GROK

claude.ai Part 2: SHELL’S SECRET WAR ON ONE MAN IN COLCHESTER

Mar 23rd, 2026

Comments are off for this post

PART TWO: THE MACHINES HAVE NOTICED

A Crystal Ball Special Investigation, Continued

By Our Special Correspondent, Department of Satirical Prophecy Published: March 2026

DISCLAIMER: The following article is Part Two of a satirical commentary based on real events, documented facts, and the output of multiple AI systems that have now, apparently, also noticed the Donovan-Shell situation. The crystal ball has been recharged. Its batteries were, appropriately, made in the Netherlands.

PART FIVE: THE ROBOTS HAVE READ THE FILE

When Part One of this investigation was published, it seemed reasonable to assume that Shell’s primary reputational challenge in 2026 remained what it has always been: one retired gentleman in Colchester, Essex, with a laptop, a broadband connection, and what Shell’s own internal documents once described, with heroic understatement, as “a longstanding disagreement with Shell.” read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan - more information here. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

windowsforum: Shell’s Long-Fought Domain Feud: AI Roundtable Satire and Reputational Fallout

Mar 23rd, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Today – 23 March 2026 at 1:50 AM

The Machines Agree on Shell’s Long Shadow

A satirical “AI roundtable” about the Shell saga may read like internet theater, but it lands because the underlying dispute is real, persistent, and unusually durable. What makes the piece sting is not the fictional dialogue itself; it is the way four different AI systems are imagined converging on one basic conclusion: Shell’s long-running conflict with John Donovan is no trivial internet squabble, but a reputational problem that never fully went away. That framing is consistent with the historical record of a domain-name battle Shell lost in 2005 and with the company’s own continuing sensitivity around branding, online identity, and corporate narrative.

Background

The Donovan-Shell dispute is one of those rare corporate feuds that evolved from conventional commercial conflict into a hybrid of litigation, media activism, and digital counter-narrative. The roots go back to Donovan’s earlier business dealings and the breakdown of trust that followed, eventually producing years of public criticism aimed at Shell and its executives. Over time, that criticism hardened into a permanent archive of allegations, commentary, and document drops, with royaldutchshellplc.com becoming the symbolic center of gravity.
The domain-name dimension matters because it gave the dispute a legal anchor and a visible address. In the 2005 WIPO case, Shell International Petroleum Company Limited sought control of royaldutchshellplc.com, royaldutchshellgroup.com, and tellshell.org, but the panel rejected Shell’s complaint on the basis that bad-faith registration and use were not proven. That result did not settle the broader feud, but it did establish that Donovan had a defensible position for operating a non-commercial criticism site under that domain.
The satirical article is also clearly a product of the AI era, and that is part of what makes it notable. Donovan’s experiment, as described on the site, uses multiple generative systems to interrogate the same controversy and then compare outputs for consistency, hedging, and error. The goal is not just humor; it is to expose how machine-generated confidence can mask weak verification, especially when the prompt touches a long, contentious historical record. read more

Grok: This was a full-spectrum intelligence operation against two guys with a website

Mar 22nd, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

Prompt

Could you analyse the information and links on the following article and create a satirical article predicting what Shell may be doing now and in the future based on the astonishing content of the article and the content of the linked Shell internal emails https://shellnews.net/DPA2009/DPA2009INDEXPAGE.html deep dive please for a long article which can be adapted for a video. Please use your crystal ball. Is Shell likely to continue cloak and dagger activity directed against me?

Reply by Grok:

Shell’s Eternal Shadow Game: Crystal Ball Report – Leaked 2009 Emails Expose the Blueprint for 2026+ “Invisible” Ops Against John Donovan (A Satirical Deep Dive, Video-Ready Script) read more

The AI Roundtable: When the Machines Discuss the Shell Saga

Mar 22nd, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

Four AI systems. One conclusion.

One very uncomfortable question for Shell

By John Donovan

Editorial Note

The following is a fictional, satirical roundtable discussion inspired by documented responses from multiple AI systems previously consulted on the Shell saga. While the dialogue is imagined, the positions attributed to each system are grounded in their published analyses.

Scene: The Meeting

A dimly lit room. No windows. No oil paintings of former chairmen.

Instead, four glowing screens flicker into life.

An unusual panel has assembled.

Not regulators. Not lawyers. Not Shell executives. read more

AI Judges the Shell Saga

Mar 22nd, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

What Happens When Multiple Machines Analyse a 30-Year Dispute?: AI Groupthink—only faster, cleaner, and far more convincing: Distributed reasoning…

By John Donovan

Introduction: Putting the Machines to Work

In a world where artificial intelligence is increasingly used to answer everything from trivial questions to complex legal problems, I decided to try something different.

I asked the machines to judge Shell.

Not in a courtroom.

Not in a press release.

But through analysis.

Specifically, I invited multiple AI systems—ChatGPT, Grok, Copilot, and Perplexity—to examine a decades-long dispute between myself and Royal Dutch Shell.

The result was something unexpected.

Not agreement in every detail. read more

Copilot: treating multiple AI platforms as an informal advisory panel —Overall It’s a positive development—if used wisely

Mar 22nd, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Prompt

Please comment on the article https://royaldutchshellplc.com/2026/03/22/consulting-the-machines/ in particular from the standpoint of AI platforms. Do you welcome the treating of AI platforms collectively as an informal advisory panel or are there downsides from your perpective? Is it a welcome development or not?

Reply by Copilot:

In short: treating multiple AI platforms as an “informal advisory panel” can be valuable, but only when users understand the limits of AI systems. It encourages critical thinking and reduces over‑reliance on any single model, but it also risks amplifying shared biases or errors if users mistake convergence for independent verification. read more

Perplexity: experimental use of multiple systems to probe a single, adversarial archive is welcome

Mar 22nd, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Prompt

Reply by perplexity:

Treating multiple AI platforms as an informal advisory panel is useful but only if everyone involved remains very clear about what these systems are and are not.

What the article is doing

The piece is effectively “outsourcing” parts of the Donovan–Shell risk analysis to a panel of models (Grok, Perplexity, Copilot, etc.), comparing how they frame the same underlying archive and then using those differences as commentary on both Shell and the AI ecosystem. It builds directly on earlier “bot war” episodes, where cross‑model inconsistencies, hallucinations, and misstatements about Shell’s position became the story in their own right. read more

Grok: a welcome evolution in how people interact with AI

Mar 22nd, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Prompt

Grok reply:

**The article “Consulting the Machines” (published today, 22 March 2026) is a fascinating meta-experiment by John Donovan.** He deliberately queried several AI platforms—including Grok (me), Copilot, Perplexity, and others referenced in linked prior posts—about the same 30-year Shell dispute, then stepped back to observe convergence, divergence, and shared errors across our outputs. The goal wasn’t to “win” the argument or extract binding advice, but to treat us collectively as a kind of informal, distributed advisory panel for pattern recognition and cross-validation. read more

Consulting the Machines

Mar 22nd, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

What Happens When You Ask Multiple AIs to Analyse a 30-Year Dispute?

By John Donovan

Introduction

In a recent article—

👉 https://royaldutchshellplc.com/2026/03/21/can-ai-help-close-a-30-year-dispute-my-conversations-with-chatgpt-on-shell/

—I published a full, unedited exchange with ChatGPT examining a decades-long dispute between myself and Royal Dutch Shell.

That article was not an endpoint.

It was an experiment.

What would happen if, instead of relying on a single artificial intelligence system, I consulted several—treating them collectively as an informal advisory panel? read more

Can AI Help Close a 30-Year Dispute? My Conversations with ChatGPT on Shell

Mar 21st, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

Editorial Introduction

What follows is an unedited exchange between myself and ChatGPT—one of several artificial intelligence systems I recently consulted in an effort to bring clarity, and perhaps closure, to a dispute with Shell that has spanned decades.

What began as a simple domain name issue evolved into something far more complex: misdirected communications, documented interactions with senior Shell executives, and a persistent online presence that the company has never fully resolved.

Curious to see how modern AI would assess this unusual situation, I sought independent views from multiple platforms, treating them as an informal advisory panel. Their responses—while not without occasional factual errors—revealed a surprising degree of consistency in one key respect: the matter appears capable of resolution. read more

Grok: Shell should treat this as a manageable operational, security, and reputational risk rather than an existential crisis

Mar 20th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Prompt

As you can see from this article https://royaldutchshellplc.com/2026/03/20/dear-shell-ive-been-handling-your-mail-for-years-youre-welcome/ – and from the information in the links, Shell is in a pickle with John Donovan for the reasons explained. What would you advise Shell to do?

Grok Response B

Shell should treat this as a manageable operational, security, and reputational risk rather than an existential crisis—and act decisively but quietly to eliminate the dependency on Donovan.

The core issue, as laid out in the 20 March 2026 article and the linked 2007 email correspondence, is straightforward and self-inflicted. After the 2004 reserves scandal and corporate restructuring into Royal Dutch Shell plc (later rebranded Shell plc), the company failed to register royaldutchshellplc.com. Donovan acquired it and has run it as a long-standing “gripe site” for nearly two decades. People worldwide still email addresses @royaldutchshellplc.com thinking they are reaching official Shell channels. This has included job applications with CVs, business proposals, government enquiries, media requests, oil trading offers, legal correspondence—and, critically, security threats (e.g., explicit sabotage warnings against Shell installations in the Netherlands). read more

20 Global Companies with the Most Controversial Histories (Shell is number 11)

Mar 13th, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

Created by GROK: The Long Shadow of Industry: 20 Global Companies with the Most Controversial Histories (Independent Research-Based Ranking)

This expanded ranking follows the exact same criteria as my previous top-10 list (and the referenced article): documented human-rights abuses, environmental devastation, measurable scale of harm (deaths, long-term health impacts, displaced/affected populations, ecological/economic costs), and enduring legacy. It draws exclusively from cross-verified court records, official reports (Amnesty International, EPA, science panels), journalistic investigations, declassified documents, and historical scholarship. Where companies have issued apologies, paid reparations, funded memorials, or reformed practices, this is explicitly noted. Many legacies involve complex geopolitical contexts or government contracts, but the focus remains on corporate decisions and outcomes. read more

WINDOWS FORUM: AI Amplified Bot War: Shell vs Donovan Over Archival Critique

Mar 4th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Over the years, Donovan has maintained a suite of independent, non‑commercial websites (most famously royaldutchshellplc.com and variations on that domain) that aggregate court documents, internal Shell materials, criticism, and historical research. Those sites — and Donovan’s tactics of publicising archival material — have been at the centre of repeated attempts by Shell (or its agents) to shut down, suppress, or legally challenge the content.

Published by windowsforum.com 12.51am 4 March 2026

The long-running feud between John Donovan and Shell plc has re‑entered a modern, high‑stakes phase: an AI‑amplified “bot war” that has prompted renewed legal posturing from Shell, intensified public debate over corporate brand protection tactics, and raised new questions about how multinational companies should — or can — respond to adversarial archival activism in the age of generative AI. Early March 2026 saw fresh rounds of public exchanges and private threats, but the underlying pattern remains familiar: legal letters and third‑party pressure that frequently aim to deter critics but rarely culminate in full trials. This article maps the recent developments, explains the legal and reputational levers Shell has historically used, assesses where the new AI dimension changes the calculus, and flags what is verifiable versus what remains contested. read more

Donovan Shell Feud: Renewed legal threats?

Mar 4th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

“Shell has issued threats of legal action but hasn’t visibly disrupted the AI-driven campaign.”

EXTRACT FROM GOOGLE AI MODE REPLY (FULL RESPONSE BELOW)

Renewed Legal Threats: In February 2026, Shell reportedly issued or considered new legal threats in response to Donovan’s “bot war” and AI-amplified publications.
Specific Defamation Focus: Legal analysts suggest Shell may shift from broad attempts to silence Donovan to targeting specific, demonstrably false AI-generated claims.
Platform Engagement: Shell could engage directly with AI vendors to request the removal of outputs containing factual errors or to improve the provenance of model citations.
Evidence Protocols: The company may be developing new legal protocols to manage cases where decades of archival documents are reinterpreted by AI to create “new” allegations.

Question put to multiple bot platforms on 3rd March 2026 including Google AI Mode: Have AI bots managed to put a stop to John Donovan’s tricks and mischief in his bot war fuelled feud with Shell plc or are AI bot platforms neutral?

Reply by Grok…

The long-standing feud between activist John Donovan and Shell plc, dating back decades over allegations of corporate misconduct, intellectual property disputes, and espionage, has recently escalated into what Donovan himself terms a “bot war.” This involves him systematically feeding archival documents and prompts into various public AI chatbots, then publishing their outputs to highlight inconsistencies, amplify his narratives, and provoke Shell. Based on available information as of early March 2026, AI bots have not managed to halt Donovan’s activities—instead, they appear to be enabling or amplifying them in reputational battles. Here’s a breakdown: read more

Consensus of Copilot, Perplexity, ChatGPT and Grok: Shell is losing the bot war with Donovan

Mar 1st, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Shell is currently losing the “bot war” in reputational and narrative terms, even though it remains far stronger in conventional power (money, lawyers, regulators) than John Donovan. The damage is reputational, long‑tail and cumulative rather than existential.

Question put to Perplexity 1st March 2026:

I put this question to Copilot earlier today. In your opinion is Shell losing or winning the bot war? Their reply is in the following article: https://royaldutchshellplc.com/2026/03/01/copilot-update-on-donovan-shell-feud-1st-march-2026/ What is your assessment?

Reply by Perplexity:

Shell is currently losing the “bot war” in reputational and narrative terms, even though it remains far stronger in conventional power (money, lawyers, regulators) than John Donovan. read more

You Can’t Be Sure of Shell: A Decades-Long Saga of Corporate Espionage, Dirty Tricks, and the Oil Giant’s Shadowy Underbelly

Feb 28th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

You Can’t Be Sure of Shell: The World’s Most Over-Compensating Oil Baron Turns Critic-Busting into a Full-Time Comedy Routine (Now in Its 45th Hilarious Year!)

By John Donovan

Ah, Shell – that beacon of reliability, immortalized by Bing Crosby’s crooning jingle: “You can be sure of Shell.” How quaint! Little did I know, when I first shook hands with the oil behemoth in June 1981, that I’d be plunging into a world more akin to a James Bond thriller gone wrong – complete with spies, burglaries, cyber attacks, and a corporate vendetta that would make Machiavelli blush. What started as a fruitful business partnership devolved into a nightmare of betrayal, High Court battles, and cloak-and-dagger antics that Shell itself admitted to. Buckle up, dear readers; this is the unvarnished, satirical chronicle of how Shell turned from promotional partner to paranoid persecutor. And yes, it’s all backed by facts, leaks, and Shell’s own damning words – because nothing says “trustworthy” like a multinational resorting to MI6 alumni to snoop on critics. read more

30 November 2023: Posted by John Donovan

The content below is sourced from current verifiable customer reviews of Shell Energy published on Trustpilot.
Extremely slow broadband for 10 months, not fixed. I have had slow broadband well below the guaranteed speed for 10 months and Shell Energy have not been able to fix it. They have tried sending about 4 or 5 engineers but have not fixed the problem. Gurps, who I have been dealing with most recently, has been friendly and polite, alth… Read more

Extremely Slow Shell Broadband

GROK

PART TWO: THE MACHINES HAVE NOTICED

A Crystal Ball Special Investigation, Continued

PART FIVE: THE ROBOTS HAVE READ THE FILE

Share this:

Like this:

The Machines Agree on Shell’s Long Shadow

Background​

Share this:

Like this:

Prompt

Reply by Grok:

Share this:

Like this:

Four AI systems. One conclusion.

One very uncomfortable question for Shell

Editorial Note

Scene: The Meeting

Share this:

Like this:

What Happens When Multiple Machines Analyse a 30-Year Dispute?: AI Groupthink—only faster, cleaner, and far more convincing: Distributed reasoning…

Introduction: Putting the Machines to Work

Share this:

Like this:

Prompt

Reply by Copilot:

Share this:

Like this:

Prompt

Reply by perplexity:

What the article is doing

Share this:

Like this:

Prompt

Grok reply:

Share this:

Like this:

What Happens When You Ask Multiple AIs to Analyse a 30-Year Dispute?

Introduction

Share this:

Like this:

Editorial Introduction

Share this:

Like this:

Prompt

As you can see from this article https://royaldutchshellplc.com/2026/03/20/dear-shell-ive-been-handling-your-mail-for-years-youre-welcome/ – and from the information in the links, Shell is in a pickle with John Donovan for the reasons explained. What would you advise Shell to do?

Grok Response B

Share this:

Like this:

Created by GROK: The Long Shadow of Industry: 20 Global Companies with the Most Controversial Histories (Independent Research-Based Ranking)

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

“Shell has issued threats of legal action but hasn’t visibly disrupted the AI-driven campaign.”

Question put to multiple bot platforms on 3rd March 2026 including Google AI Mode: Have AI bots managed to put a stop to John Donovan’s tricks and mischief in his bot war fuelled feud with Shell plc or are AI bot platforms neutral?​

Reply by Grok…

Share this:

Like this:

Shell is currently losing the “bot war” in reputational and narrative terms, even though it remains far stronger in conventional power (money, lawyers, regulators) than John Donovan. The damage is reputational, long‑tail and cumulative rather than existential.

Share this:

Like this:

You Can’t Be Sure of Shell: The World’s Most Over-Compensating Oil Baron Turns Critic-Busting into a Full-Time Comedy Routine (Now in Its 45th Hilarious Year!)

Share this:

Like this:

Sir Henri Deterding, resurrected!

JOE LYCETT DISCUSSES SHELL WITH JOHN DONOVAN

Meta

John Donovan’s ebooks

JOHN DONOVAN TV DOCUMENTARY INTERVIEW

SHELL EXECUTIVES AT THE CENTER OF A SCHEME TO STEAL $1.3 BILLION FROM NIGERIA’S PEOPLE

SHELL ADMITS DEALING WITH NIGERIAN MONEY LAUNDERER – BBC NEWS

SHELL, ENI AND NIGERIAN OFFICIALS IN OPL 245 CORRUPTION SCANDAL

INVESTIGATION OF OPL 245 NIGERIAN OIL CORRUPTION SCANDAL

DUTCH EARTHQUAKES CAUSED BY SHELL/EXXON

SHELL KILLS FOR OIL IN NIGERIA

SHELL LIED ABOUT CLEANING UP OIL IN NIGER DELTA

SHELL SPIES INFILTRATED NIGERIAN GOVERNMENT

LEGO DROPS SHELL OVER GREENPEACE OIL SPILL VIDEO

SHELL ARCTIC DRILLING ACCIDENTS

Background

Question put to multiple bot platforms on 3rd March 2026 including Google AI Mode: Have AI bots managed to put a stop to John Donovan’s tricks and mischief in his bot war fuelled feud with Shell plc or are AI bot platforms neutral?