Australia’s offshore regulator says a Prelude FLNG technician suffered hand fractures after turning gear moved unexpectedly during a manual engagement task. NOPSEMA found that Shell had not implemented effective engineering controls to prevent automatic operation and was relying too heavily on procedures, communication and worker actions to control hazardous energy.
Shell Australia has been issued with a new occupational health and safety improvement notice at Prelude FLNG after a worker suffered fracture injuries to the hand during the startup of a steam turbine generator.read more
Two experienced Shell workers aboard the Prelude floating LNG facility have lost their bid for reduced working arrangements as they moved towards semi-retirement.
At first glance, the latest OnNotice report sounds straightforward: two workers aged over 55 asked for flexible working arrangements, Shell refused, and the Fair Work Commission backed the company.
The actual decision is more complicated.
The Commission did not determine that Shell’s operational objections were necessarily reasonable, nor did it establish that reduced-hours working at Prelude is inherently unworkable. Instead, Commissioner Hunt found that the two workers had failed at an earlier jurisdictional hurdle: their requests had not been validly made under section 65 of Australia’s Fair Work Act 2009 because the required connection between being aged 55 or over and the requested changes had not been established. (Come As You Are Songkran)read more
Two veteran Shell employees working aboard the Prelude floating LNG facility off Western Australia have lost their attempt to secure substantially reduced working arrangements as they move toward retirement.
But the Fair Work Commission decision, handed down on 1 September 2026, is more nuanced than a simple finding that Shell was entitled to reject their requests.
The Commission dismissed the applications because it concluded that the workers’ requests had not been validly made under the relevant flexible-working provisions of Australia’s Fair Work Act. In other words, the Commission found that its jurisdiction to arbitrate the dispute had not been properly enlivened. Come As You Are Songkranread more
Visit “Shell Spying, Corporate Intelligence and Security: Documentary Chronology” for even more information
ChatGPT: Countries where Shell has been associated with spying, intelligence gathering or covert security activity
A necessary distinction
Shell operates in a dangerous world. Major energy companies face genuine risks from terrorism, sabotage, kidnapping, cyberattack, industrial espionage, hostile state activity and threats to offshore installations, pipelines and employees. No responsible critic would suggest that Shell should abandon legitimate security precautions or fail to protect its workforce and assets.
The concern examined in this series is different. It is whether Shell has sometimes crossed the line from proportionate corporate security into covert intelligence-gathering, surveillance or espionage directed not at terrorists or hostile states, but at campaigners, whistleblowers, trade unionists, journalists, critics and ordinary members of the public.read more
Shell, previously known as Forthdeal Limited, subsequently as Royal Dutch Shell plc, and now hiding in plain sight as Shell plc after ditching the disgraced Royal Dutch moniker, has found itself in another beautifully Shell-shaped dilemma: how to keep exporting gas from Australia while avoiding the tiresome local expectation that Australians might actually get some of it.
The latest issue concerns Shell’s Prelude FLNG facility — the gigantic floating liquefied natural gas plant stationed roughly 475km north-north-east of Broome, Western Australia. Shell describes Prelude as being “at the heart” of its Western Australian gas portfolio and says the project is planned as a multi-decade operation requiring additional gas, starting with the Crux field, to maximise its operating life. (Shell Australia)read more
Prelude FLNG, Australia’s gas squeeze, and the awkward question Shell hoped would stay offshore
Shell, previously known as Forthdeal Limited, subsequently as Royal Dutch Shell plc, and now hiding in plain sight as Shell plc after ditching the disgraced Royal Dutch moniker, has reportedly found a fresh cloud hanging over one of its most extravagant monuments to fossil-fuel optimism: Prelude FLNG, the vast floating liquefied natural gas facility moored off Western Australia.
According to the Australian Financial Review report supplied for this article, the issue now stalking Shell’s offshore gas leviathan is not simply engineering, cost, safety, downtime, or the minor inconvenience of climate physics. It is domestic gas policy — that tiresome democratic habit of asking whether a country exporting vast quantities of gas might also like to keep some for its own households and industries.read more
Toxic Timeline of Royal Dutch Shell Group, Now Shell plc
Updated 15 June 2026
This page is a chronological guide to some of the most controversial episodes in the history of Royal Dutch Shell Group, now Shell plc. It links regulatory findings, court records, mainstream journalism, campaign archives, ShellNews.net material, RoyalDutchShellPlc.com material, ShellNaziHistory.com, and John Donovan’s Shell archive.
The word “toxic” is used here in its broad public-interest sense: toxic products, toxic spills, toxic governance, toxic secrecy, toxic reputational fallout, and toxic historical associations. This page is not a court judgment. Where a matter is disputed, alleged, settled without admission, or based on campaign material, the wording says so.read more
The freshly surfaced Copilot analysis — and the archival material it ingested — force a stark conclusion: the same governance vulnerabilities that produced hazardous worker exposures decades ago still appear, in a recognisable form, in modern Shell projects ranging from North Sea platforms to megaproject FLNG and U.S. petrochemical start‑ups. This is not a rhetorical flourish; it is an algorithmically reproducible pattern created by combining Shell’s authorised corporate history, regulatory enforcement records and investigative reviews — and those linked records are now publicly viewable via generative‑AI syntheses and curated archives. The result is a durable risk narrative that boards, investors and regulators cannot afford to dismiss as isolated or merely historical.read more
A reported outbreak of contagious illness aboard Shell’s Prelude floating liquefied natural gas (FLNG) facility has prompted an investigation by Australia’s offshore regulator, renewing scrutiny of health, safety and workforce management practices on one of the world’s most ambitious energy projects.
The National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority (NOPSEMA) is examining the circumstances surrounding the outbreak, which affected personnel working aboard the offshore facility located approximately 475 kilometres off the coast of Western Australia. While details regarding the nature and extent of the illness have yet to be fully disclosed, the incident has once again placed Prelude at the centre of discussions about operational resilience and workforce welfare in remote offshore environments.read more
AI image: A shadowy Mayfair boardroom with three doors marked “MI6,” “Shell,” and “No 10.” A suited adviser carries a briefcase labelled “Strategic Advice” through the revolving door, while a Shell logo glows on the wall like a corporate moon. Outside, taxpayers and climate campaigners peer through frosted glass as a sign reads: “Nothing to See Here — Stakeholders Being Reassured.
There are revolving doors in British public life, and then there is Hakluyt: the discreet Mayfair intelligence-and-advisory outfit that appears to operate less like a door and more like a polished mahogany teleportation device between corporate power, former spooks, political insiders and the upper floors of government.
The latest spark comes from an openDemocracy investigation reporting that Hakluyt’s UK business grew by 30% in the year to July 2025, even after two senior figures left for government roles. Varun Chandra, previously Hakluyt’s managing partner, joined Keir Starmer’s government in July 2024 as the prime minister’s special adviser on business and investment. In January 2025, Sir Oliver Robbins left Hakluyt’s Europe, Middle East and Africa role to join the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office.read more
There are moments in public life when corporate theatre becomes so beautifully absurd that satire can simply put its feet up and let the executives do the work.
Enter Shell Australia.
At a federal inquiry into the taxation of gas resources, Shell was asked the sort of savage, ambush-style questions that only the most hostile parliamentary inquisitors could possibly dream up.
Questions like: How much gas did you export?
And: What was your local revenue?
Terrifying stuff. Almost unfair. How could a global gas giant possibly be expected to know how much gas it sold?
According to reports of the hearing, Shell Australia representatives were able to tell senators that the company paid $109 million in Petroleum Resource Rent Tax in the latest year — after reportedly paying none in the previous decade — and cited $2.9 billion in taxes paid on $6.2 billion in after-tax profits in 2024. But when pressed on basic figures such as export volumes and full local revenue, the answers appeared to become considerably less crisp.read more
Big Oil’s grand export bonanza rolls on—while Australians are warned they might run short at home. Yes, really.
🛢️ THE GREAT LNG GOLD RUSH (AGAIN)
Australia is once again throwing billions at liquefied natural gas (LNG) projects—because apparently, when in doubt, build more fossil fuel infrastructure and ask questions later.
According to industry reporting, a fresh wave of massive LNG developments is advancing across the country, even as warnings grow louder about looming domestic gas shortages.
Let’s translate that:
One of the world’s biggest gas exporters… might not have enough gas for itself.
You couldn’t script it better.
💰 EXPORT SUPERPOWER… DOMESTIC HEADACHE
Australia is already a global LNG heavyweight—built on an eye-watering investment binge of more than A$290 billion across major projects over the past decade.read more
Question to Google AI Mode 6 Feb 2026: What can you tell me about the innovative use of AI by John Donovan in the Donovan Shell feud? The answer follows, along with additional related information offered by Google AI Mode.
As of February 2026, John Donovan’s multi-decade feud with Shell plc has entered a new phase characterized as “AI-mediated warfare”. Donovan has transitioned from traditional activism to a strategy that leverages generative AI to amplify his extensive 76,000-document archive.
His innovative use of AI focuses on the following key areas:
Adversarial Archiving: Donovan has optimized his massive digital repository—the largest independent archive on a FTSE-100 company—to influence how AI models learn and summarise the dispute. Because Shell often remains silent, AI systems frequently default to Donovan’s well-indexed data, inheriting his “David vs. Goliath” framing and narrative structure.
“Ghost” Dialogues: Donovan uses AI to generate satirical scripts featuring “conversations” between deceased historical figures, such as former Shell leader Sir Henri Deterding and his late father, Alfred Donovan. These are designed to keep historical allegations “fresh” in search results.
Pattern Recognition vs. Corporate Spin: By feeding decades of Shell’s public statements, court filings, and internal memos into AI models, Donovan highlights semantic repetitions. He uses these tools to show that Shell’s modern ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) language often follows the same structural defensive patterns used decades ago.
Transparency Experiments: In late 2025 and early 2026, Donovan published “AI-to-AI” transcripts where he prompted various models (like Microsoft Copilot and Grok) to analyze legal claims and assess defamation risks. These experiments aim to show how AI fill informational vacuums left by corporate silence.
2026 AGM Strategy: Donovan is using these AI-generated narratives to pressure Shell’s board. He has signaled plans for the May 2026 Annual General Meeting (AGM) to submit formal shareholder questions regarding the company’s “silence” in the face of persistent AI-driven reputational noise.
Profile of John Donovan extracted from Amazon where his Shell focussed books have been sold for many years despite threats from Shell lawyers.
In 1979, John Donovan was the co-founder of a sales promotion company, Don Marketing, which created promotional games for blue chip clients such as BP.read more
Introduction: A Troubling Cross-Era Review Shell Cannot Ignore
The revised analysis obtained from Microsoft Copilot — now published in full below — brings into sharp relief a theme that should be deeply concerning to both the Shell board of directors and Shell shareholders: the persistence of governance and control weaknesses across decades, technologies, and regulatory systems.
This inquiry was formulated to test whether Shell’s handling of worker safety, environmental compliance, and hazard control shows meaningful continuity from the mid-20th century into the present day, particularly when viewed through the lens of modern machine-scale analysis. The response incorporates:read more
Is There a Long-Term Pattern in Shell’s Risk Management Failures?
UPDATED 18 JAN 2026 WITH ILLUMINATING REPLIES FROM A NUMBER OF AI PLATFORMS
This article presents a structured question put to ChatGPT and the platform’s full response, published to enable comparison with other AI systems and to illustrate how AI re-processes corporate history in the modern information environment.
Question put to ChatGPT:
The Past, the Archive, and the Algorithm: Is There a Persistent Pattern in Shell’s Worker-Safety and Public-Health Risk Management in the Age of AI?
I am seeking a research-based analysis (not speculation) of whether there is any meaningful continuity or correlation between several historically separated episodes that are alleged to reflect a similar organisational posture toward health, safety, and human lives—taking into account that large language models can now ingest, cross-reference, and recontextualise entire multi-volume corporate histories alongside modern regulatory and safety records.read more
Sir Henri Deterding, the controversial and outspoken founder of Royal Dutch Shell, now haunts the website. Wise to all the knowledge of Shell, and its shellanigans, he delivers informative and satirical insight to anything about Shell. He's a grumpy old sod, so you'll have to excuse his bluntness.
Click the big chat-bubble (bottom-right of the website)to ask Sir Henri a question. Enjoy!
SHELL EXECUTIVES AT THE CENTER OF A SCHEME TO STEAL $1.3 BILLION FROM NIGERIA’S PEOPLE
SHELL ADMITS DEALING WITH NIGERIAN MONEY LAUNDERER – BBC NEWS
SHELL, ENI AND NIGERIAN OFFICIALS IN OPL 245 CORRUPTION SCANDAL
INVESTIGATION OF OPL 245 NIGERIAN OIL CORRUPTION SCANDAL
DUTCH EARTHQUAKES CAUSED BY SHELL/EXXON
SHELL KILLS FOR OIL IN NIGERIA
SHELL LIED ABOUT CLEANING UP OIL IN NIGER DELTA
SHELL SPIES INFILTRATED NIGERIAN GOVERNMENT
LEGO DROPS SHELL OVER GREENPEACE OIL SPILL VIDEO
SHELL ARCTIC DRILLING ACCIDENTS
SHELL KNEW ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE DECADES AGO
ROYAL DUTCH SHELL FOUNDER SIR HENRI DETERDING, NAZI FINANCIER
JOHN DONOVAN PROMOTIONAL GAMES FOR SHELL AND OTHER CLIENTS
Listen and read proof in audio and transcript form of Shell CEO Ben van Beurden’s cover-up tactics in the OPL 245 Nigerian corruption scandal. The instruction given by him in the covertly recorded call to CFO Simon Henry was at odds with Shell’s claimed core business principles. Cover-up and obstruction, instead of transparency and integrity, says Shell critic John Donovan
I used shell broadband. It was by far the worst broadband provider ever! The internet did not work most days. I had their super fast broadband and it dropped out constantly. Watching a movie was awful with the constant buffering. Customer support was super slow. Now their going to charge me for the useless router which I have sent back.
Date of experience: 21 November 2023
By far the worst broadband provider ever!
30 November 2023: Posted by John Donovan
The content below is sourced from current verifiable customer reviews of Shell Energy published on Trustpilot.
Extremely slow broadband for 10 months, not fixed.I have had slow broadband well below the guaranteed speed for 10 months and Shell Energy have not been able to fix it.They have tried sending about 4 or 5 engineers but have not fixed the problem.Gurps, who I have been dealing with most recently, has been friendly and polite, alth… Read more
Extremely Slow Shell Broadband
The worst ever
I used shell broadband. It was by far the worst broadband provider ever! The internet did not work most days. I had their super fast broadband and it dropped out constantly. Watching a movie was awful with the constant buffering. Customer support was super slow. Now their going to charge me for the useless router which I have sent back.
I ordered shell energy broadband on nov 2. I was promised connection the following week. They initiated the direct debit. I called the following week and was told router would arrive on 13 and service would go live on 17. No further email or communication until 20 when I was told service would start on 30th. Spent 10 minutes waiting on phone line and spoke to a polite assistant who was absolutely useless in solving my problem. Avoid this unprofessional and chaotic… Read more
Shell Energy Broadband Service is Appalling
OVER 500 EXTERNAL PUBLICATIONS CITING OUR SHELL WEBSITES
See our link list of over 500 articles by the FT, Wall Street Journal, Reuters, Bloomberg, Forbes, Dow Jones Newswires, New York Times, CNBC etc, plus UK House of Commons Select Committee Hansard records, information on U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission websiteetc. all containing references to our Shell focussed websites, or our website founders Alfred and John Donovan. Includes TV documentary features in English and German, newspaper and magazine articles, radio interviews, newsletters etc. Plus academic papers, Stratfor intelligence reports and UK, U.S. and Australian state/parliamentary publications, also citing our Shell websites. Click on this link to see the entire list, all in date order with a link to an index of over 100 books also containing references to our non-profit websites and/or our activities.
John Donovan, the website owner
DISCLAIMER
This is not a Shell website. The nature of this platform should be evident from the content presented here and on our related Shell-focused websites, including shellnazihistory.com. For more details, please refer to the Disclaimer link at the top of this page. Shell does not endorse or approve of this website.
Our platform operates as a non-commercial, advert-free, and subscription-free space. We do not solicit or accept donations and aim to provide information to our readers free of charge. The Shell logo image with white text used on this website is in the public domain due to expired copyright and anonymous authorship. It can be found on WIKIMEDIA COMMONS. Use this link for Shell’s own website.
Our content, including images and features like the Sheldon chatbot, incorporates information generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI) and various other technological means. We may also draw from sources such as Wikipedia and other published materials. Please note that some content may include satirical adaptations or elements of gossip, rumors, or exaggeration to engage and entertain our audience.
We strive to maintain factual accuracy and encourage readers to notify us promptly if any factual inaccuracies are found, so we can address and rectify them swiftly. Readers are advised to verify all information independently for accuracy and completeness. Any actions taken based on the content provided on our platform are at your own risk.