Royal Dutch Shell Plc  .com Rotating Header Image

BP Ripe for Takeover? Not Really, Analysts Say

Published: Tuesday, 1 Jun 2010 | 2:27 AM ET
By: Barbara Stcherbatcheff
Writer, CNBC

BP’s stock price has plummeted 25 per cent since the explosion of an oil well on April 20th, leaving some analysts to wonder whether the British energy giant is vulnerable to a corporate takeover.

But others say that the perspective of a mega-merger involving BP is getting farther, not closer, as oil keeps gushing out the ruptured well.

The New York Times wrote last week that Royal Dutch Shell and Exxon Mobil “are almost certainly running the numbers” to see whether a merger makes sense.

Former BP CEO John Browne wrote in his memoirs that the company had aimed for $9 billion in annual synergies from a possible merger with Shell a few years ago, the paper said.

However, given the massive uncertainty surrounding the costs of the spill, BP may prove to be a cheap, but messy target, analysts told

“Their liability exposure is all over the map. This is a huge hindrance to successful acquisition,” Tim Seymour, Partner, Triogem Asset Management, said. Loss estimates range from $20 billion to $50 billion or even higher.

On Tuesday, the company said the cost of the response to the spill amounts to about $990 million so far, Reuters reported.

The fall-out from accidents like the latest oil spill and others continue to cloud BP’s corporate image, which may be beyond repair.

“BP’s name is now so politically compromised that only the bravest company would want to take them over,” James Batty, Editor of Energy Intelligence Finance, an oil industry newsletter, said.



Others share the same opinion. “I would never buy BP,” said one London-based M&A banker, “Because they have such a poor safety record. That inevitably affects the culture of a company. It’s like buying an airline that has a history of plane crashes.”

BP officials pledged repeatedly that the company will do all it can to fix the leak. “No one will rest until this job is done. BP understands that the spill may have an impact on people’s day-to-day lives,” Bob Dudley, BP managing director, said earlier this month.

In October 2007, BP spilled nearly 2000 gallons of mostly methanol from a pipeline in the Prudhoe Bay oil field in Alaska. And in 2005, one of BP’s largest refineries exploded, causing 15 deaths.

“It’s questionable whether they can continue to business in the United States,” John Kilduff, Partner at Round Earth Capital NYC, told

Worse than Exxon Valdez

On Monday, BP and US government officials warned that the spill, which is already causing an environmental disaster on the Gulf Coast, may not be stopped until August.

“I don’t think that anyone really wants to take on all (BP’s) problems: the Shrimperies, the Fisheries, the Nurseries… it’s a load of trouble,” Charles Maxwell Sr. Energy Analyst at Weeden & Co, said.

“This (spill) is exponentially worse than Exxon Valdez,” Kilduff said. The 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill was the worst spill in US history until the explosion of BP’s Deepwater Horizon rig last month.

To this day, “Exxon Valdez” continues to be dropped in conversation as a euphemism for corporate arrogance and damage.

In the short-term, however, Exxon shares underperformed 5 percent in the month after the accident, but recovered most of this within just a few months.

The market’s dumping of BP shares as a reaction to the Gulf oil spill may be based less on sound financial analysis than gut emotional panic, he said.

“A twenty-five percent fall is tremendous. I think people may be overdoing this,” Seymour said. The price of oil has fallen 16 percent in the past month, putting even more pressure on the company’s margins.

Seymour added, “It’s unclear how much of the move in BP’s price is due to the recent oil price drop rather than the Gulf spill.”

While BP is still a multi-billion dollar market cap company with interests all around the world, “any potential buyer would need to stump up a huge wad of cash to buy out the shareholders,” Batty said.

This price tag is simply too high for any company, according to some. “No company is in a position to take over BP,” Maxwell said.

Experts insist that BP has undeniable attractions for a company like Shell or Exxon. It is the largest producer in politically stable areas like the Gulf of Mexico, Britain’s North Sea, and Prudhoe Bay field in Alaska.

Are Mega-Mergers Dead?

But nowadays the company may simply be “too big to be acquired,” according to Cleve Rueckert, Equity Strategist at Birinyi Associates.

Even BP Chief Executive Tony Hayward admitted in November 2009 that oil industry mega-mergers were dead, and the time for deals that married BP and Amoco, Exxon and Mobil, and Chevron and Texaco had passed.

“If you put ourselves and Shell together you don’t add to the resource base,” he said at the time. Shell – a $158 billion company – is the closest in size to BP, slightly trumping BP’s $141 billion market capitalization.

“Shell could probably pull it off, other than that, ranks get pretty thin,” John Kilduff, Partner at Round Earth Capital NYC, said. “Companies like BP need vast economies of scale in order to make (deep water drilling) worthwhile.”

State-subsidized Chinese oil companies are well-positioned to bid for BP, but Roger Howard, author of “The Oil Hunters: Exploration and Espionage in the Middle East 1880 – 1939,” argues that there would be enormous political opposition to this, and a merger is inconceivable.

A Chinese attempt to buy California-based Unocal in the spring of 2005 faltered due to political concerns and the US company finally merged with Chevron.“It’s more likely we’ll see BP stripped down, they’ll sell off various units,” Kilduff said.

There are concerns that, even if BP’s stock price were to bounce back like Exxon’s did, its business strategy may not, as the company has invested vast sums into deep sea drilling.

Yet other experts believe that -despite growing public outrage over the spill – the likelihood of any permanent deep-sea drilling ban is low.

Many people consider deep sea drilling a gamble the US simply must take because of its dependence on oil.

“Citizens will pressure Obama to drill more. We need to take risks necessary to get gas we can afford,” John Hofmeister, Former president and CEO of operations at Shell, said.

As world oil reserves dwindle, the price will be the decisive factor, analysts predict. “Give it a year or two, people won’t remember it and popular mood changes very quickly. If a year from now, the price of oil is higher, pressure will be to drill, not regulate,” Kilduff said.

© 2010
This website and sisters,,,, and, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

One Comment

  1. Wilt Staph says:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Comment Rules

  • Please show respect to the opinions of others no matter how seemingly far-fetched.
  • Abusive, foul language, and/or divisive comments may be deleted without notice.
  • Each blog member is allowed limited comments, as displayed above the comment box.
  • Comments must be limited to the number of words displayed above the comment box.
  • Please limit one comment after any comment posted per post.