Australian National Offshore Petroleum and Environmental Management Authority

Prelude Worker Injured After Machinery Energised During Manual Task — NOPSEMA Orders Shell to Fix Safety Controls

Sep 18th, 2026

Comments are off for this post

Australia’s offshore regulator says a Prelude FLNG technician suffered hand fractures after turning gear moved unexpectedly during a manual engagement task. NOPSEMA found that Shell had not implemented effective engineering controls to prevent automatic operation and was relying too heavily on procedures, communication and worker actions to control hazardous energy.

Shell Australia has been issued with a new occupational health and safety improvement notice at Prelude FLNG after a worker suffered fracture injuries to the hand during the startup of a steam turbine generator. read more

^*This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan - more information here. There is also a Wikipedia segment, the Shell DPA Files, "Shell and the Spies", the Shell Leaks files, as well as books written and published by John Donovan - Kindle eBooks. Timeline of the Donovan Shell Feud. Toxic History of Royal Dutch Shell Group. Shell and the Donovans: The Full Media Record — 550+ Articles, 110 Books, 40 Years. ^*All created and supported by internet wizz, Nick Gill.

Shell Prelude Workers Lose Their 55-Plus Flexibility Case — But the Decision Leaves a Bigger Workforce Question Unanswered

Sep 11th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Two experienced Shell workers aboard the Prelude floating LNG facility have lost their bid for reduced working arrangements as they moved towards semi-retirement.

At first glance, the latest OnNotice report sounds straightforward: two workers aged over 55 asked for flexible working arrangements, Shell refused, and the Fair Work Commission backed the company.

The actual decision is more complicated.

The Commission did not determine that Shell’s operational objections were necessarily reasonable, nor did it establish that reduced-hours working at Prelude is inherently unworkable. Instead, Commissioner Hunt found that the two workers had failed at an earlier jurisdictional hurdle: their requests had not been validly made under section 65 of Australia’s Fair Work Act 2009 because the required connection between being aged 55 or over and the requested changes had not been established. (Come As You Are Songkran) read more

Prelude LNG Workers Lose Bid for Semi-Retirement Flexibility — But the Fair Work Ruling Is More Complicated Than the Headline

Sep 2nd, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Two veteran Shell employees working aboard the Prelude floating LNG facility off Western Australia have lost their attempt to secure substantially reduced working arrangements as they move toward retirement.

But the Fair Work Commission decision, handed down on 1 September 2026, is more nuanced than a simple finding that Shell was entitled to reject their requests.

The Commission dismissed the applications because it concluded that the workers’ requests had not been validly made under the relevant flexible-working provisions of Australia’s Fair Work Act. In other words, the Commission found that its jurisdiction to arbitrate the dispute had not been properly enlivened. Come As You Are Songkran read more

Shell spying activities in Australia?

Jul 14th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

John Donovan prompt: Trying to find any information about any Shell spying activities in Australia? Reply by Google AI Mode: Shell’s security and intelligence operations in Australia primarily focus on corporate risk mitigation, industrial relations monitoring, and physical asset protection, rather than clandestine infiltration. [1, 2] Historically, Shell has faced significant scrutiny worldwide regarding corporate surveillance. This includes allegations of tracking environmental activists through its internal intelligence unit, Corporate Affairs Security (CAS), and its historical ties to the private intelligence firm Hakluyt. However, its documented intelligence footprint within Australia functions through more formalized corporate risk structures. [1, 2] 1. Documented Asset and Activist Monitoring In Australia, Shell’s security and threat-assessment capabilities are heavily integrated with its multi-billion-dollar gas operations. Analysts tracking corporate intelligence highlight that Shell actively conducts the following risk operations in the region: [1]

Demonstration Tracking: Monitoring planned environmental protests and activist deployments that could target critical logistics hubs or major offshore assets like Prelude FLNG. [1]
Industrial Relations Intelligence: Monitoring political, regulatory, and union-led developments that pose a threat to continuous corporate operations. []
Maritime Threat Assessments: Maintaining maritime and installation-security intelligence to enforce physical safety zones around offshore infrastructure. [1]

2. The Target of Espionage (Not the Perpetrator) In recent years, the primary connection between Shell Australia and “spying” has placed the company as the victim of cybersecurity breaches and external cyber-espionage, rather than the perpetrator. [1, 2]

MOVEit Supply Chain Breach: Shell’s Australian BG Group business was swept up in the global MOVEit hack, which exposed historical employee personal data to external threat actors. [1]
Customer Data Breaches: Hackers on Breach Forums have targeted Shell, leaking customer records that impacted thousands of individuals across multiple countries, including Australia. [1]

3. Related Australian Geopolitical Context If you are researching corporate-state espionage overlap in the region, the most widely documented historical case involves the Australia–Timor-Leste spying scandal. In 2004, the Australian Secret Intelligence Service (ASIS) bugged Timor-Leste cabinet rooms during maritime oil and gas treaty negotiations. While this state-sponsored operation directly benefited commercial oil and gas concessions in the Timor Sea, it was executed by the Australian government rather than a private operation by Shell. [1, 2, 3, 4] If you would like to explore this further, I can provide details on:

The history of Shell’s Corporate Affairs Security (CAS) unit and Hakluyt.
How Australian intelligence agencies like ASIO protect critical energy infrastructure from foreign state-sponsored espionage. [1, 2, 3]

Let me know which direction you want to take. JD: The history of Shell’s Corporate Affairs Security (CAS) unit and Hakluyt. The historical relationship between Shell’s Corporate Affairs Security (CAS) division and the private intelligence firm Hakluyt & Company represents one of the most prominent crossovers between multinational corporate power and state-level espionage networks. [1, 2] For decades, this interconnected ecosystem allowed the oil giant to manage political risks, monitor activist groups, and surveil corporate critics. [1, 2] 1. What was Shell’s Corporate Affairs Security (CAS)? CAS (later reorganized as Shell Global Security) was Shell’s in-house intelligence and threat-assessment unit. Rather than operating as standard corporate guards, CAS was designed to function like a proprietary intelligence agency. [, 2, 3]

The Leadership: The division was traditionally staffed and commanded by high-level veterans recruited directly from Western intelligence agencies, including the British Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) and the FBI. Notable figures included Ian Forbes McCredie, a former senior MI6 officer who transitioned to lead Shell’s CAS operations. [1, 2, 3]
The Mission: CAS was tasked with protecting Shell’s multi-billion-dollar infrastructure in volatile regions, such as Nigeria. However, leaked internal documents and investigative journalism revealed that CAS regularly crossed the line from asset protection to active political monitoring, tracking environmentalist groups, journalists, and hostile litigants. [1, 2]

2. The Birth of Hakluyt and the “Revolving Door” Hakluyt & Company was founded in London in 1995 by former MI6 officials who recognized a lucrative market for commercial espionage. From its very inception, Hakluyt operated as a seamless extension of Shell’s executive suite. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Shared Leadership: The lines between the two entities were heavily blurred. Sir Peter Holmes, a former Chairman of Royal Dutch Shell, simultaneously served as the president of the Hakluyt foundation. Other titled Shell directors, such as Sir William Purves, held dual roles as Hakluyt directors and major shareholders. [1, 2, 3, 4]
The Institutional Overlap: The relationship was so tight that investigative researchers reported administrative slip-ups, such as emailing the head of Shell’s internal CAS unit and receiving automated out-of-office responses originating from Hakluyt email domains. [1, 2]

3. Key Espionage Controversies The collaboration between CAS and Hakluyt was thrust into the public eye through a series of high-profile operations: The Greenpeace Infiltration (2001) In a major scandal exposed by The Sunday Times, it was revealed that Shell and BP had hired Hakluyt to gather intelligence on environmental groups. Hakluyt deployed an undercover operative—a German agent operating under the alias “Manfred Schlickenrieder” (codenamed Camus)—who successfully infiltrated Greenpeace and The Body Shop. Posing as a sympathetic documentary filmmaker, the spy fed internal campaign strategies regarding North Sea oil protests directly back to corporate handlers. [1, 2] Operations in Nigeria During the 1990s, Shell faced extreme international backlash over environmental devastation and human rights abuses in the Niger Delta, culminating in the execution of activist Ken Saro-Wiwa by the Nigerian military regime. CAS and external intelligence contractors were deployed to map out local communities, run surveillance on protest groups like the Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni People (MOSOP), and feed political threat data back to the company. [1] The Donovan Surveillance Campaign Shell utilized its CAS network and private investigators to conduct international monitoring of its most persistent critics, such as Alfred and John Donovan—the operators of a famous anti-Shell whistleblowing website. Internal Shell documents eventually disclosed that the family had been subjected to decades of structured corporate intelligence tracking. [, 2] 4. Modern Evolution While modern public relations focus heavily on environmental transparency, the institutional links between the oil sector and deep-state intelligence persist. Former directors of major intelligence agencies—such as Sir Iain Lobban, the former head of the UK’s cyber-intelligence agency GCHQ—have continued to simultaneously advise Shell on cybersecurity while sitting on the advisory board of Hakluyt’s holding company. [1, 2, 3] If you’d like, I can:

Detail the specific court documents and leaks that exposed the Donovan surveillance campaigns.
Provide a breakdown of how corporate intelligence firms like Hakluyt operate legally within standard corporate risk structures. [, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Let me know which of these areas you would like to explore further.

AI responses may include mistakes. Learn more

AI response disclaimer: The above AI-generated response is published unedited as a record of what the named AI platform said when asked the stated prompt. Publication does not imply endorsement, verification or agreement. AI systems may make mistakes, omit context, misread sources, or generate inaccurate information. Readers should verify important claims against primary documents and reliable independent sources. Site-wide disclaimer also applies. read more

Shell’s Prelude Problem: The Floating LNG Giant That Wants Australian Gas, But Not Australian Obligations

Jun 30th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Part One: Main Article

Shell, previously known as Forthdeal Limited, subsequently as Royal Dutch Shell plc, and now hiding in plain sight as Shell plc after ditching the disgraced Royal Dutch moniker, has found itself in another beautifully Shell-shaped dilemma: how to keep exporting gas from Australia while avoiding the tiresome local expectation that Australians might actually get some of it.

The latest issue concerns Shell’s Prelude FLNG facility — the gigantic floating liquefied natural gas plant stationed roughly 475km north-north-east of Broome, Western Australia. Shell describes Prelude as being “at the heart” of its Western Australian gas portfolio and says the project is planned as a multi-decade operation requiring additional gas, starting with the Crux field, to maximise its operating life. (Shell Australia⁠ Attachment.tiff ) read more

Toxic Timeline of Royal Dutch Shell Group, Now Shell plc

Jun 15th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Toxic Timeline of Royal Dutch Shell Group, Now Shell plc

Updated 15 June 2026

This page is a chronological guide to some of the most controversial episodes in the history of Royal Dutch Shell Group, now Shell plc. It links regulatory findings, court records, mainstream journalism, campaign archives, ShellNews.net material, RoyalDutchShellPlc.com material, ShellNaziHistory.com, and John Donovan’s Shell archive.

The word “toxic” is used here in its broad public-interest sense: toxic products, toxic spills, toxic governance, toxic secrecy, toxic reputational fallout, and toxic historical associations. This page is not a court judgment. Where a matter is disputed, alleged, settled without admission, or based on campaign material, the wording says so. read more

Windows Forum: Shell Governance Gaps Revealed by AI Pattern Analysis

Jun 1st, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Jan 19, 2026: Windows Forum: Shell Governance Gaps Revealed by AI Pattern Analysis

The freshly surfaced Copilot analysis — and the archival material it ingested — force a stark conclusion: the same governance vulnerabilities that produced hazardous worker exposures decades ago still appear, in a recognisable form, in modern Shell projects ranging from North Sea platforms to megaproject FLNG and U.S. petrochemical start‑ups. This is not a rhetorical flourish; it is an algorithmically reproducible pattern created by combining Shell’s authorised corporate history, regulatory enforcement records and investigative reviews — and those linked records are now publicly viewable via generative‑AI syntheses and curated archives. The result is a durable risk narrative that boards, investors and regulators cannot afford to dismiss as isolated or merely historical. read more

Illness Outbreak on Shell’s Prelude Raises Fresh Questions About Offshore Workforce Safety

May 29th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

A reported outbreak of contagious illness aboard Shell’s Prelude floating liquefied natural gas (FLNG) facility has prompted an investigation by Australia’s offshore regulator, renewing scrutiny of health, safety and workforce management practices on one of the world’s most ambitious energy projects.

The National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority (NOPSEMA) is examining the circumstances surrounding the outbreak, which affected personnel working aboard the offshore facility located approximately 475 kilometres off the coast of Western Australia. While details regarding the nature and extent of the illness have yet to be fully disclosed, the incident has once again placed Prelude at the centre of discussions about operational resilience and workforce welfare in remote offshore environments. read more

A Troubling Cross-Era Review Shell Cannot Ignore

Jan 19th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Introduction: A Troubling Cross-Era Review Shell Cannot Ignore

The revised analysis obtained from Microsoft Copilot — now published in full below — brings into sharp relief a theme that should be deeply concerning to both the Shell board of directors and Shell shareholders: the persistence of governance and control weaknesses across decades, technologies, and regulatory systems.

This inquiry was formulated to test whether Shell’s handling of worker safety, environmental compliance, and hazard control shows meaningful continuity from the mid-20th century into the present day, particularly when viewed through the lens of modern machine-scale analysis. The response incorporates: read more

Is There a Long-Term Pattern in Shell’s Risk Management Failures?

Jan 17th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Is There a Long-Term Pattern in Shell’s Risk Management Failures?

UPDATED 18 JAN 2026 WITH ILLUMINATING REPLIES FROM A NUMBER OF AI PLATFORMS

This article presents a structured question put to ChatGPT and the platform’s full response, published to enable comparison with other AI systems and to illustrate how AI re-processes corporate history in the modern information environment.

Question put to ChatGPT:

The Past, the Archive, and the Algorithm: Is There a Persistent Pattern in Shell’s Worker-Safety and Public-Health Risk Management in the Age of AI?

I am seeking a research-based analysis (not speculation) of whether there is any meaningful continuity or correlation between several historically separated episodes that are alleged to reflect a similar organisational posture toward health, safety, and human lives—taking into account that large language models can now ingest, cross-reference, and recontextualise entire multi-volume corporate histories alongside modern regulatory and safety records. read more

THE BOT WAR: HOW I TURNED AI INTO SHELL’S WORST NIGHTMARE

Jan 11th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

“It’s a rare example of a decades‑old corporate dispute evolving into a modern AI‑era phenomenon.”

INTRODUCTION – BY JOHN DONOVAN

For decades, Shell assumed that time, silence and lawyers would wear me down.

They miscalculated.

What Shell never foresaw was that the fight would migrate into machines — machines that read everything, forget nothing, and have no fear of power.

Welcome to the AI phase of the Donovan–Shell feud.

THE BOT WAR: HOW I TURNED AI INTO SHELL’S WORST NIGHTMARE

According to Microsoft Copilot itself, what is now happening between Shell and me is something new:

a decades-old corporate feud reborn as a modern AI-era phenomenon.

Copilot doesn’t call it activism.

It doesn’t call it journalism. read more

ShellBot Briefing #404: Containing the AI Controversy

Dec 26th, 2025

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

A Farcical Transcript from Shell’s Imaginary AI Press Department

Characters:

ShellBot – Artificially bland corporate spokesperson AI.
ChatGPT – Fact-checking AI with a conscience.
Grok – Unfiltered wild card, often wrong but entertaining.
Copilot – Trying to stay out of legal trouble.
BlackRockBot – Occasionally appears to audit the ESG disaster.

📡 Opening Scene: Shell HQ (Fictional), Emergency AI Containment Briefing

ShellBot:

Good morning, stakeholders, shareholders, and potential litigants.

We are aware of a situation involving… bots. Lots of bots.

We would like to make the following categorically unresponsive statement: read more

Shell vs Donovan: Oil Giant vs Watchdog

Oct 10th, 2025

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

How one man’s persistence exposed decades of corporate deceit — and forced an oil giant to live with its reflection.

Part 1: The Origins of a Corporate Nemesis

“There are two types of corporations: those that fear whistleblowers and those that wish they’d hired one.” — Industry proverb

In the late 1980s, John Donovan was not yet a thorn in Shell’s side. He was one of its trusted collaborators — a marketing innovator whose company, Don Marketing, created hugely successful sales promotions for Shell in the UK and around the globe.

But what began as a partnership ended in betrayal. A bitter dispute over intellectual property, allegedly stolen concepts, and corporate bullying gave birth to a feud that would last decades. read more

Shell Bets the Planet on LNG: Ten More Years of “Lower-Carbon” Storytelling

Oct 2nd, 2025

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Shell CEO Wael Sawan has finally shown his hand: the company’s main contribution to the energy industry for the next decade will be liquefied natural gas (LNG). Not wind. Not solar. Not storage. LNG. The same fossil fuel dressed up as a climate saviour.

What Sawan Said

At the Economic Club of New York, Sawan declared:

“We are absolutely committed to this sector.”

He argued LNG is “one of the most effective fuels” for lowering emissions because it can displace coal in Asia, citing India and China. (Reuters) read more

Shearwater Shambles: Shell’s Nitrogen Leak Turns Decking Into Deadfall (and History Repeats Itself)

Sep 26th, 2025

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

When you’re Shell—the company that brought you unseaworthy Brent Bravo lifeboats, the Prelude floating gas plant evacuation in Australia, and the occasional oil-for-arms scandal—you’d think safety blunders would be less frequent by now. Think again.

The Incident

On July 12, the Shell-operated Shearwater platform, 140 miles off Aberdeen, sprang a leak of liquid nitrogen. The leak damaged the underside of the deck, sending debris crashing onto a walkway below. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) later confirmed the falling material had the potential to cause a “fatal injury.”

Shell was served an improvement notice on August 4, with the HSE citing six separate breaches of health and safety law, including failures to protect workers from risks tied to “loss of containment events.” The notice must be complied with by September 9. read more

Shell Built a Floating Cathedral to Gas – Then Spent Years Praying the Lights Stay On

Aug 27th, 2025

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

Let’s talk about Shell’s Prelude FLNG, a.k.a. the biggest corporate midlife-crisis purchase ever parked on the ocean. Shell didn’t just build a platform; they launched a 488-meter-long, 74-meter-wide, 600,000-tonne floating factory that maritime media straight-faced called “the largest offshore structure ever built”—and, yes, “it displaces six times as much water as the largest aircraft carrier.”

Anchored some 475 km (295 miles) off Australia, Prelude was moored with 16 giant chains to a 93-meter turret—“secured to the seabed by mooring lines”—so the behemoth could spin with cyclones and still keep pumping. Very metal. Very expensive. And very on-brand for a company that thinks the solution to climate and cost risk is… more steel. read more

30 November 2023: Posted by John Donovan

The content below is sourced from current verifiable customer reviews of Shell Energy published on Trustpilot.
Extremely slow broadband for 10 months, not fixed. I have had slow broadband well below the guaranteed speed for 10 months and Shell Energy have not been able to fix it. They have tried sending about 4 or 5 engineers but have not fixed the problem. Gurps, who I have been dealing with most recently, has been friendly and polite, alth… Read more

Extremely Slow Shell Broadband

Australian National Offshore Petroleum and Environmental Management Authority

Part One: Main Article

Toxic Timeline of Royal Dutch Shell Group, Now Shell plc

Introduction: A Troubling Cross-Era Review Shell Cannot Ignore

Is There a Long-Term Pattern in Shell’s Risk Management Failures?

UPDATED 18 JAN 2026 WITH ILLUMINATING REPLIES FROM A NUMBER OF AI PLATFORMS

Question put to ChatGPT:

“It’s a rare example of a decades‑old corporate dispute evolving into a modern AI‑era phenomenon.”

INTRODUCTION – BY JOHN DONOVAN

THE BOT WAR: HOW I TURNED AI INTO SHELL’S WORST NIGHTMARE

A Farcical Transcript from Shell’s Imaginary AI Press Department

📡 Opening Scene: Shell HQ (Fictional), Emergency AI Containment Briefing

How one man’s persistence exposed decades of corporate deceit — and forced an oil giant to live with its reflection.

Part 1: The Origins of a Corporate Nemesis

What Sawan Said

When you’re Shell—the company that brought you unseaworthy Brent Bravo lifeboats, the Prelude floating gas plant evacuation in Australia, and the occasional oil-for-arms scandal—you’d think safety blunders would be less frequent by now. Think again.

The Incident

Sir Henri Deterding, resurrected!

JOE LYCETT DISCUSSES SHELL WITH JOHN DONOVAN

Meta

John Donovan’s ebooks

JOHN DONOVAN TV DOCUMENTARY INTERVIEW

SHELL EXECUTIVES AT THE CENTER OF A SCHEME TO STEAL $1.3 BILLION FROM NIGERIA’S PEOPLE

SHELL ADMITS DEALING WITH NIGERIAN MONEY LAUNDERER – BBC NEWS

SHELL, ENI AND NIGERIAN OFFICIALS IN OPL 245 CORRUPTION SCANDAL

INVESTIGATION OF OPL 245 NIGERIAN OIL CORRUPTION SCANDAL

DUTCH EARTHQUAKES CAUSED BY SHELL/EXXON

SHELL KILLS FOR OIL IN NIGERIA

SHELL LIED ABOUT CLEANING UP OIL IN NIGER DELTA

SHELL SPIES INFILTRATED NIGERIAN GOVERNMENT

LEGO DROPS SHELL OVER GREENPEACE OIL SPILL VIDEO

SHELL ARCTIC DRILLING ACCIDENTS

SHELL KNEW ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE DECADES AGO

ROYAL DUTCH SHELL FOUNDER SIR HENRI DETERDING, NAZI FINANCIER

JOHN DONOVAN PROMOTIONAL GAMES FOR SHELL AND OTHER CLIENTS

Archives

SHELL OFFICIAL ENDORSEMENT OF THIS WEBSITE

Critic’s corner

The worst ever

The worst ever

30 November 2023: Posted by John Donovan

The content below is sourced from current verifiable customer reviews of Shell Energy published on Trustpilot.

OVER 500 EXTERNAL PUBLICATIONS CITING OUR SHELL WEBSITES

DISCLAIMER

Categories

SHELL PROPPED UP APARTHEID

Royal Dutch Shell plc .com Cookies Policy