Shell’s Malaysian Mess: Court Orders Big Oil’s “Sin Stock” to Pay Up to Petronas

When Shell isn’t busy polluting rivers, spilling oil, or fighting climate lawsuits, it’s apparently stiffing national energy companies on their gas bills.

The Case: Shell vs. Petronas

The Malaysian Court of Appeal has ordered Shell MDS (Malaysia) to pay overdue monthly gas payments to Petronas, overturning a previous High Court injunction that had let Shell skip payments since August 2024.

According to The Edge, the three-judge panel ruled unanimously that Petronas had kept up its end of the bargain, delivering gas throughout the dispute. Shell, meanwhile, argued it was “caught between competing claims” after receiving dual invoices of 80 million ringgit each from Petronas and Petros, Sarawak’s state-owned gas aggregator (Reuters).

Translation: Shell didn’t know which authority to pay, so it decided to pay neither.

The Numbers Don’t Lie

• Petronas claims Shell MDS owes between 70–80 million ringgit per month, with arrears (plus interest) potentially hitting 1 billion ringgit.

• The Court ordered Shell MDS to cough up all back payments from August 2024 through October 5, 2025, due no later than October 6.

• Petros and Shell MDS were also ordered to cover Petronas’s legal costs—50,000 and 30,000 ringgit respectively.

Shell’s official line to Reuters?

“Shell MDS respects and will comply with the ruling of the Court of Appeal on the matter.”

Which is corporate PR code for: We tried not to pay, but now we’ll pay because the court told us we have to.

Deep Context: Why This Matters

This isn’t just a Shell vs. Petronas billing squabble:

• Sarawak Autonomy Dispute: Since 2018, Sarawak has pushed for greater control of its natural resources. Petros was set up to assert those rights, creating an overlapping authority with Petronas. Shell found itself between two paymasters—and conveniently chose to delay.

• Shell’s LNG Bet in Malaysia: Shell has been a long-term player in Malaysia’s oil and gas sector. Shell MDS operates the world’s first commercial gas-to-liquids (GTL) plant in Bintulu, Sarawak. Disputes with Petronas threaten the predictability of that crown jewel.

• Global Investor Angle: Shell’s largest shareholders—BlackRock and Vanguard—have been demanding “responsible governance.” Yet here’s Shell, sitting on overdue bills in Malaysia, fending off billion-ringgit claims. That’s not just bad governance; it’s the kind of headline that makes ESG funds squirm.

WTF Shell?

Let’s recap:

• Shell tries to “lawyer up” to avoid paying for gas it consumed.

• Shell keeps operating its GTL plant while bills pile up.

• Shell only caves once the Court of Appeal says “pay or else.”

For a company posting multi-billion dollar quarterly profits, this penny-pinching is less about financial strain and more about arrogance. It’s Shell’s classic MO: delay, deny, litigate, and when cornered, issue a press release about “respecting the decision.

The Big Picture

Shell calls itself an energy transition leader. But whether it’s oil spills in the Niger Delta, money-laundering whispers in the Al-Yamamah arms deal, or dodging bills in Malaysia, the through-line is clear: this isn’t transition, it’s tradition.

Disclaimer

Warning: satire ahead. The criticisms are pointed, the humour intentional, and the facts stubbornly real. Quotes are reproduced word-for-word from trusted sources. As for authorship — John Donovan and AI both claim credit, but the jury’s still out on who was really in charge.

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan - more information here. There is also a Wikipedia segment.