Royal Dutch Shell Plc  .com Rotating Header Image

Tiresome outrageous allegations by OSSL against Shell

Screen Shot 2013-09-12 at 13.51.56Posting on our Shell Blog 19 Sept 2013:

The practice of accusing Shell of something outrageous and then claiming that lack of rebuttal equates to proof of that claim is getting quite tiresome. Does anyone agree? (ref. OSSL emails to Shell and Irish Police18 Sept 2013)

Screen Shot 2013-09-04 at 13.49.26

By John Donovan

A posting on our Shell Blog this morning by “supershell” makes a fair point…

The practice of accusing Shell of something outrageous and then claiming that lack of rebuttal equates to proof of that claim is getting quite tiresome. Does anyone agree? (ref. OSSL emails to Shell and Irish Police18 Sept 2013)

It is relevant to note that the first OSSL email of today to Supt Thomas Murphy (copied to various Shell executives and lawyers) that I have printed below, claims that 434 out of 435 emails OSSL sent on the alcohol subject to the Garda, Shell, or associates parties, went unanswered.

These emails were sent to numerous people, none of whom took issue with the reference in the emails to alcohol being supplied to the Garda.

I have to ask again, if you received an email implying your involvement, or your employers involvement, in a serious criminal offense, such as corruption, would you allow that statement to go unchallenged?

Why have none of the individuals named in the emails, many of which have been published, issued or threatened defamation proceedings against OSSL, me, or the news media, including The Observer newspaper, who have published articles on the subject in which no punches are pulled?

Why has no one reported OSSL for harassment, bearing in mind the year long daily bombardment of emails?

The totally inadequate statements that have been extracted from Shell and the Garda are almost identical in nature. Why no straightforward denial by Shell, the Garda, or any of the named parties, that the events alleged by OSSL actually took place?

Why no statement from Shell or the Garda that the related alcohol invoice OSSL supplied to Shell E&P Ireland (that I have repeatedly published) is fraudulent or fake?

Lets hope that the current reinvestigation by Supt Thomas Murphy, who did kindly reply and in a reasonable way, to my recent email, reveals the truth.

OSSL EMAIL SENT TO GARDA SUPT THOMAS MURPHY ON 19 SEPTEMBER 2013

From: THE OSSL COMPANY <[email protected]>
Subject: Media request …last evening RTE and BBC …N I …and Joe Gannon ….London
Date: 19 September 2013 07:42:12 GMT+01:00
To: Thomas Murphy <[email protected]>, Michael Crothers <[email protected]>, John Shell News <[email protected]>, Michiel Brandjes <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], Neil Rooney <[email protected]>, Des Kane <[email protected]>, Peter Voser <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected]

Tom ,

We have been requested to …prove that 435 …minus 1..emails went unanswered ..

IF…..we are printing off these emails …..do you require a copy ……?

There is a lot of work and expense involved ….but we will comply if requested .

Also the submission we claim to have made to Commissioner Martin Callinan….by Royal Mail ..
Has that been confirmed yet …..

YOU SAID AT THE TIME THAT EVEN A NUTCASE ….SUBMISSION MEETS WITH A REPLY ..
…..we got no reply ……

The JoeGannon matter is being highlighted in the street in London outside the HQ of the people who demanded the statement falsification ……SHELL …

With much respect ,

OSSL

We realise of coarse you already have the emails ….in your system …but we will resend if you want …………

Sent from my iPad

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: