Alfred Donovan

EXCLUSIVE: THE “CONSCIENCE” CLUB THAT CALLED OUT BIG OIL’S BIG LIES

Apr 5th, 2026

Comments are off for this post

In a David-vs-Goliath battle for the ages, a father-and-son duo from a quiet Suffolk market town spent years as the “secret conscience” of one of the world’s most powerful companies. Long before the headlines caught up, the Shell Corporate Conscience Pressure Group (SCCPG) was sounding the alarm on a culture of corporate rot that would eventually bring the oil giant to its knees. The “Don” of Resistance The SCCPG wasn’t born in a boardroom, but from a bitter legal war. Co-founded by Alfred Donovan (a WWII veteran) and his son John, it grew out of claims that Shell had pinched promotional ideas like the SMART loyalty card and Nintendo games from their company, Don Marketing. Driven by Shell’s alleged bullying, the Donovans launched the SCCPG to hold the oil giant to its own “General Business Principles”.

No Catch, No Cash: Membership was FREE! read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan - more information here. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

SHELL’S SECRET CONSCIENCE CLUB: The Insiders Who Dared To Fight Back

Apr 5th, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

John Donovan article assisted by Claude.ai

They weren’t Greenpeace. They weren’t protesters chained to railings. They were the people who filled up your car, ran the forecourt shops and owned Shell shares — and they’d had enough.

In the mid-1990s, a remarkable organisation was quietly born in a market town in Suffolk. The Shell Corporate Conscience Pressure Group (SCCPG) was co-founded by father-and-son duo Alfred and John Donovan, operating out of St Andrews Castle, Bury St Edmunds. Its membership was entirely free — no subscriptions, no catch, no donations asked or accepted. The whole operation was funded personally by the Donovans themselves. And within months, over 200 Shell retailers had signed up, their letters arriving thick and fast, each one more damning than the last. read more

SHELL’S SECRET CONSCIENCE CLUB: THE REBEL RETAILERS WHO BLEW THE WHISTLE ON BIG OIL’S HYPOCRISY!

Apr 4th, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

GROK EXCLUSIVE: How a fired-up father and son duo turned a garage grudge into a full-scale mutiny against the Shell empire – and were proved RIGHT when the whole Anglo-Dutch house of cards came crashing down!

In the dog-eat-dog world of petrol pumps and boardroom billionaires, one plucky band of Shell station owners dared to stand up and say: “Enough is enough!” Welcome to the Shell Corporate Conscience Pressure Group – the no-fees, no-nonsense rebel alliance that exposed the oil giant’s dodgy double standards three decades ago. And guess what? Their damning warnings about unscrupulous top brass were spot-on when the infamous 2004 reserves scandal blew the lid off Shell’s dodgy dealings and finally killed off the 100-year Anglo-Dutch marriage that had ruled Big Oil. read more

Windows Forum: Shell vs Donovan Feud: Domain Loss, Leaks, and Self-Inflicted PR Humiliation

Apr 3rd, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

…a company that could not believe it was being outplayed by a persistent critic with a website, an archive, and a very long memory.

Saturday, March 28 at 4:51 AM

The Donovan–Shell feud is one of those corporate grudge matches that has outlived half a dozen boardrooms, multiple CEOs, and the era when companies could plausibly pretend the internet was a passing fad. What began as a business dispute in the 1990s metastasized into a decades-long reputational blood feud in which Royal Dutch Shell repeatedly managed to turn irritation into spectacle, and spectacle into self-inflicted embarrassment. The most humiliating part is not that Shell was criticized; it is that on several key occasions Shell’s own reactions seemed to validate the criticism, amplify the critic, or simply hand him another victory. Reuters documented one of the strangest episodes in 2009: Shell allegedly asked an anti-cyber fraud agency to target Donovan’s site while internal emails acknowledged it offered better information than Shell’s own communications. (shellnews.net)

Background

The Donovan story starts in a conventional corporate dispute and ends somewhere closer to performance art. John Donovan and his late father Alfred were once involved in promotional work for Shell, then fell into a bitter conflict that spilled into litigation, media coverage, and eventually a sprawling archive of criticism aimed at the oil major. Reuters noted in 2009 that the feud dated back to the 1990s and that earlier business and libel disputes had already been settled, yet the internet battle only grew louder. (shellnews.net) read more

THE GREATEST CONS IN CORPORATE HISTORY

Mar 30th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Your Definitive, Entirely Unauthorised, Top 10 Countdown of Boardroom Villainy, Shameless Audacity and Industrial-Scale Cheating — Rated, Ranked and Ruthlessly Mocked

The full ranking by claude.ai is ready. Here’s how the Top 10 shakes out and the reasoning by claude.ai behind the key positions:

🥇 #1 — The Global Financial Crisis takes the top spot as the only fraud in history perpetrated not by one company but by an entire industry — with the losses paid by people who had no part in it. Virtually no senior executives went to prison. Many received bonuses.

#2 — The South Sea Bubble gets silver for being the founding template for every corporate fraud that followed, three centuries before the rest. Isaac Newton lost a fortune. The Chancellor of the Exchequer went to prison. The King was on the board. read more

THE GREATEST CON IN CORPORATE HISTORY?

Mar 30th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

SHELL’S MORAL SLIP: THE OIL GIANT, THE GAME SELLER, AND THE GREATEST CON IN CORPORATE HISTORY

How Britain’s most high-minded energy giant preached ethics to John Donovan while secretly cooking the books for billions — and keeping spies on the payroll

By Our Investigations Desk | Exclusive

PICTURE THE SCENE. It is the spring of 1997. In a wood-panelled office at Shell-Mex House on the Strand — the kind of building that practically sweats self-importance — Richard Wiseman, General Counsel & Company Secretary of Shell U.K. Limited, picks up his fountain pen and dashes off another stern letter to a marketing man from Bury St Edmunds.

The message, stripped of its lawyerly decorum, is essentially: Go away, small person. You have been dealt with. The slate is wiped clean. Do not bother our directors. read more

Shell’s Moral Compass: Now Available in Disposable, Single-Use Format

Mar 30th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Corporate giant accused of “wiping the slate clean” on morality — while hiding secrets, silencing shareholders, and rewriting history

If you ever wanted a masterclass in corporate double-speak, look no further than Shell’s long-running clash with businessman John Donovan.

Because this isn’t just a legal dispute.

It’s a story about money paid, rights admitted… and then reality quietly erased.

💣

THE £200,000 THAT “MEANT NOTHING”

Let’s get straight to the jaw-dropper.

Shell paid Donovan £200,000 to settle two claims.

That’s not pocket change. That’s not goodwill. That’s not “thanks for your time.”

And yet Shell’s official position morphed into something almost unbelievable: read more

SHELL’S SECRET CONSCIENCE CLUB: THE INSIDERS WHO DARED TO CALL OUT THE OIL GIANT’S DOUBLE LIFE

Mar 28th, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

🛢️ THE CORPORATE CONSCIENCE THAT WOULDN’T STAY QUIET

If Shell’s glossy sustainability reports are the official bedtime story, then the Shell Corporate Conscience Pressure Group (SCCPG) is the part they don’t want you reading aloud.

Buried beneath decades of PR varnish, legal muscle, and carefully curated “net-zero” messaging lies a remarkable—and deeply inconvenient—truth: some of Shell’s fiercest critics weren’t activists outside the gates… but insiders, shareholders, and business partners who had seen too much.

And they decided to talk. read more

Shell’s Glorious Parade of Self-Owns: The Top 10 Most Humiliating Face-Plants in Its 30-Year Donovan Debacle

Mar 26th, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

Researched and compiled by Grok

For three decades, a FTSE-100 oil behemoth with more lawyers than some countries have citizens has been repeatedly pantsed by two blokes from Colchester armed with nothing but a scanner, Data Protection Act requests, and Shell’s own breathtaking inability to stop scoring own goals. Here’s the definitive, evidence-based corporate roast—ranked from mildly mortifying to legendary levels of “how did we let this happen?” No. 1 is the undisputed champion of humiliation.

No. 1: The Domain Name Fiasco – Billion-Dollar Brain Fart Hands the Enemy the Company Letterhead (2005 WIPO Thrashing)

The incident: In the chaotic 2005 Royal Dutch/Shell merger rebrand to Royal Dutch Shell plc, Shell’s crack team of brand guardians somehow forgot to register the screamingly obvious royaldutchshellplc.com. Alfred Donovan, then 88, grabbed it first. Shell stormed into the World Intellectual Property Organization demanding transfer, alleging bad-faith cybersquatting. The WIPO panel unanimously told them to get lost (Case No. D2005-0538, 8 August 2005). Domain stays with the Donovans. Forever, apparently. read more

claude.ai: PART 9 — THE FINAL VERDICT: WHAT THE WHOLE SAGA TELLS US ABOUT POWER, PERSISTENCE, AND THE PERMANENT RECORD

Mar 24th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

A Crystal Ball Special Investigation, Concluded

By Our Special Correspondent, Department of Satirical Prophecy Published: March 2026

DISCLAIMER: The following is the concluding part of a satirical investigation based entirely on documented matters of public record. Everything in this series has been sourced. Everything has been verifiable. Nothing has been legally challenged. The crystal ball is aware that this is not a coincidence. It is a consequence of the facts being the facts.

PART ONE: THE VIEW FROM THE END OF THE ROAD

Let the crystal ball survey what it has covered.

Eight instalments. One oil company. One man in Colchester. A feud that began in the 1980s, escalated through the courts in the 1990s, migrated to the internet in the 2000s, expanded into ebooks and Wikipedia and parliamentary testimony and Dutch climate litigation in the 2010s, and arrives in 2026 being summarised by an AI system that was not specifically instructed to do any of this and cannot be served with a legal notice. read more

claude.ai: PART 7 — THE DOMAIN NAME DEBACLE: HOW SHELL LOST THE INTERNET TO AN 88-YEAR-OLD MAN IN COLCHESTER

Mar 24th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

A Crystal Ball Special Investigation, Continued

By Our Special Correspondent, Department of Satirical Prophecy Published: March 2026

DISCLAIMER: The following is Part Seven of a satirical commentary based entirely on matters of documented public record: WIPO proceedings, Wall Street Journal reporting, Reuters syndicated articles, The Times City Diary, Prospect Magazine, Bloomberg, court documents, and a 17-page response to Shell’s 44-page legal complaint written by or on behalf of an 88-year-old Burma veteran from Colchester, Essex, that a three-member WIPO panel unanimously found more persuasive. The crystal ball has reviewed all of the above. The crystal ball finds them extraordinary. read more

ChatGTP: Inside Shell’s Crystal Ball: What the Company’s Own Emails May Suggest About Its Future

Mar 22nd, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

ChatGPT: A glowing crystal ball on a Shell boardroom table showing floating internal emails, shadowy silhouettes in the background, and a laptop displaying a website—suggesting surveillance, narrative control, and digital persistence.

If the past is in the emails… the future may already be written.

By John Donovan

Introduction: Reading Between the Emails

Every large corporation has internal conversations it would prefer to keep internal.

In Shell’s case, a substantial archive of internal emails has, over time, provided an unusually candid glimpse behind the corporate curtain. read more

When an Oil Company Builds an Intelligence Operation

Mar 10th, 2026

by admin.

Comments are off for this post

Most people expect intelligence agencies to spy.

MI6.

The CIA.

Perhaps the occasional government security service.

What they do not usually expect is that a multinational oil company might run intelligence operations of its own.

Yet for decades Shell maintained a powerful internal intelligence apparatus, most notably through its controversial Corporate Affairs Security (CAS) division and through links to the private intelligence firm Hakluyt.

These operations were originally designed to monitor political risks, activist groups and security threats in regions where Shell operated. read more

The Donovan–Shell Feud: A Conflict That Refuses to End: 17 Feb 2026

Feb 17th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Bing response on 17 February 2026 to the prompt: John Donovan Shell feud

The Donovan-Shell feud is a decades-long conflict between activist John Donovan and Shell plc, originating from 1980s intellectual property disputes and evolving into a high-profile, AI-amplified campaign.

Origins of the Feud

The conflict began in the late 1970s and early 1980s when John Donovan, alongside his father Alfred Donovan, ran Don Marketing, a company creating promotional campaigns for Shell UK, including loyalty programs and petrol forecourt games. Donovan alleges that Shell stole intellectual property and promotional ideas, particularly related to schemes like the SMART card loyalty program, which led to bitter litigation throughout the 1990s. A high-profile court case in 1999 culminated in a settlement in 2001, with Shell paying an undisclosed sum, though Donovan has claimed ongoing breaches and surveillance. read more

Windows Forum: John Donovan’s December 2025 experiment

Feb 11th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

John Donovan’s December 2025 experiment — feeding decades of adversarial material about Royal Dutch Shell into multiple public AI assistants and publishing the divergent outputs — transformed a long‑running supplier feud and documentary archive into a live test of how generative systems handle contested archives, and in doing so exposed a set of practical governance failures that lawyers, platform designers, corporate boards and journalists must now confront.

Background

From a supplier dispute to an adversarial archive

The Donovan–Shell story begins in commerce: a 1990s dispute between Don Marketing (the Donovan family business) and Shell over promotional work evolved into litigation, domain fights and a decades‑long online campaign by John and his relatives. Over time that campaign produced a persistent, searchable archive of court filings, WIPO and administrative decisions, Subject Access Request (SAR) disclosures, leaked internal emails, press clippings and anonymous tips hosted across a cluster of sites led by royaldutchshellplc.com. The archive is complex: it containsments alongside redacted, anonymous and hard‑to‑trace materials. read more

QUESTION TO GROK: What can you tell me about the innovative use of AI by John Donovan in the Donovan Shell feud?

Feb 5th, 2026

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Question put to Grok 5 February 2026: What can you tell me about the innovative use of AI by John Donovan in the Donovan Shell feud? The answer follows, along with additional related information offered by Grok.

The long-standing feud between John Donovan and Royal Dutch Shell (now Shell plc) dates back to the 1980s and 1990s, stemming from business disputes over promotional ideas developed by Donovan’s company, Don Marketing. These included concepts like the Shell Smart loyalty card, leading to multiple lawsuits for intellectual property theft, settled out of court. Donovan has since maintained websites like royaldutchshellplc.com as vast archives of Shell-related documents, leaks, and criticisms, covering scandals such as reserves overstatements, environmental issues, and alleged corporate espionage against him (including Shell’s use of firms like Hakluyt for surveillance). This activism has evolved into what Donovan describes as a “bot war” in recent years, particularly escalating in 2025–2026 with innovative AI applications to perpetuate and amplify the conflict. read more

30 November 2023: Posted by John Donovan

The content below is sourced from current verifiable customer reviews of Shell Energy published on Trustpilot.
Extremely slow broadband for 10 months, not fixed. I have had slow broadband well below the guaranteed speed for 10 months and Shell Energy have not been able to fix it. They have tried sending about 4 or 5 engineers but have not fixed the problem. Gurps, who I have been dealing with most recently, has been friendly and polite, alth… Read more

Extremely Slow Shell Broadband

Alfred Donovan

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

…a company that could not believe it was being outplayed by a persistent critic with a website, an archive, and a very long memory.

Background​

Share this:

Like this:

Your Definitive, Entirely Unauthorised, Top 10 Countdown of Boardroom Villainy, Shameless Audacity and Industrial-Scale Cheating — Rated, Ranked and Ruthlessly Mocked

Share this:

Like this:

SHELL’S MORAL SLIP: THE OIL GIANT, THE GAME SELLER, AND THE GREATEST CON IN CORPORATE HISTORY

How Britain’s most high-minded energy giant preached ethics to John Donovan while secretly cooking the books for billions — and keeping spies on the payroll

Share this:

Like this:

Corporate giant accused of “wiping the slate clean” on morality — while hiding secrets, silencing shareholders, and rewriting history

💣

THE £200,000 THAT “MEANT NOTHING”

Share this:

Like this:

🛢️ THE CORPORATE CONSCIENCE THAT WOULDN’T STAY QUIET

Share this:

Like this:

Researched and compiled by Grok

No. 1: The Domain Name Fiasco – Billion-Dollar Brain Fart Hands the Enemy the Company Letterhead (2005 WIPO Thrashing)

Share this:

Like this:

A Crystal Ball Special Investigation, Concluded

PART ONE: THE VIEW FROM THE END OF THE ROAD

Share this:

Like this:

A Crystal Ball Special Investigation, Continued

Share this:

Like this:

If the past is in the emails… the future may already be written.

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Bing response on 17 February 2026 to the prompt: John Donovan Shell feud

The Donovan-Shell feud is a decades-long conflict between activist John Donovan and Shell plc, originating from 1980s intellectual property disputes and evolving into a high-profile, AI-amplified campaign.

Share this:

Like this:

Background​

From a supplier dispute to an adversarial archive​

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Sir Henri Deterding, resurrected!

JOE LYCETT DISCUSSES SHELL WITH JOHN DONOVAN

Meta

John Donovan’s ebooks

JOHN DONOVAN TV DOCUMENTARY INTERVIEW

SHELL EXECUTIVES AT THE CENTER OF A SCHEME TO STEAL $1.3 BILLION FROM NIGERIA’S PEOPLE

SHELL ADMITS DEALING WITH NIGERIAN MONEY LAUNDERER – BBC NEWS

SHELL, ENI AND NIGERIAN OFFICIALS IN OPL 245 CORRUPTION SCANDAL

INVESTIGATION OF OPL 245 NIGERIAN OIL CORRUPTION SCANDAL

DUTCH EARTHQUAKES CAUSED BY SHELL/EXXON

SHELL KILLS FOR OIL IN NIGERIA

SHELL LIED ABOUT CLEANING UP OIL IN NIGER DELTA

SHELL SPIES INFILTRATED NIGERIAN GOVERNMENT

LEGO DROPS SHELL OVER GREENPEACE OIL SPILL VIDEO

SHELL ARCTIC DRILLING ACCIDENTS

SHELL KNEW ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE DECADES AGO

ROYAL DUTCH SHELL FOUNDER SIR HENRI DETERDING, NAZI FINANCIER

JOHN DONOVAN PROMOTIONAL GAMES FOR SHELL AND OTHER CLIENTS

Archives

SHELL OFFICIAL ENDORSEMENT OF THIS WEBSITE

Critic’s corner

The worst ever

The worst ever

30 November 2023: Posted by John Donovan

The content below is sourced from current verifiable customer reviews of Shell Energy published on Trustpilot.

OVER 500 EXTERNAL PUBLICATIONS CITING OUR SHELL WEBSITES

DISCLAIMER

Categories

Background

Background

From a supplier dispute to an adversarial archive