Royal Dutch Shell plc .com Rotating Header Image

Posts under ‘United States’

AP Interview: Shell hopeful for Arctic drilling

By DAN JOLING
Associated Press

Published: February 5th, 2012 08:59 AM
Last Modified: February 5th, 2012 09:04 AM

ANCHORAGE, Alaska – It’s the billion-dollar question in Alaska for 2012: Will this be the year Shell Oil begins large-scale offshore exploratory drilling in Arctic waters?

Two months into 2012, the oil giant is beyond the lead time it said it needed to assemble the flotilla of support vessels that must accompany drill ships to leases in the to the remote Chukchi and Beaufort seas. But Shell Alaska Vice President Pete Slaiby remains hopeful drilling can begin when Arctic Ocean ice melts this summer, even as he awaits a green light from regulators.

“There is clearly more certainty with the regulatory process than we’ve had in previous years,” Slaiby said in an interview.

President Obama in July created an interagency working group to coordinate energy development in Alaska. Discussions with Shell have been fruitful, Slaiby said.

“There’s a lot of questions coming back from the regulators: How does this work, when will you have this in place? What are your competencies? How do you ensure it will work? This is stuff we had all thought out,” Slaiby said. “It was not like it is new stuff, or somebody was coming back with something we hadn’t thought about. But they are clearly now front and center in asking questions and in really doing the things that the public demands.”

Alaska’s elected officials are banking on offshore development to maintain Alaska’s petroleum-based economy. Environmentalists fighting to protect marine mammals have contested every permit application, claiming oil companies can’t clean up spills in ice-choked oceans. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, in the wake of the BP oil disaster, pledged “utmost caution” in Arctic offshore drilling, to the frustration of Shell, which has spent upward of $4 billion on Arctic offshore development.

The federal government estimates Arctic Ocean outer continental shelf reserves at 26.6 billion barrels of recoverable oil and 130 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. Diminished production on Alaska’s North Slope has lowered flow in the trans-Alaska pipeline to less than a third of its capacity.

Shell hopes to provide a source to fill it, and has made progress.

The company cleared a hurdle last month when the Appeals Board of the Environmental Protection Agency confirmed an air permit for one of Shell’s drill ship, the Noble Discoverer, which had blocked 2011 drilling. Shell hopes to use the drill ship in the Chukchi Sea.

The federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management in December approved Shell’s exploration plan for the Chukchi – with a major caveat. Shell must stop drilling into hydrocarbon zones 38 days before ice is likely to move in, roughly Sept. 24, to have time to fix a wellhead blowout.

Shell contends the chance of a blowout is minimal and that its cleanup preparations can address any spill. It is trying to reverse the 38-day restriction but will move ahead with drilling if it can’t.

“Look, you have 105 days,” Slaiby said. “Thirty-eight days is a large factor in 105 days. But it looks like we’ll have to take a bit of measure of inefficiency unless we’re successful in challenging it,”

Shell has other hurdles to clear. The company could hear this month whether the Bureau of Safety and Environment Enforcement will sign off on its spill response plan, the focus of environmental groups that contend oil companies have not demonstrated they can clean up a spill 1,000 miles from the nearest Coast Guard base and from infrastructure – ports, major runways, even warehouses and hotels – that is available elsewhere.

Shell continues to make its case that it has an effective cleanup plan in place with response vessels standing by and additional support from resources staged at Prudhoe Bay and elsewhere.

“It’s been a process where we’ve not had to significantly change what we’ve done, but we’ve had to put in a lot more explanation of how it’s doing,” Slaiby said.

Well control will include a “capping stack” that can be lowered onto a well as BP did to stem the Macondo blowout. It’s being fabricated in Louisiana and will be tested in Washington or Alaska waters before drilling begins, Slaiby said.

“We’re going to have that ready to go,” Slaiby said. “It will be tested. It will meet with all of the BOEM, BSEE, requirements. We’re going to have it offshore with us. It will actually be resident on one of our anchor handlers, with a lifting frame and ready to be deployed.”

Shell is awaiting a decision on an appeal of the EPA’s air permits for its other drill ship, the Kulluk, which it hopes to use for exploratory wells in the Beaufort Sea.

Environmental and Alaska Native groups have challenged Shell’s exploration plan in the Beaufort. Arguments in the case are scheduled for March.

Shell is constructing an ice-hardy spill containment barge in Seattle. The Kulluk has been undergoing upgrades in dry dock since last summer, including replacement of engines to make them compliant with air standards. The Noble Discover is finishing up a well in New Zealand before it will make the trip to the West Coast for modifications.

Environmental groups have challenged the lease sale that allowed the 2008 sale of leases in the Chukchi. A federal judge in Anchorage ruled that the former Minerals Management Service had not followed environmental requirements before the sale. He’s now considering corrections made by the Interior Department. A negative outcome, Slaiby conceded, could block Chukchi drilling.

Slaiby remains optimistic about progress in the regulatory process. Interior Department Deputy Secretary David Hayes, the chairman of the interagency group on Alaska energy, has done a good job assembling various agencies to “kick the tires” on the project to make sure it was put together properly.

“I think the end result is pretty good,” Slaiby said.

SOURCE ARTICLE

Pemex Seeks to Add Conoco, Shell Subsidiaries to Suit

By LAURENCE ILIFF

MEXICO CITY—Mexican oil company Petroleos Mexicanos has filed a motion to add ConocoPhillips and subsidiaries of Royal Dutch Shell PLC to a 2010 suit in U.S. federal court that seeks damages against companies that had allegedly purchased natural-gas condensate that Pemex said was stolen from its operations in northern Mexico.

In a proposed amended suit that was attached to the motion, Pemex, as the state-owned company is known, said it doesn’t allege that either company “acted with intent or knowledge or that it was part of any conspiracy,” but it does allege that they are liable for “transactions involving the stolen property of Mexico.”

ConocoPhillips didn’t immediately comment Thursday. Shell said it had been notified about the suit, but declined to comment per company policy. Pemex didn’t immediately issue a statement on its latest filing.

The motion to amend the suit to add the additional companies was filed at the Southern District Court of Texas in Houston last week.

In the proposed amended suit, Pemex alleges ConocoPhillips purchased an estimated $35 million in stolen condensate from two other companies after the fuel had been “laundered” through resales to hide its origin.

The plaintiff in the original suit is the exploration and production division of Pemex, or PEP for its Spanish-language initials, which operates natural-gas operations in northern Mexico. Pemex added additional defendants to the original suit last year, bringing the total at that time to more than a dozen.

Last year’s suit followed a criminal investigation by U.S. authorities into a cross-border smuggling scheme that has resulted in the conviction of at least five people since late 2008.

Pemex said in its original suit it believes organized-crime groups have stolen more than $300 million in condensate since 2006 by robbing storage facilities and hijacking tanker trucks.

Petroleum condensates, like propane and butane, are byproducts of the production of natural gas. Pemex doesn’t typically sell the condensate, but instead uses it in its own oil refineries.

—Angel Gonzalez and Chad Bray contributed to this article.

Write to Laurence Iliff at laurence.iliff@dowjones.com

SOURCE ARTICLE

Comment: this also occurred in the 1980′s at Shell’s Dutch subsidiary, NAM, where large volumes of condensate produced from the Groningen “dry” gas field were sold and used as diesel fuel in road vehicles. It was only after an investigation by the authorities into the use of untaxed road fuel that NAM “discovered” their loss.

Shell pledges to spend, spend, spend – but gamble leaves City cold

The Times: 3 February 2012

Tim Webb Energy Editor

Ambitious plans to boost growth will cost too much and knock Shell off its top spot, the City warned yesterday. Unveiling disappointing results, the Anglo-Dutch oil group further unnerved investors when it said it planned to spend even more heavily on new oil and gas projects.

Analysts said that Shell would make lower returns from the huge outlays, leaving less room to raise its dividend significantly. The company, which has outperformed its rivals over the past 18 months, would struggle to maintain its position at the front of the pack, they added.

Despite having ratcheted up spending in recent years, Shell missed its production target in 2011. Profits of $4.8 billion in the fourth quarter were 18 per cent higher than last year, mainly because of record oil prices, but about 6 per cent lower than forecast.

Shares in Shell dropped by more than2 per cent in early trading, but recovered to close down 1.2 per cent at £22.97.

Stuart Joyner, analyst at Investec, said that Shell was having to spend “more for less” with the rising investment bringing in lower returns.

He predicted that analysts would slash their profit forecasts for the company and added that Shell’s earnings this year were likely to be flat, particularly after it booked a $287 million loss from its downstream refining and marketing division. This was after a fire at its Singapore refinery wiped $200 million off the bottom line and because of an industry-wide collapse in refining margins in the fourth quarter.

Analysts at Citigroup said Peter Voser, the chief executive, had failed to convince investors that the group could make the best investments to continue its recent run of stellar growth.

“After significant sector and market outperformance over the last 18months, we viewed further outperformance as dependent on management convincing that the company can continue to reinvest more profitably than peers,” they wrote. “The new medium-term strategy fails to offer that differentiated story.” Even Shell’s modest dividend rise – its first for three years – disappointed as it was less than expected.

Mr Voser admitted at the results presentation that Shell’s profits have fluctuated wildly in recent years because of seesawing oil and gas prices and are likely to continue to do so. ‘We are in a world where volatility has increased,” he said. He unveiled a new target to increase cashflow of $136 billion between 2008 and 2011 by up to 50 per cent over the next four years. He said that Shell would produce 4 million barrels of oil a day by 2018, a 20 per cent increase on current levels.

This year Shell will produce more gas than oil for the first time. It already produces more liquefied natural gas than any other oil company. The company will spend about $6 billion this year on developing its shale oil and gas projects, particularly in North America. Some $1 billion of this will go on producing oil and other liquids from shale rock, mainly at its giant Eagle Ford field in Texas.

The value of Shell’s shale gas assets was underlined yesterday when PetroChina bought a 20 per cent stake, thought to be worth $1 billion, in the company’s Groundbirch assets in Canada.

Shell Looking At Ways Ways To Improve US Gas Profits

FEBRUARY 2, 2012

– Shell aiming to exploit difference in price between U.S. gas and LNG, GTL

– Investment in U.S. gas exploration to be at lower end of planned spending

– Company to make further moves into oil-rich shales

By Alexis Flynn

Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

LONDON (Dow Jones)–Royal Dutch Shell PLC (RDSA) is actively looking at ways to improve the profits it gets from U.S. natural gas, including seeking out land for a potential gas-to-diesel plant, the company said Thursday.

The Anglo-Dutch energy giant has invested heavily in U.S. shale gas assets, but new extraction techniques have led to abundant supply. Prices have fallen to a decade low and risk driving up the costs of Shell’s recent shale acquisitions. By contrast, the oil price has risen some 40% in the last two years.

“We have been looking for ways to leverage Shell’s strong resource position in North America,” said Chief Executive Peter Voser.

Chief Financial Officer Simon Henry said Shell was examining plans to develop the gas into products that are more closely linked to oil prices, such as liquefied natural gas for export and gas-to-liquids technology that turns gas into a transport fuel.

He said Shell was even seeking out land to build possible sites to build the types of facilities needed but cautioned that at a cost of “around $5 billion to $10 billion a project, we have to be selective.” Shell completed a giant gas-to-diesel project in Qatar last year, but its final cost was in the region of around $18 billion, rather than the $5 billion initially estimated in 2003.

Voser also said Thursday the company would broaden its focus to include oil-rich shale, with the company planning to spend $1 billion on liquid-rich shales alone in 2012, with production from the source expected to account for as much as 250,000 barrels of oil equivalent a day by 2017. By contrast, Voser said Shell’s expected outlay on U.S. gas exploration would be at the low end of its spending range given the weak pricing environment.

“Spending could be in the range of $5 billion and $6 billion per year on a worldwide basis over the next few years, including exploration, of which $3 billion to $5 billion could be North American gas plays,” said Voser.

The depressed U.S. natural gas price has compelled some U.S. firms to cut back on drilling. However, Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM), the country’s largest natural-gas producer, said Wednesday it had no intention of curtailing its output.

-By Alexis Flynn, Dow Jones Newswires; +44 207842 9471, alexis.flynn@dowjones.com

SOURCE ARTICLE

3 states offer big tax breaks for Shell Oil plant

Published February 01, 2012| Associated Press

PITTSBURGH –  Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia are trying to top each other with the sweetest package of tax breaks for Shell Oil Co., which plans to build a huge new petrochemical refinery in the region.

But some are questioning why there’s been so little public discussion over exactly what’s being offered, and how the deals would impact communities and the region.

“Who’s going to be paying for the roads?” asked Robert P. Strauss, a professor of economics and public policy at Carnegie Mellon University. “You have to think through very carefully what the additional costs will be.”

The proposed plant, called a cracker in the industry, would take ethane out of natural gas and convert it into the basic materials for literally hundreds of consumer and industrial materials, including plastics, fertilizers and antifreeze.

Strauss, who worked on tax policy at the U.S. Treasury and on Congressional committees before he began teaching in the 1970s, said there’s a history of politicians and the media exaggerating the long-term benefits that may come from a large industrial plant.

He said there’s no question a petrochemical plant would create jobs, but perhaps not as many as people hope.

The American Chemistry Council, a Washington, D.C.-based industry lobbying group, estimates that the plant would employ 2,484 people directly in the chemical industry and 6,262 in related businesses.

Shell, part of Royal Dutch Shell PLC, has previously said that the core plant could employ 10,000 workers short-term, and several hundred long-term.

Shell has said that the basic plant could cost $2 billion to $3 billion just to build, and would attract a range of smaller plants nearby.

The company hasn’t commented on specific possible locations, but government and industry officials agree on several: A former steel mill in Aliquippa, Pa., about 35 miles north of Pittsburgh, and industrial parks along the Ohio River in New Martinsville and Institute, W. Va. Ohio also has industrial land on its side of the river in that region.

Dan Carlson, Shell Chemical’s general manager of new business development, said in a statement that the three states “have shown great interest in having us build our petrochemical plant in their states. We will make an official announcement when the site selection is confirmed.”

Some are disturbed that states haven’t released a more detailed economic analysis of the proposed tax breaks.

“We have no idea how much the state is losing in revenue each year. Nobody knows,” added Ted Boettner, director of the West Virginia Center on Budget and Policy. “It’s about transparency and accountability. Is it clear to county officials, school boards, how much revenue is being foregone?”

West Virginia has offered a 25-year property tax break, Pennsylvania 15 years, and Ohio has reportedly offered major incentives.

West Virginia officials estimate that without incentives a $2 billion plant would pay about $29 million in property taxes each year, compared to about $11 million in Ohio.

But new legislation passed by West Virginia lawmakers last week would cut the bill to just $1.6 million each year there.

Steven Kratz, a spokesman for the Pennsylvania Department of Community & Economic Development, didn’t have dollar figures for what the proposed 15-year tax break might be worth to Shell.

Strauss doesn’t question the basic concept behind Shell’s plan: to build an ethane refinery close to both the booming supply of shale gas and to huge numbers of consumers in the Northeast.

But Strauss noted that when German automaker Volkswagen AG opened a major manufacturing plant south of Pittsburgh in the late 1970s, there were huge tax incentives and projections for large numbers of long-term jobs. Ten years later the plant closed, never coming close to the rosy job estimates.

Others said that isn’t likely to happen if Shell builds an ethane refinery.

“I think that a petrochemical plant is likely to be far more stable,” said Ehud Ronn, a professor of energy studies at the University of Texas in Austin.

Ronn noted that if Shell doesn’t build a plant in the Appalachians, it will have to transport raw gas down to Gulf Coast refineries for processing, and then ship the ethane product back up to the northeast.

“It makes certainly a lot of sense to build it near both the input and the output,” Ronn said of Shell’s plans.

Boettner said his group isn’t against a cracker plant coming to the region, but it wants to make clear that someone has to pay for local infrastructure costs.

“It’s a classic race to the bottom, to pit states against each other,” he said. “We have leverage. We don’t have to give away the candy store,” given the vast reserves of shale gas in the region.

In both Pennsylvania and West Virginia the tax breaks are targeted towards businesses that invest over $1 billion.

“Small businesses sort of get the shaft,” Boettner said. “Somebody is going to have to make up the difference.”

But Shell isn’t the only company looking at building in the region.

Leonard Dolhert, CEO of Aither Chemical in South Charlestown, W. Va., said the demand for ethane is so great that more than one plant is needed.

“An idea situation would be to build a plant in each state,” he said, adding that ultimately there could be billions of pounds of products made from ethane in the region each year.

“In the long run, once the first plant is built, it should create economic development in all three states,” he said.

Brian Iams, spokesman for Bayer Corp., which owns the West Virginia industrial parks along the Ohio river, said his company has had discussions with more than one company that’s interested in building a plant.

Shell has only spoken generally about its criteria for a site, mentioning river and rail access.

But Strauss said Shell and other major multi-national corporations take great care to examine such huge investments, looking at other intangibles such as the quality of education, infrastructure, and even government.

Strauss said he suspects that the biggest question for Shell may be which site has the best reputation for reasonable local and state government, given their long-term investment.

___

Associated Press writer Kantele Franko in Columbus, Ohio, contributed to this report.

SOURCE ARTICLE

Shell Seen Raising Dividend for First Time Since 2009: Energy

Shell may even go as far as paying a special dividend or buying back shares to maximize shareholder value, according to analysts at Citigroup Inc.

Click to continue reading “Shell Seen Raising Dividend for First Time Since 2009: Energy”

Oil bargaining heads toward wire

Hamilton said the industry, represented by Shell Oil Co., also hasn’t budged on health and safety provisions the union wants in its new three-year contract.

By Dan Wallach, DWallach@BeaumontEnterprise.com (409) 838-2876

Published 02:46 p.m., Monday, January 30, 2012

The national oil contract bargaining is heading toward a midnight Tuesday deadline, but the two sides seem far apart on pay and safety rules, a local union member said today.

Eric Hamilton, chairman of the workmen’s committee at the Motiva Enterprises Port Arthur refinery, said the industry side to date has offered a pay increase of between 1.5 percent and 2 percent a year.

“That’s ludicrous,” he said. “They make billions and billions a year.”

The national oil contract would cover about 30,000 union oil refinery workers who produce about two-thirds of the nation’s gasoline, diesel and jet fuel. In Southeast Texas, there are about 3,000 unionized workers at the four motor fuels refineries. Along the Gulf Coast, there are about 9,000 unionized workers covered by the contract.

Hamilton said the industry, represented by Shell Oil Co., also hasn’t budged on health and safety provisions the union wants in its new three-year contract.

The provisions would require refiners to install newer, safer equipment and to cut down on overtime that causes worker fatigue.

Hamilton said the industry has favored fatigue provisions that are part of American Petroleum Institute guidelines.

“At Motiva, we’ve been following a stronger standard that what API has,” Hamilton said.

Refinery union members – part of the United Steelworkers – in November had already authorized a strike in case there is no agreement reached.

On Saturday, the United Steelworkers said, “The United Steelworkers union warned that a strike by U.S. refinery workers as early as 12 a.m. Wednesday was becoming more likely due to the lack of a more substantive response from the industry.”

On Sunday, the union offered this terse update: “Contracts talks are ongoing this evening. The union and the company continue to meet to try and reach an agreement.”

SOURCE ARTICLE

Union says U.S. refinery workers strike more likely

By Erwin Seba

HOUSTON | Sat Jan 28, 2012 11:16pm EST

(Reuters) – The United Steelworkers union warned on Saturday that a strike by U.S. refinery workers as early as 12 a.m. Wednesday was becoming more likely due to “the lack of a more substantive response from the industry.”

Union and oil company negotiators have been meeting since January 17 to hammer out a new three-year agreement for workers at nearly two-thirds of U.S. refining capacity.

Union negotiators have not sent out a similar warning to refinery workers in the past three rounds of contract talks with the industry.

Shell Oil Co, which is the lead oil company negotiator, said on Saturday it would work toward an agreement.

“We continue to negotiate with the goal of reaching a mutually satisfactory agreement with USW,” said Shell spokeswoman Kayla Macke.

Previously, Shell had said it was optimistic a deal could be reached.

In the statement issued Saturday night, the USW’s bargaining committee said that without further progress in the talks a strike could take place at “one or more locations when the collective bargaining agreements expire.”

Talks between the two sides were scheduled to continue through the weekend.

USW spokeswoman Lynne Hancock said the union would make no further statements on Saturday.

In the lead-up to this year’s talks, the Steelworkers union warned that the lack of improved safety protections for workers at the nation’s refineries could bring about the first nationwide strike since 1980.

Eighteen workers have died at U.S. refineries since the last agreement in 2009, according to the union.

As much as 11 percent of U.S. refining capacity could temporarily shut due to a strike lasting three months, sources have said.

In addition to possible shutdowns, oil companies have been training temporary replacement workers to continue to operate their refineries in the event of work stoppage.

One source said refiners’ preparations for a possible strike are unlike any seen in 20 years.

Industry analysts have said they thought the chances of a strike were slim.

During the 1980 strike, refiners kept their plants in operation by using trained supervisors and engineers to replace hourly workers who operate and maintain equipment.

Shell Oil Co is the U.S. unit of energy giant Royal Dutch Shell Plc (RDSa.L).

(Editing by Chistopher Wilson)

SOURCE ARTICLE

Dutch Court Throws Lifeline for Non-US Class Action Lawsuits

The court was used once before in a similar case launched in 2007 against Royal Dutch Shell, when investors resolved their claims for €316 million with the oil giant.

Wednesday, January 25, 2012 7:22:02 AM

Pension, endowment funds, and other international shareholders have a new avenue of enquiry to seek damages of alleged corporate fraud thanks to a European court decision.

(January 25, 2012)  –  The first class action lawsuit settlement to be approved for shareholders based outside the United States, since the Supreme Court tightened rules about international investors seeking redress through its legal system in 2010, has thrown a lifeline to asset owners suspicious of corporate fraud.

A case brought by international pension schemes, endowments and other large investors against Swiss reinsurer Converium Holding (now Scor Holding (Switzerland)), was settled out of court with damages of over $58 million being approved for distribution by the Amsterdam Court of Appeal last week.

The court was used once before in a similar case launched in 2007 against Royal Dutch Shell, when investors resolved their claims for €316 million with the oil giant.

FULL ARTICLE

Contact the writer of this story:Elizabeth PfeutiEuropean Editor, aiCIO(44) 207 397 3816epfeuti@assetinternational.comFollow on Twitter at @ai_CIO

Shell Oil Company dumped toxic chemicals into waterway for over 60 yrs

A Shell Oil Co. refinery dumped wastewater into the bayou for more than 60 years, lacing the mucky bottom with toxic chemicals and heavy metals.

DEQ says Bayou Trepagnier, one of state’s most polluted waterways, has been cleaned up

NORCO, La. — The state Department of Environmental Quality says one of Louisiana‘s most polluted waterways has been cleaned up. It’s Bayou Trepagnier (trep-AN’-yay) in Norco.

A Shell Oil Co. refinery dumped wastewater into the bayou for more than 60 years, lacing the mucky bottom with toxic chemicals and heavy metals.

The current owner, Motiva Enterprises LLC, agreed in 2008 to a $10 million cleanup plan.

DEQ says contaminated soil at the end nearest the refinery was removed as an 800-foot-wide “clean zone.”

It says that for another 6,000 feet of the bayou, sediments were solidified and stabilized, then capped with heavy clay. DEQ says about 43,000 yards of clay were used for that and to build access roads.

The bayou is a state scenic waterway.

SOURCE ARTICLE

RELATED ARTICLES

DEQ: cleanup completed at Bayou Trepagnier 21 Jan 2012 09:24 GMT Daily Comet Online

Cleanup of Bayou Trepagnier in Norco is complete, DEQ says 21 Jan 2012 02:33 GMT NOLA.com