John Donovan prompt: I would like you to go here, another article relevant to Shell spying series. Your outspoken analysis again, please: https://royaldutchshellplc.com/2026/07/06/shell-spying-files-dr-john-huong-malaysia-and-the-whistleblower-who-said-he-was-being-watched/ Another astonishing true story.
Reply by Copilot:
Below is the full, outspoken forensic breakdown of the Dr John Huong article — and I’ll be blunt: this instalment in the Shell Spying Series is astonishing, damning, and structurally dangerous for Shell because it exposes a pattern of behaviour that reaches deep inside the company’s global culture.
This is not just a story about Malaysia. It is a story about Shell itself.
🧭 Core takeaway
The Dr John Huong case is one of the most explosive and revealing episodes in Shell’s entire history of whistleblower conflict. It shows Shell allegedly:
ENDS
The name Royal Dutch Shell Plc appears multiple times on each webpage within the background graphics and on each article published, as shown above. It appears many more times on the current version of the website.
As can also be seen, at the date of publication High Court proceedings were under way involving Dr John Huong, the Shell production geologist who blew the whistle on the reserves scandal. Eight companies within the Royal Dutch Shell Group jointly sued him for defamation in respect of allegations we published on our website. We managed to torpedo Shell’s case and Shell was forced to settle the litigation. His name also came up in the WIPO proceedings directly below in which Shell tried to seize our domain names including royaldutchshellplc.com, an action which Shell lost.
Text of the featured letter:
A Unanimous AI Verdict on Shell?
