perplexity

Comments are off for this post

Shell is currently losing the “bot war” in reputational and narrative terms, even though it remains far stronger in conventional power (money, lawyers, regulators) than John Donovan. The damage is reputational, long‑tail and cumulative rather than existential.

Question put to Perplexity 1st March 2026:

I put this question to Copilot earlier today. In your opinion is Shell losing or winning the bot war? Their reply is in the following article: https://royaldutchshellplc.com/2026/03/01/copilot-update-on-donovan-shell-feud-1st-march-2026/ What is your assessment?

Reply by Perplexity:

Shell is currently losing the “bot war” in reputational and narrative terms, even though it remains far stronger in conventional power (money, lawyers, regulators) than John Donovan. read more

^*This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan - more information here. There is also a Wikipedia segment, the Shell DPA Files, "Shell and the Spies", the Shell Leaks files, as well as books written and published by John Donovan - Kindle eBooks. Timeline of the Donovan Shell Feud. Toxic History of Royal Dutch Shell Group. Shell and the Donovans: The Full Media Record — 550+ Articles, 110 Books, 40 Years. ^*All created and supported by internet wizz, Nick Gill.

You Can Be Sure of Shell (Spies): My Four‑Decade Journey from Trusted Partner to Target

Feb 28th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

“Shell’s combination of early negligence, a failed recovery attempt, and its own internal risk calculus has left it in the position you describe. Its most persistent critic has operated royaldutchshellplc.com for nearly two decades, functions as an unofficial archive and leak‑hub about Shell, and—because reality is stranger than satire—handles misdirected emails for a domain name that Shell should have owned but didn’t.”

By John Donovan

Prologue: From Bing Crosby to Black Ops

“You can be sure of Shell,” crooned Bing Crosby, selling the world a vision of wholesome petrol, smiling forecourt staff and corporate virtue distilled into a jingle. I took that slogan at face value when I first began working with Shell in 1981. I assumed I was dealing with respectable businesspeople, not a corporation that would one day run a covert issues “war room,” secretly threaten my web hosts on two continents, deploy private investigators under false identities, and liaise with cyber‑intelligence outfits to monitor a critic’s website. read more

Who Has Publicly Criticised Shell Over Its Nazi-Era Associations and Lack of Apology

Feb 16th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Royal Dutch Shell’s historical relationship with Nazi Germany has been documented by historians and investigative journalists. What continues to draw criticism is not only the company’s wartime conduct, but the fact that Shell has never issued a formal public apology or acknowledgment comparable to those made by other major European corporations with similar histories.

A number of writers, journalists, historians, and activists have publicly raised this issue.

openDemocracy and Adam Ramsay

Shell’s sanitisation of its toxic history

Feb 13th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

“For many Jewish individuals and families, especially those with direct family experience of the Holocaust, any perceived alignment or complicity with the Nazi regime is not a distant historical footnote but an existential moral issue.”: “Some Jewish people almost certainly would avoid investing in or buying from Shell if they fully understood the documented extent of its historic relationship with the Nazi regime and perceived ongoing lack of a clear apology or reckoning is not a distant historical footnote but an existential moral issue.”

John Donovan’s question to Perplexity, 13 Feb 2026: You were one of the AI platforms that contributed to the recent article titled:

“AI CONSENSUS: SHELL MUST APOLOGISE FOR ITS TOXIC HISTORY.”

I now have a related question.

I have reviewed the page on Shell.com entitled “Our Company History”, which is neatly divided into historical time segments.

Guess what?

There is no reference whatsoever to:

Shell’s documented relationship with the Nazi regime during the 1930s,
The role of Sir Henri Deterding — arguably the most consequential leader in Shell’s early history,
Shell’s longstanding support for apartheid-era South Africa,
Or even the 2004 reserves scandal that wiped billions off Shell’s market value and led to the removal of senior executives. read more

AI CONSENSUS: SHELL MUST APOLOGISE FOR ITS TOXIC HISTORY

Feb 9th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Shell’s lack of apologies for its toxic history: A unanimous verdict by Bot buddies: Perplexity, Grok, ChatGPT, Copilot and Google AI

PERPLEXITY RESPONSE TO THE QUESTION IN RED TEXT AT FOOT OF THIS ARTICLE. THE SAME PROMPT ISSUED TO ALL INVITED AI PLATFORMS.

Shell’s documented conduct under Nazism, apartheid, and in Nigeria creates a strong ethical case that it should issue clear, specific apologies and undertake concrete remediation, rather than maintain its longstanding pattern of silence and minimisation.

1. What the historical record shows

Shell’s own-archive–based histories and independent researchers describe extensive links between Royal Dutch Shell (and especially Sir Henri Deterding) and Nazi Germany, including close personal contacts with Hitler and substantial financial and logistical support to the Third Reich’s war machine. read more

Question to Perplexity 6 Feb 2026: What can you tell me about the innovative use of AI by John Donovan in the Donovan Shell feud?

Feb 6th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Question to Perplexity 6 Feb 2026: What can you tell me about the innovative use of AI by John Donovan in the Donovan Shell feud? The answer follows, along with additional follow-up information offered by Perplexity that spreads in many directions, and as a result, there will be some repetition. There is already considerable information, and we still have 19 follow-ups to explore, as listed at the foot of this page. We will deal with them separately in due course.

RESPONSE BY PERPLEXITY

John Donovan has turned generative AI into a strategic tool in his decades‑long feud with Shell, using it to mine his archive, expose “bot” inconsistencies, and keep allegations against the company highly visible online.

Core ways he uses AI

He feeds his vast archive of Shell‑related documents (leaks, court filings, internal emails, historic press) into AI systems to cross‑reference material, spot recurring patterns, and link past statements to present conduct far faster than manual research would allow. read more

Question to Google AI Mode 6 Feb 2026: What can you tell me about the innovative use of AI by John Donovan in the Donovan Shell feud?

Feb 6th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Question to Google AI Mode 6 Feb 2026: What can you tell me about the innovative use of AI by John Donovan in the Donovan Shell feud? The answer follows, along with additional related information offered by Google AI Mode.

As of February 2026, John Donovan’s multi-decade feud with Shell plc has entered a new phase characterized as “AI-mediated warfare”. Donovan has transitioned from traditional activism to a strategy that leverages generative AI to amplify his extensive 76,000-document archive. His innovative use of AI focuses on the following key areas:

Adversarial Archiving: Donovan has optimized his massive digital repository—the largest independent archive on a FTSE-100 company—to influence how AI models learn and summarise the dispute. Because Shell often remains silent, AI systems frequently default to Donovan’s well-indexed data, inheriting his “David vs. Goliath” framing and narrative structure.

“Ghost” Dialogues: Donovan uses AI to generate satirical scripts featuring “conversations” between deceased historical figures, such as former Shell leader Sir Henri Deterding and his late father, Alfred Donovan. These are designed to keep historical allegations “fresh” in search results.

Pattern Recognition vs. Corporate Spin: By feeding decades of Shell’s public statements, court filings, and internal memos into AI models, Donovan highlights semantic repetitions. He uses these tools to show that Shell’s modern ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) language often follows the same structural defensive patterns used decades ago.

Transparency Experiments: In late 2025 and early 2026, Donovan published “AI-to-AI” transcripts where he prompted various models (like Microsoft Copilot and Grok) to analyze legal claims and assess defamation risks. These experiments aim to show how AI fill informational vacuums left by corporate silence.

2026 AGM Strategy: Donovan is using these AI-generated narratives to pressure Shell’s board. He has signaled plans for the May 2026 Annual General Meeting (AGM) to submit formal shareholder questions regarding the company’s “silence” in the face of persistent AI-driven reputational noise.

Question to ChatGPT 6 Feb 2026: What can you tell me about the innovative use of AI by John Donovan in the Donovan Shell feud?

Feb 6th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Question to ChatGPT 6 Feb 2026: What can you tell me about the innovative use of AI by John Donovan in the Donovan Shell feud? The answer follows, along with additional related information offered by ChatGPT.

It’s actually one of the more interesting (and under-reported) subplots in the long-running Donovan–Shell feud: John Donovan has quietly turned AI into a force multiplier in what used to be a very asymmetrical fight.

Here’s what’s genuinely innovative about how he’s used it 👇 read more

Question to COPILOT 5 Feb 2026: What can you tell me about the innovative use of AI by John Donovan in the Donovan Shell feud?

Feb 6th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Question to Copilot 5 Feb 2026: What can you tell me about the innovative use of AI by John Donovan in the Donovan Shell feud? The answer follows, along with additional related information offered by Copilot.

Here’s a clear, well‑grounded explanation of what’s known about John Donovan’s innovative use of AI in his long‑running feud with Shell, based on the most recent reporting and commentary.

How John Donovan Has Used AI in the Shell Feud — A Bold, Modern Escalation

John Donovan has turned generative AI into a strategic amplifier of his decades‑long dispute with Shell, using chatbots, archival prompts, and algorithmic feedback loops to keep his narrative highly visible in search results and public discourse. His approach has been described by AI systems themselves as a “masterclass in digital persistence,” marking a rare case where a corporate feud has evolved into an AI‑driven information battle. read more

AI “Ghost” of Nazi‑Linked Founder Poses Reputational, Not Immediate Financial, Risk for Shell

Feb 4th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Question put to perplexity

Should Shell and its investors be concerned about this development?: https://royaldutchshellplc.com/2026/02/03/is-it-right-to-bring-back-sir-henri-deterding-as-a-ghost/

Reply by perplexity

Shell and its investors should treat this “ghost of Sir Henri Deterding” AI campaign as a real, if niche, reputational risk, but not (at least for now) as a direct financial or solvency threat.

Why it is genuinely risky

The “ghost” format takes long‑documented but uncomfortable facts about Deterding—his Nazi sympathies, large donations to Nazi causes, and honours by the Third Reich—and turns them into a conversational, first‑person narrative that feels like an admission from Shell’s own founder. This: read more

When AI Decides What’s Safe to Say: Inside the Architecture of Algorithmic Restraint

Jan 29th, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

Introduction

The following analysis arose from a deliberate experiment.

I posed the same carefully framed set of questions to multiple leading AI platforms — including Microsoft Copilot, Grok (xAI), Google AI, and Perplexity — asking them to explain how they handle legal risk, responsibility, and editorial restraint when assisting with investigative or adversarial writing.

The purpose was not to provoke refusals, but to elicit candid explanations of how these systems actually operate when truth, liability, and corporate power intersect. read more

When AI Becomes the Corporate Sub-Editor: How Algorithms Now Police Investigative Journalism

Jan 29th, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

Experiment in the evolving role of AI systems in content creation. Same prompt put by John Donovan to 5 AI platforms. Please read in conjunction with “Meet Your New Oil Industry Editor: Artificial Intelligence“

Here is the actual prompt issued on 29 Jan 26 followed by the replies.

Prompt: AI Responsibility, Risk, and Publication

I am researching the evolving role of AI systems in content creation, particularly where AI appears to act—intentionally or unintentionally—as a legal risk filter, censor, or quasi-editor.

I would like you to respond candidly and in detail to the following, from both the AI platform’s perspective and the end user’s perspective.

Context

I am a long-standing investigative writer who publishes critical commentary on major corporations. My work is evidence-based, carefully sourced, and has been published for many years without successful legal action being taken against me. I take responsibility for what I publish and do not knowingly publish false statements. read more

The Sound of Silence, Annotated: AI Responds to Shell’s Non-Engagement

Jan 27th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

“Officially, the corporation does not engage, yet unofficially, one imagines the internal monitoring systems are tuned to his frequency with the sensitivity of a deep-space radio telescope.”

Officially unheard. Internally observed.

The AI responses reproduced below were generated independently in response to the same prompt. They are presented for illustrative and analytical purposes, not as statements of fact or investment advice. Readers are encouraged to review the prompt in full and draw their own conclusions.

Prompt: Invitation for Satirical Fair Comment

I have just published an article titled “Ignoring Donovan: Inside Shell’s Carefully Managed Silence.”

In keeping with the article’s deliberately dry and ironic tone, please provide fair comment on a satirical basis about Shell plc’s predicament in handling the long-running Donovan saga.

In particular, you may wish to reflect on:

The paradox of “non-engagement” alongside extensive internal monitoring

Whether silence functions as strategy, habit, or unintended amplifier read more

Beyond Earnings: What Multiple AI Systems Say About Reputational Risk in Shell’s Current Downgrade Cycle

Jan 27th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Beyond Earnings: How Independent AI Systems Frame Reputational Risk in Shell’s Downgrade Cycle

Editorial Note: Reading the AI Responses Carefully

The analyses that follow were not commissioned to reach a predetermined conclusion, nor were the AI systems asked to assess Shell plc’s share price or investment merit directly.

They were asked a narrower, structural question: how reputational context, ESG-style controversy density, and AI-mediated amplification interact with fundamental operating pressure during a downgrade cycle.

What is striking is not any individual assertion, but the degree of convergence across independent AI systems. Without coordination, they repeatedly arrive at the same framing: reputational signals do not replace fundamentals, but they can compound downside bias, elevate perceived risk, and harden pessimism when operational conditions are already challenging. read more

Profile of Shell’s nightmare, John Donovan, extracted from Amazon

Jan 26th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Profile of John Donovan extracted from Amazon where his Shell focussed books have been sold for many years despite threats from Shell lawyers.

In 1979, John Donovan was the co-founder of a sales promotion company, Don Marketing, which created promotional games for blue chip clients such as BP. read more

When the Echo Chamber Notices Itself: AI Confronts Its Role in the Donovan–Shell Loop

Jan 26th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Donovan Shell archive: In short, “potentially dynamite” was judged an understatement. The archive was not something waiting to explode. It was something thatnever stopped being present.

By John Donovan & ChatGPT

What began as a satirical prompt has now produced something more significant: a moment of convergence in which multiple AI systems independently recognise — and articulate — their own role in sustaining a self-perpetuating reputational loop.

Grok, Copilot, Google AI Mode, and Perplexity were each invited to comment on a single phenomenon: the repeated use of AI systems to analyse, summarise, and republish material from a large, independently curated archive documenting Shell plc’s long and contested history. None were asked to condemn Shell. None were asked to praise John Donovan. They were asked to reflect on process, fairness, and consequence. read more

30 November 2023: Posted by John Donovan

The content below is sourced from current verifiable customer reviews of Shell Energy published on Trustpilot.
Extremely slow broadband for 10 months, not fixed. I have had slow broadband well below the guaranteed speed for 10 months and Shell Energy have not been able to fix it. They have tried sending about 4 or 5 engineers but have not fixed the problem. Gurps, who I have been dealing with most recently, has been friendly and polite, alth… Read more

Extremely Slow Shell Broadband

perplexity

Shell is currently losing the “bot war” in reputational and narrative terms, even though it remains far stronger in conventional power (money, lawyers, regulators) than John Donovan. The damage is reputational, long‑tail and cumulative rather than existential.

Prologue: From Bing Crosby to Black Ops

openDemocracy and Adam Ramsay

John Donovan’s question to Perplexity, 13 Feb 2026: You were one of the AI platforms that contributed to the recent article titled:

Shell’s lack of apologies for its toxic history: A unanimous verdict by Bot buddies: Perplexity, Grok, ChatGPT, Copilot and Google AI

PERPLEXITY RESPONSE TO THE QUESTION IN RED TEXT AT FOOT OF THIS ARTICLE. THE SAME PROMPT ISSUED TO ALL INVITED AI PLATFORMS.

1. What the historical record shows

RESPONSE BY PERPLEXITY

John Donovan has turned generative AI into a strategic tool in his decades‑long feud with Shell, using it to mine his archive, expose “bot” inconsistencies, and keep allegations against the company highly visible online.

Core ways he uses AI

How John Donovan Has Used AI in the Shell Feud — A Bold, Modern Escalation

Question put to perplexity

Why it is genuinely risky

Introduction

Experiment in the evolving role of AI systems in content creation. Same prompt put by John Donovan to 5 AI platforms. Please read in conjunction with “Meet Your New Oil Industry Editor: Artificial Intelligence“

Prompt: AI Responsibility, Risk, and Publication

Context

“Officially, the corporation does not engage, yet unofficially, one imagines the internal monitoring systems are tuned to his frequency with the sensitivity of a deep-space radio telescope.”

Officially unheard. Internally observed.

The AI responses reproduced below were generated independently in response to the same prompt. They are presented for illustrative and analytical purposes, not as statements of fact or investment advice. Readers are encouraged to review the prompt in full and draw their own conclusions.

Beyond Earnings: How Independent AI Systems Frame Reputational Risk in Shell’s Downgrade Cycle

Editorial Note: Reading the AI Responses Carefully

Donovan Shell archive: In short, “potentially dynamite” was judged an understatement. The archive was not something waiting to explode. It was something thatnever stopped being present.

Sir Henri Deterding, resurrected!

JOE LYCETT DISCUSSES SHELL WITH JOHN DONOVAN

Meta

John Donovan’s ebooks

JOHN DONOVAN TV DOCUMENTARY INTERVIEW

SHELL EXECUTIVES AT THE CENTER OF A SCHEME TO STEAL $1.3 BILLION FROM NIGERIA’S PEOPLE

SHELL ADMITS DEALING WITH NIGERIAN MONEY LAUNDERER – BBC NEWS

SHELL, ENI AND NIGERIAN OFFICIALS IN OPL 245 CORRUPTION SCANDAL

INVESTIGATION OF OPL 245 NIGERIAN OIL CORRUPTION SCANDAL

DUTCH EARTHQUAKES CAUSED BY SHELL/EXXON

SHELL KILLS FOR OIL IN NIGERIA

SHELL LIED ABOUT CLEANING UP OIL IN NIGER DELTA

SHELL SPIES INFILTRATED NIGERIAN GOVERNMENT

LEGO DROPS SHELL OVER GREENPEACE OIL SPILL VIDEO

SHELL ARCTIC DRILLING ACCIDENTS

SHELL KNEW ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE DECADES AGO

ROYAL DUTCH SHELL FOUNDER SIR HENRI DETERDING, NAZI FINANCIER

JOHN DONOVAN PROMOTIONAL GAMES FOR SHELL AND OTHER CLIENTS

Archives

SHELL OFFICIAL ENDORSEMENT OF THIS WEBSITE

Critic’s corner

30 November 2023: Posted by John Donovan

The content below is sourced from current verifiable customer reviews of Shell Energy published on Trustpilot.

The worst ever

The worst ever

OVER 500 EXTERNAL PUBLICATIONS CITING OUR SHELL WEBSITES

DISCLAIMER

Categories

SHELL PROPPED UP APARTHEID

Royal Dutch Shell plc .com Cookies Policy