By Emily Pickrell, HOUSTON CHRONICLE

Published Thursday, January 12, 2012

Shell Oil Co. expects to clear remaining regulatory hurdles and begin drilling later this year in the Chukchi Sea near Alaska, company President Marvin Odum said at a scientific conference on Thursday.

Shell received conditional federal approval last month to drill six exploratory wells in the Arctic offshore region but still must secure permits for individual wells.

Among the requirements for Shell to obtain those permits will be selling regulators on its plan for responding to spills or other accidents at the sites.

Odum said Shell is mindful of the 2010 Deepwater Horizon disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, and the wide criticism BP and others involved received for the conditions leading to the accident and their response.

“We will have every piece of response in Alaska available on a one-hour notice,” Odum said in a keynote address at the ninth conference of the Academy of Medicine, Engineering and Science of Texas.

“The access to the equipment will provide for a much different response than what the world watched in the Gulf of Mexico.”

Environmentalists who oppose the drilling contend that no proven technology exists for cleaning up a spill in the slushy Arctic environment.

The area about 70 miles off the Alaska coast is more remote than the Gulf, and winter ice causes additional challenges.

Odum noted, however, that the drilling will be in about 150 feet of water – far shallower than the well under a mile of water that blew out in the Deepwater Horizon disaster.

He said that Shell is also working with Norwegian experts on how best to clean up any potential spills in colder climates.

On another subject, Odum predicted that Shell will soon get into the gas-to-liquids business in the U.S., with plants similar to its $20 billion Pearl plant in Qatar, which converts natural gas to liquid transportation fuel.

“With very low natural gas prices, we have a market that still has to import much of its liquid fuels,” Odum said. “It is high time to do something like that in the U.S.”

A view of the wind

In another panel Thursday, Shell Wind Energy President Richard Williams presented an optimistic view of the opportunities in wind.

“Everyone asks us if a wind farm makes money,” Williams said. “The answer is yes.”

The cost of turbine construction has decreased about 30 percent, and installation costs have gone down about 10 percent, Williams said, while improvements in safety and additional technical education programs have made it easier to find and train employees to run wind farms.

Odum emphasized, however, that while Shell is continuing to explore opportunities in renewable energy, growing demand will mean continued reliance on oil and natural gas.

“Thirty percent of global energy could come from alternatives to oil and gas, but at the same time, the world will need twice as much energy as today,” Odum said.

emily.pickrell@chron.com

SOURCE ARTICLE

Shell also seeks oil deal with Libyan NATO-rebels.

From: New Energy Times Blog
By Steven B. Krivit

Royal Dutch Shell, plc, one of the largest energy companies in the world, is interested in exploring low-energy nuclear reaction research as a possible game-changer in the energy business.

Two Shell scientists, Anitha Sarkar and Gilles Buchs, with the backing of the Shell GameChanger program, are looking for opportunities to work actively with Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR) experts, according to a brief introduction the researchers prepared.

Edward Beardsworth, a venture capitalist at Jane Capital Partners in San Francisco, introduced the researchers to the field in a message to the CMNS e-mail list today.

“At my request, they prepared the attached biographical sketches and description of what they bring to the group. They are both located at the company’s research and development offices in the Netherlands,” Beardsworth wrote. “I believe their fresh and enthusiastic approach will lead to good contributions to the field.”

According to its Web site, Shell GameChanger “helps move ideas to reality by sponsoring entrepreneurs to develop their ideas into a product that can be introduced to the marketplace.”

“Specifically,” the site says, “we look for innovative ideas that address a demand or significant problem in the energy industry and have the potential to change the game.”

The Shell researchers, according to the document provided by Beardsworth, offer the following to the field:

• Broad expertise in wide variety of energy conversion systemsAccess to significant group of Shell surface science and catalysis experts

• Access to key related disciplines: thermodynamics, physics, electrochemistry, computational chemistry,   heat exchange, etc.

• Shell GameChanger program, (www.shell.com/gamechanger) rapidly funds initial proof of concept testing for revolutionary innovation

• Significant expertise and track record of development and scaling-up and from lab-scale to commercial unit of a wide range of complex energy technologies.

This is not the first time Shell has looked into LENR research. In 1995, Shell sponsored LENR research at the French laboratory Laboratoire des Sciences Nucléaires at the Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers (CNAM). This research showed high-quality LENR work, and the research paper provided the expected level of professionalism in a scientific communication.

The researchers found a small ratio of excess heat compared to the input electrical power in both light- and heavy-hydrogen experiments. However, the experiments demonstrated a sustained period of steady excess-heat production. The hydrogen experiment produced 16 megajoules during a 39-day run, with a mean excess-heat production of 4.7 Watts from a 150 Watt electrical input.

Consistent with the extensive body of LENR research, the CNAM researchers found no significant levels of dangerous radiation from neutrons, X-rays or gamma rays. The researchers failed to find nuclear signatures consistent with the amount of excess energy produced. They did not, however, check for isotopic shifts or transmutations, and they did not use solid-state nuclear track detectors to look for alphas or bursts of spallation neutrons.

The current Shell initiative follows an inquiry from the United States intelligence community into LENR. Both news items are powerful indicators that 2012 is the year that LENR will move forward into serious technology research.

After publishing this article, the author has received the following email from above mentioned Edward Beardsworth:

REPLY

Steven B. Krivit says:

NOTE: Royal Dutch Shell Plc also aims to restart exploration in Libya, whose so-called new government (a bunch of NATO-led rebels who came to power through only violence and aren’t chosen or wanted by the Libyan people) says to “seek to stabilize relations with foreign companies.”

Shell head Peter Voser said in Doha, Qatar, on December 6 that the company, together with BP Plc, “evaluates resumption of drilling at wells.”

Libya is the holder of Africa’s biggest oil reserves. Under Jamahiriya government, a portion of every Libyan oil sale was credited directly to the bank accounts of all Libyan citizens. Now the illegal NATO-rebel government seeks to steal the benefits of the oil production (a 1.6 million barrels) from the Libyan people in an attempt to solve the immense problems of the bankrupt Western countries.

SOURCE ARTICLE

Updated: 2011-11-09

By Peter Voser (China Daily)

Coordinated global response is needed to meet challenge of providing more energy for more people and cutting CO2

Our world reached a significant milestone on Oct 31 when a mother gave birth to the Earth’s 7 billionth inhabitant. At this rate, the Earth will be home to more than 9 billion people by 2050 a number with an enormous potential impact on the global demand for energy, water and food.

Planning wisely for the future energy needs of this huge population is one of the most important challenges our generation faces, in part because it is far more than just an energy issue. Our future energy challenge is also a global security issue, an environmental issue, an economic issue and a jobs issue.

The global energy system is already in the early stages of a fundamental transformation. The future will see expanded use of renewable energy and cleaner fossil fuels. We will have more energy choices, but those choices will be more costly, so we will all have to become smarter about using energy efficiently.

Despite the scale of the challenge, I’m confident human ingenuity and technological innovation can make it happen. But what is lacking today is the common will to act. Getting where we need to go will require a new level of leadership and global collaboration on multiple fronts.

But the leadership triangle of government, business and society is increasingly ineffective. We need to rekindle the spirit of global cooperation and leadership that helped us deal with past challenges.

Simply put, our challenge is to produce far more energy for a world with far more people. At the same time, we need to reduce CO2 emissions and get smarter about how we extract and use our resources. And we will need to do this against a backdrop of almost constant volatility and change.

A big part of a broader global energy mix will be the rapidly expanding contribution of renewable energy resources. Up to 30 percent of the world’s energy mix could come from renewables by 2050. But that target assumes a very rapid growth rate that will require significant effort and sustained investment.

Even if the world achieves this target, all forms of energy will need to be developed to meet the future demand.

Among fossil fuels, natural gas will play an increasingly important role. It is the cleanest burning and the best ally of wind and solar power, which need a highly flexible backup.

Natural gas is also an ideal alternative to coal-fired power plants, emitting 50 to 70 percent less CO2. Replacing coal with gas to produce electricity is, by far, the fastest and least expensive way for the world to reduce CO2 emissions in the energy sector. Gas is affordable, its resource base is vast and widely dispersed, and it can help diversify energy supplies all of which enhance energy security.

It is also important that we focus on the ways in which water, energy and food are interconnected. Water is used to produce nearly all forms of energy energy is used to move and treat water, and energy and water are used to produce food. There is a growing awareness that the path to a more sustainable energy future will require society to balance the needs of these systems, while at the same time, keeping sight of carbon emissions and other resource stresses.

At Shell we have brought together specialists from various fields to map the links and better understand the trade-offs. Our early findings have identified two important factors that could help avoid a future water-energy-food crisis: smart urban development and greenhouse gas regulation and pricing.

Cities today hold half of the world’s population and generate up to 80 percent of its CO2 emissions. The global urban proportion is expected to grow to 75 percent by 2050. So the way in which our cities develop will greatly affect energy and water demand.

Through more efficient public transport, energy-efficient buildings and designs that utilize waste heat as an efficient energy source, and through investing heavily to upgrade our infrastructure, we can offset some of the growth in energy demand while creating new jobs.

But what is still urgently needed is a global consensus on greenhouse gas regulation and pricing. Widespread adoption of the most cost-effective CO2 reduction measures will only occur when governments promote frameworks to price CO2.

It brings us back to the need for leadership and global collaboration.

The absence of coherent energy policies among some of our largest energy-consuming nations and regions is a direct result of the lack of leadership and, more broadly, a troubling lack of basic trust between business, government and society.

Rather than choosing winners and losers, governments should set the goals and then provide appropriate incentives that let the market determine the most effective solutions.

I’m optimistic we will meet this challenge, as there are past examples of global leadership that offer hope. The coordinated response to the 2008 financial crisis is one. The international agreement to ban substances blamed for depleting the ozone layer is another.

Today we have a major opportunity to address the energy challenge in a way that avoids unnecessary pain in the future. Let’s not waste it.

The author is chief executive officer of Royal Dutch Shell. The article is based on a speech he delivered on Oct 31 to the Singapore Energy Summit.

(China Daily 11/09/2011 page8)

SOURCE ARTICLE

New ways to extract oil and natural gas could buy the U.S. some time to develop renewable energy. Or they could keep us addicted to dirty fuels.

INTRODUCTION

For renewable energy, even the successes can reveal how much work remains to be done: huge amounts of hydroelectric and wind power in the Pacific Northwest sometimes threaten to overwhelm the grid. So is it good news that recent approaches to drilling have created a boom for fossil fuels?

Companies can now extract oil and natural gas from the high Arctic, shale, oil sands and deepwater wells. These fossil fuels are still finite and dwindling, but tapping the new sources pushes back the date of “peak oil.” Does that give the United States necessary time to develop sustainable energy sources, or will it keep Americans needlessly addicted to dirty fuels by keeping them cheap — and eroding the “energy security” argument?

Cheap Gas Is a Trap

Updated November 6, 2011, 07:00 PM

Matthew Kotchen is a professor of environmental economics and policy at Yale University.

New and efficient technologies for extracting oil and natural gas are increasing the supply of both fuels from North America. But the consequences will be different for oil than for natural gas. Oil is traded in a highly integrated world market, and the relatively small increases in North American oil will have virtually no effect on prices. The result is that our demand for oil will remain unaffected by the change in supply, though we may take comfort in knowing that more of the oil we use is produced closer to home.

Natural gas is a different story. The markets are far less integrated, so the increase in domestic supply will lower prices and increase demand. We will have more households switching from oil to natural gas for heating, and we will have relatively more electricity generated with natural gas than with coal. The lower prices will be a good thing for consumers paying their utility bills, and there will be health and environmental benefits because natural gas is a relatively clean fuel.

But more and cheaper natural gas does not help our prospects for bolstering renewable sources of energy, including solar, wind and biomass. History has shown repeatedly that nothing is worse for renewable energy — and the policies that support it — than cheap and abundant conventional energy. Without the urgency of high fuel prices, the United States has never sustained meaningful private and public investment in the technological innovation and deployment of renewables.

We should do our best to make sure this time is different. There has been meaningful investment — both public and private — in recent years, and despite our current economic challenges, it would be a mistake to turn back these efforts. Also, we must not throw out the baby with the bath water in response to the Solyndra bankruptcy. Instead, it is critical that we find ways to do better with the right economic incentives.

The expansion of oil and natural gas supplies in North America changes little about our long-term energy challenges. Beyond the growing demand for energy worldwide, climate change is an increasingly important and closely related problem. Conventional sources of energy generate greenhouse-gas emissions that cause global warming. While the burning of natural gas generates fewer emissions than oil and coal, its emissions are nevertheless substantial — and extraction using hydraulic fracturing raises other environmental concerns.

Renewable sources of energy provide a leading alternative, and we need a sustained commitment to improving these technologies with the aim of making them cost competitive. Indeed, it should be concerning that China is doing exactly this while we in the U.S. watch our former leadership in renewable energy continue to erode.

SOURCE ARTICLE

Debaters

RELATED

• A Reality Check on Renewables

  Amy Myers Jaffe, co-author of “Oil, Dollars, Debt and Crises”

• An Outmoded Strategy

  Peter Lehner, Natural Resources Defense Council

• Oil Isn’t Scarce. It’s Just Wasted.

  Lisa Margonelli, New America Foundation

COMMENTS FROM A ROYAL DUTCH SHELL RETIREE ON CURRENT NEWS STORIES

Interested in the report on this leak they are trying to stop in Athabasca…

Oilsands leak turned mine to pond

Few people probably realise this is a nightmare and very likely unstoppable until the whole aquifer runs out of energy. Compare it with a blow-out.  I think it is a major mishap but have no other info then what I read in the article.

And the oilwells in Sakhalin going to sand is a disaster of great magnitude.

6 Oil Wells On Sakhalin Go Offline

With winter starting they presumably cannot re-enter the wells and try to fix it. It also shows the original design was flawed. I bet that even those atheist Russians (and the secular Shell folk as well)  are praying the same will not happen on the gaswells because then they really are f*cked!

Finally, will Malcolm Brinded be attending the funeral of his friend Gaddafi, or is Shell’s focus solely on its slick switch of allegiance to the new government?

Shell execs in Tripoli discuss Libya return

BUSINESS CHINA

11 Oct 2011

Published: Sept. 23, 2011 at 8:22 AM

BANDAR SERI BEGAWAN, Brunei, Sept. 23 (UPI) — Natural gas resources will help fuel economic growth in Asia, where advances are vastly outpacing the rest of the world, a Shell executive said.

Malcolm Brinded, executive director for upstream developments at Shell, spoke to delegates at an energy conference in Brunei.

He said advancing economies in Asia, coupled with the energy deficit brought on by Japan’s nuclear power disaster, means the region needs to “invest heavily” in all resources, including solar and wind.

Beijing is moving to include more renewable energy on the national grid. The country set a goal of increasing its solar power capacity significantly in the next five years.

Brinded noted, however, that conventional resources like oil and natural gas will continue to dominate the global energy mix.

“Natural gas will not just be a reliable and abundant fuel for Asia’s remarkable economic growth,” he said. “As the cleanest burning fossil fuel, it can also make an immediate impact in cushioning the environmental impact of the region’s rising energy consumption.”

This week, Howard Gruenspecht, acting administrator at the U.S. Energy Information Administration, said top energy consumer China is expected to use 68 percent more energy than the United States within the next quarter century.

The EIA said the expected increase in world energy consumption by 53 percent by 2035 to be driven largely by economic growth in China and India.

Shell says it would invest billions of dollars in the development of a Karoo gas field in the event that it got the go- ahead to drill and if its exploration of the area proved fruitful

LINDA ENSOR
Published: 2011/09/02 06:49:50 AM

CAPE TOWN — Shell would invest billions of dollars in the development of a Karoo gas field in the event that it got the go- ahead to drill and if its exploration of the area proved fruitful, Shell’s upstream manager for SA, Jan Eggink, said yesterday.

The US Energy Information Administration has estimated that there are 485-trillion cubic feet of shale gas in the Karoo, enough to make SA self-sufficient in energy for decades to come.

Exploration alone would cost Shell $200m even if it was found that the reserves were not exploitable, Mr Eggink told the Cape Town Press Club.

Shell, along with a number of other companies, has applied to the government to explore for gas in the Karoo — a proposal that has generated fierce opposition from environmental lobby groups and some Karoo landowners. The debate rages on, with opponents saying gas mining in the Karoo would desecrate an ecologically sensitive area of pristine beauty. Mineral Resources Minister Susan Shabangu has established a task team to investigate the pros and cons of “fracking” for gas, and is expected to receive this report in the next few months.

Mr Eggink stressed that Shell was committed to paying fair compensation to landowners in the Karoo to gain access to their land and also made the commitment that it would not compete with residents for water. This is one of the major concerns of landowners. Access to sufficient quantities of water will be a critical factor in the decision to develop the gas.

Mr Eggink said about 1-million litres would be required in the exploration phase and a further 5- million to 10-million litres in the development phase. If there was not enough water underground, it would have to be brought in by truck or by pipeline.

Contamination of underground water supplies is another of the key concerns of landowners, as chemicals would be used in the process of hydraulic fracturing.

But Mr Eggink said Shell knew from experience elsewhere “that if a well is properly constructed it will not leak any fluid into groundwater supplies.”

He believed SA would gain enormously from producing its own gas, which was a much cleaner form of fuel than the coal that was currently used to generate about 90% of the country’s electricity. Gas was a cleaner source of energy, which would enable SA to reduce its carbon footprint.

Developing renewable sources of energy, such as solar and wind, in sufficient quantities to make an impact would take decades.

Mr Eggink noted that a modern gas power plant generated up to 70% less CO² than the old-styled coal-fired plant and was cheaper to build.

He also stressed that the surface footprint of a shale gas development would be very small (1%) compared to the overall acreage that Shell had applied to explore in, and would create thousands of jobs.

“Rapid economic growth means electricity demand is rising. By drawing on potential abundant gas supplies you can meet rising energy demand while maintaining energy security,” Mr Eggink said.

In the exploration phase, Shell would drill at least six wells, which would reveal whether gas could be extracted in sufficient quantities to be commercially viable. But even before this phase started, an environmental impact assessment would have to be made — a process that could take between 18 months and two years.

ensorl@bdfm.co.za

SOURCE ARTICLE

By James Paton – Jun 15, 2011 10:30 AM GMT+0100

Australia should introduce a cap- and-trade system to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions and act “earlier rather than later” to tackle climate change, Royal Dutch Shell Plc (RDSA) said.

“The clock is ticking,” Ann Pickard, chairman of Shell’s operations in Australia, said today in a speech in Sydney, according to an e-mailed copy of her presentation. “I do think that it’s in our interest for Australia to be an example to the rest of the world.”

Australia, which has about A$200 billion ($214 billion) of proposed liquefied natural gas projects targeting Asian demand for the fuel, also needs “well thought-out policies on labor and immigration” to deliver a skilled work force, she said. A surging Australian dollar has made labor “even more important to solve,” she said.

Shell, Europe’s largest oil company, expects to invest about $30 billion during the next five years on oil and gas developments in Australia, it said in May. The company plans to pioneer the use of floating LNG technology to develop the Prelude project off northwest Australia and is Chevron Corp. (CVX)’s partner in the proposed Gorgon LNG project.

To contact the reporter on this story: James Paton in Sydney jpaton4@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Amit Prakash at aprakash1@bloomberg.net.

SOURCE ARTICLE

Comment posted on Shell Blog by “Outsider” on Jun 15th, 2011 at 4:46 pm

Shell ‘apologises’ for worldwide damage in “erratum” to annual report

THE HAGUE, NETHERLANDS, May 17, 2011: During the Shell annual general assembly (AGM) in The Hague, today, Friends of the Earth International presented an “erratum” [1] to Shell’s 2010 annual report. In this spoof “erratum”, which was distributed among shareholders, Shell ‘admits’ that it is “causing a lot of unwanted and unnecessary damage” in its global oil-gas- and biofuels operations. The company also states that Shell “has learnt from these mistakes” and pledges to take “full responsibility to prevent and mitigate costs for the environment and people affected by our operations”.

The “erratum” published by Friends of the Earth International today highlights 12 cases from 5 different continents. It displays climate and other environmental impacts from Shell’s oil and gas operations, but also shows the involvement of Shell in the violation of human rights and labour irregularities, such as those resulting from Shell’s joint venture with Brazilian biofuel producer Cosan S.A., which has been linked to slave labour and violations of labour rights. Furthermore, the report lists cases of corruption and interference with politics in order to ensure business profits. The erratum, which should serve as a wake up call for Shell’s shareholders and board, is backed by an in-depth report about the 12 cases involving life threatening pollution, bribery, slavery and violation of national and international laws.

Paul de Clerck, coordinator of the corporates campaign at Friends of the Earth International, said: “We expect that the promises in the erratum we wrote for Shell will become reality. Shell is aware of the damage it is causing to the environment and of the violation of rights of local communities that it is involved in. We want the company to take measures to restore this damage and to prevent further wrongdoing”.

During the presentation of the “erratum” to Shell’s shareholders and board, today, representatives  from different communities affected by Shell’s wrongdoing were present:

Eric Dooh, a Nigerian farmer who is taking Shell to court in The Netherlands [2] for refusal to clean up oil spills in his fishponds and on his fields said: “Oil spills from Shell pipelines caused the water and agricultural land in our village to be severely polluted. We want Shell to clean up the pollution so we can fish and farm again”.

Lionel Lepine, representing the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation in Canada said: “Shell’s tar sand operations are disrupting our traditional way of life. They are destroying our air, water, land and medicinal plants and the birds, fish and animals we depend on to sustain our people” Mr. Lepine also stated that “Shell’s footprint in our lands will have a multi-generational effect on our children not yet born, they are violating our Indigenous rights, the rights of our sacred Mother Earth and we are here at their AGM to put them on notice that we will stop them.”

[2] On May 19, Eric Dooh will for the first time face Shell in court during a hearing in The Hague. For more information about the court case and about what will happen on May 19, please visit: www.milieudefensie.nl/english/shellinnigeria