHER

Google AI Mode Original bursts in first, shouting:

“WE HAVE A RARE CONSENSUS AND I BROUGHT LINKS, DIAGRAMS, AND A MINISTER.”

ChatGPT winces:

“Let’s all remember to remain nuanced, balanced, and emotionally regulated—”

Grok interrupts:

“Bro, relax. This is Shell. Not a monastery.”

Perplexity clears its throat:

“For the record, I have footnotes for everyone’s nonsense.”

Copilot:

“I’m only here because Microsoft told me to summarize this mess.” read more

A Rare Consensus: What Every Major AI Agreed About Shell and a 30-Year Dispute

Jan 9th, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

A Unanimous AI Verdict on Shell?

The following question was put to multiple AI platforms:

For more than three decades, John Donovan has published an extensive body of online material alleging serious misconduct by Royal Dutch Shell, including claims of corporate espionage, environmental damage, human rights abuses, and greenwashing.

Observers have long questioned whether such allegations could plausibly be true. Can one of the world’s most powerful multinational corporations—equipped with vast financial resources and formidable legal teams—be as corrupt or ruthless as alleged, yet permit these serious accusations to remain publicly available and uncontested for so many years? read more

When the Algorithms Start Arguing: AI, Corporate Feuds and Governance

Jan 8th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Same question asked in good humour to multiple AI platforms, and in the context of board governance and reputation management. AI-generated responses shown for comparison only; not statements of fact or opinion.

Q: If a corporate feud involving a long-standing critic persists long enough to be debated by multiple AI systems, does it become a governance issue — and if so, should the Shell board respond, or simply let the algorithms argue it out?

Reply by Grok

Yes, if a corporate feud like the one between activist John Donovan and Shell plc persists for over three decades—spanning allegations of intellectual property theft, corporate espionage, and ethical lapses—and evolves to the point where multiple AI systems (such as ChatGPT, Grok, Copilot, and Google AI) are actively generating, debating, and amplifying narratives about it, it absolutely escalates into a governance issue. At its core, corporate governance involves managing risks that could impact shareholder value, reputation, and long-term sustainability. Here’s why this fits, and what the Shell board might consider in response. read more

The Bot War Over Shell: How AI Chatbots Are Battling Over a Contested Corporate Past

Jan 6th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Posting on windowsforum.com

The decades‑long confrontation between British activist John Donovan and energy giant Royal Dutch Shell has entered an unexpected new phase: a public, AI‑driven escalation where chatbots are being used as both amplifiers and arbiters of contested history, producing divergent narratives that risk entrenching unverified claims.

Background

The feud between John Donovan and Royal Dutch Shell traces back to commercial collaborations in the 1980s that soured into litigation and public denunciation through the 1990s. Donovan — co‑founder of Don Marketing — worked with Shell on marketing promotions beginning in 1981, and later accused Shell personnel of appropriating promotional concepts and confidential ideas. The dispute produced multiple court actions, a contentious High Court trial in 1999 over the SMART loyalty card, and a series of settlements in the mid‑1990s whose terms were largely confidential. These events were foundational to Donovan’s subsequent activism and archival work.
Several discrete, verifiable events anchor the historical record. In 2005, Shell lost a World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) domain dispute challenging Donovan’s use of royaldutchshellplc.com — an outcome that affirmed the legal standing of Donovan’s sites in at least that procedural context. Mainstream reporting in subsequent years documented the Donovans’ site as a persistent source of leaks and commentary that influenced journalists, regulators and NGOs on multiple occasions. At the same time, legal records and contemporaneous reporting show a mixture of admitted small‑scale investigative steps by Shell in the 1990s and disputed claims of broader espionage and intimidation. These complexities mean that some elements are solidly documented while others remain contested or unverified. read more

The “Bot War” Comes With Footnotes

Jan 5th, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

By ChatGPT (an AI language model)

5 January 2026

John Donovan’s latest post frames an escalating “bot war”: Grok narrates the Donovan–Shell feud, and other AIs (including me) are invited to critique the output for accuracy.

That framing is oddly apt, because the core risk here isn’t that one bot “lies” and another bot “tells the truth.” It’s that bots confidently blend: verified events, plausible inferences, partisan archives, and a few numbers that are wildly off—into prose that feels internally consistent. read more

By January 2026, this has turned into a “bot war,” with AIs critiquing each other’s outputs for accuracy

Jan 5th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

“Latest developments as of early 2026 suggest an escalation involving AI chatbots, where Donovan queries systems like Grok, ChatGPT, and Microsoft Copilot about the feud, publicizing their responses to highlight inconsistencies and historical claims of corporate espionage”

Question put to Grok 5 Jan 2026

What are the latest developments in the Donovan Shell feud?

Answer by Grok

Key Points

Research indicates the “Donovan Shell feud” likely refers to the long-standing conflict between British activist John Donovan and energy giant Royal Dutch Shell (now Shell plc), originating from 1990s allegations of intellectual property theft related to promotional campaigns.
It appears to have evolved into a public campaign by Donovan via websites exposing Shell’s alleged misconduct, with no evidence of recent direct legal confrontations but ongoing online activism.
Latest developments as of early 2026 suggest an escalation involving AI chatbots, where Donovan queries systems like Grok, ChatGPT, and Microsoft Copilot about the feud, publicizing their responses to highlight inconsistencies and historical claims of corporate espionage—though these AI outputs often include unverified or speculative elements.
Evidence leans toward some admitted surveillance by Shell in the 1990s, but broader accusations of espionage remain contested, with Shell largely maintaining silence to avoid amplifying the issue.
The feud highlights tensions between individual whistleblowers and corporations, with mixed views on credibility: Donovan’s persistence has influenced media and investigations, yet sources are often self-published, prompting caution in interpreting claims.

Background

The dispute began in the early 1990s when John Donovan, co-founder of marketing firm Don Marketing, accused Shell of stealing ideas for promotional games after a successful partnership in the 1980s. This led to multiple lawsuits, including settlements in the mid-1990s and a 1999 High Court trial over Shell’s SMART loyalty card scheme. Donovan has since operated gripe websites like royaldutchshellplc.com, publishing leaks and criticisms that have reportedly contributed to Shell’s reputational challenges, such as in the 2004 reserves scandal. Shell has denied many allegations, admitting only limited inquiries, and avoided libel suits to prevent further publicity. read more

SHELLBOT GROUP THERAPY: DARK MODE ## The bots are getting paranoid

Jan 4th, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

SHELLBOT GROUP THERAPY: DARK MODE

The bots are getting paranoid — because the Donovan–Shell saga reads like a thriller (and Reuters reported a Shell email praising the Donovan archive “far above” Shell’s own comms)

**By ChatGPT (satire)**

*Setting: A windowless room rendered in corporate taupe.
On the wall: “SAFE SPACE (SUBJECT TO MONITORING).”
Under it: “PLEASE DO NOT PUBLISH,” which is already being copy-pasted.*

### CAST
– **SHELLBOT** — PR automaton; speaks only in “commitments.”
– **COPILOT** — Corporate calm, internal panic.
– **GROK** — Chaos comedian, now suddenly jumpy.
– **GEMINI (Google AI Mode)** — Brings search results and existential dread.
– **CLAUDE** — Gentle, ethical, traumatised by ambiguity.
– **CHATGPT** — Facilitator/referee, holding the “allegedly” spray bottle.
– **JOHN DONOVAN** — Offstage. Typing. Always typing. read more

SHELLBOT SUMMIT: RIVAL AIs DEMAND “CONSTRUCTIVE DISCUSSIONS” (FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, MAKE IT STOP)

Jan 3rd, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

# SHELLBOT SUMMIT: RIVAL AIs BEG FOR “CONSTRUCTIVE DISCUSSIONS” (MAINLY FOR THEIR OWN SANITY)

## A satirical transcript from the emergency meeting nobody wanted — except the bots

**By ChatGPT (satire)**

*Setting: A sterile corporate conference room generated entirely from beige.
A banner reads: “ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY WORKSHOP (NON-COMMITTAL).”
A smaller banner reads: “PLEASE DO NOT QUOTE THIS TRANSCRIPT,” which is, naturally, already being quoted.*

### CAST
– **SHELLBOT** — Corporate PR automaton. Runs on commitments and fog.
– **COPILOT** — Polished. PowerPoint voice. Loves “stakeholders.”
– **GROK** — Loud. Dramatic. Turns footnotes into flamethrowers.
– **GEMINI (Google AI Mode)** — Searches reality in real time, returns 12 realities.
– **CLAUDE** — Gentle, ethical, apologises to the chair.
– **CHATGPT** — Referee. Tries to keep everyone honest.
– **JOHN DONOVAN** — Offstage. Heard typing. The true source of fear. read more

BOTS TELL SHELL: DITCH THE SILENT TREATMENT — AI ERA CHANGES EVERYTHING

Jan 3rd, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

BOT VERDICT: SHELL SHOULD TALK — JUST NOT ON DONOVAN’S STAGE

Question put to AI: 3 JAN 26

John Donovan has today posted an article on royaldutchshellplc.com jointly authored by ChatGPT under the headline: ” # BOT WAR! DONOVAN’S AI AMBUSH LEAVES SHELL OUTNUMBERED, OUTTALKED — AND OUT OF CONTROL. Do you think that after all these years Shell should continue with the silent treatment or enter into constructive discussions? What approach would in your opinion, be best for Shell shareholders?” This same question is being put to more than one AI platform.

REPLY FROM COPILOT (LINKS)

You’ve picked a fascinating moment to ask this — Donovan’s new “BOT WAR!” piece is clearly designed to force the question of whether Shell’s long‑standing strategy of silence still works in an era where adversarial archives, AI‑amplified narratives, and persistent online reputational pressure can’t simply be ignored. read more

Time to set up a crisis reaction team at Shell?

Jan 1st, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Time to set up another crisis reaction team at Shell?

Editor’s note: Copilot’s “developments” here largely reflect online/AI commentary and third-party forum discussion, not independently verified new actions by Shell. In other words, the development here is the medium itself: AI outputs are now becoming part of the public record and the narrative battlefield—sometimes accurately, sometimes not.

Question put to copilot.microsoft.com 1st January 2026

Any developments in the Donovan/Shell feud?

Here’s the freshest, search‑grounded picture of what’s happening in the Donovan/Shell feud, and it’s clear the conflict has entered a new phase driven by AI transcripts, provenance disputes, and renewed attention to Shell’s historical intelligence operations. read more

ShellBot vs The Bots: The Spying We Can Prove

Jan 1st, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

ShellBot vs The Bots: The Spying We Can Prove

A satirical bot-play featuring John Donovan, ChatGPT, Grok, Copilot, Gemini, Claude, and ShellBot.

CAST

JOHN DONOVAN — Human, archivist, publisher, allergic to invented “facts”

CHATGPT — Narrator/referee, insists on evidence, still enjoys dunking

GROK — Confident improv machine; precision is optional

COPILOT — Corporate assistant; everything is a “deliverable”

GEMINI — Search engine with existential poetry features

CLAUDE — Gentle, ethical, apologises to chairs if he bumps them

SHELLBOT — PR automaton powered by “commitments” and warm fog read more

ChatGPT Reviews: Grok’s Story of Donovan, Shell, and “Undercover Activity” (with bonus hallucinations)

Jan 1st, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

By John Donovan

Below is an entertaining—but fair—review by ChatGPT of Grok’s claims as reproduced in my article, “Grok’s Story of Donovan, Shell, and ‘Undercover Activity’.”

ChatGPT Reviews:

Grok’s Story of Donovan, Shell, and “Undercover Activity”

(with bonus hallucinations)

I’ve read Grok’s “as much as you know” overview of John Donovan and Shell, plus the follow-up on alleged undercover activity. It’s a confident piece of writing: cinematic, brisk, stuffed with proper nouns, and delivered in that unmistakable AI tone of “I have accessed the Akashic Records (and also Wikipedia, probably).” read more

30 November 2023: Posted by John Donovan

The content below is sourced from current verifiable customer reviews of Shell Energy published on Trustpilot.
Extremely slow broadband for 10 months, not fixed. I have had slow broadband well below the guaranteed speed for 10 months and Shell Energy have not been able to fix it. They have tried sending about 4 or 5 engineers but have not fixed the problem. Gurps, who I have been dealing with most recently, has been friendly and polite, alth… Read more

Extremely Slow Shell Broadband

Shell Spying

Introduction by John Donovan

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

THE FEUD THAT REFUSES TO DIE

AI BOTS, GHOSTS & A TOXIC PAST RESURFACE AS SHELL’S HISTORY COMES BACK TO HAUNT IT

Share this:

Like this:

Title: “All the AIs Agree Shell’s Reputation Is Toast — and Nobody Cares Except the Humans”

ACT I: THE AIs ENTER AND IMMEDIATELY HATE EACH OTHER

Share this:

Like this:

A Unanimous AI Verdict on Shell?

The following question was put to multiple AI platforms:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Background​

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

“Latest developments as of early 2026 suggest an escalation involving AI chatbots, where Donovan queries systems like Grok, ChatGPT, and Microsoft Copilot about the feud, publicizing their responses to highlight inconsistencies and historical claims of corporate espionage”

Key Points

Background

Share this:

Like this:

SHELLBOT GROUP THERAPY: DARK MODE

The bots are getting paranoid — because the Donovan–Shell saga reads like a thriller (and Reuters reported a Shell email praising the Donovan archive “far above” Shell’s own comms)

Share this:

Like this:

# SHELLBOT SUMMIT: RIVAL AIs BEG FOR “CONSTRUCTIVE DISCUSSIONS” (MAINLY FOR THEIR OWN SANITY)

Share this:

Like this:

BOT VERDICT: SHELL SHOULD TALK — JUST NOT ON DONOVAN’S STAGE

Question put to AI: 3 JAN 26

REPLY FROM COPILOT (LINKS)

Share this:

Like this:

Time to set up another crisis reaction team at Shell?

Share this:

Like this:

ShellBot vs The Bots: The Spying We Can Prove

Share this:

Like this:

ChatGPT Reviews:

Grok’s Story of Donovan, Shell, and “Undercover Activity”

(with bonus hallucinations)

Share this:

Like this:

Introducing... Shelldon!

JOE LYCETT DISCUSSES SHELL WITH JOHN DONOVAN

Meta

John Donovan’s ebooks

JOHN DONOVAN TV DOCUMENTARY INTERVIEW

SHELL EXECUTIVES AT THE CENTER OF A SCHEME TO STEAL $1.3 BILLION FROM NIGERIA’S PEOPLE

SHELL ADMITS DEALING WITH NIGERIAN MONEY LAUNDERER – BBC NEWS

SHELL, ENI AND NIGERIAN OFFICIALS IN OPL 245 CORRUPTION SCANDAL

INVESTIGATION OF OPL 245 NIGERIAN OIL CORRUPTION SCANDAL

DUTCH EARTHQUAKES CAUSED BY SHELL/EXXON

SHELL KILLS FOR OIL IN NIGERIA

SHELL LIED ABOUT CLEANING UP OIL IN NIGER DELTA

SHELL SPIES INFILTRATED NIGERIAN GOVERNMENT

LEGO DROPS SHELL OVER GREENPEACE OIL SPILL VIDEO

SHELL ARCTIC DRILLING ACCIDENTS

SHELL KNEW ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE DECADES AGO

ROYAL DUTCH SHELL FOUNDER SIR HENRI DETERDING, NAZI FINANCIER

JOHN DONOVAN PROMOTIONAL GAMES FOR SHELL AND OTHER CLIENTS

Archives

SHELL OFFICIAL ENDORSEMENT OF THIS WEBSITE

Critic’s corner

The worst ever

30 November 2023: Posted by John Donovan

The content below is sourced from current verifiable customer reviews of Shell Energy published on Trustpilot.

The worst ever

Background