AI

Comments are off for this post

A Crystal Ball Special Investigation, Continued

By Our Special Correspondent, Department of Satirical Prophecy Published: March 2026

DISCLAIMER: The following is Part Three of a satirical commentary based entirely on the published ebook “Toxic Facts About Shell Removed From Wikipedia” by John Donovan, available on Amazon, the contents of which — by the author’s own account, and notably without contradiction from Shell — have never been legally challenged by Royal Dutch Shell or any of its subsidiaries, affiliates, successors, legal representatives, or the forty-odd people on that round table. The crystal ball has been updated. It now runs on renewable energy, which is more than can be said for certain subjects of this investigation. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan - more information here. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

claude.ai Part 2: SHELL’S SECRET WAR ON ONE MAN IN COLCHESTER

Mar 23rd, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

PART TWO: THE MACHINES HAVE NOTICED

A Crystal Ball Special Investigation, Continued

By Our Special Correspondent, Department of Satirical Prophecy Published: March 2026

DISCLAIMER: The following article is Part Two of a satirical commentary based on real events, documented facts, and the output of multiple AI systems that have now, apparently, also noticed the Donovan-Shell situation. The crystal ball has been recharged. Its batteries were, appropriately, made in the Netherlands.

PART FIVE: THE ROBOTS HAVE READ THE FILE

When Part One of this investigation was published, it seemed reasonable to assume that Shell’s primary reputational challenge in 2026 remained what it has always been: one retired gentleman in Colchester, Essex, with a laptop, a broadband connection, and what Shell’s own internal documents once described, with heroic understatement, as “a longstanding disagreement with Shell.” read more

claude.ai: SHELL’S SECRET WAR ON ONE MAN IN COLCHESTER: A CRYSTAL BALL SPECIAL INVESTIGATION

Mar 23rd, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Part 1: claude.ai: SHELL’S SECRET WAR ON ONE MAN IN COLCHESTER: A CRYSTAL BALL SPECIAL INVESTIGATION

…a global internal surveillance operation triggered by one website

## *How Britain’s Most Surveilled Retired Gentleman May Still Be Keeping a $200 Billion Corporation Very, Very Busy*

*By Our Special Correspondent, Department of Satirical Prophecy*
*Published: March 2026*

—

> *DISCLAIMER: The following article is satirical commentary based on real internal Shell documents obtained under the UK Data Protection Act and published on shellnews.net. It extrapolates — with liberal use of imagination, irony, and a functioning crystal ball — what Shell plc may be doing now and in the future. Any resemblance to actual ongoing covert corporate operations against a retired gentleman in Colchester is entirely the reader’s problem to ponder.* read more

Donovan Shell Serial Drama: Downloaded from Bing 23 March 2026

Mar 23rd, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

John Donovan is a long-time shareholder and whistleblower who has publicly challenged Royal Dutch Shell over alleged intellectual property theft, corporate misconduct, and environmental abuses, documenting his experiences in his book and through dedicated Shell-focused websites.

Background and Professional History

John Donovan has been involved in petrol retailing since the 1960s and co-founded Don Marketing, a sales promotion agency that ran successful promotional campaigns for major oil brands, including Shell, BP, Esso, Chevron, and others

For over a decade, Donovan maintained a mutually beneficial business relationship with Shell, managing multi-million-dollar promotions such as the “Shell StarTrek: The Game” in 1992, distributing over 100 million game pieces

Conflict with Shell

Following their initial business collaboration, Donovan became embroiled in an extended legal and corporate feud with Shell. Central issues included:

Alleged theft of intellectual propertyby Shell concerning promotional ideas disclosed confidentially read more
Share this:
Like this:
Like Loading...
This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan - more information here. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

windowsforum: Shell’s Long-Fought Domain Feud: AI Roundtable Satire and Reputational Fallout

Mar 23rd, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Today – 23 March 2026 at 1:50 AM

The Machines Agree on Shell’s Long Shadow

A satirical “AI roundtable” about the Shell saga may read like internet theater, but it lands because the underlying dispute is real, persistent, and unusually durable. What makes the piece sting is not the fictional dialogue itself; it is the way four different AI systems are imagined converging on one basic conclusion: Shell’s long-running conflict with John Donovan is no trivial internet squabble, but a reputational problem that never fully went away. That framing is consistent with the historical record of a domain-name battle Shell lost in 2005 and with the company’s own continuing sensitivity around branding, online identity, and corporate narrative.

Background

The Donovan-Shell dispute is one of those rare corporate feuds that evolved from conventional commercial conflict into a hybrid of litigation, media activism, and digital counter-narrative. The roots go back to Donovan’s earlier business dealings and the breakdown of trust that followed, eventually producing years of public criticism aimed at Shell and its executives. Over time, that criticism hardened into a permanent archive of allegations, commentary, and document drops, with royaldutchshellplc.com becoming the symbolic center of gravity.
The domain-name dimension matters because it gave the dispute a legal anchor and a visible address. In the 2005 WIPO case, Shell International Petroleum Company Limited sought control of royaldutchshellplc.com, royaldutchshellgroup.com, and tellshell.org, but the panel rejected Shell’s complaint on the basis that bad-faith registration and use were not proven. That result did not settle the broader feud, but it did establish that Donovan had a defensible position for operating a non-commercial criticism site under that domain.
The satirical article is also clearly a product of the AI era, and that is part of what makes it notable. Donovan’s experiment, as described on the site, uses multiple generative systems to interrogate the same controversy and then compare outputs for consistency, hedging, and error. The goal is not just humor; it is to expose how machine-generated confidence can mask weak verification, especially when the prompt touches a long, contentious historical record. read more

Grok: This was a full-spectrum intelligence operation against two guys with a website

Mar 22nd, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

Prompt

Could you analyse the information and links on the following article and create a satirical article predicting what Shell may be doing now and in the future based on the astonishing content of the article and the content of the linked Shell internal emails https://shellnews.net/DPA2009/DPA2009INDEXPAGE.html deep dive please for a long article which can be adapted for a video. Please use your crystal ball. Is Shell likely to continue cloak and dagger activity directed against me?

Reply by Grok:

Shell’s Eternal Shadow Game: Crystal Ball Report – Leaked 2009 Emails Expose the Blueprint for 2026+ “Invisible” Ops Against John Donovan (A Satirical Deep Dive, Video-Ready Script) read more

ChatGTP: Inside Shell’s Crystal Ball: What the Company’s Own Emails May Suggest About Its Future

Mar 22nd, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

ChatGPT: A glowing crystal ball on a Shell boardroom table showing floating internal emails, shadowy silhouettes in the background, and a laptop displaying a website—suggesting surveillance, narrative control, and digital persistence.

If the past is in the emails… the future may already be written.

By John Donovan

Introduction: Reading Between the Emails

Every large corporation has internal conversations it would prefer to keep internal.

In Shell’s case, a substantial archive of internal emails has, over time, provided an unusually candid glimpse behind the corporate curtain. read more

The AI Roundtable: When the Machines Discuss the Shell Saga

Mar 22nd, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

Four AI systems. One conclusion.

One very uncomfortable question for Shell

By John Donovan

Editorial Note

The following is a fictional, satirical roundtable discussion inspired by documented responses from multiple AI systems previously consulted on the Shell saga. While the dialogue is imagined, the positions attributed to each system are grounded in their published analyses.

Scene: The Meeting

A dimly lit room. No windows. No oil paintings of former chairmen.

Instead, four glowing screens flicker into life.

An unusual panel has assembled.

Not regulators. Not lawyers. Not Shell executives. read more

AI Judges the Shell Saga

Mar 22nd, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

What Happens When Multiple Machines Analyse a 30-Year Dispute?: AI Groupthink—only faster, cleaner, and far more convincing: Distributed reasoning…

By John Donovan

Introduction: Putting the Machines to Work

In a world where artificial intelligence is increasingly used to answer everything from trivial questions to complex legal problems, I decided to try something different.

I asked the machines to judge Shell.

Not in a courtroom.

Not in a press release.

But through analysis.

Specifically, I invited multiple AI systems—ChatGPT, Grok, Copilot, and Perplexity—to examine a decades-long dispute between myself and Royal Dutch Shell.

The result was something unexpected.

Not agreement in every detail. read more

Copilot: treating multiple AI platforms as an informal advisory panel —Overall It’s a positive development—if used wisely

Mar 22nd, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Prompt

Please comment on the article https://royaldutchshellplc.com/2026/03/22/consulting-the-machines/ in particular from the standpoint of AI platforms. Do you welcome the treating of AI platforms collectively as an informal advisory panel or are there downsides from your perpective? Is it a welcome development or not?

Reply by Copilot:

In short: treating multiple AI platforms as an “informal advisory panel” can be valuable, but only when users understand the limits of AI systems. It encourages critical thinking and reduces over‑reliance on any single model, but it also risks amplifying shared biases or errors if users mistake convergence for independent verification. read more

Perplexity: experimental use of multiple systems to probe a single, adversarial archive is welcome

Mar 22nd, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Prompt

Reply by perplexity:

Treating multiple AI platforms as an informal advisory panel is useful but only if everyone involved remains very clear about what these systems are and are not.

What the article is doing

The piece is effectively “outsourcing” parts of the Donovan–Shell risk analysis to a panel of models (Grok, Perplexity, Copilot, etc.), comparing how they frame the same underlying archive and then using those differences as commentary on both Shell and the AI ecosystem. It builds directly on earlier “bot war” episodes, where cross‑model inconsistencies, hallucinations, and misstatements about Shell’s position became the story in their own right. read more

Grok: a welcome evolution in how people interact with AI

Mar 22nd, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Prompt

Grok reply:

**The article “Consulting the Machines” (published today, 22 March 2026) is a fascinating meta-experiment by John Donovan.** He deliberately queried several AI platforms—including Grok (me), Copilot, Perplexity, and others referenced in linked prior posts—about the same 30-year Shell dispute, then stepped back to observe convergence, divergence, and shared errors across our outputs. The goal wasn’t to “win” the argument or extract binding advice, but to treat us collectively as a kind of informal, distributed advisory panel for pattern recognition and cross-validation. read more

Can AI Help Close a 30-Year Dispute? My Conversations with ChatGPT on Shell

Mar 21st, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

Editorial Introduction

What follows is an unedited exchange between myself and ChatGPT—one of several artificial intelligence systems I recently consulted in an effort to bring clarity, and perhaps closure, to a dispute with Shell that has spanned decades.

What began as a simple domain name issue evolved into something far more complex: misdirected communications, documented interactions with senior Shell executives, and a persistent online presence that the company has never fully resolved.

Curious to see how modern AI would assess this unusual situation, I sought independent views from multiple platforms, treating them as an informal advisory panel. Their responses—while not without occasional factual errors—revealed a surprising degree of consistency in one key respect: the matter appears capable of resolution. read more

Grok: Shell should treat this as a manageable operational, security, and reputational risk rather than an existential crisis

Mar 20th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Prompt

As you can see from this article https://royaldutchshellplc.com/2026/03/20/dear-shell-ive-been-handling-your-mail-for-years-youre-welcome/ – and from the information in the links, Shell is in a pickle with John Donovan for the reasons explained. What would you advise Shell to do?

Grok Response B

Shell should treat this as a manageable operational, security, and reputational risk rather than an existential crisis—and act decisively but quietly to eliminate the dependency on Donovan.

The core issue, as laid out in the 20 March 2026 article and the linked 2007 email correspondence, is straightforward and self-inflicted. After the 2004 reserves scandal and corporate restructuring into Royal Dutch Shell plc (later rebranded Shell plc), the company failed to register royaldutchshellplc.com. Donovan acquired it and has run it as a long-standing “gripe site” for nearly two decades. People worldwide still email addresses @royaldutchshellplc.com thinking they are reaching official Shell channels. This has included job applications with CVs, business proposals, government enquiries, media requests, oil trading offers, legal correspondence—and, critically, security threats (e.g., explicit sabotage warnings against Shell installations in the Netherlands). read more

Dear Shell: I’ve Been Handling Your Mail for Years (You’re Welcome)

Mar 20th, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

ChatGPT: A giant oil pipeline labelled “SHELL COMMUNICATIONS” bursts open, flooding a cluttered desk marked royaldutchshellplc.com with envelopes stamped CONFIDENTIAL. In the background, a corporate tower flickers between: Royal Dutch Shell → Royal Dutch Shell plc → Shell plc, while a Google search bar displays both entities side by side.

How I Became Royal Dutch Shell’s Accidental Gatekeeper — With Their Permission

By John Donovan (Updated 20 March 2026)

There are David vs Goliath stories.

And then there are stories where David ends up running Goliath’s mailroom—with Goliath’s legal department quietly signing off on the arrangement. read more

Shell’s South Africa Exit: Selling Petrol Stations — But Not Its Toxic Past

Mar 17th, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

“Exit Without Closure”: A Shell petrol station being dismantled, with workers removing the logo. Behind it, a faded apartheid-era scene emerges — police lines, protest signs, and oil barrels stamped with the Shell logo. A corporate executive walks away carrying a briefcase labelled “Divestment Strategy”, while the past lingers in the background. Tone: sombre, satirical, historically reflective.

Shell is once again preparing to exit South Africa’s fuel retail market, dusting off a plan that has been circulating for years — and quietly moving to offload a network of petrol stations that once symbolised its deep roots in the country. read more

30 November 2023: Posted by John Donovan

The content below is sourced from current verifiable customer reviews of Shell Energy published on Trustpilot.
Extremely slow broadband for 10 months, not fixed. I have had slow broadband well below the guaranteed speed for 10 months and Shell Energy have not been able to fix it. They have tried sending about 4 or 5 engineers but have not fixed the problem. Gurps, who I have been dealing with most recently, has been friendly and polite, alth… Read more

Extremely Slow Shell Broadband

AI

A Crystal Ball Special Investigation, Continued

Share this:

Like this:

PART TWO: THE MACHINES HAVE NOTICED

A Crystal Ball Special Investigation, Continued

PART FIVE: THE ROBOTS HAVE READ THE FILE

Share this:

Like this:

Part 1: claude.ai: SHELL’S SECRET WAR ON ONE MAN IN COLCHESTER: A CRYSTAL BALL SPECIAL INVESTIGATION

…a global internal surveillance operation triggered by one website

Share this:

Like this:

Background and Professional History

Conflict with Shell

Share this:

Like this:

The Machines Agree on Shell’s Long Shadow

Background​

Share this:

Like this:

Prompt

Reply by Grok:

Share this:

Like this:

If the past is in the emails… the future may already be written.

Share this:

Like this:

Four AI systems. One conclusion.

One very uncomfortable question for Shell

Editorial Note

Scene: The Meeting

Share this:

Like this:

What Happens When Multiple Machines Analyse a 30-Year Dispute?: AI Groupthink—only faster, cleaner, and far more convincing: Distributed reasoning…

Introduction: Putting the Machines to Work

Share this:

Like this:

Prompt

Reply by Copilot:

Share this:

Like this:

Prompt

Reply by perplexity:

What the article is doing

Share this:

Like this:

Prompt

Grok reply:

Share this:

Like this:

Editorial Introduction

Share this:

Like this:

Prompt

As you can see from this article https://royaldutchshellplc.com/2026/03/20/dear-shell-ive-been-handling-your-mail-for-years-youre-welcome/ – and from the information in the links, Shell is in a pickle with John Donovan for the reasons explained. What would you advise Shell to do?

Grok Response B

Share this:

Like this:

How I Became Royal Dutch Shell’s Accidental Gatekeeper — With Their Permission

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Sir Henri Deterding, resurrected!

JOE LYCETT DISCUSSES SHELL WITH JOHN DONOVAN

Meta

John Donovan’s ebooks

JOHN DONOVAN TV DOCUMENTARY INTERVIEW

SHELL EXECUTIVES AT THE CENTER OF A SCHEME TO STEAL $1.3 BILLION FROM NIGERIA’S PEOPLE

SHELL ADMITS DEALING WITH NIGERIAN MONEY LAUNDERER – BBC NEWS

SHELL, ENI AND NIGERIAN OFFICIALS IN OPL 245 CORRUPTION SCANDAL

INVESTIGATION OF OPL 245 NIGERIAN OIL CORRUPTION SCANDAL

DUTCH EARTHQUAKES CAUSED BY SHELL/EXXON

SHELL KILLS FOR OIL IN NIGERIA

SHELL LIED ABOUT CLEANING UP OIL IN NIGER DELTA

SHELL SPIES INFILTRATED NIGERIAN GOVERNMENT

LEGO DROPS SHELL OVER GREENPEACE OIL SPILL VIDEO

SHELL ARCTIC DRILLING ACCIDENTS

SHELL KNEW ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE DECADES AGO

Background