News and information on Shell Plc
SAM MASTERS: Sunday 08 September 2013
For five years a London law firm and Anglo-Dutch oil giant have argued over reparations for one of the world’s worst spills in Africa’s oil heartland. But now, as fishing villages on the banks of the Niger Delta continue to count the cost of the leaks, compensation claims are finally due to be settled.
Royal Dutch Shell will tomorrow seek to reach an “acceptable agreement” with inhabitants of the cluster of Nigerian fishing villages over claims their livelihoods were ruined by the spills in 2008.
The compensation talks, which could reportedly cost Shell £100m, start in Port Harcourt – the capital of Nigeria’s southern Rivers state and the centre of Africa’s oil industry. Should a multimillion-pound settlement be reached, it could set a precedent for payouts in developing, but oil rich, nations.
Some 15,000 residents of the villages in the Bodo community are seeking compensation. The London law firm Leigh Day, which is representing the Nigerians, estimates that up to 600,000 barrels was spilled into the waters over 100 days.
Shell disputes that figure and the amount of damage caused, but admitted liability in 2011 for the spills. The oil firm estimates that 4,100 barrels were leaked.
According to the United Nations, the spill left at least 10 Ogoni communities with drinking water contaminated by “high levels of hydrocarbons” and the public health “seriously threatened”. In Nisisioken Ogale, in western Ogoniland, people were drinking water from wells contaminated with benzene at levels 900 times those of World Health Organisation guidelines.
“The oil industry has been a key sector of the Nigerian economy for over 50 years, but many Nigerians have paid a high price,” said Achim Steiner, the UN environment programme executive director, in 2011.
But two years after the UN said trust needed to be built and action taken to remedy the “multiple health and sustainable development issues”, no agreement has been reached. Shell said there was a “very limited” chance of a resolution as recently as last month. But on Friday a spokesman was more positive. “We’re hopeful that an acceptable agreement can be reached with the Bodo during next week’s negotiations.”
Leigh Day’s position that “no clean-up work has begun” is disputed by Shell. According to Leigh Day, much of the oil that leaked into waterways around the Bodo and Niger Delta is yet to be cleared.
The Nigerians’ lawyer, Martyn Day, last week described Shell’s clean-up efforts as “pitiful”. He said some 1,000 hectares of mangrove swamps were destroyed and another 5,000 hectares affected. Mr Day said: “We will be doing our damnedest to ensure Shell pays out a fair amount for the damage they have caused, and put the Bodo Creek back into its pre-spill state.” He added: “It is entirely depressing that one of the largest companies in the world is acting like the playground bully, trying to batter local people, whose lives have been devastated, into submission.”
Shell said it hoped a deal would be reached to provide “fair compensation, as well as a way forward on cleaning up the entire area affected by oil spills”. The oil company, which described the 2008 spills as “highly regrettable” and blamed corrosion to a pipeline, said it sought “resolution, not recrimination” tomorrow.
The Nigerian environmentalist and activist Nnimmo Bassey welcomed the talks, but added that Shell needed to clean up the spill. “More important is a clean-up of the mess, the pollution, so that the fishermen and farmers can have their means of livelihood back,” he said.
Posted in: Africa, Environment, Human Rights, Litigation, Nigeria, Ogoniland, Oil, Pollution, Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Toxic contamination.
Tagged: Litigation · Niger Delta · Nigeria · Oil · Royal Dutch Shell Plc
EBOOK TITLE: “SIR HENRI DETERDING AND THE NAZI HISTORY OF ROYAL DUTCH SHELL” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON
EBOOK TITLE: “JOHN DONOVAN, SHELL’S NIGHTMARE: MY EPIC FEUD WITH THE UNSCRUPULOUS OIL GIANT ROYAL DUTCH SHELL” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON.
EBOOK TITLE: “TOXIC FACTS ABOUT SHELL REMOVED FROM WIKIPEDIA: HOW SHELL BECAME THE MOST HATED BRAND IN THE WORLD” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON.
Broadband Service is Appalling
I ordered shell energy broadband on nov 2. I was promised connection the following week. They initiated the direct debit. I called the following week and was told router would arrive on 13 and service would go live on 17. No further email or communication until 20 when I was told service would start on 30th. Spent 10 minutes waiting on phone line and spoke to a polite assistant who was absolutely useless in solving my problem. Avoid this unprofessional and chaotic… Read more
The worst ever
I used shell broadband. It was by far the worst broadband provider ever! The internet did not work most days. I had their super fast broadband and it dropped out constantly. Watching a movie was awful with the constant buffering. Customer support was super slow. Now their going to charge me for the useless router which I have sent back.
Date of experience: 21 November 2023
The worst ever
I used shell broadband. It was by far the worst broadband provider ever! The internet did not work most days. I had their super fast broadband and it dropped out constantly. Watching a movie was awful with the constant buffering. Customer support was super slow. Now their going to charge me for the useless router which I have sent back.
Date of experience: 21 November 2023
30 November 2023: Posted by John Donovan
The content below is sourced from current verifiable customer reviews of Shell Energy published on Trustpilot.
Extremely slow broadband for 10 months, not fixed. I have had slow broadband well below the guaranteed speed for 10 months and Shell Energy have not been able to fix it. They have tried sending about 4 or 5 engineers but have not fixed the problem. Gurps, who I have been dealing with most recently, has been friendly and polite, alth… Read more
See our link list of over 500 articles by the FT, Wall Street Journal, Reuters, Bloomberg, Forbes, Dow Jones Newswires, New York Times, CNBC etc, plus UK House of Commons Select Committee Hansard records, information on U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission website etc. all containing references to our Shell focussed websites, or our website founders Alfred and John Donovan. Includes TV documentary features in English and German, newspaper and magazine articles, radio interviews, newsletters etc. Plus academic papers, Stratfor intelligence reports and UK, U.S. and Australian state/parliamentary publications, also citing our Shell websites. Click on this link to see the entire list, all in date order with a link to an index of over 100 books also containing references to our non-profit websites and/or our activities.
John Donovan, the website owner
This is not a Shell website. That fact should be abundantly plain from the overall content of this home page and our sister Shell focussed websites, including shellnazihistory.com. Click on the Disclaimer link at top of this page for more information. You Can Be Sure Shell does not endorse or approve of this website. There are no subscription charges nor do we solicit or accept donations. No advertising is accepted. It is an entirely free to use non-commercial website drawing attention to the negative side of Shell. The Shell logo image with the white text used on this website, as per the above example, is in the public domain because its copyright has expired and its author is anonymous. It can be found here on WIKIMEDIA COMMONS. Use this link for Shell’s own website.
© 2024 Royal Dutch Shell Plc .com | Powered by WordPress
A WordPress theme by Ravi Varma