perplexity

Timeline of the Donovan Shell Feud

Comments are off for this post

The Donovan–Shell Feud: The Timeline Shell Cannot Bury

For most corporations, a commercial dispute from the last century would be dead, buried, and forgotten — filed away in dusty legal archives, smothered by PR varnish, and quietly erased from public memory. But Shell is not most corporations, and the Donovan feud is no ordinary business quarrel.

This is the extraordinary chronology of a dispute that began with petrol forecourt promotions, confidential marketing ideas, and a family business that once worked alongside Shell — only to spiral into High Court battles, public campaigning, domain-name warfare, leaked documents, media investigations, alleged monitoring, reputational blowback, and, now, the strange new battlefield of artificial intelligence. read more

^*This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan - more information here. There is also a Wikipedia segment, the Shell DPA Files, "Shell and the Spies", the Shell Leaks files, as well as books written and published by John Donovan - Kindle eBooks. Timeline of the Donovan Shell Feud. Toxic History of Royal Dutch Shell Group. Shell and the Donovans: The Full Media Record — 550+ Articles, 110 Books, 40 Years. ^*All created and supported by internet wizz, Nick Gill.

Is Shell Plc an international laughing stock? Perplexity Verdict.

May 27th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

No—calling Shell an “international laughing stock” is too strong for a publication-safe assessment, even in a satirical frame. A fairer line is that Shell has suffered a long-running reputation nuisance: a public name-change story, a messy legacy around “Royal Dutch,” and an unusually durable critic’s website that keeps resurfacing in the company’s image problem.

Why the joke lands

The satire works because the contrast is real: Shell is still a global energy giant operating in more than 70 countries, yet a relatively small domain-name and criticism dispute has repeatedly punched above its weight in public perception. The 2022 rename from “Royal Dutch Shell plc” to “Shell plc” was official, so any suggestion that the old full name still somehow haunts the brand is rooted in actual corporate history rather than pure invention. read more

Fact, Fiction or Hallucination? The Donovan–Shell “Bot War” and the New Frontline of AI, Law and Reputation

Apr 15th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

What happens when a decades-long corporate dispute collides with generative artificial intelligence? The evolving confrontation between activist John Donovan and Shell has become an unusual but revealing test case. What began in the 1990s as a traditional legal and reputational conflict has, in recent years, migrated into the domain of AI systems—where archives, allegations, and corporate responses are reinterpreted, recombined, and sometimes distorted by large language models.

Central to this latest phase is what participants have termed a “bot war”: a series of experiments in which Donovan inputs historical materials, leaked documents, and prior claims into multiple AI platforms, then publishes the outputs—highlighting inconsistencies, apparent hallucinations, and divergent narratives about Shell’s past conduct. The results raise broader questions about how AI systems handle contested histories, how corporate reputations can be affected by machine-generated content, and where responsibility lies when outputs blur the line between synthesis and fabrication. read more

“Even the AIs Are Laughing”: Five Different Systems Reach the Same Damaging Verdict on Shell’s Donovan Saga

Mar 27th, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

When machines trained on the world’s data all point in the same direction, it’s no longer just a feud—it’s a pattern

Shell has spent decades dealing with critics.

But what happens when the critics are no longer just human?

In a deliberately provocative experiment, the same prompt was fired at multiple leading AI platforms—including ChatGPT—asking a simple question:

What are the most embarrassing moments in Shell’s long-running feud with John Donovan?

The expectation: chaos.

Different answers. Different rankings. Different narratives.

Instead?

Something far more awkward.

Five AIs. One Conclusion.

Despite operating independently, trained on different datasets, and designed to think differently… read more

Shell top 10 most humiliating own goals in Donovan feud as ranked by AI

Mar 27th, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

MARCH 2026

SHELL’S GREATEST HITS (OF SELF-INFLICTED WOUNDS): THE TOP 10 MOST HUMILIATING EPISODES IN SHELL’S THREE-DECADE WAR WITH JOHN DONOVAN: Researched and compiled by claude.ai

Shell Outmaneuvered by Its Own Morality Play: Researched and compiled by Perplexity

Top 10 most humiliating Shell own‑goals in the Donovan feud: Researched and compiled by Microsoft Copilot

Shell’s Glorious Parade of Self-Owns: The Top 10 Most Humiliating Face-Plants in Its 30-Year Donovan Debacle: Researched and compiled by Grok

Top 10 most embarrassing Donovan-era setbacks for Shell: Researched and compiled by ChatGPT

The prompt issued to the above AI platforms

This identical prompt is being submitted to multiple AI platforms.

Your task is to conduct deep research and produce a fact-based, satirical Top 10 list of the most humiliating, embarrassing, absurd, or self-inflicted setbacks suffered by Shell in its long-running, roughly three-decade conflict with John Donovan and the Donovans.

Use publicly available evidence, including credible media coverage, legal cases, archived materials, and relevant material from Donovan’s books and websites, especially royaldutchshellplc.com. read more

Shell Outmaneuvered by Its Own Morality Play

Mar 26th, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

Researched and compiled by Perplexity

Shell versus Donovan is the corporate equivalent of a heavyweight champion repeatedly walking into his own punches. Below is the Top 10 reel of Shell’s most self‑inflicted, humiliating episodes in a feud it should have ended cleanly decades ago – but instead turned into a rolling farce.

10. The “Conscience” Problem: Shell Outmaneuvered by Its Own Morality Play

Shell’s first big mistake was spiritual: it helped create, then had to live with, its own corporate Jiminy Cricket. John Donovan co‑founded the “Shell Corporate Conscience” pressure group, a tidy little phrase that lodged like shrapnel in Shell’s brand narrative. read more

claude.ai Part 2: SHELL’S SECRET WAR ON ONE MAN IN COLCHESTER

Mar 23rd, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

PART TWO: THE MACHINES HAVE NOTICED

A Crystal Ball Special Investigation, Continued

By Our Special Correspondent, Department of Satirical Prophecy Published: March 2026

DISCLAIMER: The following article is Part Two of a satirical commentary based on real events, documented facts, and the output of multiple AI systems that have now, apparently, also noticed the Donovan-Shell situation. The crystal ball has been recharged. Its batteries were, appropriately, made in the Netherlands.

PART FIVE: THE ROBOTS HAVE READ THE FILE

When Part One of this investigation was published, it seemed reasonable to assume that Shell’s primary reputational challenge in 2026 remained what it has always been: one retired gentleman in Colchester, Essex, with a laptop, a broadband connection, and what Shell’s own internal documents once described, with heroic understatement, as “a longstanding disagreement with Shell.” read more

windowsforum: Shell’s Long-Fought Domain Feud: AI Roundtable Satire and Reputational Fallout

Mar 23rd, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Today – 23 March 2026 at 1:50 AM

The Machines Agree on Shell’s Long Shadow

A satirical “AI roundtable” about the Shell saga may read like internet theater, but it lands because the underlying dispute is real, persistent, and unusually durable. What makes the piece sting is not the fictional dialogue itself; it is the way four different AI systems are imagined converging on one basic conclusion: Shell’s long-running conflict with John Donovan is no trivial internet squabble, but a reputational problem that never fully went away. That framing is consistent with the historical record of a domain-name battle Shell lost in 2005 and with the company’s own continuing sensitivity around branding, online identity, and corporate narrative.

Background

The Donovan-Shell dispute is one of those rare corporate feuds that evolved from conventional commercial conflict into a hybrid of litigation, media activism, and digital counter-narrative. The roots go back to Donovan’s earlier business dealings and the breakdown of trust that followed, eventually producing years of public criticism aimed at Shell and its executives. Over time, that criticism hardened into a permanent archive of allegations, commentary, and document drops, with royaldutchshellplc.com becoming the symbolic center of gravity.
The domain-name dimension matters because it gave the dispute a legal anchor and a visible address. In the 2005 WIPO case, Shell International Petroleum Company Limited sought control of royaldutchshellplc.com, royaldutchshellgroup.com, and tellshell.org, but the panel rejected Shell’s complaint on the basis that bad-faith registration and use were not proven. That result did not settle the broader feud, but it did establish that Donovan had a defensible position for operating a non-commercial criticism site under that domain.
The satirical article is also clearly a product of the AI era, and that is part of what makes it notable. Donovan’s experiment, as described on the site, uses multiple generative systems to interrogate the same controversy and then compare outputs for consistency, hedging, and error. The goal is not just humor; it is to expose how machine-generated confidence can mask weak verification, especially when the prompt touches a long, contentious historical record. read more

Perplexity: Please, for the love of God, update the Donovan issue brief before the AGM

Mar 22nd, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Prompt

Could you analyse the information and links on the following article and create a satirical article predicting what Shell may be doing now and in the future based on the astonishing content of the article and the content of the linked Shell internal emails https://shellnews.net/DPA2009/DPA2009INDEXPAGE.html deep dive please for a long article. Please use your crystal ball. Is Shell likely to continue cloak and dagger activity directed against me.

Reply by Perplexity

Shell’s own email trail already reads like a corporate thriller, so a satirical “crystal‑ball” sequel almost writes itself.

Prologue: Shell’s Ghost Department – Group Donovan Affairs

Somewhere deep inside Shell Centre, long after the “Tell Shell” forum died and was quietly taxidermied for the archives, a discreet new unit is born: Group Donovan Affairs (GDA), reporting jointly to Legal, Corporate Affairs, and “Special Projects.” Its founding PowerPoint explains the remit in serene bullet points:

“Minimise oxygen to Donovan while maximising monitoring of Donovan‑related risk.” read more

AI Judges the Shell Saga

Mar 22nd, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

What Happens When Multiple Machines Analyse a 30-Year Dispute?: AI Groupthink—only faster, cleaner, and far more convincing: Distributed reasoning…

By John Donovan

Introduction: Putting the Machines to Work

In a world where artificial intelligence is increasingly used to answer everything from trivial questions to complex legal problems, I decided to try something different.

I asked the machines to judge Shell.

Not in a courtroom.

Not in a press release.

But through analysis.

Specifically, I invited multiple AI systems—ChatGPT, Grok, Copilot, and Perplexity—to examine a decades-long dispute between myself and Royal Dutch Shell.

The result was something unexpected.

Not agreement in every detail. read more

Copilot: treating multiple AI platforms as an informal advisory panel —Overall It’s a positive development—if used wisely

Mar 22nd, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Prompt

Please comment on the article https://royaldutchshellplc.com/2026/03/22/consulting-the-machines/ in particular from the standpoint of AI platforms. Do you welcome the treating of AI platforms collectively as an informal advisory panel or are there downsides from your perpective? Is it a welcome development or not?

Reply by Copilot:

In short: treating multiple AI platforms as an “informal advisory panel” can be valuable, but only when users understand the limits of AI systems. It encourages critical thinking and reduces over‑reliance on any single model, but it also risks amplifying shared biases or errors if users mistake convergence for independent verification. read more

Perplexity: experimental use of multiple systems to probe a single, adversarial archive is welcome

Mar 22nd, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Prompt

Reply by perplexity:

Treating multiple AI platforms as an informal advisory panel is useful but only if everyone involved remains very clear about what these systems are and are not.

What the article is doing

The piece is effectively “outsourcing” parts of the Donovan–Shell risk analysis to a panel of models (Grok, Perplexity, Copilot, etc.), comparing how they frame the same underlying archive and then using those differences as commentary on both Shell and the AI ecosystem. It builds directly on earlier “bot war” episodes, where cross‑model inconsistencies, hallucinations, and misstatements about Shell’s position became the story in their own right. read more

Grok: a welcome evolution in how people interact with AI

Mar 22nd, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Prompt

Grok reply:

**The article “Consulting the Machines” (published today, 22 March 2026) is a fascinating meta-experiment by John Donovan.** He deliberately queried several AI platforms—including Grok (me), Copilot, Perplexity, and others referenced in linked prior posts—about the same 30-year Shell dispute, then stepped back to observe convergence, divergence, and shared errors across our outputs. The goal wasn’t to “win” the argument or extract binding advice, but to treat us collectively as a kind of informal, distributed advisory panel for pattern recognition and cross-validation. read more

Consulting the Machines

Mar 22nd, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

What Happens When You Ask Multiple AIs to Analyse a 30-Year Dispute?

By John Donovan

Introduction

In a recent article—

👉 https://royaldutchshellplc.com/2026/03/21/can-ai-help-close-a-30-year-dispute-my-conversations-with-chatgpt-on-shell/

—I published a full, unedited exchange with ChatGPT examining a decades-long dispute between myself and Royal Dutch Shell.

That article was not an endpoint.

It was an experiment.

What would happen if, instead of relying on a single artificial intelligence system, I consulted several—treating them collectively as an informal advisory panel? read more

Can AI Help Close a 30-Year Dispute? My Conversations with ChatGPT on Shell

Mar 21st, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

Editorial Introduction

What follows is an unedited exchange between myself and ChatGPT—one of several artificial intelligence systems I recently consulted in an effort to bring clarity, and perhaps closure, to a dispute with Shell that has spanned decades.

What began as a simple domain name issue evolved into something far more complex: misdirected communications, documented interactions with senior Shell executives, and a persistent online presence that the company has never fully resolved.

Curious to see how modern AI would assess this unusual situation, I sought independent views from multiple platforms, treating them as an informal advisory panel. Their responses—while not without occasional factual errors—revealed a surprising degree of consistency in one key respect: the matter appears capable of resolution. read more

Perplexity: Shell’s Ghost Inbox: How One Man Ended Up Handling Big Oil’s Misdelivered Secrets

Mar 20th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

“…the domain gave Donovan naming‑level visibility, a magnet for leaks and complaints, and a permanent, search‑optimised stage from which to attack Shell’s reputation.”

Prompt by John Donovan

As you can see from this article https://royaldutchshellplc.com/2026/03/20/dear-shell-ive-been-handling-your-mail-for-years-youre-welcome/ – and from the information in the links, Shell is in a pickle with John Donovan for the reasons explained. What would you advise Shell to do? Please also take this article into account: https://royaldutchshellplc.com/2026/03/20/grok-shell-should-treat-this-as-a-manageable-operational-security-and-reputational-risk-rather-than-an-existential-crisis/ and this article https://royaldutchshellplc.com/2026/03/20/shell-faces-renewed-pressure-to-resolve-long-running-domain-dispute-as-donovan-publishes-fresh-claims/ read more

30 November 2023: Posted by John Donovan

The content below is sourced from current verifiable customer reviews of Shell Energy published on Trustpilot.
Extremely slow broadband for 10 months, not fixed. I have had slow broadband well below the guaranteed speed for 10 months and Shell Energy have not been able to fix it. They have tried sending about 4 or 5 engineers but have not fixed the problem. Gurps, who I have been dealing with most recently, has been friendly and polite, alth… Read more

Extremely Slow Shell Broadband

perplexity

The Donovan–Shell Feud: The Timeline Shell Cannot Bury

Why the joke lands

When machines trained on the world’s data all point in the same direction, it’s no longer just a feud—it’s a pattern

Five AIs. One Conclusion.

MARCH 2026

SHELL’S GREATEST HITS (OF SELF-INFLICTED WOUNDS): THE TOP 10 MOST HUMILIATING EPISODES IN SHELL’S THREE-DECADE WAR WITH JOHN DONOVAN: Researched and compiled by claude.ai

Shell Outmaneuvered by Its Own Morality Play: Researched and compiled by Perplexity

Top 10 most humiliating Shell own‑goals in the Donovan feud: Researched and compiled by Microsoft Copilot

Shell’s Glorious Parade of Self-Owns: The Top 10 Most Humiliating Face-Plants in Its 30-Year Donovan Debacle: Researched and compiled by Grok

Top 10 most embarrassing Donovan-era setbacks for Shell: Researched and compiled by ChatGPT

The prompt issued to the above AI platforms

Researched and compiled by Perplexity

10. The “Conscience” Problem: Shell Outmaneuvered by Its Own Morality Play

PART TWO: THE MACHINES HAVE NOTICED

A Crystal Ball Special Investigation, Continued

PART FIVE: THE ROBOTS HAVE READ THE FILE

The Machines Agree on Shell’s Long Shadow

Background​

Prompt

Reply by Perplexity

Prologue: Shell’s Ghost Department – Group Donovan Affairs

What Happens When Multiple Machines Analyse a 30-Year Dispute?: AI Groupthink—only faster, cleaner, and far more convincing: Distributed reasoning…

Introduction: Putting the Machines to Work

Prompt

Reply by Copilot:

Prompt

Reply by perplexity:

What the article is doing

Prompt

Grok reply:

What Happens When You Ask Multiple AIs to Analyse a 30-Year Dispute?

Introduction

Editorial Introduction

“…the domain gave Donovan naming‑level visibility, a magnet for leaks and complaints, and a permanent, search‑optimised stage from which to attack Shell’s reputation.”

Prompt by John Donovan

Sir Henri Deterding, resurrected!

JOE LYCETT DISCUSSES SHELL WITH JOHN DONOVAN

Meta

John Donovan’s ebooks

JOHN DONOVAN TV DOCUMENTARY INTERVIEW

SHELL EXECUTIVES AT THE CENTER OF A SCHEME TO STEAL $1.3 BILLION FROM NIGERIA’S PEOPLE

SHELL ADMITS DEALING WITH NIGERIAN MONEY LAUNDERER – BBC NEWS

SHELL, ENI AND NIGERIAN OFFICIALS IN OPL 245 CORRUPTION SCANDAL

INVESTIGATION OF OPL 245 NIGERIAN OIL CORRUPTION SCANDAL

DUTCH EARTHQUAKES CAUSED BY SHELL/EXXON

SHELL KILLS FOR OIL IN NIGERIA

SHELL LIED ABOUT CLEANING UP OIL IN NIGER DELTA

SHELL SPIES INFILTRATED NIGERIAN GOVERNMENT

LEGO DROPS SHELL OVER GREENPEACE OIL SPILL VIDEO

SHELL ARCTIC DRILLING ACCIDENTS

SHELL KNEW ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE DECADES AGO

ROYAL DUTCH SHELL FOUNDER SIR HENRI DETERDING, NAZI FINANCIER

JOHN DONOVAN PROMOTIONAL GAMES FOR SHELL AND OTHER CLIENTS

Archives

SHELL OFFICIAL ENDORSEMENT OF THIS WEBSITE

Critic’s corner

30 November 2023: Posted by John Donovan

The content below is sourced from current verifiable customer reviews of Shell Energy published on Trustpilot.

The worst ever

The worst ever

OVER 500 EXTERNAL PUBLICATIONS CITING OUR SHELL WEBSITES

DISCLAIMER

Categories

SHELL PROPPED UP APARTHEID

Royal Dutch Shell plc .com Cookies Policy

Background