Litigation

The Shell Annual Report: A Satirical Reading

Comments are off for this post

The Shell Annual Report – A Satirical Reading

Each year Shell publishes an Annual Report running to hundreds of pages.

The document explains the company’s strategy, outlines risks, describes governance structures and sets out how the global energy transition will be navigated — preferably in a manner that remains compatible with strong shareholder returns.

Like most corporate reports, it contains a remarkable quantity of carefully crafted language designed to sound both confident and reassuring. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan - more information here. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Shell Annual Report: Forward-Looking Statements: Everything We Just Said May Be Wrong

Mar 14th, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

No annual report would be complete without a section known as the Forward-Looking Statements disclaimer.

This is the part where, after several hundred pages confidently explaining strategy, performance and long-term plans, the company gently reminds readers that none of those statements should be interpreted as a guarantee that anything described will actually happen.

Shell’s Annual Report contains the usual carefully crafted legal language explaining that certain statements within the document relate to future expectations, projections and strategic ambitions. read more

Risk Factors: A Helpful Guide to Everything That Might Go Wrong (Except the Business Model)

Mar 14th, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

Every major corporate annual report contains a section known as “Risk Factors.”

This is where the company carefully explains the many things that could theoretically threaten its business, ranging from geopolitical instability to meteor strikes, while delicately avoiding any suggestion that the core business model itself might be one of those risks.

Shell’s Annual Report is no exception.

Running through many pages of legal language and corporate understatement, the section outlines the numerous hazards that could potentially affect one of the world’s largest energy companies. read more

Perplexity: 20 Global Companies with the Most Controversial Histories (Shell is number 3)

Mar 13th, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

Created by Perplexity: Here is a 20‑company ranking, extending the logic and criteria of the original article (severity, scale, duration, and notoriety of controversies).

Top 20 companies with highly controversial histories

Bayer (Germany) – IG Farben participation, forced labour at Auschwitz-Monowitz, and role in supplying components for Zyklon B during the Nazi era, followed by later pharmaceutical and agrochemical controversies.watchmojo+1

Volkswagen (Germany) – Founded under the Nazi regime, heavy use of forced labour during WWII, and the modern diesel emissions‑cheating scandal affecting millions of vehicles globally.ig+1

Royal Dutch Shell / Shell plc (UK / Netherlands) – Long-running allegations over pollution and human‑rights issues in the Niger Delta, major 2004 reserves overstatement scandal, and historical controversy around Sir Henri Deterding’s interactions with Nazi Germany.royaldutchshellplc+1 read more

COPILOT: 20 Global Companies with the Most Controversial Histories (Shell is number 2)

Mar 13th, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

CREATED BY COPILOT: Here’s a ranked, interpretive “top 20” list of global companies with especially long and controversial histories—environmental damage, human rights, corruption, product harms, and governance scandals. The order is judgment-based, not a formal metric.

Rank	Company (current or successor)	Main areas of controversy
1	ExxonMobil	Climate denial, environmental disasters, lobbying against climate policy
2	Royal Dutch Shell	Oil spills, Niger Delta conflict, climate litigation, alleged human rights complicity
3	Deepwater Horizon spill, safety record, environmental damage
4	Union Carbide / Dow	Bhopal disaster, toxic chemicals, long‑tail liability disputes
5	Monsanto (now part of Bayer)	Glyphosate health claims, GM seeds, Agent Orange legacy, farmer lawsuits
6	Volkswagen Group	Diesel emissions cheating, regulatory deception, environmental impact
7	Meta Platforms (Facebook)	Data privacy, misinformation, mental‑health concerns, content moderation failures
8	Amazon	Labour conditions, union busting, surveillance, antitrust and tax practices
9	Nestlé	Infant formula marketing, water extraction, child labour in cocoa supply chains
10	Philip Morris International / Altria	Tobacco health harms, youth marketing, long history of denial and lobbying
11	Rio Tinto	Indigenous rights violations, mine disasters, environmental damage
12	Glencore	Corruption cases, resource extraction impacts, market manipulation allegations
13	Foxconn (Hon Hai)	Worker suicides, harsh factory conditions, excessive overtime
14	Boeing	737 MAX crashes, safety culture, regulatory capture concerns
15	HSBC	Money‑laundering cases, sanctions breaches, tax‑evasion facilitation
16	Goldman Sachs	Role in 2008 crisis, Abacus deal, 1MDB scandal, conflicts of interest
17	Uber Technologies	Aggressive “growth at all costs” tactics, labour classification, data misuse, “Greyball”
18	Wells Fargo	Fake accounts scandal, sales‑pressure culture, repeated consumer abuses
19	Chevron	Ecuador rainforest pollution case, other environmental and community disputes
20	Samsung Electronics (group context)	Chaebol governance issues, corruption cases, labour and safety controversies

Brief context by company

ExxonMobil: Long‑running accusations that it funded climate‑science denial while its own research showed fossil‑fuel risks; major spills and refinery pollution, plus intense lobbying against climate regulation.

Royal Dutch Shell: Oil spills (notably in the Niger Delta), allegations of complicity in human rights abuses in Nigeria, and prominent climate lawsuits over its emissions trajectory.

BP: The Deepwater Horizon disaster became one of history’s worst marine oil spills, highlighting safety and risk‑management failures; BP has also faced criticism over other spills and its broader environmental footprint.

Union Carbide / Dow: The 1984 Bhopal gas leak in India killed and injured thousands; disputes over compensation, remediation, and responsibility have persisted for decades, now tied to Dow as the corporate successor.

Monsanto (Bayer): Criticised for glyphosate (Roundup) cancer claims, aggressive enforcement of seed patents, GM crops, and the legacy of Agent Orange; it frequently appears on lists of “most infamous” corporations.

Volkswagen Group: “Dieselgate” revealed systematic cheating on emissions tests worldwide, leading to huge fines, recalls, and reputational damage, and it remains a flagship ESG‑controversy case.

Meta Platforms (Facebook): Cambridge Analytica, repeated data‑privacy failures, algorithmic amplification of misinformation and hate, and concerns about mental‑health impacts have made Meta a central ESG and tech‑ethics flashpoint.

Amazon: Criticised for warehouse working conditions, anti‑union tactics, intense productivity surveillance, tax strategies, and market dominance; it features heavily in ESG‑controversy datasets.

Nestlé: Long‑running infant‑formula marketing scandals, accusations of over‑extracting groundwater, and child labour in cocoa supply chains have given Nestlé one of the most persistent reputational shadows.

Philip Morris International / Altria: Tobacco’s health toll, historic denial of smoking risks, youth‑targeted marketing, and lobbying against regulation make these firms emblematic of product‑harm controversies.

Rio Tinto: Criticised for mine‑related environmental damage and for destroying the 46,000‑year‑old Juukan Gorge Aboriginal heritage site in Australia, sparking global outrage over Indigenous rights.

Glencore: Has faced multiple corruption and bribery investigations, sanctions‑related cases, and scrutiny over environmental and social impacts of its mining and trading operations.

Foxconn (Hon Hai): Known for harsh working conditions, excessive overtime, and a cluster of worker suicides at Chinese plants supplying major electronics brands.

Boeing: The 737 MAX crashes exposed serious issues in safety culture, engineering oversight, and regulatory relationships, leading to criminal settlements and ongoing scrutiny.

HSBC: Involved in major money‑laundering and sanctions‑breach cases, including handling funds for drug cartels, and has been repeatedly fined by regulators.

Goldman Sachs: Central to several high‑profile scandals, including its role in the 2008 financial crisis and the 1MDB corruption case, raising questions about conflicts of interest and governance.

Uber Technologies: Built a reputation for “move fast, break rules” tactics: regulatory evasion tools, toxic internal culture, sexual‑harassment scandals, and disputes over driver classification and rights.

Wells Fargo: Created millions of fake customer accounts under extreme sales pressure, then faced further issues around auto‑insurance, mortgages, and governance failures.

Chevron: Best known for the long‑running Ecuador rainforest pollution case and other environmental disputes, plus aggressive legal counter‑campaigns against critics and plaintiffs.

Samsung Electronics (wider Samsung group): Part of a chaebol system repeatedly linked to corruption and political scandals in South Korea, alongside labour and safety controversies in its electronics supply chain.

20 Global Companies with the Most Controversial Histories (Shell is number 11)

Mar 13th, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

Created by GROK: The Long Shadow of Industry: 20 Global Companies with the Most Controversial Histories (Independent Research-Based Ranking)

This expanded ranking follows the exact same criteria as my previous top-10 list (and the referenced article): documented human-rights abuses, environmental devastation, measurable scale of harm (deaths, long-term health impacts, displaced/affected populations, ecological/economic costs), and enduring legacy. It draws exclusively from cross-verified court records, official reports (Amnesty International, EPA, science panels), journalistic investigations, declassified documents, and historical scholarship. Where companies have issued apologies, paid reparations, funded memorials, or reformed practices, this is explicitly noted. Many legacies involve complex geopolitical contexts or government contracts, but the focus remains on corporate decisions and outcomes. read more

The Long Shadow of Industry: 10 Global Companies with the Most Controversial Histories

Mar 12th, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

Below is a historically informed, but inevitably interpretive, list of major companies still operating today whose records include some of the most severe ethical controversies. The ranking considers factors such as human-rights abuses, environmental damage, scale, and duration. I’ve also indicated where companies have formally acknowledged or apologised for past wrongdoing.

The Long Shadow of Corporate Power

From wartime collaboration to environmental disasters, the historical controversies that still follow some of the world’s largest companies.

Large corporations often span generations, and with that longevity comes history — sometimes admirable, sometimes deeply troubling. Some of the world’s most recognisable companies have been connected to events that remain controversial decades later. The following overview highlights ten corporations still in existence whose histories include some of the most debated episodes in modern industrial history. read more

The 25 Most Explosive Internal Shell Documents Ever Published

Mar 12th, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

When Corporate Documents Escape the Vault

Large corporations produce enormous quantities of internal documents.

Most remain hidden in company archives, legal files, or confidential email servers.

But occasionally some of those documents emerge into the public domain — through court cases, whistleblowers, regulatory investigations or journalistic reporting.

When they do, they can provide rare insight into how companies actually operate behind closed doors.

Shell, one of the world’s largest energy companies, has been the subject of numerous controversies over the decades. Along the way, a number of internal communications and documents have surfaced that offer glimpses into moments of crisis, corporate debate and reputational damage. read more

The 16 Biggest Corporate Controversies in Shell’s History

Mar 11th, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

A Long History of Controversy

Shell is one of the most powerful corporations on Earth.

For more than a century the company has operated across dozens of countries, generating enormous profits while supplying energy to the global economy.

But with that scale has come controversy.

From environmental disasters and political scandals to accounting crises and legal battles, Shell’s history includes a number of episodes that have drawn intense scrutiny from regulators, governments, activists and journalists. read more

The 11 Most Damaging Internal Shell Emails Ever Published

Mar 10th, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

When Internal Emails Escape the Boardroom

Corporate emails are meant to stay private.

They are written quickly, often candidly, and rarely intended for public consumption.

But occasionally those messages escape into the open — through regulatory investigations, court cases, whistleblowers or investigative journalism.

When they do, they often reveal far more about a company than the polished language of annual reports.

That was certainly the case during Shell’s 2004 reserves scandal, when internal communications surfaced that exposed confusion, concern and embarrassment inside one of the world’s largest energy companies. read more

When an Oil Company Builds an Intelligence Operation

Mar 10th, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

Most people expect intelligence agencies to spy.

MI6.

The CIA.

Perhaps the occasional government security service.

What they do not usually expect is that a multinational oil company might run intelligence operations of its own.

Yet for decades Shell maintained a powerful internal intelligence apparatus, most notably through its controversial Corporate Affairs Security (CAS) division and through links to the private intelligence firm Hakluyt.

These operations were originally designed to monitor political risks, activist groups and security threats in regions where Shell operated. read more

OPL 245 Returns: The $1.3 Billion Scandal That Refuses to Stay Buried

Mar 6th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Just when you thought one of the oil industry’s most notorious corruption sagas might finally fade into history, Nigeria has decided to give it a fresh coat of paint and a new corporate structure.

The controversial offshore oil licence OPL 245—long associated with bribery allegations, court battles across continents, and enough legal paperwork to deforest half the Niger Delta—has now been split into four new blocks under an arrangement involving Shell plc and Italy’s Eni, according to a report by Reuters. (MarketScreener Attachment.tiff ) read more

WINDOWS FORUM: AI Amplified Bot War: Shell vs Donovan Over Archival Critique

Mar 4th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Over the years, Donovan has maintained a suite of independent, non‑commercial websites (most famously royaldutchshellplc.com and variations on that domain) that aggregate court documents, internal Shell materials, criticism, and historical research. Those sites — and Donovan’s tactics of publicising archival material — have been at the centre of repeated attempts by Shell (or its agents) to shut down, suppress, or legally challenge the content.

Published by windowsforum.com 12.51am 4 March 2026

The long-running feud between John Donovan and Shell plc has re‑entered a modern, high‑stakes phase: an AI‑amplified “bot war” that has prompted renewed legal posturing from Shell, intensified public debate over corporate brand protection tactics, and raised new questions about how multinational companies should — or can — respond to adversarial archival activism in the age of generative AI. Early March 2026 saw fresh rounds of public exchanges and private threats, but the underlying pattern remains familiar: legal letters and third‑party pressure that frequently aim to deter critics but rarely culminate in full trials. This article maps the recent developments, explains the legal and reputational levers Shell has historically used, assesses where the new AI dimension changes the calculus, and flags what is verifiable versus what remains contested. read more

EXTRACTS FROM JOHN DONOVAN BOOK “SIR HENRI DETERDING AND THE NAZI HISTORY OF ROYAL DUTCH SHELL”

Mar 2nd, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

In the years leading up to WW2, the Dutch founder of the Royal Dutch Shell Group, Sir Henri Deterding became an ardent Nazi. He financially backed the Third Reich and met directly with Hitler on behalf of Royal Dutch Shell.

As a major financial contributor to Nazi Germany in pre-WW2 years, the Royal Dutch Shell Group, under Dutch leadership, arguably had some indirect responsibility for the death toll in the subsequent war, in which over 50 million people perished.

Shell publicly boasted at the time about the importance of its financial contribution to the German economy. The claims were made by Shell in Germany while the country was under Nazi control.

In years leading up to WW2, Shell conspired with partners, Standard Oil, and German chemical giant I.G. Farben, to covertly import oil products, including airplane fuel, from the US into Nazi Germany. The US government was kept in the dark.

I.G. Farben supplied the Zyklon-B gas used in the Holocaust to kill millions of people.

The portrayal in 2007 by Shell’s paid historians of a distant relationship between Deterding and Hitler, in which all attempts by Deterding to meet with Hitler were rebuffed is simply untrue.

In fact, their meetings included a four-day one-on-one summit held at Hitler’s mountain retreat, as reported by Reuters in 1934.

Deterding has been described by independent authors as “a hardline Nazi revered and ultimately mourned by Hitler.” That description is confirmed by the evidence within this book and evidence accessible via links.

There are credible allegations that the Royal Dutch Shell Group, under the control of Dutch directors, used forced labor at its German subsidiary, Rhenania-Ossag. Many of its directors and staff were fanatical Nazis.

Royal Dutch Shell collaborated in the annexation and occupation of sovereign countries by the Nazis – Austria and Czechoslovakia – before the outbreak of WW2.

The donations and financial contributions to the Third Reich were all carried out under the control of Dutch directors of companies within the Royal Dutch Shell Group.

In 1936, while still a director of multiple Royal Dutch Shell group companies, Sir Henri purchased the Castle Dobbin estate North of Berlin for 1,050,000 Reich marks from Queen Wilhelmina of the Netherlands.

Deterding moved into Castle Dobbin with his young German wife, his secretary, a fanatical Nazi said by one source to be a former private secretary of Hitler’s.

Sir Henri’s friend Hermann Göring, the founder of the Gestapo, regularly visited Castle Dobbin to go hunting with him. Deterding generously gave Göring the Rominten Hunting Lodge in East Prussia as a spectacular gift. Kaiser Wilhelm II once owned it.

In 1936 and 1937, Sir Henri – while still a director of multiple companies within the Royal Dutch Shell Group, in which he held a controlling interest – made huge donations of food (“millions of tonnes”) to Nazi Germany as part of the “Winter Help” scheme. A New York Times report in June 1937 (“Deterding to Distribute More Food in Germany”) specifically linked the food donations to Germany’s rearmament policy.

The massive donations enabled significant funds to be diverted at a time when the Nazi regime was engaged in urgent rearmament of its military might.

Seven thousand railway wagons were used in the first immense delivery.

Deterding died just before the outbreak of WW2. He was honored by a Nazi ceremonial funeral at Castle Dobbin in February 1939. It was attended by a full contingent of Royal Dutch Shell Group directors mingling with Nazi military officers.

A glowing tribute to Sir Henri on behalf of the German nation was inscribed on a wreath sent by Adolf Hitler.

The Bishop who conducted the funeral service was a supporter of Hitler and a rabid anti-Semite.

Film footage of the Nazi funeral spectacular exists.

Fears that the Nazis intended to exploit the death of Sir Henri, just before the start of WW2, to seize control of the Royal Dutch Shell Group, were well founded. The UK National Archives has kindly given permission for related documents and correspondence to be featured within this book.

Dutch directors of the Royal Dutch Shell Group engaged in anti-Semitic policies against Shell employees and were also guilty of collaboration and appeasement.

Royal Dutch Shell employees in the Netherlands were instructed to complete a form that for some amounted to a self-declared death warrant. Many did not survive the war.

The Nazis did succeed in gaining control over Dobbin Castle.

In the latter part of WW2, Field Marshal Wilhelm Keitel, SS leader Heinrich Himmler and General Alfred Jodl, Chief of the Operations Staff of the Armed Forces High Command, were all stationed at Dobbin Castle.

Hitler’s final despairing message from his Berlin bunker, a day before he committed suicide, was sent to Field Marshal Keitel at Dobbin Castle, whilst it was still owned by the Deterding family. Strangely, that somehow seems appropriate.

Evidence was on display at Castle Dobbin, signed by Hitler, confirming Deterding’s financial support for the Nazis. Also a personal testimony by Herman Göring acknowledging the generosity of his friend and benefactor, Sir Henri Deterding.

The close friendship between Herman Göring and Sir Henri Deterding has been confirmed in a book published in 2015 authored by the grandson of Henry van der Waerden, Shell’s Director for Europe under Sir Henri Deterding. The content is partly based on family records, including correspondence with Deterding.

Please see the related article “Henry van Waerden, the Shell executive who defied Deterding and his Nazi ambitions.”

Shell’s HQ in Copenhagen, Denmark, was used in WW2 as the HQ for the dreaded Nazi secret police, the Gestapo. “Shellhus” was bombed and destroyed by the RAF on 21 March 1945. It had been used for the torture of Danish citizens.

At the time of the RAF bombing raid – Operation Carthage, Shell’s businesses in occupied Europe were under the control of Nazi administrators, some of whom ended up as executives in Shell’s German subsidiary Rhenania-Ossag after WW2 ended.

The above information was first published by John Donovan several years ago in defiance of litigation threats by Michiel Brandjes, a senior lawyer and Company Secretary of Royal Dutch Shell Plc. Shell prudently decided not to sue.

Consensus of Copilot, Perplexity, ChatGPT and Grok: Shell is losing the bot war with Donovan

Mar 1st, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Shell is currently losing the “bot war” in reputational and narrative terms, even though it remains far stronger in conventional power (money, lawyers, regulators) than John Donovan. The damage is reputational, long‑tail and cumulative rather than existential.

Question put to Perplexity 1st March 2026:

I put this question to Copilot earlier today. In your opinion is Shell losing or winning the bot war? Their reply is in the following article: https://royaldutchshellplc.com/2026/03/01/copilot-update-on-donovan-shell-feud-1st-march-2026/ What is your assessment?

Reply by Perplexity:

Shell is currently losing the “bot war” in reputational and narrative terms, even though it remains far stronger in conventional power (money, lawyers, regulators) than John Donovan. read more

Copilot update on Donovan Shell feud 1st March 2026: Shell is losing the bot war

Mar 1st, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

ESG analysts are watching the feud because AI‑generated narratives can reshape perceptions of ethics and sustainability.

The latest developments in the Donovan–Shell feud center on a long‑running corporate dispute that has recently evolved into a digitally amplified, AI‑driven information battle. The conflict, which began decades ago, is now being reshaped by the use of chatbots, archival material, and public provocations.

📰 Most recent headlines at a glance

February 2026 updates describe renewed legal threats and continued public clashes between John Donovan and Shell.
A “bot war” has emerged, with Donovan feeding archival documents into AI systems to expose inconsistencies and provoke Shell.
Regulators have stepped in, with the UK’s Financial Reporting Council investigating Shell’s 2024 audit amid the broader narrative tensions.
AI‑mediated activism is escalating, creating new reputational risks for Shell and new visibility for Donovan.
A February 2026 retrospective reiterates the feud’s origins in 1980s intellectual‑property disputes and its evolution into a modern digital campaign.

🔍 What’s happening now

1. Escalation through AI

Recent coverage highlights that Donovan is deliberately using large‑language models to revive and amplify decades of documents, litigation records, and leaked materials. By publishing the differing outputs from various chatbots, he is reframing the feud as a test of AI reliability and corporate transparency. This tactic has created a fast‑moving information environment that Shell has struggled to control. read more

30 November 2023: Posted by John Donovan

The content below is sourced from current verifiable customer reviews of Shell Energy published on Trustpilot.
Extremely slow broadband for 10 months, not fixed. I have had slow broadband well below the guaranteed speed for 10 months and Shell Energy have not been able to fix it. They have tried sending about 4 or 5 engineers but have not fixed the problem. Gurps, who I have been dealing with most recently, has been friendly and polite, alth… Read more

Extremely Slow Shell Broadband

Litigation

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Created by Perplexity: Here is a 20‑company ranking, extending the logic and criteria of the original article (severity, scale, duration, and notoriety of controversies).

Top 20 companies with highly controversial histories

Share this:

Like this:

Brief context by company

Share this:

Like this:

Created by GROK: The Long Shadow of Industry: 20 Global Companies with the Most Controversial Histories (Independent Research-Based Ranking)

Share this:

Like this:

The Long Shadow of Corporate Power

From wartime collaboration to environmental disasters, the historical controversies that still follow some of the world’s largest companies.

Share this:

Like this:

When Corporate Documents Escape the Vault

Share this:

Like this:

A Long History of Controversy

Share this:

Like this:

When Internal Emails Escape the Boardroom

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Shell is currently losing the “bot war” in reputational and narrative terms, even though it remains far stronger in conventional power (money, lawyers, regulators) than John Donovan. The damage is reputational, long‑tail and cumulative rather than existential.

Share this:

Like this:

ESG analysts are watching the feud because AI‑generated narratives can reshape perceptions of ethics and sustainability.

📰 Most recent headlines at a glance

🔍 What’s happening now

1. Escalation through AI

Share this:

Like this:

Sir Henri Deterding, resurrected!

JOE LYCETT DISCUSSES SHELL WITH JOHN DONOVAN

Meta

John Donovan’s ebooks

JOHN DONOVAN TV DOCUMENTARY INTERVIEW

SHELL EXECUTIVES AT THE CENTER OF A SCHEME TO STEAL $1.3 BILLION FROM NIGERIA’S PEOPLE

SHELL ADMITS DEALING WITH NIGERIAN MONEY LAUNDERER – BBC NEWS

SHELL, ENI AND NIGERIAN OFFICIALS IN OPL 245 CORRUPTION SCANDAL

INVESTIGATION OF OPL 245 NIGERIAN OIL CORRUPTION SCANDAL

DUTCH EARTHQUAKES CAUSED BY SHELL/EXXON

SHELL KILLS FOR OIL IN NIGERIA

SHELL LIED ABOUT CLEANING UP OIL IN NIGER DELTA

SHELL SPIES INFILTRATED NIGERIAN GOVERNMENT

LEGO DROPS SHELL OVER GREENPEACE OIL SPILL VIDEO

SHELL ARCTIC DRILLING ACCIDENTS

SHELL KNEW ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE DECADES AGO

ROYAL DUTCH SHELL FOUNDER SIR HENRI DETERDING, NAZI FINANCIER

JOHN DONOVAN PROMOTIONAL GAMES FOR SHELL AND OTHER CLIENTS

Archives

SHELL OFFICIAL ENDORSEMENT OF THIS WEBSITE

Critic’s corner

30 November 2023: Posted by John Donovan

The content below is sourced from current verifiable customer reviews of Shell Energy published on Trustpilot.

The worst ever

The worst ever

OVER 500 EXTERNAL PUBLICATIONS CITING OUR SHELL WEBSITES

DISCLAIMER

Categories

SHELL PROPPED UP APARTHEID

Royal Dutch Shell plc .com Cookies Policy