Article by former Royal Dutch Shell exec Paddy Briggs: Shell pulls out of Wind Farm project
‘THURSDAY, MAY 01, 2008
Sometimes Shells actions are so extraordinary that you wonder if the announcements that they make are a wind up thrown into the ether just to see what might happen. The withdrawal from the London Array wind farm project is just such a decision. I know nothing about the business plan for this project except that I doubt that there were any unknowns which have suddenly become knowns. Indeed Shells statement that the decision is a consequence of an “ongoing review of projects and investment choices” suggests that they just went off the idea as they have with so many other non traditional business ventures over the years. Shells definition of their core business becomes narrower and narrower over the years step-outs into Renewables being walked away from with the same disregard for their reputation for veracity as many of the previous wimp outs.
As an ex-employee, pensioner and small shareholder I have actually argued that unless Shell is really prepared to diversify into alternative energy wholeheartedly then they really shouldnt bother at all. The track record of management success at anything but the oil and gas business is deplorable so why bother? But as a commentator on brand and reputation management I find Shells mismatch between rhetoric and reality a continuing and monstrous disgrace. Remember the Say No to no ad shown here? I thought when it was launched a few months ago that it was deceitful, self congratulatory and facile. The wind farm decision is sadly not the only example which proves my point what is Shell doing but saying Yes to no with this walk away from wind energy? But it gets worse.
The latest so-called Shell brand campaign featuring the disingenuous Clearing the Air campaign about which I have written before on this Blog is apparently a new initiative designed to communicate What Shell stands for – the campaign material states what this is:
SO WHAT DOES SHELL STAND FOR?
We are positive about energy
We are anti-complacent
We are creative, persistent problem solvers
So lets take a look at the withdrawal from the wind farm project about which Shell UK Chairman James Smith boasted less than eighteen months ago: “The London Array offshore wind farm will make a crucial contribution to the UK’s renewable energy targets. ” Is this withdrawal being Positive about energy? Isnt the abandonment of the project so precipitously extremely complacent? Cant Shell be seen not as creative, persistent problem solvers but as mendacious knee-jerkers who when they encounter the unknown or the uncertain they run like hell for cover?
As I have said before I dont really mind what Shell does as long as it is legal and in the interests of their stakeholders. What I vehemently object to is when they fail to walk the talk. When they promulgate bullshit in their brand campaigns about innovation and creativity when the reality of their business decision-making is anything but creative, original or innovative. Its not the most elegant phrase to use but it seems appropriate come on Shell Cut the crap.
© Paddy Briggs
Paddy Briggs worked for Shell for 37 years during the last fifteen of which he was responsible for Brand management in a number of appointments. He was the winner of the Shell/Economist writing prize (internal) in 2001. Paddy retired from Shell in 2002 to form the brand consultancy BrandAware and to write and speak on brand and reputation matters. He is also active as a director of training courses on brand and reputation management. Paddy is also a sports journalist and a member of the “Sports Journalists Association” and the “Cricket Writers’ Club”. He has had weekly columns in the “Bahrain Tribune”, the “Khaleej Times”, the “Emirates Evening Post” and Ameinfo. Paddy’s book of light verse “Jumeira Jane” was published in Dubai in 2001 and the first edition print run of 5000 copies was sold out.
Paddy Briggs website: www.Brandaware.co.uk