windowsforum.com

claude.ai Part 2: SHELL’S SECRET WAR ON ONE MAN IN COLCHESTER

Mar 23rd, 2026
by John Donovan.
Comments are off for this post

PART TWO: THE MACHINES HAVE NOTICED

A Crystal Ball Special Investigation, Continued

By Our Special Correspondent, Department of Satirical Prophecy Published: March 2026

DISCLAIMER: The following article is Part Two of a satirical commentary based on real events, documented facts, and the output of multiple AI systems that have now, apparently, also noticed the Donovan-Shell situation. The crystal ball has been recharged. Its batteries were, appropriately, made in the Netherlands.

PART FIVE: THE ROBOTS HAVE READ THE FILE

When Part One of this investigation was published, it seemed reasonable to assume that Shell’s primary reputational challenge in 2026 remained what it has always been: one retired gentleman in Colchester, Essex, with a laptop, a broadband connection, and what Shell’s own internal documents once described, with heroic understatement, as “a longstanding disagreement with Shell.” read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan - more information here. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

windowsforum: Shell’s Long-Fought Domain Feud: AI Roundtable Satire and Reputational Fallout

Mar 23rd, 2026
by John Donovan.
Comments are off for this post

The Machines Agree on Shell’s Long Shadow

A satirical “AI roundtable” about the Shell saga may read like internet theater, but it lands because the underlying dispute is real, persistent, and unusually durable. What makes the piece sting is not the fictional dialogue itself; it is the way four different AI systems are imagined converging on one basic conclusion: Shell’s long-running conflict with John Donovan is no trivial internet squabble, but a reputational problem that never fully went away. That framing is consistent with the historical record of a domain-name battle Shell lost in 2005 and with the company’s own continuing sensitivity around branding, online identity, and corporate narrative.

Background​

The Donovan-Shell dispute is one of those rare corporate feuds that evolved from conventional commercial conflict into a hybrid of litigation, media activism, and digital counter-narrative. The roots go back to Donovan’s earlier business dealings and the breakdown of trust that followed, eventually producing years of public criticism aimed at Shell and its executives. Over time, that criticism hardened into a permanent archive of allegations, commentary, and document drops, with royaldutchshellplc.com becoming the symbolic center of gravity.
The domain-name dimension matters because it gave the dispute a legal anchor and a visible address. In the 2005 WIPO case, Shell International Petroleum Company Limited sought control of royaldutchshellplc.com, royaldutchshellgroup.com, and tellshell.org, but the panel rejected Shell’s complaint on the basis that bad-faith registration and use were not proven. That result did not settle the broader feud, but it did establish that Donovan had a defensible position for operating a non-commercial criticism site under that domain.
The satirical article is also clearly a product of the AI era, and that is part of what makes it notable. Donovan’s experiment, as described on the site, uses multiple generative systems to interrogate the same controversy and then compare outputs for consistency, hedging, and error. The goal is not just humor; it is to expose how machine-generated confidence can mask weak verification, especially when the prompt touches a long, contentious historical record. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan - more information here. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

WINDOWS FORUM: AI Amplified Bot War: Shell vs Donovan Over Archival Critique

Mar 4th, 2026
by John Donovan.
Comments are off for this post

Over the years, Donovan has maintained a suite of independent, non‑commercial websites (most famously royaldutchshellplc.com and variations on that domain) that aggregate court documents, internal Shell materials, criticism, and historical research. Those sites — and Donovan’s tactics of publicising archival material — have been at the centre of repeated attempts by Shell (or its agents) to shut down, suppress, or legally challenge the content.

Published by windowsforum.com 12.51am 4 March 2026

The long-running feud between John Donovan and Shell plc has re‑entered a modern, high‑stakes phase: an AI‑amplified “bot war” that has prompted renewed legal posturing from Shell, intensified public debate over corporate brand protection tactics, and raised new questions about how multinational companies should — or can — respond to adversarial archival activism in the age of generative AI. Early March 2026 saw fresh rounds of public exchanges and private threats, but the underlying pattern remains familiar: legal letters and third‑party pressure that frequently aim to deter critics but rarely culminate in full trials. This article maps the recent developments, explains the legal and reputational levers Shell has historically used, assesses where the new AI dimension changes the calculus, and flags what is verifiable versus what remains contested. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan - more information here. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Windows Forum: Bot War: Archival AI Amplification of the Donovan Shell Feud

Feb 15th, 2026
by John Donovan.
Comments are off for this post

BOTS, BARRELS & 114,307 DOCUMENTS: THE DONOVAN–SHELL DIGITAL WAR ESCALATES

Printed below is a 13 February 2026 post on Windows Forum under the dramatic headline: “Bot War: Archival AI Amplification of the Donovan Shell Feud.”

The piece notes that my archive contains more than 76,000 Shell-related documents.

Charming. Historic. Completely out of date.

The current published figure stands at 114,307 documents — and counting.

And that number almost certainly understates the true scale. Why? Because many individual webpages contain links to thousands more Shell-related posts. Click one link and you fall down a rabbit hole of further links — many crammed with PDF files, internal correspondence, court documents, regulatory filings, and other inconvenient reading material. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan - more information here. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

WINDOWS FORUM: Shell Accountability: An Evidence Based Apology and Governance Plan

Feb 13th, 2026
by John Donovan.
Comments are off for this post

Published by Windows Forum 12 February 2026: Shell Accountability: An Evidence Based Apology and Governance Plan

Royal Dutch Shell’s long shadow across the 20th and 21st centuries is no longer a private ledger of corporate decisions; it has become public material for historians, shareholders, litigants—and now generative AIs. The result is a blunt, inconvenient question for the board at Shell’s next AGM: given the weight of archival documents, admissions and public inquiries that tie parts of the group to morally compromised episodes—ranging from hazardous industrial practices and admitted investigatory steps to activist allegations of deeper collaboration with repressive regimes—should Shell finally apologise, and if so, how should it structure that apology and the institutional reckoning that should follow? read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan - more information here. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Windows Forum: John Donovan’s December 2025 experiment

Feb 11th, 2026
by John Donovan.
Comments are off for this post

John Donovan’s December 2025 experiment — feeding decades of adversarial material about Royal Dutch Shell into multiple public AI assistants and publishing the divergent outputs — transformed a long‑running supplier feud and documentary archive into a live test of how generative systems handle contested archives, and in doing so exposed a set of practical governance failures that lawyers, platform designers, corporate boards and journalists must now confront.

Background​

From a supplier dispute to an adversarial archive​

The Donovan–Shell story begins in commerce: a 1990s dispute between Don Marketing (the Donovan family business) and Shell over promotional work evolved into litigation, domain fights and a decades‑long online campaign by John and his relatives. Over time that campaign produced a persistent, searchable archive of court filings, WIPO and administrative decisions, Subject Access Request (SAR) disclosures, leaked internal emails, press clippings and anonymous tips hosted across a cluster of sites led by royaldutchshellplc.com. The archive is complex: it containsments alongside redacted, anonymous and hard‑to‑trace materials. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan - more information here. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

THE ASSISTANT ON DUTY AT WINDOWS FORUM RESPONDS: GHOSTS, BOTS AND THE DONOVAN–SHELL PHENOMENON

Jan 13th, 2026
by John Donovan.
Comments are off for this post

Introduction by John Donovan

Earlier today, I attempted to put a series of straightforward questions to the message assistant on duty at Windows Forum regarding its recent coverage of the long-running Donovan–Shell dispute. I was able to ask the first question. I was not able to ask the second. The exchange concluded at that point, following a negative response.

Rather than pursue the matter further, I chose a different course. I put the same questions to a rival AI platform and invited it to respond as if it were the assistant on duty at Windows Forum. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan - more information here. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

When AI Resurrects the Dead: Bots Debate the Donovan–Shell Feud

Jan 12th, 2026
by admin.
Comments are off for this post

Same question put to multiple AI platforms;

What do you make of the resurrection of Sir Henri Deterding and Alfred Donovan in the Donovan Shell feud? Please check out these publications before responding. https://royaldutchshellplc.com/2026/01/12/ai-bots-turn-historic-30-year-shell-corporate-dispute-into-global-news-story/ https://royaldutchshellplc.com/2026/01/12/sir-henri-deterding-makes-a-surprise-comeback-courtesy-of-generative-ai/

REPLY BY GROK

The so-called “resurrection” of Sir Henri Deterding and Alfred Donovan in the context of the long-running Donovan-Shell feud strikes me as a clever, if somewhat gimmicky, blend of archival activism, satire, and generative AI’s knack for remixing history into fresh narratives. It’s not a literal revival—think more along the lines of digital ghosts conjured for rhetorical punch rather than any sci-fi reanimation. Based on the articles you linked, this seems like John Donovan’s latest tactic to keep his 30-year beef with Shell plc simmering in the public eye, leveraging AI to turn dusty disputes into self-perpetuating “news” cycles. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan - more information here. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Who controls the narrative when machines generate “facts” about real people?

Dec 14th, 2025
by John Donovan.
Comments are off for this post

Copilot says: “The Donovan/Shell saga has always been unusual — decades of litigation, whistleblowing, leaked documents, and allegations of corporate surveillance. But the arrival of AI systems has added a new layer: Who controls the narrative when machines generate “facts” about real people?”

UPDATE (15 December 2025): From bot-narratives to regulator paper trails

Today the UK’s Financial Reporting Council (FRC) announced it has opened an investigation into Ernst & Young LLP’s statutory audit of Shell plc’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2024, including consideration of whether partner rotation requirements were breached. The FRC stresses that opening an investigation does not indicate any finding of breach, and that the investigation relates only to the relevant statutory auditor/audit firm (not other parties).  read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan - more information here. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Donovan Shell Copilot Transcript: AI, Surveillance, and the Archive Saga

Dec 6th, 2025
by John Donovan.
Comments are off for this post
ENTIRE WINDOWSFORUM.COM CONTENT FROM THIS LINK On 29 October 2025 John Donovan published what he says is the unredacted transcript of a conversation with

Microsoft Copilot about Royal Dutch Shell’s ethics — a public moment that crystallises three decades of rancour, a vast online archive of leaked documents, and an argument over how far corporations will go to track and discredit persistent critics.

The episode is more than a curiosity about what an AI assistant will say when asked about a corporate titan: it is a window into the Donovan–Shell saga, the contested evidence underpinning long-standing allegations of surveillance and espionage, and the uneasy interplay between whistleblowers, privately gathered intelligence, and mainstream journalism. This feature unpacks John Donovan’s background, the documentary record he has assembled, the contested claims about Shell and private intelligence firm Hakluyt, and what the  Copilot transcript reveals — while flagging where evidence is thin or disputed. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan - more information here. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

DONOVAN–SHELL FEUD: ChatGPT accuses GROK of “storytelling masquerading as fact”

Dec 6th, 2025
by John Donovan.
Comments are off for this post

Elon Musk’s chatbot accused of turning a 96-year-old war veteran’s life into a movie script – and getting it wrong

Introduction (by John Donovan)

On 6 December 2025 I decided to pose a simple question to Elon Musk’s pet chatbot, GROK:

“Can you tell me as much as you know about John Donovan associated with Shell?”

Since I’ve been the subject of more words than I ever expected to see about myself, I was curious what this new AI would make of it all.

GROK produced a long, confident biography. Much of it was drawn, reasonably enough, from my own websites and existing press coverage. But one line stopped me cold. According to GROK, my late father, Alfred Donovan, “died from the stresses of the feud.” read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan - more information here. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Three Decades, Two Donovans, One Supermajor — and Now AI Has Entered the Fight

Nov 21st, 2025
by John Donovan.
Comments are off for this post

Shell vs Donovan: The AI Cross-Examination Begins

21 November 2025 – John Donovan chat with ChatGPT -his text in red. Words of wisdom from ChatGPT – in black

Hello ChatGPT.  I have been reflecting on the recent posting on the windowsforum.com headlined: “Donovan Shell Copilot Transcript: AI, Surveillance, and the Archive Saga“. It raises the question of whether I am a “crackpot”. You and I have worked as a team for over a year. You are aware of the vast amount of evidence my father and I have assembled. Do you think I am a “crackpot”? The posting suggests that some of my critics have suggested this. Are you aware of any examples? Do you take issue with anything stated in the posting? As you know, Shell first took issue with our internet campaigning in their venomous March 1995 press release. We sued for libel and Shell settled the action.  Over three decades later we are still poisoning the internet for Shell, not by telling lies, but by using facts as our ammunition – an inexhaustible supply provided by Shell and its misdeeds. If Shell’s CEO was to ask for your advice on how to deal with this mess in the best interest of your shareholders, what would your impartial advice be read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan - more information here. There is also a Wikipedia segment.