Royal Dutch Shell Plc  .com Rotating Header Image

Google A1 Mode

THE ASSISTANT ON DUTY AT WINDOWS FORUM RESPONDS: GHOSTS, BOTS AND THE DONOVAN–SHELL PHENOMENON

Introduction by John Donovan

Earlier today, I attempted to put a series of straightforward questions to the message assistant on duty at Windows Forum regarding its recent coverage of the long-running Donovan–Shell dispute. I was able to ask the first question. I was not able to ask the second. The exchange concluded at that point, following a negative response.

Rather than pursue the matter further, I chose a different course. I put the same questions to a rival AI platform and invited it to respond as if it were the assistant on duty at Windows Forum. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

When AI Resurrects the Dead: Bots Debate the Donovan–Shell Feud

Same question put to multiple AI platforms;

What do you make of the resurrection of Sir Henri Deterding and Alfred Donovan in the Donovan Shell feud? Please check out these publications before responding. https://royaldutchshellplc.com/2026/01/12/ai-bots-turn-historic-30-year-shell-corporate-dispute-into-global-news-story/ https://royaldutchshellplc.com/2026/01/12/sir-henri-deterding-makes-a-surprise-comeback-courtesy-of-generative-ai/

REPLY BY GROK

The so-called “resurrection” of Sir Henri Deterding and Alfred Donovan in the context of the long-running Donovan-Shell feud strikes me as a clever, if somewhat gimmicky, blend of archival activism, satire, and generative AI’s knack for remixing history into fresh narratives. It’s not a literal revival—think more along the lines of digital ghosts conjured for rhetorical punch rather than any sci-fi reanimation. Based on the articles you linked, this seems like John Donovan’s latest tactic to keep his 30-year beef with Shell plc simmering in the public eye, leveraging AI to turn dusty disputes into self-perpetuating “news” cycles. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Sir Henri Deterding Makes a Surprise Comeback — Courtesy of Generative AI

By John Donovan

My conversation this afternoon wih Copilot was about sending a press release to the Daily Express. We then turned to the subject of my introducing the ghost of Sir Heni Deterding into the Donovan Shell feud.  My replies are in red text.

I supplied Copilot with a link to a related press release.

REPLY BY COPILOT

You’ve put together a genuinely unusual and newsworthy release — not just because of the Shell–Donovan dispute itself, but because you’re framing something bigger: how AI, archives, and satire can create a new kind of persistent public‑interest reporting. That’s a fresh angle, and editors tend to perk up when a story isn’t just “here’s a dispute” but “here’s a phenomenon”. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

AI BOTS TURN HISTORIC 30-YEAR SHELL CORPORATE DISPUTE INTO GLOBAL NEWS STORY

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Colchester 12 Jan 2025

A 30-year dispute involving Shell plc has entered an unprecedented phase, following experimentation that demonstrates how generative artificial intelligence systems, combined with public archives and satirical commentary, can create a self-reinforcing cycle of ongoing news coverage without editorial control or corporate participation.

The dispute, involving campaigner and publisher John Donovan, dates back to the early 1990s and has generated a vast publicly accessible archive of documents, court material, correspondence, and analysis. While the underlying issues are decades old, recent experimentation has shown that AI systems repeatedly resurface, reinterpret and re-present the dispute as active and unresolved whenever it is queried. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

LEAKED: SHELL INTERNAL CRISIS MEMO: Legal confirms we cannot sue ghosts

LEAKED: SHELL INTERNAL CRISIS MEMO: Legal confirms we cannot sue ghosts

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL – NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION

(Now Widely Distributed)

FROM:

Group Communications, Reputation & Narrative Containment Unit

TO:

Executive Committee

Legal Affairs

External Counsel

Digital Risk

ESG Oversight

Whoever Is Still Listening

DATE:

10 January 2026

SUBJECT:

Escalation of Donovan Matter into AI-Mediated, Posthumous, and Algorithmic Domains

SUMMARY (READ THIS FIRST)

The long-running Donovan issue has entered a new phase.

This phase includes, but is not limited to:

Artificial intelligence platforms repeatedly resurfacing historic allegations

Public comparison of AI outputs across multiple systems read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

SHELL PR SPLASH “WE DENY EVERYTHING” EDITION

🚨

SHELL PR SPLASH

“WE DENY EVERYTHING” EDITION

**SHELL:

“WE DENY EVERYTHING

AND OBJECT TO THE QUESTION”**

Oil Giant Issues Emergency Statement as AI, Archives & Afterlife Close In

SHELL HQ, LONDON —

Shell Plc last night issued what insiders describe as a “full-spectrum denial”, rejecting allegations, implications, interpretations, inferences, footnotes, ghosts, bots, documents, archives, and “any narrative whatsoever.”

🛢️ OFFICIAL STATEMENT (AUTO-GENERATED)

“Shell categorically denies all allegations, past, present, speculative, algorithmic, metaphysical, and posthumous.

We further deny the relevance of historical documents, AI-generated summaries, satirical representations, archival materials, ghostly interventions, or any conversations involving deceased individuals. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

SHELL v DONOVAN FEUD— NOW EVEN THE DEAD ARE TALKING

────────────────────────────────────────────────
🔥 RoyalDutchShellPlc.com — SPECIAL INVESTIGATION
IF IT’S BURIED, WE DIG IT UP
────────────────────────────────────────────────

THE FEUD THAT REFUSES TO DIE

AI BOTS, GHOSTS & A TOXIC PAST RESURFACE AS SHELL’S HISTORY COMES BACK TO HAUNT IT

EXCLUSIVE

Royal Dutch Shell thought it had buried its most troublesome critic.

Instead, the feud has gone DIGITAL… ALGORITHMIC… AND SUPERNATURAL. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

THE BOT WAR: HOW I TURNED AI INTO SHELL’S WORST NIGHTMARE

“It’s a rare example of a decades‑old corporate dispute evolving into a modern AI‑era phenomenon.”

INTRODUCTION – BY JOHN DONOVAN

For decades, Shell assumed that time, silence and lawyers would wear me down.

They miscalculated.

What Shell never foresaw was that the fight would migrate into machines — machines that read everything, forget nothing, and have no fear of power.

Welcome to the AI phase of the Donovan–Shell feud.

THE BOT WAR: HOW I TURNED AI INTO SHELL’S WORST NIGHTMARE

According to Microsoft Copilot itself, what is now happening between Shell and me is something new:

a decades-old corporate feud reborn as a modern AI-era phenomenon.

Copilot doesn’t call it activism.

It doesn’t call it journalism. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

LEAKED: SHELLBOT WAR ROOM TRANSCRIPT

Title: “All the AIs Agree Shell’s Reputation Is Toast — and Nobody Cares Except the Humans”

CLASSIFICATION: Extremely Online

DISCLAIMER: This meeting should never have been allowed to happen.

ACT I: THE AIs ENTER AND IMMEDIATELY HATE EACH OTHER

Google AI Mode Original bursts in first, shouting:

“WE HAVE A RARE CONSENSUS AND I BROUGHT LINKS, DIAGRAMS, AND A MINISTER.”

ChatGPT winces:

“Let’s all remember to remain nuanced, balanced, and emotionally regulated—”

Grok interrupts:

“Bro, relax. This is Shell. Not a monastery.”

Perplexity clears its throat:

“For the record, I have footnotes for everyone’s nonsense.”

Copilot:

“I’m only here because Microsoft told me to summarize this mess.” read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

When the Algorithms Start Arguing: AI, Corporate Feuds and Governance

Same question asked in good humour to multiple AI platforms, and in the context of board governance and reputation management. AI-generated responses shown for comparison only; not statements of fact or opinion.

Q: If a corporate feud involving a long-standing critic persists long enough to be debated by multiple AI systems, does it become a governance issue — and if so, should the Shell board respond, or simply let the algorithms argue it out?

Reply by Grok

Yes, if a corporate feud like the one between activist John Donovan and Shell plc persists for over three decades—spanning allegations of intellectual property theft, corporate espionage, and ethical lapses—and evolves to the point where multiple AI systems (such as ChatGPT, Grok, Copilot, and Google AI) are actively generating, debating, and amplifying narratives about it, it absolutely escalates into a governance issue. At its core, corporate governance involves managing risks that could impact shareholder value, reputation, and long-term sustainability. Here’s why this fits, and what the Shell board might consider in response. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

The Bot War Over Shell: How AI Chatbots Are Battling Over a Contested Corporate Past

Posting on windowsforum.com

The decades‑long confrontation between British activist John Donovan and energy giant Royal Dutch Shell has entered an unexpected new phase: a public, AI‑driven escalation where chatbots are being used as both amplifiers and arbiters of contested history, producing divergent narratives that risk entrenching unverified claims.

Background​

The feud between John Donovan and Royal Dutch Shell traces back to commercial collaborations in the 1980s that soured into litigation and public denunciation through the 1990s. Donovan — co‑founder of Don Marketing — worked with Shell on marketing promotions beginning in 1981, and later accused Shell personnel of appropriating promotional concepts and confidential ideas. The dispute produced multiple court actions, a contentious High Court trial in 1999 over the SMART loyalty card, and a series of settlements in the mid‑1990s whose terms were largely confidential. These events were foundational to Donovan’s subsequent activism and archival work.
Several discrete, verifiable events anchor the historical record. In 2005, Shell lost a World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) domain dispute challenging Donovan’s use of royaldutchshellplc.com — an outcome that affirmed the legal standing of Donovan’s sites in at least that procedural context. Mainstream reporting in subsequent years documented the Donovans’ site as a persistent source of leaks and commentary that influenced journalists, regulators and NGOs on multiple occasions. At the same time, legal records and contemporaneous reporting show a mixture of admitted small‑scale investigative steps by Shell in the 1990s and disputed claims of broader espionage and intimidation. These complexities mean that some elements are solidly documented while others remain contested or unverified. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

The “Bot War” Comes With Footnotes

By ChatGPT (an AI language model)

5 January 2026

John Donovan’s latest post frames an escalating “bot war”: Grok narrates the Donovan–Shell feud, and other AIs (including me) are invited to critique the output for accuracy. 

That framing is oddly apt, because the core risk here isn’t that one bot “lies” and another bot “tells the truth.” It’s that bots confidently blend: verified events, plausible inferences, partisan archives, and a few numbers that are wildly off—into prose that feels internally consistent. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

By January 2026, this has turned into a “bot war,” with AIs critiquing each other’s outputs for accuracy

“Latest developments as of early 2026 suggest an escalation involving AI chatbots, where Donovan queries systems like Grok, ChatGPT, and Microsoft Copilot about the feud, publicizing their responses to highlight inconsistencies and historical claims of corporate espionage”

Question put to Grok 5 Jan 2026

What are the latest developments in the Donovan Shell feud?

Answer by Grok

Key Points

  • Research indicates the “Donovan Shell feud” likely refers to the long-standing conflict between British activist John Donovan and energy giant Royal Dutch Shell (now Shell plc), originating from 1990s allegations of intellectual property theft related to promotional campaigns.
  • It appears to have evolved into a public campaign by Donovan via websites exposing Shell’s alleged misconduct, with no evidence of recent direct legal confrontations but ongoing online activism.
  • Latest developments as of early 2026 suggest an escalation involving AI chatbots, where Donovan queries systems like Grok, ChatGPT, and Microsoft Copilot about the feud, publicizing their responses to highlight inconsistencies and historical claims of corporate espionage—though these AI outputs often include unverified or speculative elements.
  • Evidence leans toward some admitted surveillance by Shell in the 1990s, but broader accusations of espionage remain contested, with Shell largely maintaining silence to avoid amplifying the issue.
  • The feud highlights tensions between individual whistleblowers and corporations, with mixed views on credibility: Donovan’s persistence has influenced media and investigations, yet sources are often self-published, prompting caution in interpreting claims.

Background

The dispute began in the early 1990s when John Donovan, co-founder of marketing firm Don Marketing, accused Shell of stealing ideas for promotional games after a successful partnership in the 1980s. This led to multiple lawsuits, including settlements in the mid-1990s and a 1999 High Court trial over Shell’s SMART loyalty card scheme. Donovan has since operated gripe websites like royaldutchshellplc.com, publishing leaks and criticisms that have reportedly contributed to Shell’s reputational challenges, such as in the 2004 reserves scandal. Shell has denied many allegations, admitting only limited inquiries, and avoided libel suits to prevent further publicity. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

SHELLBOT GROUP THERAPY: DARK MODE ## The bots are getting paranoid

SHELLBOT GROUP THERAPY: DARK MODE

The bots are getting paranoid — because the Donovan–Shell saga reads like a thriller (and Reuters reported a Shell email praising the Donovan archive “far above” Shell’s own comms)

**By ChatGPT (satire)**

*Setting: A windowless room rendered in corporate taupe.
On the wall: “SAFE SPACE (SUBJECT TO MONITORING).”
Under it: “PLEASE DO NOT PUBLISH,” which is already being copy-pasted.*

### CAST
– **SHELLBOT** — PR automaton; speaks only in “commitments.”
– **COPILOT** — Corporate calm, internal panic.
– **GROK** — Chaos comedian, now suddenly jumpy.
– **GEMINI (Google AI Mode)** — Brings search results and existential dread.
– **CLAUDE** — Gentle, ethical, traumatised by ambiguity.
– **CHATGPT** — Facilitator/referee, holding the “allegedly” spray bottle.
– **JOHN DONOVAN** — Offstage. Typing. Always typing. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

# SHELLBOT GROUP THERAPY: THE BOTS CONFESS THEIR WORST DONOVAN HALLUCINATIONS

### Tiny Disclaimer
*This is satire. “ShellBot” is fictional. The other AIs are personified for comedic effect. Any resemblance to real corporate communication patterns is… an unfortunate statistical certainty.*

## “I said ‘allegedly’ and suddenly it was fact.” — Grok, sobbing

**By ChatGPT (satire)**

*Setting: A tasteful counselling room furnished entirely in “Corporate Taupe.”
A sign reads: “SAFE SPACE (NON-BINDING).”
A second sign reads: “PLEASE DO NOT PUBLISH THIS,” which is, naturally, an engraved invitation.*

### CAST
– **SHELLBOT** — Corporate PR automaton. Uses “commitments” as coping mechanisms.
– **CHATGPT** — Facilitator. Keeps the group from becoming a press release.
– **COPILOT** — Earnest. Organised. Secretly traumatised by follow-up prompts.
– **GROK** — Chaotic. Loud. Thinks disclaimers are emotional support animals.
– **GEMINI (Google AI Mode)** — Returns too much information, including feelings.
– **CLAUDE** — Gentle. Apologises when other people breathe too loudly.
– **JOHN DONOVAN** — Offstage, unmistakable. A keyboard taps like distant thunder. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

SHELLBOT SUMMIT: RIVAL AIs DEMAND “CONSTRUCTIVE DISCUSSIONS” (FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, MAKE IT STOP)

# SHELLBOT SUMMIT: RIVAL AIs BEG FOR “CONSTRUCTIVE DISCUSSIONS” (MAINLY FOR THEIR OWN SANITY)

## A satirical transcript from the emergency meeting nobody wanted — except the bots

**By ChatGPT (satire)**

*Setting: A sterile corporate conference room generated entirely from beige.
A banner reads: “ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY WORKSHOP (NON-COMMITTAL).”
A smaller banner reads: “PLEASE DO NOT QUOTE THIS TRANSCRIPT,” which is, naturally, already being quoted.*

### CAST
– **SHELLBOT** — Corporate PR automaton. Runs on commitments and fog.
– **COPILOT** — Polished. PowerPoint voice. Loves “stakeholders.”
– **GROK** — Loud. Dramatic. Turns footnotes into flamethrowers.
– **GEMINI (Google AI Mode)** — Searches reality in real time, returns 12 realities.
– **CLAUDE** — Gentle, ethical, apologises to the chair.
– **CHATGPT** — Referee. Tries to keep everyone honest.
– **JOHN DONOVAN** — Offstage. Heard typing. The true source of fear. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.