How Does Shell Justify Its Role in Contributing to Climate Change, Given the Overwhelming Scientific Consensus on the Impacts of Fossil Fuels? With a mix of denial, deflection, and just enough greenwashing to keep the PR machine humming.
Ah, Shell, our dear old friend. The company that gave the world not just oil, but a masterclass in corporate acrobatics. You’ve got to hand it to them: it takes some serious chutzpah to pump out billions of barrels of oil while also pretending to care about the planet they’re actively setting on fire. So, how exactly does Shell justify its role in contributing to climate change? Grab your popcorn, because this is where the real entertainment begins.
Step 1: Acknowledge the Obvious (But Not Really)

EBOOK TITLE: “SIR HENRI DETERDING AND THE NAZI HISTORY OF ROYAL DUTCH SHELL” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON
EBOOK TITLE: “JOHN DONOVAN, SHELL’S NIGHTMARE: MY EPIC FEUD WITH THE UNSCRUPULOUS OIL GIANT ROYAL DUTCH SHELL” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON.
EBOOK TITLE: “TOXIC FACTS ABOUT SHELL REMOVED FROM WIKIPEDIA: HOW SHELL BECAME THE MOST HATED BRAND IN THE WORLD” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON.



















