LEAKED: SHELL INTERNAL CRISIS MEMO: Legal confirms we cannot sue ghosts

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL – NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION

(Now Widely Distributed)

---

FROM:

Group Communications, Reputation & Narrative Containment Unit

TO:

Executive Committee

Legal Affairs

External Counsel

Digital Risk

ESG Oversight

Whoever Is Still Listening

DATE:

10 January 2026

SUBJECT:

Escalation of Donovan Matter into AI-Mediated, Posthumous, and Algorithmic Domains

---

SUMMARY (READ THIS FIRST)

The long-running Donovan issue has entered a new phase.

This phase includes, but is not limited to:

• Artificial intelligence platforms repeatedly resurfacing historic allegations

• Public comparison of AI outputs across multiple systems

• Satirical “ShellBot” publications gaining traction

• Reputational narratives now involving deceased individuals

• The unexpected reappearance of Sir Henri Deterding (fictional, but inconvenient)

This development was not anticipated.

---

KEY CONCERNS

1. AI SYSTEMS ARE NOT COOPERATING

Despite our expectation that AI platforms would:

• soften historical narratives

• dilute archival emphasis

• prioritise “balanced perspectives”

they are instead:

• amplifying Donovan-controlled archives

• identifying “governance gaps”

• repeating phrases such as “Shell remains silent”

We have been informed that AI does not respond to legal letters.

This remains under review.

---

2. THE ARCHIVE PROBLEM HAS BECOME PERMANENT

Our previous strategy relied on:

• time

• silence

• attrition

This strategy assumed memory decay.

AI systems do not forget.

One internal assessment describes Donovan’s archive as an

“algorithmic gravity well.”

We do not like this phrase.

---

3. THE AFTERLIFE SITUATION

Recent satirical publications now include:

• Sir Henri Deterding

• Alfred Donovan

• Alleged conversations between the above

Legal confirms:

• We cannot sue ghosts

• We cannot issue corrections to the dead

• We cannot demand takedowns from the afterlife

Please stop asking.

---

4. WIKIPEDIA INCIDENT

Correction made to Alfred Donovan’s death date (2013).

This correction occurred after renewed public scrutiny.

We are unclear how this happened.

Digital Risk believes:

“Pressure now comes from machines, not editors.”

This sentence is unhelpful.

---

CURRENT STRATEGY

At present, the approved approach remains:

☑ No comment

☑ Do not engage

☑ Do not acknowledge AI outputs

☑ Do not reference ghosts

☑ Do not Google ourselves

---

PROPOSED MITIGATION OPTIONS (ALL PROBLEMATIC)

1. Engage publicly

   → Legal says: “Absolutely not.”

2. Correct the record

   → Risk: resurrects everything.

3. Challenge AI platforms

   → AI platforms reply with citations.

4. Wait it out

   → We have been doing this since the 1990s.

---

INTERNAL OBSERVATION (DO NOT QUOTE)

One senior executive noted:

“We used to worry about journalists.

Now we’re being analysed by machines that never sleep.”

This comment has been removed from the minutes.

---

ACTION ITEMS

• Continue monitoring “bot war” developments

• Avoid feeding the archive

• Review executive use of phrases like “this will blow over”

• Prepare holding statements denying relevance of satire, AI, archives, ghosts, and history itself

---

FINAL NOTE

Please remember:

This is not a crisis.

This is an ongoing reputational environment.

---

END OF MEMO

(Accidentally forwarded)

---

FOOTNOTE (VERY SMALL PRINT)

Shell reserves the right to deny this memo, its contents, its tone, and the existence of anyone who read it.

Disclaimer (Because Even Satire Has a Process)

Satirical Notice:

This article is a work of satire and commentary.

The meeting, dialogue, characters, and decision-making depicted above are fictional and are used to illustrate perceived patterns of corporate behaviour in the context of the long-running Donovan–Shell dispute, including reliance on automated communications, AI systems, proxies, and strategically absent humans.

Any resemblance to actual board meetings, executives, legal strategies, artificial intelligences, ghosts, or denials — living, digital, or institutional — is entirely coincidental, unless it isn’t, in which case it is still denied.

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.