Australia

Official Hansard Confirms Senator Paul Scarr Urged ASIC to “Take a Serious Look” at Quinlan v Shell Energy

Oct 7th, 2026

Comments are off for this post

The official parliamentary record has now removed any uncertainty about what was said when Australian Senator Paul Scarr raised the case of whistleblower Kent Quinlan and Shell Energy before the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services.

At the committee’s public hearing in Sydney on 4 September 2026, Senator Scarr expressly identified Quinlan v Shell Energy and questioned ASIC Chair Sarah Court about whether Australia’s corporate regulator had examined the allegations being raised in the Queensland Supreme Court litigation. read more

^*This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan - more information here. There is also a Wikipedia segment, the Shell DPA Files, "Shell and the Spies", the Shell Leaks files, as well as books written and published by John Donovan - Kindle eBooks. Timeline of the Donovan Shell Feud. Toxic History of Royal Dutch Shell Group. Shell and the Donovans: The Full Media Record — 550+ Articles, 110 Books, 40 Years. ^*All created and supported by internet wizz, Nick Gill.

Shell Australia FLNG Faces Two New Industrial Court Proceedings Over Prelude

Oct 1st, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Australian Workers’ Union cases M 93/2026 and M 115/2026 are both heading to pre-trial conferences in October

Shell’s troubled Prelude floating LNG operation has acquired another legal complication.

The Industrial Magistrates Court of Western Australia is now listing two separate proceedings brought by the Australian Workers’ Union against Shell Australia FLNG Pty Ltd, the Shell entity associated with the Prelude project.

The first case, Australian Workers’ Union v Shell Australia FLNG Pty Ltd, M 93/2026, is listed for a pre-trial conference at 11:00 am on Friday 2 October 2026. The court’s current hearing list names Shell Australia FLNG Pty Ltd directly as respondent. imc.wa.gov.au read more

Shell Whistleblower Case: Queensland Court Weighs Legal Privilege Against Whistleblower Protection

Sep 18th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

68 disputed documents, allegations concerning disclosure of Kent Quinlan’s identity, a reserved Supreme Court judgment—and ASIC has already been urged in Parliament to examine the case

The long-running litigation between former ERM Power executive Kent Quinlan and Shell Energy Operations Pty Ltd has reached another potentially important stage, with the Supreme Court of Queensland being asked to determine how legal professional privilege interacts with Australia’s statutory protections for corporate whistleblowers. read more

Prelude Worker Injured After Machinery Energised During Manual Task — NOPSEMA Orders Shell to Fix Safety Controls

Sep 18th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Australia’s offshore regulator says a Prelude FLNG technician suffered hand fractures after turning gear moved unexpectedly during a manual engagement task. NOPSEMA found that Shell had not implemented effective engineering controls to prevent automatic operation and was relying too heavily on procedures, communication and worker actions to control hazardous energy.

Shell Australia has been issued with a new occupational health and safety improvement notice at Prelude FLNG after a worker suffered fracture injuries to the hand during the startup of a steam turbine generator. read more

Shell Prelude Workers Lose Their 55-Plus Flexibility Case — But the Decision Leaves a Bigger Workforce Question Unanswered

Sep 11th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Two experienced Shell workers aboard the Prelude floating LNG facility have lost their bid for reduced working arrangements as they moved towards semi-retirement.

At first glance, the latest OnNotice report sounds straightforward: two workers aged over 55 asked for flexible working arrangements, Shell refused, and the Fair Work Commission backed the company.

The actual decision is more complicated.

The Commission did not determine that Shell’s operational objections were necessarily reasonable, nor did it establish that reduced-hours working at Prelude is inherently unworkable. Instead, Commissioner Hunt found that the two workers had failed at an earlier jurisdictional hurdle: their requests had not been validly made under section 65 of Australia’s Fair Work Act 2009 because the required connection between being aged 55 or over and the requested changes had not been established. (Come As You Are Songkran) read more

Senator Paul Scarr Urges ASIC to Examine Kent Quinlan’s Shell Case After Raising “Red Flags”

Sep 4th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Senator Paul Scarr has urged the Australian Securities and Investments Commission to take a “serious look” at the court case involving former energy executive Kent Quinlan and Shell Energy Operations, after questioning whether ASIC should investigate allegations connected with the proceedings.

The intervention came during the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services’ 4 September 2026 oversight hearing in Sydney. ASIC lodged a submission for that hearing as part of the committee’s continuing oversight of the regulator and corporations legislation. Parliamentary Joint Committee inquiry material read more

Prelude LNG Workers Lose Bid for Semi-Retirement Flexibility — But the Fair Work Ruling Is More Complicated Than the Headline

Sep 2nd, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Two veteran Shell employees working aboard the Prelude floating LNG facility off Western Australia have lost their attempt to secure substantially reduced working arrangements as they move toward retirement.

But the Fair Work Commission decision, handed down on 1 September 2026, is more nuanced than a simple finding that Shell was entitled to reject their requests.

The Commission dismissed the applications because it concluded that the workers’ requests had not been validly made under the relevant flexible-working provisions of Australia’s Fair Work Act. In other words, the Commission found that its jurisdiction to arbitrate the dispute had not been properly enlivened. Come As You Are Songkran read more

Kent Quinlan v Shell: Court Fast-Tracks Evidence After Terminal Cancer Diagnosis

Aug 9th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Disclosure Ruling Is Followed by a Timetable to Preserve Evidence

Archive reference: AUS-WB-2026-002
Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of Queensland
Case: Quinlan v Shell Energy Operations Pty Ltd [2026] QSC 115
Decision date: 10 June 2026
Evidence standard: Reported court proceedings and published case information. This article does not treat allegations in pleadings or media reports as established facts.

Site-wide disclaimer applies. Mr Quinlan’s substantive allegations remain contested and have not been proved in court. Shell denies wrongdoing.

The Update Since the March Hearing

In March, former ERM Power executive Kent Quinlan asked the Supreme Court of Queensland to require Shell Power to provide further internal documents. He alleges that he raised concerns about insider trading and “sham” transactions at ERM Power, and that he later suffered detrimental treatment. Shell disputes the claims. read more

Shell Australia Faces Potential Job Cuts As QGC Review Gets Under Way

Aug 5th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Illustration of Queensland onshore-gas operations. AI-generated image for ShellNews.net; it does not depict a specific Shell site.

By John Donovan

Shell has confirmed that its Queensland gas business is undergoing an operational review after reports that jobs could be cut. The company has not disclosed how many roles, if any, may go, nor when decisions might be made.

Review Confirmed, Numbers Unknown

Upstream reported on 5 August 2026 that Australian media had reported a possible restructuring at Shell QGC, citing an unnamed source. The reports said that corporate and site-based positions could be affected. No proposed number of job losses was disclosed. read more

Australia’s Biggest Corporate Whistleblower That No-One Has Ever Heard Of!

Jul 22nd, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

18 July 2026

Whistleblower Kent Quinlan will return to the Supreme Court of Australia on 30th July 2026 before Justice Cooper in the long-running proceedings

Quinlan v Shell and Others.

The case likely supersedes Australia’s highest-profile corporate whistleblower matters to date, exposing alleged criminal findings which could result in significant terms of imprisonment and market manipulation with potential ASIC fines in excess of a billion dollars and additional class actions in excess of a billion dollars. read more

Shell spying activities in Australia?

Jul 14th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

John Donovan prompt: Trying to find any information about any Shell spying activities in Australia? Reply by Google AI Mode: Shell’s security and intelligence operations in Australia primarily focus on corporate risk mitigation, industrial relations monitoring, and physical asset protection, rather than clandestine infiltration. [1, 2] Historically, Shell has faced significant scrutiny worldwide regarding corporate surveillance. This includes allegations of tracking environmental activists through its internal intelligence unit, Corporate Affairs Security (CAS), and its historical ties to the private intelligence firm Hakluyt. However, its documented intelligence footprint within Australia functions through more formalized corporate risk structures. [1, 2] 1. Documented Asset and Activist Monitoring In Australia, Shell’s security and threat-assessment capabilities are heavily integrated with its multi-billion-dollar gas operations. Analysts tracking corporate intelligence highlight that Shell actively conducts the following risk operations in the region: [1]

Demonstration Tracking: Monitoring planned environmental protests and activist deployments that could target critical logistics hubs or major offshore assets like Prelude FLNG. [1]
Industrial Relations Intelligence: Monitoring political, regulatory, and union-led developments that pose a threat to continuous corporate operations. []
Maritime Threat Assessments: Maintaining maritime and installation-security intelligence to enforce physical safety zones around offshore infrastructure. [1]

2. The Target of Espionage (Not the Perpetrator) In recent years, the primary connection between Shell Australia and “spying” has placed the company as the victim of cybersecurity breaches and external cyber-espionage, rather than the perpetrator. [1, 2]

MOVEit Supply Chain Breach: Shell’s Australian BG Group business was swept up in the global MOVEit hack, which exposed historical employee personal data to external threat actors. [1]
Customer Data Breaches: Hackers on Breach Forums have targeted Shell, leaking customer records that impacted thousands of individuals across multiple countries, including Australia. [1]

3. Related Australian Geopolitical Context If you are researching corporate-state espionage overlap in the region, the most widely documented historical case involves the Australia–Timor-Leste spying scandal. In 2004, the Australian Secret Intelligence Service (ASIS) bugged Timor-Leste cabinet rooms during maritime oil and gas treaty negotiations. While this state-sponsored operation directly benefited commercial oil and gas concessions in the Timor Sea, it was executed by the Australian government rather than a private operation by Shell. [1, 2, 3, 4] If you would like to explore this further, I can provide details on:

The history of Shell’s Corporate Affairs Security (CAS) unit and Hakluyt.
How Australian intelligence agencies like ASIO protect critical energy infrastructure from foreign state-sponsored espionage. [1, 2, 3]

Let me know which direction you want to take. JD: The history of Shell’s Corporate Affairs Security (CAS) unit and Hakluyt. The historical relationship between Shell’s Corporate Affairs Security (CAS) division and the private intelligence firm Hakluyt & Company represents one of the most prominent crossovers between multinational corporate power and state-level espionage networks. [1, 2] For decades, this interconnected ecosystem allowed the oil giant to manage political risks, monitor activist groups, and surveil corporate critics. [1, 2] 1. What was Shell’s Corporate Affairs Security (CAS)? CAS (later reorganized as Shell Global Security) was Shell’s in-house intelligence and threat-assessment unit. Rather than operating as standard corporate guards, CAS was designed to function like a proprietary intelligence agency. [, 2, 3]

The Leadership: The division was traditionally staffed and commanded by high-level veterans recruited directly from Western intelligence agencies, including the British Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) and the FBI. Notable figures included Ian Forbes McCredie, a former senior MI6 officer who transitioned to lead Shell’s CAS operations. [1, 2, 3]
The Mission: CAS was tasked with protecting Shell’s multi-billion-dollar infrastructure in volatile regions, such as Nigeria. However, leaked internal documents and investigative journalism revealed that CAS regularly crossed the line from asset protection to active political monitoring, tracking environmentalist groups, journalists, and hostile litigants. [1, 2]

2. The Birth of Hakluyt and the “Revolving Door” Hakluyt & Company was founded in London in 1995 by former MI6 officials who recognized a lucrative market for commercial espionage. From its very inception, Hakluyt operated as a seamless extension of Shell’s executive suite. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Shared Leadership: The lines between the two entities were heavily blurred. Sir Peter Holmes, a former Chairman of Royal Dutch Shell, simultaneously served as the president of the Hakluyt foundation. Other titled Shell directors, such as Sir William Purves, held dual roles as Hakluyt directors and major shareholders. [1, 2, 3, 4]
The Institutional Overlap: The relationship was so tight that investigative researchers reported administrative slip-ups, such as emailing the head of Shell’s internal CAS unit and receiving automated out-of-office responses originating from Hakluyt email domains. [1, 2]

3. Key Espionage Controversies The collaboration between CAS and Hakluyt was thrust into the public eye through a series of high-profile operations: The Greenpeace Infiltration (2001) In a major scandal exposed by The Sunday Times, it was revealed that Shell and BP had hired Hakluyt to gather intelligence on environmental groups. Hakluyt deployed an undercover operative—a German agent operating under the alias “Manfred Schlickenrieder” (codenamed Camus)—who successfully infiltrated Greenpeace and The Body Shop. Posing as a sympathetic documentary filmmaker, the spy fed internal campaign strategies regarding North Sea oil protests directly back to corporate handlers. [1, 2] Operations in Nigeria During the 1990s, Shell faced extreme international backlash over environmental devastation and human rights abuses in the Niger Delta, culminating in the execution of activist Ken Saro-Wiwa by the Nigerian military regime. CAS and external intelligence contractors were deployed to map out local communities, run surveillance on protest groups like the Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni People (MOSOP), and feed political threat data back to the company. [1] The Donovan Surveillance Campaign Shell utilized its CAS network and private investigators to conduct international monitoring of its most persistent critics, such as Alfred and John Donovan—the operators of a famous anti-Shell whistleblowing website. Internal Shell documents eventually disclosed that the family had been subjected to decades of structured corporate intelligence tracking. [, 2] 4. Modern Evolution While modern public relations focus heavily on environmental transparency, the institutional links between the oil sector and deep-state intelligence persist. Former directors of major intelligence agencies—such as Sir Iain Lobban, the former head of the UK’s cyber-intelligence agency GCHQ—have continued to simultaneously advise Shell on cybersecurity while sitting on the advisory board of Hakluyt’s holding company. [1, 2, 3] If you’d like, I can:

Detail the specific court documents and leaks that exposed the Donovan surveillance campaigns.
Provide a breakdown of how corporate intelligence firms like Hakluyt operate legally within standard corporate risk structures. [, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Let me know which of these areas you would like to explore further.

AI responses may include mistakes. Learn more

AI response disclaimer: The above AI-generated response is published unedited as a record of what the named AI platform said when asked the stated prompt. Publication does not imply endorsement, verification or agreement. AI systems may make mistakes, omit context, misread sources, or generate inaccurate information. Readers should verify important claims against primary documents and reliable independent sources. Site-wide disclaimer also applies. read more

Shell and the Spies: A Country-by-Country Evidence Audit

Jul 13th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Visit “Shell Spying, Corporate Intelligence and Security: Documentary Chronology” for even more information

ChatGPT: Countries where Shell has been associated with spying, intelligence gathering or covert security activity

A necessary distinction

Shell operates in a dangerous world. Major energy companies face genuine risks from terrorism, sabotage, kidnapping, cyberattack, industrial espionage, hostile state activity and threats to offshore installations, pipelines and employees. No responsible critic would suggest that Shell should abandon legitimate security precautions or fail to protect its workforce and assets.

The concern examined in this series is different. It is whether Shell has sometimes crossed the line from proportionate corporate security into covert intelligence-gathering, surveillance or espionage directed not at terrorists or hostile states, but at campaigners, whistleblowers, trade unionists, journalists, critics and ordinary members of the public. read more

Shell’s Prelude Problem: The Floating LNG Giant That Wants Australian Gas, But Not Australian Obligations

Jun 30th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Part One: Main Article

Shell, previously known as Forthdeal Limited, subsequently as Royal Dutch Shell plc, and now hiding in plain sight as Shell plc after ditching the disgraced Royal Dutch moniker, has found itself in another beautifully Shell-shaped dilemma: how to keep exporting gas from Australia while avoiding the tiresome local expectation that Australians might actually get some of it.

The latest issue concerns Shell’s Prelude FLNG facility — the gigantic floating liquefied natural gas plant stationed roughly 475km north-north-east of Broome, Western Australia. Shell describes Prelude as being “at the heart” of its Western Australian gas portfolio and says the project is planned as a multi-decade operation requiring additional gas, starting with the Crux field, to maximise its operating life. (Shell Australia⁠ Attachment.tiff ) read more

Shell Built a Floating LNG Empire — Now Australia Wants Some Gas Back

Jun 28th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Prelude FLNG, Australia’s gas squeeze, and the awkward question Shell hoped would stay offshore

Shell, previously known as Forthdeal Limited, subsequently as Royal Dutch Shell plc, and now hiding in plain sight as Shell plc after ditching the disgraced Royal Dutch moniker, has reportedly found a fresh cloud hanging over one of its most extravagant monuments to fossil-fuel optimism: Prelude FLNG, the vast floating liquefied natural gas facility moored off Western Australia.

According to the Australian Financial Review report supplied for this article, the issue now stalking Shell’s offshore gas leviathan is not simply engineering, cost, safety, downtime, or the minor inconvenience of climate physics. It is domestic gas policy — that tiresome democratic habit of asking whether a country exporting vast quantities of gas might also like to keep some for its own households and industries. read more

Shell Tells Australia to Grab the LNG Crisis “With Both Hands” — Because Nothing Says Climate Leadership Like Milking a Geopolitical Emergency

Jun 17th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

ChatGPT image: A giant Shell-branded LNG tanker sailing through a storm labelled “Middle East Crisis,” while Australia is depicted as a kangaroo holding a gas nozzle in one paw and a household energy bill in the other. In the background, Indigenous rock art, a smoky LNG plant, and suited executives toast beneath a banner reading: “Energy Security — Terms and Conditions Apply.

Shell, previously known as Forthdeal Limited, subsequently as Royal Dutch Shell plc, and now hiding in plain sight as Shell plc after ditching the disgraced Royal Dutch moniker, has reportedly marched back into the Australian LNG debate with all the delicacy of a supertanker reversing into a coral reef.

According to Energy News Bulletin, Shell chair Sir Andrew Mackenzie has urged Australia to seize the LNG opportunity “with both hands,” as the Iran crisis and disruption around Middle Eastern supply reportedly prompt buyers to look for alternatives. The framing is familiar: crisis abroad, opportunity at home, gas industry applause, and Shell politely suggesting that what the world really needs during instability is more of the product Shell happens to sell. read more

Toxic Timeline of Royal Dutch Shell Group, Now Shell plc

Jun 15th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Toxic Timeline of Royal Dutch Shell Group, Now Shell plc

Updated 15 June 2026

This page is a chronological guide to some of the most controversial episodes in the history of Royal Dutch Shell Group, now Shell plc. It links regulatory findings, court records, mainstream journalism, campaign archives, ShellNews.net material, RoyalDutchShellPlc.com material, ShellNaziHistory.com, and John Donovan’s Shell archive.

The word “toxic” is used here in its broad public-interest sense: toxic products, toxic spills, toxic governance, toxic secrecy, toxic reputational fallout, and toxic historical associations. This page is not a court judgment. Where a matter is disputed, alleged, settled without admission, or based on campaign material, the wording says so. read more

30 November 2023: Posted by John Donovan

The content below is sourced from current verifiable customer reviews of Shell Energy published on Trustpilot.
Extremely slow broadband for 10 months, not fixed. I have had slow broadband well below the guaranteed speed for 10 months and Shell Energy have not been able to fix it. They have tried sending about 4 or 5 engineers but have not fixed the problem. Gurps, who I have been dealing with most recently, has been friendly and polite, alth… Read more

Extremely Slow Shell Broadband

Australia

Disclosure Ruling Is Followed by a Timetable to Preserve Evidence

The Update Since the March Hearing

Review Confirmed, Numbers Unknown

Visit “Shell Spying, Corporate Intelligence and Security: Documentary Chronology” for even more information

ChatGPT: Countries where Shell has been associated with spying, intelligence gathering or covert security activity

A necessary distinction

Part One: Main Article

Prelude FLNG, Australia’s gas squeeze, and the awkward question Shell hoped would stay offshore

Toxic Timeline of Royal Dutch Shell Group, Now Shell plc

Sir Henri Deterding, resurrected!

JOE LYCETT DISCUSSES SHELL WITH JOHN DONOVAN

Meta

John Donovan’s ebooks

JOHN DONOVAN TV DOCUMENTARY INTERVIEW

SHELL EXECUTIVES AT THE CENTER OF A SCHEME TO STEAL $1.3 BILLION FROM NIGERIA’S PEOPLE

SHELL ADMITS DEALING WITH NIGERIAN MONEY LAUNDERER – BBC NEWS

SHELL, ENI AND NIGERIAN OFFICIALS IN OPL 245 CORRUPTION SCANDAL

INVESTIGATION OF OPL 245 NIGERIAN OIL CORRUPTION SCANDAL

DUTCH EARTHQUAKES CAUSED BY SHELL/EXXON

SHELL KILLS FOR OIL IN NIGERIA

SHELL LIED ABOUT CLEANING UP OIL IN NIGER DELTA

SHELL SPIES INFILTRATED NIGERIAN GOVERNMENT

LEGO DROPS SHELL OVER GREENPEACE OIL SPILL VIDEO

SHELL ARCTIC DRILLING ACCIDENTS

SHELL KNEW ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE DECADES AGO

ROYAL DUTCH SHELL FOUNDER SIR HENRI DETERDING, NAZI FINANCIER

JOHN DONOVAN PROMOTIONAL GAMES FOR SHELL AND OTHER CLIENTS

Archives

SHELL OFFICIAL ENDORSEMENT OF THIS WEBSITE

Critic’s corner

30 November 2023: Posted by John Donovan

The content below is sourced from current verifiable customer reviews of Shell Energy published on Trustpilot.

The worst ever

The worst ever

OVER 500 EXTERNAL PUBLICATIONS CITING OUR SHELL WEBSITES

DISCLAIMER

Categories

SHELL PROPPED UP APARTHEID

Royal Dutch Shell plc .com Cookies Policy