Royal Dutch Shell plc .com Rotating Header Image

Posts Tagged ‘Ogoni’

U.S. Supreme Court to hear bid to sue Shell for Nigerian abuses

OCTOBER 17, 2011 12.35 P.M. ET

Associated Press

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court said Monday it will use a dispute between Nigerian villagers and oil giant Royal Dutch Shell to decide whether corporations may be held liable in U.S. courts for alleged human rights abuses overseas.

The justices said they will review a federal appeals court ruling in favor of Shell. The case centers on the 222-year-old Alien Tort Statute that has been increasingly used in recent years to sue corporations for alleged abuses abroad.

Other cases pending in U.S. courts seek to hold accountable Chiquita Brands International for its relationship with paramilitary groups in Colombia; Exxon and Chevron for abuses in Indonesia and Nigeria, respectively, and several companies for their role in apartheid in South Africa.

The Nigerians argue Shell was complicit in torture and other crimes against humanity in the country’s oil-rich Ogoni region in the Niger Delta.

A divided panel of federal appeals court judges in New York said the 18th century law may not be used against corporations. More recently, appellate judges in Washington said it could.

In a second case the court agreed to hear, the justices will weigh whether the Torture Victims Protection Act of 1992 can be invoked against organizations, or only individuals.

The sons and widow of Azzam Rahim have filed a civil lawsuit against the Palestinian Authority and the Palestine Liberation Organization. The Palestinian-born Rahim was a naturalized U.S. citizen who was beaten and died in the custody of Palestinian intelligence officers in Jericho in 1995. Three officers were jailed for their role in the case, according to a State Department report.

But when Rahim’s relatives sought money damages for his death, the federal appeals court in Washington said they could not use the 1992 law to go after the Palestinian organizations. The law may be applied only to “natural persons,” the appeals court said.

The Nigerians’ lawsuit stems from alleged human rights violations between 1992 and 1995. The suit claims that Shell was eager to stop protests about continuing oil exploration in the area and was complicit in Nigerian government actions that included fatal shootings, rapes, beatings, arrests and property destruction.

Specifically, the villagers claim Shell gave soldiers money, food and transportation, and allowed its facilities to be used as staging grounds.

A divided panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York voted 2-1 to throw out the suit, saying corporations cannot be held liable under the Alien Tort Statute. The full appeals court split 5-5 on whether to rehear the case. The tie vote left the panel ruling in place.

The cases will be argued early next year.

The cases are Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, 10-1491, and Mohamad v. Rajoub, 11-88.

—Copyright 2011 Associated Press

SOURCE ARTICLE

U.S. Supreme Court to hear bid to sue Shell for Nigerian abuses

17 October 2011

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court says it will use a dispute between Nigerian villagers and oil giant Royal Dutch Shell to decide whether corporations may be held liable in U.S. courts for alleged human rights abuses overseas.

The justices said Monday they will review a federal appeals court ruling in favor of Shell. The case centers on the 222-year-old Alien Tort Statute that has been increasingly used in recent years to sue corporations for alleged abuses abroad.

The villagers argue Shell was complicit in torture and other crimes against humanity in the country’s oil-rich Ogoni region in the Niger Delta.

A divided panel of federal appeals court judges in New York said the 18th century law may not be used against corporations. More recently, appellate judges in Washington said it could.

ADDED BY JOHN DONOVAN: SHELL IN NIGERIA

Shell’s horrendous track record in Nigeria includes embedding spies in the Nigerian government; paying rival militant gangs; engaging in corruption (not only in Nigeria); arming police spies; using a private spy firm (Hakluyt) partly owned and controlled by Shell directors, to infiltrate Nigerian activists (friends of Ken Saro-Wiwa) and linking Shell with murder and human rights abuses which are the subject of the above case. Questions inevitably arise about financial linkage to Shell of the militants responsible for the repeated attacks against Shell pipelines and infrastructure over many years, which has driven up the cost of oil. Shell has such a shameful record in Nigeria, including plunder and pollution on an epic scale, that it has even considered ditching the Shell global brand name. Such a radical move would also distance the company from its Nazi past.

Email from Sunny Ofehe: Terror Trial in The Netherlands

Email from Sunny Ofehe, Founder of Hope for Niger Delta Campaign

From: Comrade Sunny Ofehe <sunnyofehe@yahoo.com>
Date: 1 October 2011 07:47:16 GMT+01:00
To: “john@shellnews.net” <john@shellnews.net>
Subject: Terror Trial in The Netherlands.
Reply-To: Comrade Sunny Ofehe <sunnyofehe@yahoo.com>

Dear John,

I have always been an avid follower of your good work online through the Shell website.

I am an environmental activist living here in The Netherlands. I am from the Niger Delta region of Nigeria where Shell has a huge presence with a history of environmental devastation of our people’s environment.

I have been campaigning against this for many years and testified at the Dutch Parliament against Shell in a Parliamentary hearing where Shell was summoned to defend their practice in the region.

Less than a month after the hearing, a team of about 30 police came to my house and arrested me on trumped up charges and I was detained for 14 days before being released, but remained a suspect.

When they could not establish a case against me, just last month they came up with a new charge: “conspiracy to commit terror act by blowing oil pipelines belonging to Shell in the Niger Delta.”

I became the first person to be charged under this law since it came into effect in 2004. I appeared in court for the first time on 5th September and we now have a new hearing date of 5th December 2011.

It is an interesting politically motivated case which I would like you to follow up. You can get more details on google search with my names. You will find my details below.

Many thanks and hope to hear from you soon.

Best regards,

Comrade Sunny Ofehe
Founder/President
Hope for Niger Delta Campaign, HNDC
The Netherlands
+31634351598
www.ofehe.com
www.sunnyofehe.com
www.nigerdeltacampaign.com

MOSOP URGES BISHOP KUKAH TO END CORRUPTION IN NIGERIA

STATEMENT ISSUED BY MOSOP (Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni People)

8 September 2011

MOSOP URGES Dr. GOODLUCK JONATHAN’ PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN TO END CORRUPTION IN NIGERIA.

In a congratulatory message today to Bishop Matthew Hassan Kukah, MOSOP President/Spokesman, Dr. Goodluck Diigbo implored Bishop Kukah on his installation as the Bishop of Sokoto Diocese to champion the cause to end corruption in Nigeria and to promote economic and political justice.

Dr. said: “In your capacity as Chairman of the Ogoni –Shell Conflict Resolution and Reconciliation Presidential Committee, I implore you to use your new position to work towards the meeting of minds in the Ogoni situation, in a way that can usher in peace and promote economic and political justice in Nigeria.

In addition, I further implore you to champion the cause to end corruption, misrule, internal colonialism and arrogance of power in Nigeria. The Ogoni people are staying strong, and we will continue to count on your support.The history of Christianity reminds us that Christianity was officially persecuted for three centuries. The same history tells us that Roman Christianity is the mother of Western civilization. The Ogoni people are full of hopes and dreams that the day is coming when the Ogoni story will become the story of Christianity and Western civilization.”

The full Statement is reproduced below:

Dear Rt. Rev. Msgr Matthew Hassan Kukah,

I write to congratulate you for the great rise on your episcopal ordination and installation as Bishop of Sokoto Diocese today, Thursday, September 8, 2011 following your recent elevation by His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI.

On behalf of the Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni People, MOSOP, I thank God for your lift. God remains the greatest judge. God puts down one, and lifts up another.

In your capacity as Chairman of the Ogoni –Shell Conflict Resolution and Reconciliation Presidential Committee, I implore you to use your new position to work towards the meeting of minds in the Ogoni situation, in a way that can usher in peace and promote economic and political justice in Nigeria. In addition, I further implore you to champion the cause to end corruption, misrule, internal colonialism and arrogance of power in Nigeria. The Ogoni people are staying strong, and we will continue to count on your support.

The history of Christianity reminds us that Christianity was officially persecuted for three centuries. The same history tells us that Roman Christianity is the mother of Western civilization.

The Ogoni people are full of hopes and dreams that the day is coming when the Ogoni story will become the story of Christianity and Western civilization.

Dr. Goodluck Diigbo
MOSOP President/Spokesman

Released by:
Tambari Deekor
Assist. Editor, MOSOP Media
tdeekor88@gmail.com

The Movement for the Survival of Ogoni People (MOSOP) is an Ogoni-based non-governmental, non-political apex organisation of the Ogoni ethnic minority people of South-Eastern Nigeria and was founded in 1990 with the mandate to campaign non-violently to:

• Promote democratic awareness;

• Protect the environment of the Ogoni People;

• Seek social, economic and physical development for the region;

• Protect the cultural rights and practices of the Ogoni people; and

• Seek appropriate rights of self-determination for the Ogoni people.

Shell battles its North Sea oil spill from pipeline below the Gannet Alpha platform


By Rob Davies: Last updated at 10:59 PM on 16th August 2011

Shell is facing a burgeoning image crisis as its North Sea oil spill – the biggest in British waters for a decade – stretched into its seventh day.

The Anglo-Dutch giant has been using teams of divers and Remote Operated Vehicles (ROVs) to battle the leak, which is estimated to have slowed from five barrels a day to two.

But initial work on the sub-sea pipeline below the Gannet Alpha platform succeeded only in plugging one part of the damaged pipe, forcing oil out elsewhere.

The company estimates that some 1,300 barrels of oil have been spilt so far.

In the context of BP’s oil spill in Gulf of Mexico last year – which saw an estimated 4.9m barrels of oil gush into US waters – Shell’s leak is relatively small.

But one industry insider acknowledged that it was significant in UK terms.

‘In the context of the North Sea, this is a pretty big spill,’ he said.

Shares in the oil giant declined just 10p to 2005.5p yesterday and have actually risen since the leak was first discovered last week.

But chief executive Peter Voser was unabashed in his criticism of BP’s safety record late last year and the North Sea leak will prove something of an embarrassment.

The timing is especially poor, coming just weeks after Shell admitted liability for a gargantuan oil spillage in Ogoniland, Nigeria.

The UN said the region may need the largest ever oil clean-up operation, while the company faces legal claims potentially running into hundreds of millions of dollars.Shell says the vast majority of spills in the Niger Delta are caused by sabotage, but it is difficult to imagine the company getting off so lightly had it left a giant toxic mess in a country such as the US or UK.

The mishap in the North Sea will also give encouragement to environmental groups  who warn that Shell’s plans to drill for oil in the Arctic Circle could have disastrous consequences.

Cleaning up an oil spill in the frozen wastes of the Arctic is considered highly difficult and dangerous and no company has ever had to deal with such a disaster.

Gannet Alpha is very far from being Shell’s Deepwater Horizon.

But the company has been reminded that the black marks the oil industry leaves on the planet are not confined to its great rival BP.

Supreme Court Set to Decide Corporate Liability for Human Rights Violations

Tom Ramstack: August 15, 2011 07:14 pm EDT

The Supreme Court is expected to decide within weeks whether it will hear a case on the liability of U.S. corporations for human rights violations in other countries.

The issue has simmered for years as human rights advocates accused corporations of abusing residents of mineral rich areas overseas to evade U.S. laws that never would allow the same kind of exploitation.

The dispute came to a head in recent lawsuits against oil companies Royal Dutch Shell PLC and Exxon Mobil Corp. for their oil exploration in Nigeria and Indonesia.

They are accused of trampling the health and livelihoods of native people and using soldiers to intimidate them.

The corporations say no U.S. law exists that could make them responsible for alleged human rights abuses in Nigeria and Indonesia.

They have been joined in opposing the lawsuit by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which submitted an amicus – or friend-of-the-court – brief that says international law “establishes liability for states and individuals, and not for corporations.”

The chances the Supreme Court will hear the case, entitled Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Shell, are heightened by the fact lower courts have split in deciding corporate liability. The Supreme Court normally steps into a case to clear up confusion among lower courts.

The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled in July that federal courts are authorized by U.S. law to determine whether corporations are liable for human rights violations abroad.

The ruling ran exactly opposite to a September 2010 decision by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on the same issue.

Days after the decision in the District of Columbia, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago agreed corporations could be liable in U.S. federal courts.

The Chicago court ruled on a lawsuit against Firestone Natural Rubber Co. for its conduct in Liberia. The court concluded the accusations against the company lacked merit.

The lawsuits are based largely on the U.S. Alien Tort Statute, a 1789 law that allows foreign citizens to sue Americans for violating international laws and treaties.

The law was rarely used until a 1997 lawsuit by 13 Burmese villagers against California energy company Unocal. It accused the company of using forced labor to build an oil pipeline.

An appellate court in San Francisco allowed the lawsuit, forcing the parties to settle.

Royal Dutch Shell is accused under the law of suppressing Nigeria’s Ogoni people.

About a half-million Ogoni live in the Rivers State region of Nigeria, where they make their living largely as fishermen and farmers. Their lifestyles became threatened when Shell discovered oil there in 1958.

Environmental hazards that followed included oil spills that damaged the soil and gas flares that polluted the air, causing acid rain and respiratory problems.

A 1998 United Nations report accused the Nigerian government and Shell of human rights violations against the Ogoni for the environmental disaster.

Exxon Mobil is accused of hiring Indonesian soldiers to guard the company’s Arun natural gas field.

Eleven villagers say Exxon Mobil knew the Indonesian military had committed genocide in the region where the natural gas field is located. They say the military had murdered, tortured and raped residents.

The corporations say they might have to shut down their overseas operations under a flood of litigation if they can be sued for human rights violations. The money damages they would need to pay could be enormous, according to their lawyers.

One of their briefs says about 150 lawsuits have been filed against corporations in the past 20 years accusing them of human rights violations in 60 countries.

Courts that have ruled the corporations could be sued largely followed the reasoning of Judge Pierre Leval, who dissented in the 2010 Chicago court ruling in favor of the corporations.

The ruling protecting the corporations shows that “one who earns profits by commercial exploitation of abuse of fundamental human rights can successfully shield those profits from victims’ claims for compensation simply by taking the precaution of conducting the heinous operation in the corporate form,” Leval wrote.

As long as corporations are not liable for their human rights violations, they will “be free to trade in or exploit slaves, employ mercenary armies to do dirty work for despots, perform genocides or operate torture prisons for a despot’s political opponents, or engage in piracy – all without civil liability to victims,” Leval wrote.

SOURCE ARTICLE

OGONI ACTIVISTS ACCUSE SHELL OF ‘ENVIRONMENTAL RACISM’

Extracts from a Press Statement issued by the National Union of Ogoni Students, USA.

On August 04, 2011 the world had a preview of the report of the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP) sent to the Nigerian government after 14 months of studying the impact of Shell Oil Company’s operations in Ogoni.

The report was astonishing and confirmed the toxicology of the Ogoni environment as a result of oil exploration, pollution, spillages and negligence. The report also collaborated on genocidal claim by Ogoni people as they experience slow death resulting from oil agents like benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylene (BTEX), mercury, PAHs, VOC, polluted reactive gases, and metals.

Shell Oil Company has knowingly degraded the Ogoni environment and made Ogoni people live and die slowly  from pollutants, a man made poison for 55 years, while applying different operating standards in the west. This is the height of injustice and tantamount to environmental racism.

Since it is the desire of the United Nations that Ogoni and other indigenous communities should survive, we urge the UN and other western nations to come to the aid of Ogoni by compelling Nigeria to adhere to the terms of the Ogoni Bill of Rights (1990), Resolution of the Rivers State House of Assembly (1993), and the UN Report on Ogoni (1996).  We also recommend that the international community should compel Shell Oil Company to follow universal operation standards, be accountable, and accept responsibilities for 55 years of environmental devastation and degradation in Ogoniland.

BP accepted liability in the United States’ Gulf Oil Spillage in 2010 by adequate clean-up and setting-up compensation funds.

We want Shell Oil to do the same in Ogoni.

MOSOP PRESIDENT REFUTES CORRUPTION ALLEGATION

By John Donovan

We have printed below an email we have received purportedly from MOSOP President Dr Goodluck Diigbo replying to corruption allegations made against him.  The”Amaechi”mentioned in the email is a reference to Chibuike Amaechi, Governor of Rivers State in Nigeria.

The email was addressed to fellow Ogonis, Austin Lemea, and refers to Patrick Naagbaaton, another Ogoni activist. We are in possession of email correspondence from both of these individuals relating to Nigerian politics, Shell and the recent UNEP report on Nigerian oil spills.

From: MOSOP President Spokesman <mosoppresidentspksmn@gmail.com>
Subject:  You can focus on more productive writing, not peddling rumors
Date: 9 August 2011 13:00:56 GMT+01:00
To: austinlemea@yahoo.com
Bcc: alfred@shellnews.net

Lemea,

You are referring to Patrick Naagbaaton’s rumor suggesting that Amaechi gave me N10 million.

It is a total falsehood.

You can focus on more productive writing, not rumor-mongering.

My interest is not in short-term goal.

I have my conscience intact.

This is an abuse of my time.

It is a distraction.

I wish you folks luck.


Dr. Goodluck Diigbo

Nigeria: Oil-polluted Ogoniland could become environmental model

UN says clean-up operation following two massive oil spills in the Niger Delta could benefit other African countries developing their oil reserves

Crude oil spilled in the Niger Delta swamps of Bodo, a village in Ogoniland. Photograph: Pius Utomi Ekpei/AFP/Getty Images

Ogoniland is one of the most oil-polluted places on earth but it could become a model for other countries wanting to clean up their environments or avoid making the same mistakes, the UN has said.

This could be the world’s biggest oil contamination clean-up,” said Nick Nuttall, spokesman for the UN’s environment programme (UNEP) director, Achim Steiner. “It is up to the government of Nigeria what happens now, but [from talks with President Goodluck Jonathan in Abuja this week] there appears to be a willingness to act,” he said while in London.

Preliminary cost estimates to decontaminate and restore the devastated ecology of the 1,000 sq km of land and water are nearly $1bn for the first five years, with much more money possibly needed over the full 30 years it will take to clean up the region, said UNEP chief scientist Joseph Alcamo in London.

But he said that if governments and oil companies were prepared to put up the money to act, it could provide work to train tens of thousands of Ogonis, leave the area “pristine” and help many other African countries that were on the point of commercially developing their oil reserves.

São Tomé, Ghana, Uganda, Sierra Leone and Ethiopia all expect to produce oil in the next 10 years. “One in 10 barrels of oil in the world presently comes from Africa. It is very likely that oil production will increase on the continent. Countries can learn from this painful experience,” said Alcamo.

As well as immediate measures, such as warning Ogoni people if they are drinking from polluted wells and proposing that the oil companies rethink their clean-up procedures, the UN recommended that a global centre for excellence for environmental restoration be set up in Ogoniland.

This would run courses in environmental monitoring, promote learning about pollution and decontamination of land in Nigeria and abroad, and become a model for restoration, attracting people from around the world, said Alcamo.

It would like to see Nigeria declare its intention to make the extensive wetlands around Ogoniland a “Ramsar site” – the highest classification of wetland. “This would provide the government with a roadmap for restoration and bring the site into the global spotlight, which will make the many agencies and companies focus on their task,” said the report.

Shell Nigeria said it was willing to act. “Shell Petroleum Development Company is already reviewing its remediation practices and looking to involve independent international experts in assessing how it can improve. The company is also examining ways to bring third-party verification to the oil spill investigation process, bringing further transparency to the assessment of causes and volumes,” said managing director Mutiu Sunmonu. “We pledge to work with the government, UNEP and others on the next steps.”

Sunmonu urged the Nigerian government to take concerted action to curb oil theft by communities and others. “Unless these activities are brought to a halt, any action we take will be of limited impact,” he said.

But the Movement for the Survival of the Ogonio People (Mosop), which was founded by Ogoni writer Ken Saro-Wiwa and has been a powerful political voice in the region, rejected the UN report, saying it was compromised because it was mostly paid for by Shell.

“Who determined that restoration of Ogoniland would last for 30 years? What is the extent or estimate of overall damage? Everything is dictated to us, the Ogoni people, who have lost our means of livelihood, [and been] subjected to economic burden and poverty,” said Mosop president Goodluck Diigbo.

SOURCE ARTICLE

Environmental Rights Action/Friends of the Earth Nigeria called for the creation of a $100bn environmental restoration fund for the whole Niger Delta, parts of which they said were just as polluted as Ogoniland. “The $1bn initial restoration fund that the report has proposed is negligible compared with the mammoth ecological disaster caused by Shell,” said director Nnimmo Bassey. “Other communities must now also be considered for a comprehensive environmental audit,” he said.

Shell Defends Self Over Oil Pollution in Ogoniland

By  Chuks Okocha  and Omon-Julius Onabu

Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria has absolved itself of any wrongdoing in respect of the widely reported 2008 oil spills in Ogoni communities in the Niger-Delta.

Apparently reacting to the recent report by the United Nations Environmental Programme on the pollution of Ogoniland, which indicted Shell, SPDC Managing Director, Mr. Mutiu Sunmonu, said “oil spills in the Niger-Delta are a tragedy,” adding, also, that the company “takes them very seriously”.

He said SPDC had always accepted responsibility for paying compensation when they occur as a result of operational failure.
Sunmonu, however, blamed the media for sensationalizing reports on oil pollution and also faulted the financial claims being speculated by lawyers to the Ogoni communities as possible compensation to be coughed out by Shell.

Also, the President/Spokesman of the Movement for the Survival of Ogoni Peoples, Dr. Goodluck Digbo, said Friday that the people of Ogoni have rejected the UNEP report on the environmental pollution in the area. He challenged the integrity of the report.

In the report which emerged on Thursday, UNEP painted a gloomy picture of the level of environmental degradation in Nigeria’s oil-rich region, particularly Ogoniland, saying it might require 30 years to clean up the mess.

The study also said complete restoration could entail the world’s “most wide-ranging and long-term oil clean-up and it is estimated to cost $1 billion.

According to him, “The two spills at issue here resulted in around 4,000 barrels of oil being spilt. It is regrettable that any oil is spilt anywhere, but it is wildly inaccurate to suggest that those two spills represent anything like the scale which some reports refer to.”

He accused the media of closing its eyes to the fact that rampant acts of sabotage and vandalism by people involved in illegal bunkering or stealing petroleum products were responsible for most of the cases of oil spills in Nigeria.

Sunmonu’s remarks are contained in a written reaction, made available to THISDAY in Warri, titled “An open letter on oil spills from the Managing Director of The Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Limited,” and dated August 4, 2011.

He said SPDC had acted in its usually responsive and responsible manner even though the contentious spills in Bodo (in Ogoniland) was a relatively small scale, and nothing near the picture of seemingly massive spills now being painted.

Text of Sunmonu’s letter read: “Oil spills in the Niger-Delta are a tragedy, and The Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria (SPDC) takes them very seriously. That is why we have always accepted responsibility for paying compensation when they occur as a result of operational failure.

“SPDC has always acknowledged that the two spills in the Bodo area (Ogoni-land) in 2008, which are the focus of extensive media reports today, were caused by such operational failure. Even when, as is true in the great majority of cases, spills are caused by illegal activity such as sabotage or theft, we are also committed to cleaning up spilt oil and restoring the surrounding land.

“It is regrettable that any oil is spilt anywhere, but it is wildly inaccurate to suggest that those two spills represent anything like the scale which some reports refer to.

“It is unfortunate that inaccurate reporting has created the impression that SPDC in particular and oil companies in general are responsible for all oil spills in Nigeria. The two spills at issue here resulted in around 4,000 barrels of oil being spilt. It is regrettable that any oil is spilt anywhere, but it is wildly inaccurate to suggest that those two spills represent anything like the scale which some reports refer to. Equally, speculation by the plaintiffs’ lawyers as to the level of compensation, which may be payable is misguided and massively in excess of the true position.

“Concerted effort is needed on the part of the Nigerian government (which itself owns a majority interest in the assets operated by SPDC under a joint operating agreement with the NNPC), working with oil companies and others, to end the blight of illegal refining and oil theft in the Niger Delta, both of which perpetuate poverty. This is the major cause of the environmental damage which media reports have so graphically illustrated.”

MOSOP president recalled an earlier confession by UNEP team leader Mike Cowing that the report had been informed by data and information solely supplied by Shell and the government, without actual study on the ground.

According to Diigbo in a statement, “The purported UNEP meeting with 23,000 Ogonis is only on paper. There is no evidence to prove who attended, what review was done, agreements reached, if any and Ogonis who signed such agreements as proof of public participation as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment Study, EIAS due process”.

He said: “UNEP report is a high profile media game. It began a day earlier with a news flash of Shell admitting responsibility for oil spillage in Bodo, Ogoniland. Then a report appeared, exactly in line with several other failed promises by Shell, stating one billion dollars to be spent for oil damages of 55 years, accompanied by an air view of a wealthy looking city at seaside that has nothing to do with Ogoniland.

“This is absolutely a regrettable act of disinformation and cover-up. Who determined that restoration of Ogoniland would last for 30 years? What is the extent or estimate of overall damage? Everything is dictated to us, the Ogoni people who have lost our means of livelihood, subjected economic burden and poverty. In Nov. 2010 the Ogoni worried that UNEP report was secretly being done and they immediately protested.

“In arriving at this position, MOSOP takes into account continued effort by Shell to deceive and silence the Ogoni people as with the hanging of the Ogoni Nine, the corruption with which Shell cooperating with the government has treated environmental violation with impunity in Ogoniland, and the insensitivity of the Nigerian Government in handling specific Ogoni demands. The unilateral report may sound wonderfully pleasant because of the rich scientific literature, but MOSOP has records of conflicting statements by UNEP team leader Mike Cowing that contradict the genuineness of the report. This further reminds MOSOP of the previously publicized report of attempts by UNEP team under Mike Cowing to bribe Ogonis to sign on to an already written report even without a single visit to Ogoniland”.

SOURCE ARTICLE