March 20 (Bloomberg) — China may become of the world’s biggest natural gas markets by 2020 as the country seeks to reduce its carbon intensity by increasing the use of cleaner burning fuel, Royal Dutch Shell Plc Chief Executive Officer Peter Voser (above) said today at a forum in Beijing.

Shell is working together with PetroChina Co., the nation’s largest oil producer, to seek new energy sources in China, Voser said, according to a Web cast of the conference on the Web site of the official People’s Daily in the Chinese language.

To contact the reporter on this story: Ying Wang in Beijing at ywang30@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: March 20, 2010 04:10 EDT

BLOOMBERG ARTICLE

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

By ROSS KELLY and CYNTHIA KOONS

FRIDAY MARCH 19, 2010, 2:00 A.M. ET

SYDNEY—Arrow Energy Ltd. has yet to strike an agreement with Royal Dutch Shell PLC and PetroChina Co. on a takeover offer, people familiar with the matter said Friday amid mounting speculation of a sweetened offer from the pair.

“There is no agreement at this point,” one person said.

It has been nearly two weeks since Royal Dutch Shell and PetroChina offered 3.3 billion Australian dollars (US$3.0 billion) for Arrow’s Australian operations. The continuation of talks may cool speculation that an Arrow-endorsed deal is imminent.

Another person said it is “unlikely” a deal will be struck by the end of the day, but that anything is possible. Negotiations at this point involve “all aspects of the initial proposal”, the person said, without dismissing the possibility that a higher bid for the Australian assets could emerge.

Arrow said in a statement Friday that its shares will be halted from trading until Tuesday, or until it makes its next announcement on the offer.

All three parties have been locked in discussions for almost two weeks and a person familiar with the matter said Wednesday they’re “working really hard to see if there’s a deal here.”

Previously, a person involved with the talks said the separation of the domestic and international operations was a sticking point in negotiations. The original proposal would leave Arrow’s international operations in the hands of its existing shareholders.

Nik Burns, an energy analyst at RBS, said he is “very confident” of an improved bid and raised his target price on Arrow’s shares to A$5.45 from A$5.00.

Arrow hasn’t yet publicly responded to a A$4.45-a-share cash equal joint bid from Shell and PetroChina for its Australian assets, although most analysts agree the bid undervalues the assets.

“Arrow has been in active discussions with Shell and PetroChina over the past few days, probably thrashing out a revised offer,” Mr. Burns said in a note to clients. “With too much to lose on both sides if this deal falls over, we are very confident of an improved bid.”

Mr. Burns said Arrow needs a deal because more than 80% of its acreage is currently unexplored and the A$2.2 billion Fisherman’s Landing liquefied-natural-gas project in Queensland state was looking like a big ask from a funding perspective. “With no other bidder expected, maximizing the sale price should be Arrow’s primary objective,” Mr. Burns said.

Shell needs Arrow because it doesn’t have enough assets to back its claims that Australia is a key growth region with huge potential and PetroChina needs to secure long-term energy supplies, Mr. Burns said.

A spokesman for Arrow wasn’t immediately available for comment and a spokesman for Shell said the parties are still in talks.

PetroChina spokesman Mao Zefeng declined to comment specifically on the joint bid, saying the company would issue an appropriate press release if needed.

Merrill Lynch analyst Mark Hume said on Thursday that expected aggressive growth in Chinese demand for gas makes a sweetened bid for Arrow more likely.

—Aries Poon in Hong Kong contributed to this article.

Write to Ross Kelly at ross.kelly@dowjones.com

WSJ ARTICLE

Ian Lyall, Daily Mail
16 March 2010, 9:52pm

He said he was ‘energised’ and up for the fight. But as he stood at the podium to deliver the company’s annual strategy review, Shell boss Peter Voser (right) looked anything but.

His audience of a hundred or so British and foreign journalists listened with an air of resignation rather than in rapt attention.

Voser isn’t a natural orator. His clipped Swiss accent and the dry delivery may work well around the boardroom table, but his style is hardly inspirational.

Which is a pity. Because his message was an uplifting one for Shell investors, and addressed the concerns of the critics who dismiss the Anglo-Dutch giant as low growth, bureaucratic and bloated.

Voser’s trick was to come up with a fairly punchy production target and spice it with a subtle change of direction and emphasis.

And it seemed to work, with the company’s London-listed A shares rising 27.5p to close the day at 2920p.

The briefing re- capped the impact Voser has made in his short tenure. Since becoming chief executive in the summer of last year, he has spearheaded an impressive $2bn cost cutting drive that has seen the loss off 5,000 jobs, mostly mid-ranking managerial posts.

An extension to that programme was unveiled yesterday. It will save another $1bn by cutting a further 1,000 roles, though the workforce still numbers more than 100,000.

But what grabbed the analysts’ attention was his plans to have Shell pumping around 3.5m barrels of oil a day by 2012.

This implies an annual growth rate of 3.5%, which is well ahead of the rather pedestrian performance of rival BP at around 1.5%.

Shell even seems to have raised its game in finding new oil and gas fields, with its reserve replacement rate running at a healthy 288%.

Voser showed he recognised the lingering misgivings of investors, though he was careful to couch the message in diplomatic terms that wouldn’t offend his colleagues and predecessor.

‘When I became chief executive in the middle of last year, I did think the organisation of the company was working against us,’ he told the meeting at a central London hotel.

‘Shell had become too complicated, and slower than I’d like, and working on too many areas and options.’

The simplification of Shell, which has many moving parts, is borne out of necessity.

With the oil price hovering at, or close to, $80 a barrel, more investment is going into exploration and production.

For recession-hit refining, in the middle of the worst slump in 20 years, the pendulum has swung the other way. Capacity is set to be cut by around 15%, with plants sold or even shut down.

And the marketing operation, which owns the company’s filling stations and also sells motor oil and jet fuel, is also undergoing a shake-up. It is focusing on fewer markets to improve profitability.

Only one of the laggards seems to have been spared the Voser treatment: Shell’s gas business.

It has been hit by the downturn but is deemed to be a fundamentally sound business.

Voser trumpeted a series of exploration success stories that tell a tale of a growing conservatism, so we heard about the company’s strikes in the Gulf of Mexico, Australia and North America.

Relatively expensive regions in which to work, they do have the upside of being politically stable and incredibly easy places to do business.

Air-brushed from the literature were the likes of Nigeria and Russia.

It was only when prodded that Voser commented on the war-torn African nation, where the oil reserves are plentiful, but the region is a mess of infighting and instability: ‘In the past, as I have said many times, Shell has depended a lot on the growth of Nigeria. In today’s situation, we still have the same growth potential in Nigeria. But we have seeded plenty of projects in other parts of the world where we also can achieve growth.’

Hardly a ringing endorsement of the country’s prospects.

Some analysts, such as Collins Stewart’s Gordon Grey, see Voser’s latest strategy pronouncement as ‘an important turning point operationally’ for Shell.

The respected and experienced Richard Griffith of Evolution has been following the company for far too long to be totally convinced: ‘It’s a positive statement, but there is still plenty to be delivered.’

Daily Mail
17 March 2010, 8:11am

Linda Cook, the former head of Shell’s oil and gas division, received a £5m compensation payment after losing out on the role of chief executive to Peter Voser.

Compensation: Linda Cook

The revelation came in the firm’s annual report and will overshadow a well received strategy update by Voser.

His earnings were £2.9m last year.

Bloomberg.com

Watch

Shell’s Voser Interview

March 17 (Bloomberg) — Peter Voser, chief executive officer of Royal Dutch Shell Plc, talks with Bloomberg’s Andrea Catherwood about efforts to control spending as industry costs rise. Voser also discusses the company’s growth strategy and investments in refineries and biofuel projects. They spoke yesterday in London.

Voser Says Shell Must Control Spending as Industry Costs Rise

By Will Kennedy and Andrea Catherwood

March 17 (Bloomberg) — Royal Dutch Shell Plc Chief Executive Officer Peter Voser said industry costs have started to rise and the company will use technology to control spending as it invests $100 billion to boost production.

“Costs have not come down as much as we hoped for, and some of them are now rising again,” Voser said in an interview with Bloomberg Television broadcast today. Shell’s challenge is to be “more speedy in terms of technology implementation.”

Shell, vying with BP Plc as Europe’s biggest oil company, said yesterday it’s assessing more than 35 projects to keep production rising until 2020. Australia, where the company is developing offshore and coal-seam gas reserves, may attract as much as 40 percent of Shell’s capital expenditure. It has higher wage rates than other countries where the company operates.

“In Australia, we are doing floating LNG, which is actually fabricated in Korea, so we will be less exposed to the labor costs,” Voser said in London. We need to do “things differently in the future so that you actually save costs and get things built cheaper.”

Crude prices doubled to more than $80 a barrel in the past year, prompting producers to resume projects put on hold during the recession. Oil and gas industry spending will rise 11 percent this year to $439 billion, according to Barclays Capital. Increased investment may start to reverse reductions in drilling and engineering costs caused by the global slowdown.

Raise Production

Voser, speaking to analysts at the company’s annual strategy briefing, outlined plans to raise oil and gas production 11 percent by 2012 to 3.5 million barrels a day. The company’s capital expenditure, set at $28 billion this year, will be between $25 billion and $27 billion from 2011 to 2014.

Investment in production will be focused on three main areas, Voser said in the interview. These are Australia, the Gulf of Mexico and so-called tight gas in the U.S., where recently developed drilling techniques are used to access resources trapped between rocks.

“On top of that we have other projects in areas like Kazakhstan, like Nigeria, in the Middle East we have Iraq,” he said. “We have got a vast set of opportunities. I’m very pleased with the variety we have in the portfolio, so if one doesn’t come, we’ve got others to replace those.”

Shell yesterday announced plans to cut staff by a further 1,000 people, making the overall reduction of 7,000 in the three years through 2011. Voser has said he will cut costs by $1 billion this year, after reducing them by $2 billion last year.

The company plans to sell filling stations and oil refineries to free up capital for production spending. Shell is negotiating with India’s Essar Oil Ltd. to sell three European plants after the recession cut fuel-processing profits.

“You need bigger refineries, more complex refineries, because they can withstand recessions better than smaller refineries,” Voser said.

To contact the reporters on this story: Will Kennedy in London at wkennedy3@bloomberg.net; Andrea Catherwood in London at acatherwood@bloomberg.net.

Last Updated: March 17, 2010 05:09 EDT

BLOOMBERG ARTICLE

Daily Telegraph: Royal Dutch Shell has unveiled the most dramatic overhaul of its business in recent memory, outlining plans to exit more than a third of its 90 retail markets, slash refining capacity and return to growth after seven years of falling output.

By Garry White
Published: 10:10PM GMT 16 Mar 2010

Peter Voser, chief executive, unveiled a further 1,000 jobs cuts in addition to the 6,000 already announced as he vowed to “sharpen up” Shell in the next three years by boosting output by 11pc.

“Shell has been disadvantaged recently, due to our higher exposure to refining and natural gas, where margins are hard-wired to the economy,” Mr Voser said.

“The priorities are for a more competitive performance, for growth, and for sharper delivery of strategy. We have more to do to drive out cost and improve the operating performance in the company.”

Shell plans to exit 35pc of its petrol station markets and reduce refining capacity by 15pc to help it make cost saving of $1bn (£658m) this year. It also said it would sell non-core assets worth $1bn-$3bn a year, including its refineries in Gothenburg, Los Angeles and New Zealand.

Monday is the deadline for bids for the company’s liquified petroleum gas distribution arm, which could raise £1.1bn. Those understood to be tabling offers include Brazilian chemicals group Ultrapar, Centrica spin-off DCC and French listed Rubis, as well as a number of private equity groups.

“Upstream, we have built up strong foundations in activities like gas-to-liquids, oil sands and liquefied natural gas,” Mr Voser said. “Looking out to 2020, I expect Shell’s exploration to underpin new upstream growth, especially in North America and Australia, with additional barrels from development-led projects.”

The news came on the day that Shell released its annual report, which showed that Mr Voser earned less than Tony Hayward, chief executive of rival BP, in 2009. Mr Voser earned a total salary and bonus of £2.8m compared with Mr Hayward’s £4m.

Shell has said it would freeze management salaries until 2011 after shareholders objected last year when executives were awarded bonuses even after performance targets were missed.

Linda Cook, who resigned as head of Shell’s gas and power business in May last year, was paid a salary and bonus of £2.1m as well as a severance payment of almost €5.5m (£5m). She leaves with a total pension pot of just under $25m. Mr Voser’s predecessor, Jeroen van der Veer, left with a pension pot worth $34.2m.

Shell predicts oil will trade between $50 and $90 a barrel over the next few years and is targeting output of 3.5m barrels of oil equivalent per day in 2012. This compares to 3.15m in 2009, the equivalent to an annual growth rate of 3.5pc, or 11pc in total over three years

Mr Voser said the company should be in a surplus cash flow position in 2012, after capital investment and dividend payments – assuming $60 oil prices and a more normal environment for natural gas prices and downstream. In order to achieve this it will have to invest between $25bn and $27 a year in its operations.

The Anglo Dutch group also said that it replaced 288pc of its oil and gas output with new discoveries in 2009, or 3.42bn barrels of oil equivalent.

SOURCE ARTICLE

RELATED TELEGRAPH ARTICLES

• Will shelling out on gas projects reignite growth at Shell?
• Shell speaks the right words but now it must pump up the profits
• Growth plan makes Shell a buy
• Shell and PetroChina swoop on Arrow Energy
• Shell stakes green future on sugar biofuel in $2bn Brazil venture
• Shell overhauls executive pay after shareholder revolt

SHELL is working on a submission for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regarding the discharge of water which will be separated from the gas, writes Marian Harrison. The company agreed with fishermen not to discharge the treated water into the Sruwaddacon Bay and are investigating alternative options before seeking permission from the EPA.

• Shell to quit 9,000 petrol stations worldwide

SOURCE ARTICLE

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

MARCH 16, 2010 By Lananh Nguyen Of Dow Jones Newswires

LONDON (Dow Jones)–The startup of Royal Dutch Shell PLC’s (RDSB) Corrib gas project off the west coast of Ireland will be delayed to 2012-2013, the company said Tuesday in a strategy update.

The project was originally set to come online between 2010-2011, but has been held up. Shell was asked by Ireland’s planning board in late 2009 to consider an alternative route for a nine-kilometer onshore pipeline to deliver gas from its Corrib fields to a processing terminal in response to local opposition.

“In Ireland, the Corrib Gas Project is currently under development, and is largely complete (pending a final decision from the Irish planning board on an application for a nine kilometres onshore pipeline),” the company said in its 2009 annual report.

Shell is the operator of Corrib and has a 45% stake in the project.

-By Lananh Nguyen, Dow Jones Newswires; +44 (0)20-7842-9479; lananh.nguyen@dowjones.com

(James Herron in London contributed to this report.)

WSJ ARTICLE

A stream of analyst comments and silence on the offer from the Australian coal-seam gas group has fuelled expectations that Arrow will reject the bid and the two parties will have to come in with a higher – and hostile – offer. Last week, Shell and PetroChina offered A$4.45 in cash for each Arrow share, plus a share in a new, international Arrow entity.