When BP Steps Back, Shell Lights Up (Or Tries To)
In a twist that’s making all the wrong people blink, BP has quietly withdrawn from the high-stakes takeover dance. The energy giant was reportedly eyeing Ampol, an Australian fuels and infrastructure company. But now it’s told stakeholders: not us, thanks. (“BP quietly steps out of the takeover spotlight.”)
Meanwhile, Shell—the ultimate sin stock—is still scrambling for scraps of legitimacy in the energy transition. BP’s retreat offers it a weird kind of spotlight: “Look how far behind Shell is.”
What’s the Deal with BP?
Per the CNBC report, BP:
-
“Quietly pulled back from takeover interest” in Ampol
-
Indicated it’s refocusing on core operations, not acquisition sprees
-
Admitted the market for big energy mergers is dicey these days
BP’s move may be practical (less risk, more focus). Or it might be the kind of retreat Shell would do after a safety scare—only with fewer headlines.
Shell: The Always-Here Giant
If BP’s stepping off stage, Shell is still center ring. Still drilling. Still gaslighting. Still promising “transition”—but mostly via PR spin. Shell’s core business remains oil, gas, petrochemicals.
Its biggest investors—BlackRock, Vanguard, and sovereign funds—are demanding better climate alignment. So Shell keeps juggling: new renewables projects here, new fossil commitments there.
When BP says “no thanks” to takeovers, Shell should maybe take note: less is more. But the gas giant never was one for modesty.
Context & Stakes
-
Market volatility: The energy sector is more like tinder than gold right now. Big acquisitions risk being black holes for capital.
-
Regulatory & climate risk: Governments, regulators, and investors are more demanding than ever. Buying more fossil assets is less of a prize and more of a gamble.
-
Focus on core strength: BP may believe it can get more bang from optimizing what it has than chasing expansion. Maybe Shell should adopt that philosophy—except Shell’s identity is expansion, even when reckless.
WTF Shell?
BP can walk away from deals; Shell can’t seem to walk away from its own hubris.
BP saying “not now” to acquisition is a savvy pause. Shell’s decision-making too often looks like “just go harder”—on fossil expansion, debt leverage, risk layering.
If BP can press pause, maybe Shell should too—before forced into it by climate crisis or investor revolt.
Disclaimer
Warning: satire ahead. The criticisms are pointed, the humour intentional, and the facts stubbornly real. Quotes are reproduced word-for-word from trusted sources. As for authorship—John Donovan and AI both claim credit, but the jury’s still out on who was really in charge.
This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.
EBOOK TITLE: “SIR HENRI DETERDING AND THE NAZI HISTORY OF ROYAL DUTCH SHELL” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON
EBOOK TITLE: “JOHN DONOVAN, SHELL’S NIGHTMARE: MY EPIC FEUD WITH THE UNSCRUPULOUS OIL GIANT ROYAL DUTCH SHELL” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON.
EBOOK TITLE: “TOXIC FACTS ABOUT SHELL REMOVED FROM WIKIPEDIA: HOW SHELL BECAME THE MOST HATED BRAND IN THE WORLD” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON.
