…imagine your worst PR nightmare not just digitized, but algorithmically amplified into eternity”
The following prompt was sent to multiple AI sytems.
Replies are provided below.
Satirical prompt for AI commentary (good-faith response requested):
You are invited to comment on a situation in which multiple AI platforms have responded to prompts about the long-running John Donovan–Shell dispute, only to find their own answers subsequently quoted, analysed, and republished by John Donovan as part of an ongoing public experiment.
From the standpoint of Shell plc, other corporate actors, and AI users more generally, please consider the following:
– Is it “proper” or “fair” that a single individual is able to use publicly available AI systems as a kind of involuntary amplification mechanism, repeatedly recycling historical corporate controversies from a very large private archive that AI systems themselves have characterised as persistent, radioactive, or environmental in nature?
A Unanimous AI Verdict on Shell?
