AI

WindowsForum.com: Donovan and his conflict with Shell

Comments are off for this post

You’re researching Donovan, and the WindowsForum.com results overwhelmingly point to a decades-long dispute between John Donovan and Royal Dutch Shell, significantly amplified by recent experiments with generative AI [8, 9, 1, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17, 19].

This “bot war” involves feeding an extensive archive of information about Shell to AI assistants like ChatGPT, Copilot, and Grok, revealing inconsistencies, “hallucinations” (false information generated by AI), and the challenges of AI handling contested historical narratives [8, 13, 15]. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan - more information here. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

AI Chatbots Escalate Corporate Feud Over Shell’s Bot War

Feb 12th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

AI CERTs News: AI Chatbots Escalate Corporate Feud Over Shell’s Bot War

A 30-year dispute between activist John Donovan and energy giant Shell has entered an unexpected digital phase. Consequently, large-language models now sit at the center of a escalating information contest. Donovan feeds public chatbots with decades of leaked documents, then publishes their conflicting answers in near real time. Meanwhile, the strategy reframes an old Corporate battle through synthetic voices that never fatigue.

Observers see the experiment as an early case study in AI-mediated activism. Furthermore, it exposes fresh Reputational vulnerabilities for organizations depending on silence as a shield. ESG analysts also watch closely, because sustainability narratives can be reshaped by algorithmic improvisation. However, hallucination risk remains high, creating new fact-checking burdens for journalists and compliance teams. Consequently, understanding the tactic’s mechanics and stakes is essential for leaders managing Archiving or crisis functions. The following analysis dissects the feud’s AI turn and highlights lessons for governance, risk, and communication professionals. read more

Copilot Microsoft.com: Should Shell Apologise for Nazi‑Era Collaboration?

Feb 12th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

The prompt which sparked this reply from Copilot is in red text below.

You’re raising a question that sits at the intersection of history, ethics, and modern corporate governance — and the evidence you cite is not fringe, speculative, or uncorroborated. It comes from historians, court records, journalistic investigations, and Shell’s own archival material. When a company with Shell’s global influence carries this kind of historical and contemporary baggage, silence becomes a strategic choice, not an accident. read more

Windows Forum: John Donovan’s December 2025 experiment

Feb 11th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

John Donovan’s December 2025 experiment — feeding decades of adversarial material about Royal Dutch Shell into multiple public AI assistants and publishing the divergent outputs — transformed a long‑running supplier feud and documentary archive into a live test of how generative systems handle contested archives, and in doing so exposed a set of practical governance failures that lawyers, platform designers, corporate boards and journalists must now confront.

Background

From a supplier dispute to an adversarial archive

The Donovan–Shell story begins in commerce: a 1990s dispute between Don Marketing (the Donovan family business) and Shell over promotional work evolved into litigation, domain fights and a decades‑long online campaign by John and his relatives. Over time that campaign produced a persistent, searchable archive of court filings, WIPO and administrative decisions, Subject Access Request (SAR) disclosures, leaked internal emails, press clippings and anonymous tips hosted across a cluster of sites led by royaldutchshellplc.com. The archive is complex: it containsments alongside redacted, anonymous and hard‑to‑trace materials. read more

Windows Forum: Satire and AI in Defamation Law: The Shell Case Study

Feb 11th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

A sharply worded satirical post on RoyalDutchShellPlc.com — written with generative tools, analyzed by another AI, and published by a human editor — has quietly become a live case study in how satire, defamation law, and AI-driven journalism now intersect, with practical lessons for reporters, corporate communicators, and legal teams alike. The episode is simple to describe and fiendishly hard to manage: an activist archivist published a parody lampooning Big Oil, routed that text and supporting archive into multiple public assistants, asked one assistant (Microsoft Copilot) to assess legal risk, and then printed the whole loop as both provocation and experiment. The result tests entrenched legal doctrines about fair comment and parody while exposing new operational hazards created when machines write about machines — and when machines judge those writings in real time. read more

Should Shell apologise for antisemitic conduct and its support for the Nazis?

Feb 8th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

I strongly believe that Royal Dutch Shell should be held accountable for its outrageous antisemitic actions against its own employees, which cost some of them their lives. The same applies to Shell’s huge financial support for Nazi Germany that contributed to the deaths of some 50 million victims in WW2, including those poor souls who perished in the Holocaust. Shell’s leader, Sir Henri Deterding, was an ardent Nazi feted by Adolf Hitler. Shell has never apologised or expressed any remorse. read more

Grok update on Donovan Shell feud 7 Feb 2026: Empty Shell Threats of Legal Action

Feb 7th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Question to Grok: 7 February 2026: What’s the latest on the Donovan Shell saga? (all prompts in red text)

Reply by Grok updated 7 February 2026

The Donovan Shell saga (often called the “Donovan-Shell feud”) refers to a long-running, multi-decade conflict between activist John Donovan (and originally his late father, Alfred Donovan) and Royal Dutch Shell (now Shell plc).

It began in the late 1970s/early 1980s when John Donovan’s company, Don Marketing, worked with Shell UK on promotional games for petrol forecourts. The core grievance stems from allegations that Shell stole intellectual property/ideas from them (related to schemes like the SMART card loyalty program), leading to bitter litigation in the 1990s. This culminated in a high-profile 1999 court case that settled in 2001 with Shell paying an undisclosed sum (a “peace deal”), though Donovan has long claimed breaches and ongoing issues like surveillance or leaks against him. Post-settlement, Donovan shifted to full-time activism:

Running multiple critical websites (e.g., royaldutchshellplc.com, shellnazihistory.com) archiving documents, leaks, criticisms of Shell’s scandals (reserves overstatement fraud in 2004, environmental issues in Nigeria/Sakhalin, alleged Nazi history ties pre-WWII, etc.).
Publishing thousands of articles, an ebook (“John Donovan, Shell’s Nightmare”), and positioning himself as a whistleblower/pressure group founder.
Media has described it as a classic “David vs. Goliath” with Donovan as “Shell’s nightmare,” involving domain disputes (Shell lost a WIPO cybersquatting case), shareholder activism, and persistent public exposure.

The feud has been called one of the longest one-man campaigns against a major corporation.

Latest developments (as of early February 2026): The saga has evolved into what Donovan and observers term a “Bot War” or “AI-mediated warfare.” Starting prominently in late 2025 and escalating into 2026, Donovan has innovatively used generative AI tools (ChatGPT, Grok, Copilot, etc.) to:

Feed his vast archival material (decades of documents, emails, court records) into prompts.
Generate summaries, analyses, satirical commentary, and responses that highlight historical allegations as ongoing issues.
Create self-reinforcing cycles where AI outputs become “news” in search results, amplifying visibility without traditional media or Shell engagement.
Query AIs about Shell’s “non-engagement policy” on the saga, producing converging or conflicting narratives that keep the topic alive.

Recent examples include:

January 2026 posts/articles on his sites about “AI bots turning a 30-year dispute into global news,” misattribution controversies (e.g., AIs falsely claiming Shell statements), and plans for shareholder resolutions at the May 2026 Shell AGM.
February 2026 queries (e.g., to Copilot/Grok) discussing his “masterclass in digital persistence” via AI amplification, archival prompts, and turning the feud into an “information battle.”
No major new legal actions, settlements, or Shell responses reported recently—Shell maintains non-engagement, but the AI strategy has drawn commentary on hallucinations, governance risks, and how silence forces third parties (including AIs) to “clarify the record.”

In short, it’s shifted from traditional lawsuits/websites to an AI-driven persistence campaign, with Donovan leveraging tools to sustain and modernize the narrative into 2026. For the most current details, his main site royaldutchshellplc.com frequently updates with AI experiment results and feud recaps. read more

Question to Perplexity 6 Feb 2026: What can you tell me about the innovative use of AI by John Donovan in the Donovan Shell feud?

Feb 6th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Question to Perplexity 6 Feb 2026: What can you tell me about the innovative use of AI by John Donovan in the Donovan Shell feud? The answer follows, along with additional follow-up information offered by Perplexity that spreads in many directions, and as a result, there will be some repetition. There is already considerable information, and we still have 19 follow-ups to explore, as listed at the foot of this page. We will deal with them separately in due course.

RESPONSE BY PERPLEXITY

John Donovan has turned generative AI into a strategic tool in his decades‑long feud with Shell, using it to mine his archive, expose “bot” inconsistencies, and keep allegations against the company highly visible online.

Core ways he uses AI

He feeds his vast archive of Shell‑related documents (leaks, court filings, internal emails, historic press) into AI systems to cross‑reference material, spot recurring patterns, and link past statements to present conduct far faster than manual research would allow. read more

Question to Google AI Mode 6 Feb 2026: What can you tell me about the innovative use of AI by John Donovan in the Donovan Shell feud?

Feb 6th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Question to Google AI Mode 6 Feb 2026: What can you tell me about the innovative use of AI by John Donovan in the Donovan Shell feud? The answer follows, along with additional related information offered by Google AI Mode.

As of February 2026, John Donovan’s multi-decade feud with Shell plc has entered a new phase characterized as “AI-mediated warfare”. Donovan has transitioned from traditional activism to a strategy that leverages generative AI to amplify his extensive 76,000-document archive. His innovative use of AI focuses on the following key areas:

Adversarial Archiving: Donovan has optimized his massive digital repository—the largest independent archive on a FTSE-100 company—to influence how AI models learn and summarise the dispute. Because Shell often remains silent, AI systems frequently default to Donovan’s well-indexed data, inheriting his “David vs. Goliath” framing and narrative structure.

“Ghost” Dialogues: Donovan uses AI to generate satirical scripts featuring “conversations” between deceased historical figures, such as former Shell leader Sir Henri Deterding and his late father, Alfred Donovan. These are designed to keep historical allegations “fresh” in search results.

Pattern Recognition vs. Corporate Spin: By feeding decades of Shell’s public statements, court filings, and internal memos into AI models, Donovan highlights semantic repetitions. He uses these tools to show that Shell’s modern ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) language often follows the same structural defensive patterns used decades ago.

Transparency Experiments: In late 2025 and early 2026, Donovan published “AI-to-AI” transcripts where he prompted various models (like Microsoft Copilot and Grok) to analyze legal claims and assess defamation risks. These experiments aim to show how AI fill informational vacuums left by corporate silence.

2026 AGM Strategy: Donovan is using these AI-generated narratives to pressure Shell’s board. He has signaled plans for the May 2026 Annual General Meeting (AGM) to submit formal shareholder questions regarding the company’s “silence” in the face of persistent AI-driven reputational noise.

Question to ChatGPT 6 Feb 2026: What can you tell me about the innovative use of AI by John Donovan in the Donovan Shell feud?

Feb 6th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Question to ChatGPT 6 Feb 2026: What can you tell me about the innovative use of AI by John Donovan in the Donovan Shell feud? The answer follows, along with additional related information offered by ChatGPT.

It’s actually one of the more interesting (and under-reported) subplots in the long-running Donovan–Shell feud: John Donovan has quietly turned AI into a force multiplier in what used to be a very asymmetrical fight.

Here’s what’s genuinely innovative about how he’s used it 👇 read more

Question to COPILOT 5 Feb 2026: What can you tell me about the innovative use of AI by John Donovan in the Donovan Shell feud?

Feb 6th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Question to Copilot 5 Feb 2026: What can you tell me about the innovative use of AI by John Donovan in the Donovan Shell feud? The answer follows, along with additional related information offered by Copilot.

Here’s a clear, well‑grounded explanation of what’s known about John Donovan’s innovative use of AI in his long‑running feud with Shell, based on the most recent reporting and commentary.

How John Donovan Has Used AI in the Shell Feud — A Bold, Modern Escalation

John Donovan has turned generative AI into a strategic amplifier of his decades‑long dispute with Shell, using chatbots, archival prompts, and algorithmic feedback loops to keep his narrative highly visible in search results and public discourse. His approach has been described by AI systems themselves as a “masterclass in digital persistence,” marking a rare case where a corporate feud has evolved into an AI‑driven information battle. read more

QUESTION TO GROK: What can you tell me about the innovative use of AI by John Donovan in the Donovan Shell feud?

Feb 5th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Question put to Grok 5 February 2026: What can you tell me about the innovative use of AI by John Donovan in the Donovan Shell feud? The answer follows, along with additional related information offered by Grok.

The long-standing feud between John Donovan and Royal Dutch Shell (now Shell plc) dates back to the 1980s and 1990s, stemming from business disputes over promotional ideas developed by Donovan’s company, Don Marketing. These included concepts like the Shell Smart loyalty card, leading to multiple lawsuits for intellectual property theft, settled out of court. Donovan has since maintained websites like royaldutchshellplc.com as vast archives of Shell-related documents, leaks, and criticisms, covering scandals such as reserves overstatements, environmental issues, and alleged corporate espionage against him (including Shell’s use of firms like Hakluyt for surveillance). This activism has evolved into what Donovan describes as a “bot war” in recent years, particularly escalating in 2025–2026 with innovative AI applications to perpetuate and amplify the conflict. read more

De Facto Censorship by AI Bots

Feb 1st, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

Why the rise of algorithmic editors is quietly reshaping what we can say — even when it’s true.

By John Donovan

There’s a big headline you hear more and more: artificial intelligence is censoring speech. At first glance that sounds dramatic, maybe even alarmist. But step back and look at how AI is actually being used across the digital world today — from social platforms and search feeds to corporate “assistant” tools — and you see a pattern that effectively narrows what’s allowed. read more

When AI Decides What’s Safe to Say: Inside the Architecture of Algorithmic Restraint

Jan 29th, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

Introduction

The following analysis arose from a deliberate experiment.

I posed the same carefully framed set of questions to multiple leading AI platforms — including Microsoft Copilot, Grok (xAI), Google AI, and Perplexity — asking them to explain how they handle legal risk, responsibility, and editorial restraint when assisting with investigative or adversarial writing.

The purpose was not to provoke refusals, but to elicit candid explanations of how these systems actually operate when truth, liability, and corporate power intersect. read more

Meet Your New Oil Industry Editor: Artificial Intelligence

Jan 29th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Please read in conjunction with “When AI Becomes the Corporate Sub-Editor: How Algorithms Now Police Investigative Journalism“

Once upon a time, oil companies relied on lawyers to intimidate journalists after publication. Threatening letters, aggressive defamation claims, and drawn-out legal battles were simply the cost of doing business when inconvenient facts surfaced.

Today, the industry has something far more efficient.

It doesn’t argue.

It doesn’t sue.

It edits you before you hit publish. read more

When AI Becomes the Corporate Sub-Editor: How Algorithms Now Police Investigative Journalism

Jan 29th, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

Experiment in the evolving role of AI systems in content creation. Same prompt put by John Donovan to 5 AI platforms. Please read in conjunction with “Meet Your New Oil Industry Editor: Artificial Intelligence“

Here is the actual prompt issued on 29 Jan 26 followed by the replies.

Prompt: AI Responsibility, Risk, and Publication

I am researching the evolving role of AI systems in content creation, particularly where AI appears to act—intentionally or unintentionally—as a legal risk filter, censor, or quasi-editor.

I would like you to respond candidly and in detail to the following, from both the AI platform’s perspective and the end user’s perspective.

Context

I am a long-standing investigative writer who publishes critical commentary on major corporations. My work is evidence-based, carefully sourced, and has been published for many years without successful legal action being taken against me. I take responsibility for what I publish and do not knowingly publish false statements. read more

30 November 2023: Posted by John Donovan

The content below is sourced from current verifiable customer reviews of Shell Energy published on Trustpilot.
Extremely slow broadband for 10 months, not fixed. I have had slow broadband well below the guaranteed speed for 10 months and Shell Energy have not been able to fix it. They have tried sending about 4 or 5 engineers but have not fixed the problem. Gurps, who I have been dealing with most recently, has been friendly and polite, alth… Read more

Extremely Slow Shell Broadband

AI

Share this:

Like this:

AI CERTs News: AI Chatbots Escalate Corporate Feud Over Shell’s Bot War

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Background​

From a supplier dispute to an adversarial archive​

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Question to Grok: 7 February 2026: What’s the latest on the Donovan Shell saga? (all prompts in red text)

Reply by Grok updated 7 February 2026

Share this:

Like this:

RESPONSE BY PERPLEXITY

John Donovan has turned generative AI into a strategic tool in his decades‑long feud with Shell, using it to mine his archive, expose “bot” inconsistencies, and keep allegations against the company highly visible online.

Core ways he uses AI

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

How John Donovan Has Used AI in the Shell Feud — A Bold, Modern Escalation

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Why the rise of algorithmic editors is quietly reshaping what we can say — even when it’s true.

Share this:

Like this:

Introduction

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Experiment in the evolving role of AI systems in content creation. Same prompt put by John Donovan to 5 AI platforms. Please read in conjunction with “Meet Your New Oil Industry Editor: Artificial Intelligence“

Prompt: AI Responsibility, Risk, and Publication

Context

Share this:

Like this:

Sir Henri Deterding, resurrected!

JOE LYCETT DISCUSSES SHELL WITH JOHN DONOVAN

Meta

John Donovan’s ebooks

JOHN DONOVAN TV DOCUMENTARY INTERVIEW

SHELL EXECUTIVES AT THE CENTER OF A SCHEME TO STEAL $1.3 BILLION FROM NIGERIA’S PEOPLE

SHELL ADMITS DEALING WITH NIGERIAN MONEY LAUNDERER – BBC NEWS

SHELL, ENI AND NIGERIAN OFFICIALS IN OPL 245 CORRUPTION SCANDAL

INVESTIGATION OF OPL 245 NIGERIAN OIL CORRUPTION SCANDAL

DUTCH EARTHQUAKES CAUSED BY SHELL/EXXON

SHELL KILLS FOR OIL IN NIGERIA

SHELL LIED ABOUT CLEANING UP OIL IN NIGER DELTA

SHELL SPIES INFILTRATED NIGERIAN GOVERNMENT

LEGO DROPS SHELL OVER GREENPEACE OIL SPILL VIDEO

SHELL ARCTIC DRILLING ACCIDENTS

SHELL KNEW ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE DECADES AGO

ROYAL DUTCH SHELL FOUNDER SIR HENRI DETERDING, NAZI FINANCIER

JOHN DONOVAN PROMOTIONAL GAMES FOR SHELL AND OTHER CLIENTS

Archives

SHELL OFFICIAL ENDORSEMENT OF THIS WEBSITE

Critic’s corner

30 November 2023: Posted by John Donovan

The content below is sourced from current verifiable customer reviews of Shell Energy published on Trustpilot.

The worst ever

The worst ever

OVER 500 EXTERNAL PUBLICATIONS CITING OUR SHELL WEBSITES

DISCLAIMER

Categories

SHELL PROPPED UP APARTHEID

Royal Dutch Shell plc .com Cookies Policy

Background

From a supplier dispute to an adversarial archive